HCJ 10650/03 Abu Gwella et. al v
HCJ 10650/03 Abu Gwella et. al v
HCJ 10650/03 Abu Gwella et. al v
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
6. The refus<strong>al</strong> of the Respondents to grant a status in Israel to P<strong>et</strong>itioners 2-5 and to other<br />
children in their situation causes grave and immediate effect on their lives. The<br />
Respondents are forcing the separation of children and their parents, or, in the<br />
<strong>al</strong>ternative, sentencing the children to live in the country without any status and<br />
identity.<br />
7. Because she is not recorded in her mother’s identity card, the 14-year-old child,<br />
P<strong>et</strong>itioner 2, has <strong>al</strong>ready encountered problems at checkpoints s<strong>et</strong> up in East<br />
Jerus<strong>al</strong>em. When she accompanies her mother shopping outside the neighborhood or<br />
on a family visit, more than once soldiers delayed her for a prolonged period of time,<br />
demanded that she r<strong>et</strong>urn home, and even threatened that she would be deported to the<br />
West Bank. She does not take part in school activities outside the neighborhood.<br />
Recently, P<strong>et</strong>itioner 3, who is 13 years old, was r<strong>et</strong>urned to his home and forbidden to<br />
go with others in his class on a class trip, because he was unable to show a birth<br />
certificate to the soldiers at the checkpoint. 1<br />
Why the p<strong>et</strong>ition to the High Court of Justice was filed<br />
8. The p<strong>et</strong>ition filed to this Honorable Court de<strong>al</strong>s with a subject that dictates the fate of<br />
many children and, as result, of their parents who are residents of Israel. Also, part of<br />
the relief requested in the p<strong>et</strong>ition is the nullification of part of the Nation<strong>al</strong>ity and<br />
Entry into Israel Law; thus, it is appropriate for the High Court of Justice to hear the<br />
matter.<br />
9. Furthermore, as will be described at length below, following the government’s<br />
decision, the P<strong>et</strong>itioners (in the present p<strong>et</strong>ition) filed a similar p<strong>et</strong>ition to the Court for<br />
Administrative Matters in Jerus<strong>al</strong>em – Adm. P<strong>et</strong>. 952/<strong>03</strong>, <strong>Abu</strong> <strong>Gwella</strong> <strong>et</strong> <strong>al</strong>. v. Minister<br />
of the Interior <strong>et</strong> <strong>al</strong>. Following the decision of the Honorable Court for Administrative<br />
Matters to stay the proceedings on the p<strong>et</strong>ition, the P<strong>et</strong>itioners requested that it be<br />
dismissed. The P<strong>et</strong>itioners should mention that the said court issued a brief decision on<br />
the stay of proceedings on the p<strong>et</strong>ition, without stating the reasons for the decision.<br />
The facts<br />
The factu<strong>al</strong> background on which the P<strong>et</strong>itioners base their contentions is as follows:<br />
1<br />
A birth certificate is a mark of identity, showing that the child received a status in Israel and<br />
is registered in the identity card of his resident parent. Children whose status is not arranged<br />
are not entitled to a birth certificate, and the parents are given a Notice of Birth (which is <strong>al</strong>so<br />
the case when the child is born in Israel).<br />
5