18.11.2012 Views

1 Regulating Sex Work Adrienne D. Davis VERY ROUGH DRAFT ...

1 Regulating Sex Work Adrienne D. Davis VERY ROUGH DRAFT ...

1 Regulating Sex Work Adrienne D. Davis VERY ROUGH DRAFT ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Some pro-sex work theorists accuse feminists who oppose it of not being concerned with<br />

“overcoming the oppression of all women,” which is what feminism is supposed to be<br />

about. 328 Anne McClintock contends that “[e]mpowering sex workers empowers all<br />

women, for the whore stigma is used to discipline women in general; and encouraging<br />

society to respect sex workers encourages society to respect all women.” 329 Finally,<br />

under some definitions of feminism, prostitution might be lauded for its potentially<br />

positive effects in subverting and destabilizing the current sex/gender system. 330<br />

C. Endowments [& Bargaining Power?]<br />

I began this Section by observing that the controversy over condom mandates in<br />

the pornography industry, a long-standing legal sex market, suggests the difficulty in<br />

administering a regulatory regime for sex markets. On the other hand, the opposite might<br />

be true. Institutional endowments form differently in legal versus illegal markets. One<br />

effect of decriminalization is to disrupt the endowments that have become entrenched in<br />

the shadow of illegality. In fact, decriminalization is often urged explicitly to disrupt<br />

these interests as evidenced in instances as diverse as the legalization of alcohol,<br />

gambling, and the emerging legal markets for marijuana. 331 Hence, part of pimps’ power<br />

over prostitutes comes from their close and complex relationships with law enforcement<br />

institutions. 332 It is unclear how current endowments would transform in legalized<br />

markets for sexual labor. Thus, prostitution might actually be easier to regulate than<br />

pornography because the current institutional endowments will be disrupted, it will take<br />

some time for them to re-form and re-organize in the legal economy.<br />

D. Substitution Effects<br />

Of course, there are limits to regulation. Equally important are its unintended effects.<br />

<strong>Sex</strong> work comprises a labor sector that is highly susceptible to substitution effects. That<br />

is, as the costs of operating a legal business increase, employers, workers, and customers<br />

migrate, or substitute, to the underground, illegal economy. In economic language,<br />

changing the cost structure of a market produces an equilibrium response. Classic<br />

examples include markets for house-keeping and yard work. <strong>Work</strong>ers in these sectors<br />

self-sort into four markets. They can work for a legal company, independently and<br />

and followers, and withhuge numbers of women who spend billions on cosmetics and surgical<br />

procedures in their struggle to prolong sexiness into old age. In each of these cases, like sex<br />

workers, women are also either taking pleasure in the power of temporarily sexy and salable<br />

bodies, or attempting to find such power. Thus, from the standpoint of feminist theory, it is<br />

inconsistent to indict only the prostitute for collusion with patriarchy unless millions of other<br />

women are also viewed just as critically.<br />

Chancer, supra note [x], at 165.<br />

328 Chancer, supra note [x], at 156 (emphasis in original). Elsewhere Chancer contends “For all these<br />

reasons, then, it strikes me that feminism would be most consistent with its own goals of representing the<br />

interests of all women to the extent that it rigorously avoided reproaching prostitutes for coping within<br />

gender-skewed conditions.” Chancer, supra note [x], at 166 (emphasis in original).<br />

329 McClintock, supra note [x], at [add pincite].<br />

330 [add cite to Jody Green on this definition; Gayle Rubin and Judith Butler too? Katherine Franke in law?]<br />

331<br />

332<br />

See also LEVITT & DUBNER, supra note [x], at 40-41 (discussing negotiations between pimps and police)<br />

[change to Venkatesh].<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!