18.11.2012 Views

HCJ 10650/03 Abu Gwella et. al v

HCJ 10650/03 Abu Gwella et. al v

HCJ 10650/03 Abu Gwella et. al v

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6. The refus<strong>al</strong> of the Respondents to grant a status in Israel to P<strong>et</strong>itioners 2-5 and to other<br />

children in their situation causes grave and immediate effect on their lives. The<br />

Respondents are forcing the separation of children and their parents, or, in the<br />

<strong>al</strong>ternative, sentencing the children to live in the country without any status and<br />

identity.<br />

7. Because she is not recorded in her mother’s identity card, the 14-year-old child,<br />

P<strong>et</strong>itioner 2, has <strong>al</strong>ready encountered problems at checkpoints s<strong>et</strong> up in East<br />

Jerus<strong>al</strong>em. When she accompanies her mother shopping outside the neighborhood or<br />

on a family visit, more than once soldiers delayed her for a prolonged period of time,<br />

demanded that she r<strong>et</strong>urn home, and even threatened that she would be deported to the<br />

West Bank. She does not take part in school activities outside the neighborhood.<br />

Recently, P<strong>et</strong>itioner 3, who is 13 years old, was r<strong>et</strong>urned to his home and forbidden to<br />

go with others in his class on a class trip, because he was unable to show a birth<br />

certificate to the soldiers at the checkpoint. 1<br />

Why the p<strong>et</strong>ition to the High Court of Justice was filed<br />

8. The p<strong>et</strong>ition filed to this Honorable Court de<strong>al</strong>s with a subject that dictates the fate of<br />

many children and, as result, of their parents who are residents of Israel. Also, part of<br />

the relief requested in the p<strong>et</strong>ition is the nullification of part of the Nation<strong>al</strong>ity and<br />

Entry into Israel Law; thus, it is appropriate for the High Court of Justice to hear the<br />

matter.<br />

9. Furthermore, as will be described at length below, following the government’s<br />

decision, the P<strong>et</strong>itioners (in the present p<strong>et</strong>ition) filed a similar p<strong>et</strong>ition to the Court for<br />

Administrative Matters in Jerus<strong>al</strong>em – Adm. P<strong>et</strong>. 952/<strong>03</strong>, <strong>Abu</strong> <strong>Gwella</strong> <strong>et</strong> <strong>al</strong>. v. Minister<br />

of the Interior <strong>et</strong> <strong>al</strong>. Following the decision of the Honorable Court for Administrative<br />

Matters to stay the proceedings on the p<strong>et</strong>ition, the P<strong>et</strong>itioners requested that it be<br />

dismissed. The P<strong>et</strong>itioners should mention that the said court issued a brief decision on<br />

the stay of proceedings on the p<strong>et</strong>ition, without stating the reasons for the decision.<br />

The facts<br />

The factu<strong>al</strong> background on which the P<strong>et</strong>itioners base their contentions is as follows:<br />

1<br />

A birth certificate is a mark of identity, showing that the child received a status in Israel and<br />

is registered in the identity card of his resident parent. Children whose status is not arranged<br />

are not entitled to a birth certificate, and the parents are given a Notice of Birth (which is <strong>al</strong>so<br />

the case when the child is born in Israel).<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!