E9_jury's report

Gyór 

european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces 

EUROPAN 9 

Warszawa 

Berlin 

Babenhausen 

Donauwörth 

REPORT 

of the trinational jury-meeting 

Germany // Poland // Hungary 

Extensions in question// Limiting 

Rostock 

Local Mutations// Infi ltrating 

Straubing 

Local Mutations// Intensifying 

Selb 

Opportunities for punlic Space // Walking 

Spremberg


EUROPAN 9 

Organiser 

coordination of the competition 

EUROPAN 

Deutsche Gesellschaft zur Förderung von 

Architektur, Städte- und Wohnungsbau e.V. 

Lützowstraße 102-104 

D-10785 Berlin 

Tel. 030 262 01 12 

Fax 030 261 56 84 

E-Mail: mail@europan.de 

in co-operation with 

EUROPAN Polska 

EUROPAN Magyarország 

and the cities 

Babenhausen 

Berlin 

Donauwörth 

Gyór 

Rostock 

Selb 

Spremberg 

Straubing 

Warszawa 

EUROPAN 

Deutsche Gesellschaft zur Förderung von 

Architektur, Städte- und Wohnungsbau e.V. 

Ulrike Poeverlein 

Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Herrmann 

Dipl.-Ing. Melanie Humann 

Dipl.-Ing. Sven Kröger 

Dipl.-Kommunikationswirt Stefan Meyer 

Dipl.-Ing. Ulrike Poeverlein

JURY´S REPORT 


EUROPAN 9 

Report of the trinational jury-meeting 

1 Forming the jury 

2 Opening the meeting of the jury 

3 Information round/report of the local technical committee 

4 Discussion of basic principles 

5 First valuation round 

6 Return applications 

7 Second valuation round 

8 Prizes, runners-up, honorable mentions 

9 Written assessment of the works 

10 Opening the authors’ envelopes 

11 The meeting of the jury is closed 

Participants Babenhausen 

Participants Berlin 

Participants Donauwörth 

Participants Rostock 

Participants Selb 

Participants Spremberg 

Participants Straubing 

Participants Gyór 

Participants Warschau 

Table of attendances 

5 

5 

5 

8 

9 

10 

10 

11 

13 

21 

21 

22 

24 

26 

28 

31 

33 

35 

37 

39 

41



EUROPAN 9 

Report 

of the meeting of the trinational jury on 11/12 January 2008 in Berlin 

The meeting started on Friday 11 January, 2008 at 10.00 am 

Mr Kleine, deputy chairperson of EUROPAN Germany greets those present and 

apologises for the 

chairperson, Ms Sandeck, who very much regrets that she is unable to take 

part in the jury meeting due to illness. Mr Kleine explains the significance of 

the EUROPAN competition for young architects in the whole of Europe and the 

specialness of this year’s trinational jury meeting, in which not only the projects 

submitted for the German locations, but also the projects for Warsaw in 

Poland and Gyór in Hungary are to be judged. Throughout Europe, EUROPAN 9 

saw more than 1,750 projects submitted at 73 different locations; in Germany, 

there were 137 proposals for a total of seven locations, in Warsaw 19 and in 

Gyór 21 projects. 

In September and October 2007, in an initial jury phase, special committees 

met at the individual sites and decided on a preliminary selection from among 

the projects submitted. Members of the jury were represented in each of the 

special committees. Mr Kleine explains, that it is the jury’s task to assess the 

43 pre-selected works independent of the location involved. He points out that 

the awarding of the prizes and runners-up prizes must be decided based on the 

quality of the works, however, he also clearly states that it is EUROPAN 

Germany’s wish that prizes and runners-up prizes be awarded at all of the 

sites. 

Mr Kleine reports on the Cities and Juries Forum that took place in Catania/ 

Sicily at the beginning of December 2007 where the problems faced at each of 

the sites was discussed comparatively using the pre-selected projects in thematic 

groups together with projects at other European sites. He suggests that 

the individual members of the jury who took part in the special committees and 

workshops in Catania bring the aspects talked about there into the present discussion 

as part of the information-gathering round. 

The competition works are arranged in this report according to the thematic 

groups, keeping to the same order, these have been hanged up as an exhibition 

to be viewed: 

Extensions in question – limiting 

ROSTOCK Fishermen and tanner‘s quarter 

Local mutations – infiltrating 

BABENHAUSEN Stadteingang Ost 

GYÓR Sziget 

STRAUBING Völkl-Gelände 

WARSZAWA Czyste 

Local mutations – intensifying 

SELB Nördliche Innenstadt 

Opportunities for public space – walking 

BERLIN Südkreuz 

DONAUWÖRTH Parkstadt 

SPREMBERG Georgenberg 

4



EUROPAN 9 

1 Forming the jury 

Mr Kleine confirms that the jury are all present. Mr Claus, Mr Hirsch and 

Ms Sandeck had to cancel their participation in the meeting of the jury 

and are replaced by Mr Gunther, Ms Heinisch and Mr Kleine. At the proposal 

of Mr Kleine, Dr Merk is voted in as the chairperson with no dissentient 

votes. As such, the jury is made up of the following persons: 

Voting members 

Dr. Elisabeth Merk, Munich (chairperson) 

Prof. Henri Bava, Paris/Karlsruhe 

Wallie Heinisch, Stuttgart 

Holger Kleine, Berlin 

Dr. Engelbert Lütke Daldrup, Berlin 

Jürgen Mayer H., Berlin 

Jens Metz, Berlin 

Hubert Trammer, Warsaw 

Zsolt Gunther, Budapest 

Representatives 

Prof. Herbert Kallmayer, Munich 

Prof. Christian Kern, Munich/Vienna 

Gunter Maurer, Munich 

Eckhard Rieper, Kempten 

Dr. Irene Wiese-von Ofen, Essen 

International observers 

Yuna Conan, EUROPAN Europe, Paris 

Dr. Lütke Daldrup has to leave the meeting at around 7.00 pm and is 

represented thereafter by Prof. Kallmayer. 

2 Opening the meeting of the jury 

Dr. Merk thanks the jury for the trust it has placed in her and takes the 

chair. The members of the jury assure those present that they 

– have not had any exchange of views with the competition participants 

concerning the tasks and the solution to these and that they shall not do 

so during the meeting; 

– have not received any information about competition works up to the 

date of submittal; 

– will treat the advisory meetings of the special committee as confidential; 

– have kept anonymity; 

– will refrain from commenting on presumed authors. 

The chairperson points out the personal obligation of the jurors to 

assess the works objectively, basing their decisions solely on the public 

offer. 

3 Information round/report of the local technical committee 

The chairperson suggests having an information round first, during 

which the sites and the pre-selected works will be introduced and the 

jury members will report on the discussions that took place in the local 

special committees and on the Cities and Juries Forum in Catania. In the 

order of the thematic groups, the sites and the pre-selected projects will 

be introduced using a beamer presentation and discussed in detail. 

5



EUROPAN 9 

Extensions in question – limiting 

ROSTOCK Fischermen and tanners’ quarter 

The Hanseatic town of Rostock intends to further stabilise and develop its town 

centre as part of its overall urban planning. Here, residential utilisation also 

plays a decisive role for new user groups and the stabilisation of or increase in 

the number of inhabitants living in the town centre. With the competition, concepts 

are to be worked out for the reuse of an extensive piece of land which, 

although it is mainly wasteland, is nevertheless a historically important former 

commercial and residential area directly at the edge of the old town which 

should be developed into an urban, central and ecologically oriented residential 

site. Below the old town, a new and smaller town district is to emerge, which 

deliberately sets itself apart from the image of the old town. Here, an expedient 

concentration of the buildings in favour of generous landscaped areas along 

the Unterwarnow and along the town walls is desired. 

The special situation of the area at the water should be emphasised and should 

be something that can be clearly experienced in the open spaces. 


BABENHAUSEN eastern entryway into the town 

As the US Army has relinquished the site, the hundred-year old barracks are to 

be converted back to civilian life. Because of its former function, the site is isolated 

spatially from the rest of the town at the present time, whereby it dominates 

the situation at the eastern edge of the town due to the size of its surface 

area. Together with the commercial wasteland situated opposite it, the area is 

to be integrated into the overall situation as part of a restructuring process and 

should thus form the new entryway into the town from the east. A positive revaluation 

and address formation should contribute to developing a residential and 

commercial site, which evolves its own identity. In addition to its function as an 

entryway into the town, in future, the area should reflect the town’s self-image 

as a location for sustainable energy technologies and employment and confer 

this to the whole town. 

GYÓR Sziget 

The main theme is taken up at three levels at this site: territorial, urban and 

local. The district of Sziget (island) is one of the most sensitive zones in the 

town. This district developed its specific character in the course of the 19th 

century. Different nationalities and religious minorities were banished from the 

town and formed the multi-cultural background against which a provincial 

milieu was able to emerge. This was followed in the 20th century by the settlement 

of industry, something which is on the retreat at the present time, as production 

is being relocated to other areas. Although Sziget has become a district 

with its own atmosphere, it is lacking in public places with urban functions and 

a lively urban neighbourhood. The site proposed for a building project is located 

in an industrial area that is in the middle of a breaking up. 

STRAUBING Völkl premises 

The manufacturer of sports products, Völkl, is not only an example of the development 

of indigenous manual work into an innovative-productive industrial 

operation. Völkl is also associated with sport, leisure and ‘youth culture’. On 

the site of the former manufacturing plants which have mostly been standing 

unoccupied since the relocation of operations to the edge of the town, a piece 

of the town’s history is still present, and the revitalisation and restructuring of 

this site within a super-ordinate urban construction concept is what is aimed 

at. The transformation from an industrial to a services society and the demographic 

perspectives of dwindling population figures of an ever older social 

community presents challenges for the sustainable development of town centre 

areas, especially here in this contact area between commercial and residential 

6



EUROPAN 9 

utilisations. Taking into consideration the existing building stock that is 

worth keeping and by including and/or developing existing green structures, 

a multifunctional quarter should emerge, which enables an innovative, 

new form of urbanity. Here, the structuring and design of the 

public space as well the improvement of the functional and architectural 

qualities in the necessary repair of the town is regarded as a substantial 

factor for a sustainable, positive development of the town centre’s residential 

and working environment. 

WARSAW Czyste 

The area under consideration includes a zone traditionally used by 

industry, the railway and for residential purposes with a low concentration 

of warehouses, production plants as well as retail trade, offices and 

residential buildings. Green surfaces and a park stretch along the 

expanse of Brylowksa Street. The old gasworks comprise several protected 

buildings for which a new utilisation can be proposed. A good link 

to the public transport system is guaranteed by the local street network 

and the immediate vicinity of the railway station. The proximity to 

Warsaw’s inner city offers adequate prerequisites for the development of 

multi-functional utilisation options and for the creation of public spaces. 

The aim is to develop a new residential quarter with a private atmosphere 

and the creation of an attractive public space which integrates the 

existing park and offers secure pedestrian footpaths to the neighbouring 

quarters. 


SELB northern innercity 

In the town of Selb, which is threatened by shrinkage and excessive 

aging, a new structure for the northern town centre is to be provided 

with residential and leisure qualities that include this aspect in their 

design: the guarantee of mobility, barrier-free access as well as a harmonious 

programme of cultural facilities are part of the urban construction 

requirements. Particular value is placed on a comprehensive concept 

for the open spaces, which links individual areas of the town with 

one another and provides the town with new qualities for pedestrians. As 

such, a coherent traffic concept, which makes economic and ecological 

sense is to be developed for the area. 

The architectural part of the design comprises both the conversion of 

existing apartments in accordance with disabled-friendly standards and 

the planning of new cost-effective residential building types which 

enable, in an innovative way, barrier-free living to the same extent for 

young families as for older people and the disabled. The design of the 

residential surroundings and a differentiation of the exterior spaces are 

an important component in the design task. 

Oppotunities of public space – walking 

BERLIN Südkreuz 

The Südkreuz area is infrastructurally very well integrated into the 

urban and regional context. The inner access to the area, however, is 

insufficient, even pedestrian and cycle paths break off at the area’s 

boundaries. The existing traffic surfaces (railway, car) only pass through 

the area at the present time, the railway station is used by city train passengers 

to change trains, but not as a final destination and it is hardly 

used at all for intercity rail transport. 

In order to do away with this island situation, a super-ordinate development 

concept for access to the area is needed, one that includes both 

the publicly-owned properties and the numerous private wasteland 

7



EUROPAN 9 

areas. The ‘Schöneberg Loop’ is being planned in order to link the area up to 

the urban context; the ‘loop’, a pedestrian and cycle path, should start from the 

‘bottleneck’ at the Yorck bridges and lead via Südkreuz back to Gleisdreieck/ 

Potsdamer Platz/Tiergarten. The integration of public spaces including already 

existing parks and sport facilities should thus join up the mosaic-like structure 

of the quarter to a cohesive whole and connect this to the inner city. 

DONAUWÖRTH Parkstadt 

The town district of Parkstadt came into being from the end of the fifties up to 

the seventies as a planned area of the town to expand the settlement capacities 

of the town’s core located to the south-west. The area is located on the ridge of 

the “Schellenberg” mountain, part of the foothills of the forested peaks of the 

Franconian Jura, elevated approx. 100 metres above the actual town centre. 

The town quarter, which was designed at the drawing-board, has shortcomings 

in practice, above all with respect to public spaces. The open park structure 

does not offer a central point of orientation and the street areas are lacking in 

qualities that make people want to spend time there. One important project 

over the coming years is therefore the redesign and revaluation of the central 

area of Parkstadt, which already has important infrastructural facilities, but 

nevertheless has been unable to develop a function as a centre. A point of identification 

for the town district and an area where people can encounter one 

another and spend time should be created which adequately serves the public 

functions. The traffic access situation should be improved and the network of 

pathways should be adapted. The aim is to adjust the area to the changing 

needs and demands of the residents under the aspect of sustainability and to 

further develop the public space as a communicative place for encounters. 

SPREMBERG Georgenberg 

The town of Spremberg has a diverse urban construction and topographic 

appearance. The historical, compact town centre is surrounded by two arms of 

the River Spree. The watercourses and the existing green belt separate the 

parts of the town that emerged later than the town centre. In the course of 

urban renewal, the interlacing of the town centre residential areas is afforded 

great significance. The Stadtpark am Georgenberg (the town park) situated between 

the railway station and the town centre must be developed in a modern 

way, in line with its hinge effect. The Stadtpark/Georgenbergpark is a diffuse 

place which consists of the park, its monuments, the Bismarck Tower, the 

cemetery, the open-air stage, the fairground and the pond with swans. In the 

previous urban development, neither the functional nor the spatial linking up of 

the individual objects was given any notice. The task at hand is to bring the 

area to life and to increase the qualities that encourage people to spend time 

there by a better interlinking and revival of the places in it. By guiding the 

pedestrian flow between the historical town centre and the railway station, the 

Georgenberg is to be revaluated in its significance as an infrastructural access 

element and make a contribution to the improved interlinking of the areas. 

The extensive information round ended at 1.30 pm. 

4 Discussion of basic principles 

After the lunch break, the chairperson Dr. Merk suggested that super-ordinate 

criteria for judging the competition entries at the different sites be defined in a 

discussion of basic principles. 

After detailed discussion, the jury decides, in addition to the questions concerning 

the specific solution approaches for the task set at each site, to apply the 

following criteria for judging the competition works: 

8



EUROPAN 9 

ROSTOCK 

GYÓR 

WARSZAWA 

BABENHAUSEN 

STRAUBING 

SELB 

– choice of means 

– programmatic approach 

– strategic approach 

– realisation qualities 

5 First valuation round 

The jury decides to choose the projects that demonstrate approaches 

that are continuative with respect to the above-mentioned criteria in a 

first round and with a simple majority of the votes. The 43 works will be 

discussed with regard to the specific theme set and the relevancy of this 

theme when applied to the competition area. Following these discussions, 

an application will be made for every work for its continuation in 

the further proceedings: 

Extensions in question – limiting ja nein 

ET 192 STEPSCAPEGREENSCAPEWATERSCAPE 6 3 

FM 314 ALLE WOHNEN AM WASSER 8 1 

FM 914 sinking cities 3 6 

MX 381 Die Schilfstadt – Reed City 4 5 

PA 367 Rostock, ZweiBrücken 2 7 

UR 300 elevated village 5 4 


CC 881 urban magma 9 0 

DD 123 1+1=1 1 8 

DG 112 DONGIOVANNI 1 8 

FU 359 4 in 1 5 4 

NN 010 RECONSTRUCTING LANDMARK 2 7 

WS 248 wetside 8 1 

ZY 457 NOMADIC LANDSCAPE 2 7 

AE 826 where winds walk 1 8 

AR 002 four rooms 4 5 

EE 560 Warszawa Czyste 4 5 

MM 321 Warszawa 6 3 

XY 139 urban cocktail 8 1 

AT 356 vielfeld 2 7 

AZ 751 a gardeners theory … 4 5 

MW 993 grünkern Babenhausen 9 0 

AP 123 readymade 3 6 

NK 507 ALLMENDE/AGORA 2 7 

SW 777 NOW HERE 3 6 

UR 334 „come together!“ 6 3 


BO 573 PUNKTUNDLINIEZUFLÄCHE 3 6 

BY 123 selb_ständig bewegt 4 5 

IB 290 Green City 8 1 

MA 683 CROSSOVER 1 8 

PO 007 LUXUS DER LEERE 5 4 

ZK 977 catalog for dwelling on the time 9 0 

9



EUROPAN 9 

BERLIN 

DONAUWÖRTH 

SPREMBERG 

ROSTOCK 

GYÓR 

WARSZAWA 

BABENHAUSEN 

STRAUBING 

ROSTOCK 

Opportunities for public space – walking 

BR 287 Südparcours 2 7 

LG 034 Lügengebäude 9 0 

MB 001 Menschbahn 3 6 

MM 777 “Over the Train“ 5 4 

AT 247 AUSSER WAND UND BAND 0 9 

DW 628 recharging space 8 1 

LF 392 PARKSTADT MITTE 0 9 

MC 345 Donauwörth – Zentrum Parkstadt 0 9 

AS 691 Park ÜBER Fluß 0 9 

CB 107 acupuncture Spremberg 0 9 

JS 303 Auf Tuchfühlung 6 3 

LB 369 brücke & tür 8 1 

In the first round, which ends at approx. 9.00 pm, 24 works have been rejected 

and 19 submitted to the further proceedings. 

The chairperson suggests ending the meeting with this outcome and continuing 

it on the next day at 9:00 am. She asks all of the jury members to check their 

selection up to now and, if necessary, to submit applications for works to be 

returned to the competition proceedings. 

Second meeting day, Saturday 12 January, 2008 

Start of meeting: 9.00 am 

6 Return applications 

At the beginning of the meeting, return applications are filed for 7 competition 

entries and are voted on as follows: 




AT 356 vielfeld 2 7 

AZ 751 a gardener‘s theory … 4 5 



2 return applications are rejected, 5 projects are resubmitted to the further 

procedure. 

7 Second valuation round 

In a second valuation round, the 24 works still taking part in the procedure are 

once again discussed in detail. Following that, an application for continuation in 

the competition is filed for every work: 



10



EUROPAN 9 

GYÓR 

WARSZAWA 

BABENHAUSEN 

STRAUBING 

SELB 

BERLIN 

DONAUWÖRTH 

SPREMBERG 

ROSTOCK 

GYÓR 

WARSZAWA 

BABENHAUSEN 

STRAUBING 





FU 359 4 in 1 3 6 









UR 334 „come together !“ 6 3 









The outcome is that 17 projects remain in the further procedure. 

8 Prizes, runners-up, honourable mentions 

The chairperson proposes that the works be discussed in a further 

round and, upon application by the panel, the jurors first of all vote on 

the prizes and, following that, on the runners-up prizes. 

The votes for awarding prizes are as follows: 










11



EUROPAN 9 

SELB 

BERLIN 

DONAUWÖRTH 

SPREMBERG 

ROSTOCK 

GYÓR 

WARSZAWA 

STRAUBING 

SELB 

SELB 

BERLIN 

SPREMBERG 

ROSTOCK 

ROSTOCK 

DONAUWÖRTH 

BERLIN 

SELB 

ROSTOCK 









As such, nine works are awarded a prize. 

After this, each of the remaining works is considered with respect to rewarding 

them with runners-up prizes, the vote is as follows: 









As such, 7 works are awarded runners-up prizes. 

Ms Poeverlein explains that, for the German sites, a total of seven prizes and 

seven runners-up prizes have been awarded and Europan Germany is aiming to 

distribute the total amount of prize money awarded, on the basis of the principles 

and guidelines for competitions (GRW). The chairperson asks the members 

of the jury to once again check the decisions they have reached up to now 

and, if necessary, to file applications for the awarding of further prizes or runners-up 

prizes. She points out that the possibility also exists of awarding an 

honourable mention, for example, for outstanding partial solutions. 

After an individual round, the following return applications are filed and voted 

upon by the panel of jurors as follows: 



LF 392 PARKSTADT MITTE 3 6 

As a result, the work ‘UR 300 elevated village’ is once again entered into the 

competition proceedings. 

After that, the applications for the awarding of further prizes and/or runnersup 

prizes were filed, and were voted on as follows: 

PRIZE 


RUNNERS-UP 



12



EUROPAN 9 

ROSTOCK 

GYÓR 

WARSZAWA 

WARSZAWA 

BABENHAUSEN 

STRAUBING 

SELB 

ROSTOCK 

GYÓR 

WARSZAWA 

BABENHAUSEN 

STRAUBING 

SELB 

BERLIN 

BERLIN 

DONAUWÖRTH 

SPREMBERG 

ROSTOCK 

ROSTOCK 

GYÓR 

WARSZAWA 

STRAUBING 

SELB 

SPREMBERG 

GYÓR 

WARSZAWA 

WARSZAWA 

BABENHAUSEN 

ROSTOCK 

Finally, the following works were nominated for honourable mention. 

The votes on the applications were as follows. 





AZ 751 a gardeners theory … 7 2 



As such, the prizes, runners-up prizes and honourable mentions are as 

outlined below: 

PRIZE GROUP 

ET 192 STEPSCAPEGREENSCAPEWATERSCAPE 

CC 881 urban magma 

XY 139 urban cocktail 

MW 993 grünkern Babenhausen 

AP 123 readymade 

ZK 977 catalog for dwelling on the time 

LG 034 Lügengebäude 

MM777 “Over the Train“ 

DW 628 recharging space 

LB 369 brücke & tür 

RUNNERS-UP GROUP 

FM 914 sinking cities 

UR 300 elevated village 

WS 248 wetside 

MM 321 Warszawa 

UR 334 „come together !“ 

PO 007 LUXUS DER LEERE 

JS 303 Auf Tuchfühlung 

HONOURALBLE MENTIONS 

DG 112 DONGIOVANNI 

AR 002 four rooms 

EE 560 Warszawa Czyste 

AZ 751 a gardeners theory … 

9 Written assessment of the works 

The jury decides to issue a written appraisal of the works awarded with 

prizes, runners-up prizes and honourable mentions. The individual 

jurors each take on works, for the purposes of formulating the written 

appraisal as a résumé of the joint discussions in the jury. The written 

appraisals are then read out, discussed and recorded in the protocol in 

the following version as a summary of the jury’s opinion: 

ET 192 STEPSCAPEGREENSCAPEWATERSCAPE 

This design shows a clear structuring of the area into a green zone 

which encourages the opening up of the town wall, and a constructed 

progressive line structure with its point of focus at the water, while also 

making the accessibility of the town to the water its main theme. In a 

further, necessary review, this diagrammatic basic structure can easily 

13



EUROPAN 9 

ROSTOCK 

ROSTOCK 

be made dynamic without losing its individuality, but rather reinforcing it as an 

independent urban proposal. A greater differentiation of the residential bars 

with respect to how the lengths and heights are designed, the alignment, parallelism 

and different forms for the open areas is desired in order to interweave 

the stubborn principle more intensely with an even more attractive and 

more accessible design of the waterside and to understand it as an offering to 

the whole town. 

Adding on to single-storey buildings to give them an accentuated four-storey 

form which is opposed to the down-sloping terrain initially seems unusual, but, 

in the context of the open spaces and the differentiated housing, residential 

and design proposals, conveys a very plausible approach. 

The idea, characterised by urban construction aspects and with its courtyard 

house, linked rows of houses and the apartment building which brings in new 

aspects, offers sufficient and manifold proposals and the prerequisite for a 

required mix. 


Particularly in face of the worldwide discussion about an increasing sea level, 

“Sinking Cities” constitutes the active formulation of a building site which 

changes with the weather and sees this fact as potential. The design here 

questions the supposed safety of a real estate property on secure ground and is 

replaced in favour of a changing environment with a new relationship to water, 

theoretically as a residential adventure. The residential units, however, do not 

exploit the potential of their relation to the open space. This could be designed 

more forcefully and more provocatively. The proposals for the design of the 

open spaces, which react to the changing water levels and could provide a unique 

public realm still have to be developed. 


With the creation of residential groups, in order to create inner courtyards, a 

clear structure in the urban construction of the eastern surface areas is generated. 

Only the Gerberbruch axis leads into the area from the old town. The 

area directly in front of the town wall is clearly inferior to the eastern area in 

its urban construction because it does not convey clearly defined statements. 

A green area between these new buildings to the west and the town wall means 

that the distance to the historical old town is respected and the visual axis to 

the Petrikirche (church) is maintained and extended. In the area on the banks 

of the Warnow, an attractive and generous green belt will be created with a 

clear orientation towards the water, a public path and incorporated public 

amenities. 

What is noticeable is the penetration of the area in its middle axis by a water 

canal that flanks the footpaths and forms a central area. All in all, an area, 

which has qualities that invite people to linger there is created by the naturefriendly 

concept in the partial area along the banks of the Warnow. The same 

treatment of the towards the connecting street is regarded with criticism. 

Also regarded with some criticism is the design of the public and semi-public 

spaces which cannot be concealed, not even by the atmospheric perspectives. 

The reduction of the street that goes along the canal in the middle of the quarter 

to its function as an access point and measures to calm the traffic overlook 

the opportunity for an urban proposal for the open spaces complementary to 

the generous natural open area on the banks of the Warnow. 

The fragmented building structure of contemporary architecture plays with the 

texture and style of the old town. The 2 to 4-storey residential groups play an 

exemplarily subordinate role in relation to the old town. Through a differentiated 

development of the buildings, extremely diverse structures emerge which 

allow very different residential forms (apartments, maisonettes). 

14



EUROPAN 9 

GYÓR 

GYÓR 

GYÓR 

WARSZAWA 


The design defines the small alleyways in the town quarter and, ultimately, 

redefines the overall structure of Sziget. By maintaining the industrial 

building fabric and by adding to this with a flexible, carpet-like residential 

structure, an interesting interaction is created between the large 

and the small. This leap in scale is bridged by means of residential 

towers which are connected to the public functions. 

The deserted factory buildings are to be reutilised to serve public functions 

(sport, multifunctional spaces, local supplies, restaurants) and will 

be arrayed along a curving line to follow the building fabric. These 

closed spaces will be interrupted by paths that permeate the entire area, 

giving the exterior spaces a strong identity. The exterior spaces, which 

are seemingly haphazard, and yet clearly positioned due to the existing 

buildings and the predefined roads and pathways, lend the quarter an 

additional quality that is true to scale. 


The concept assumes that the industrial building fabric is to be almost 

completely demolished, as it was not erected until the 20th century. In 

its place, it is proposed that a nature area be reintroduced/reinstituted 

on the former floodplain as water lily-like forms. The area will be filled 

with these circular forms and, by leaving out several buildings, the 

emerging intermediate spaces will be defined as public areas. The project 

introduces a new, unusual character to the area, which is totally 

foreign to the existing, adjacent structure. The dynamics of the units 

nevertheless reflect the rhythm of the Sziget district. These forms stand 

out due to their functional flexibility. Alternating cross-sections and different 

arrangements of the volumes within the structures enable identifiable, 

versatile spaces. 

Due to the unusual form, the public rooms will be defined in a novel way. 

They deliberately forgo the conventional central character and, instead, 

create flowing spaces. The oblique surfaces that resemble segments of 

a circle underline the fact that a certain group of users (students, 

researchers and professors) are being addressed. 

DG 112 DONGIOVANNI 

The authors have decided to accentuate the diffuse suburban former 

commercial area with the strong figure of a largely visible gatehouse. 

This building has been designed with a keen eye on the townscape, but 

at the same time, interrupts its relationship to its environment. It opens 

up a wide view across the town and, in turn, also simultaneously draws 

the attention of people crossing the bridge towards the building. 

The concentration on the large form with underground garages and 

shops, sport facilities and restaurants, as well as the elevated plateau 

for access purposes mean a great deal of work for building and maintenance, 

but allow respective green areas and open spaces to recreate 

themselves in diverse ways. 

The jury appreciated the large gesture that the design provides with an 

honourable mention because it provides an opportunity for discussion 

about an urban construction feature by another dimension in the town 

Gyór, however, they found the details of the project inadequate. 


This project picks up on the scale and morphology of the surroundings in 

a playful and intelligent manner and develops a mixed utilisation quarter 

with its own identity and a high residential quality. It emphasises local 

features and creates diverse intermediate spaces which have an inviting 

and open atmosphere. 

15



EUROPAN 9 

WARSZAWA 

WARSZAWA 

A closer look at the design makes clear that the arrangements are not of an 

arbitrary nature, but, with their “patchwork strategy”, they very precisely 

reflect the contextual disarray of the surroundings and lend power to their qualities 

without falsely harmonising or “straightening” them. The fragmentary 

nature and polymorphism enable a phase-by-phase realisation. What has been 

discussed with some controversy, is whether the design is rather meant as a 

strategic contribution that advocates “fewer rules achieve more” and an open 

development from “case to case”, or whether it deals with morphological 

arrangements which are prescribed and not open for negotiation. The fact that 

precisely this debate is kicked off at this site with these means is seen as a 

quality however and, what is more, it is also indisputable that this project represents 

in both interpretations a courageous, unconventional approach that is 

dealt with virtuously and precisely. 

MM 321 Warsaw 

The author of this design is obviously fascinated by the poetic qualities of this 

“terrain vague” and therefore does not propose a complete re-planning of the 

competition area, but four groups of buildings in the forms of rows which act 

like fragments flushed from the cut caused by the railway to the edge of the 

city. Not only a hard border between city and wasteland, but a transition zone, 

an area of porousness is intended. The author attempts to anchor the rows of 

buildings more tightly to the site by placing them parallel to the existing building 

lines. The four groups are joined up by glass bridges designed as large 

public conservatories with Mediterranean plants, or by rows of tower blocks 

that should create both space and identity. A mixed utilisation is planned for 

the building which includes, in addition to offices and shops, child day-care 

centres and common areas, although residential utilisation should dominate. 

The position of the sun, lighting and shadow as well as the appropriate plants 

are investigated in detail. The lack of private open spaces is seen with some 

criticism, while the concentration of parking spaces in two strips and the exclusive 

access of the Pradzynskiego are seen as positive because, in this way, the 

intermediate spaces can be kept as homogeneous areas with vegetation. The 

ring railway tracks will be laid underground thus removing a barrier within the 

“terrain vague”. 

All in all, the jury is won over by the sensitive creation of space, which balances 

the openness and indefiniteness on the one hand, as well as order and proportionateness, 

in an uninhibited way; moreover, the design enables a phase-byphase 

realisation and programmatic adjustment in the face of changing conditions. 


The project regards the town as an archipelago – every island is distinguished 

by its own composition and its own character. The town district of Czyste is 

dealt with as one of these islands. The already existing diversity of forms and 

functions is seen as motivation to introduce a new organising principle into the 

area. 

Four long elevated building bars structure the space diagonally to the existing 

street. This solution connects the neighbouring building and open space structures 

in a way that is respectful. 

This strategy can have both model character for growth in the city within 

clearly defined boundaries and can represent an expedient upgrading of 

modern terraced housing estates (of which there are many in Poland and Warsaw). 

However, the new construction of elevated housing rows, which copy this type 

of housing from the sixties without criticism, is discussed very controversially 

by the jury. 

16



EUROPAN 9 

WARSZAWA 

BABENHAUSEN 

By comparison, the treatment of open space within the archipelago is 

seen overall as positive, especially the proportionateness and quality of 

the park in front of the gasometer. 

The diversity of the architectural typologies and functions of the “infills“, 

which tend to have an interchangeable character between the 

rows of houses which are seen as permanent organisational structures, 

fall back on the genius loci of Czyste. 

EE 560 Warsaw, Czyste 

The gasworks area is to be made more compact by building new structures 

which reinforce the existing structures with their orthogonal grid 

pattern and the dimension of the individual elements. In-between solitary 

buildings, a quiet, flowing space emerges with a regular rhythm. 

The proposal for the project area stands in complete contrast to this: a 

monumental, folded structure is proposed which resembles the public 

park in its size and basic form. In conjunction with the park area, it 

forms an angle which surrounds the gasworks. 

The structure consists of two-storey bridges made of steel and glass 

which cross one another and form a continuous roof structure which is 

accessible on foot. These draw reference from the industrial past in their 

materiality. For pedestrians, a huge viewing platform opens up, which 

enables new views of Warsaw and its skyline, as well as into the intermediate 

spaces of the artificial hill. Views into the distance contrast with 

close-ups. 

The ground floor is dedicated to office utilisations, the “branches” of the 

structure are filled with apartments whose conventional floor plans do 

not adequately continue the urbanistic daringness. 

As to what extent the structure is suitable for providing qualitative, 

generation-specific and person-specific living is discussed with some 

controversy in the jury. The lack of cultural and public facilities is criticised, 

both inside the building and on the roof garden. Despite this, the 

project shows a new way of articulating spaces for Warsaw and opens up 

a new debate about the question of artificiality and nature in the city. 

MW 993 Babenhausen’s green core 

The author develops three quarters from out of the large-scale existing 

situation, each of which have the potential of creating their own identity. 

The size of the quarter is oriented towards the dimensions of 

Babenhausen’s town districts and thus defuses any competition between 

the new town district and the town centre. 

Due to the clear and well-structured formation of boundaries, a new 

“green centre” comes into being between the different parts of the quarter, 

which cleverly generates sustainable links to the town centre, in the 

open space and to the nearby artificial lake. 

Formalities are proposed to secure the quality of these boundaries and 

are typologically identified. 

As a framework for the successive further development and as a sign of 

new qualities for the former barracks site, the construction of attractive 

residential buildings at these boundaries allows for a rhythmical pace 

for the development measures in the core of the partial areaa and therefore 

also demonstrates robustness with respect to possibly changing 

utilisations and needs. 

The concept structures the existing buildings and manages without a 

radical tabula rasa. The quality of the “green core” can be emphasised 

more by the author, whereby the “Monte Scherbelino” is a charming 

detail from the deconstruction of disposable buildings. 

17



EUROPAN 9 

BABENHAUSEN 

STRAUBING 

STRAUBING 

Unfortunately, the opportunity of using water as a landscape element in Babenhausen 

is far too tentative and has been considered without the decided inclusion 

of the nearby lake. 

The three new quarters have been dedicated to the functions of living in the 

east, commerce in the south-west and mixed utilisation with services in the 

barracks area which is listed under the protection of historical buildings. Here, 

it is of interest that the respective boundaries towards the central green area 

are formed from different living concepts which are also adapted to the area’s 

character (workshops, town villas, terraced houses). One aspect which is seen 

in a positive light is the possibility of also placing convenience stores in the 

“innovation field” and to connect them to the bypass. As such, this also offers 

the opportunity of providing the new area with local supply outlets. 

AZ 751 a gardener‘s theory … 

This design guides the water from the northerly located Hassel lake (artificial) 

as a consistent image-generating element into the design area and, with a 

canal that is cut off by a marina at the southern end, creates a unique quality. 

The possibility of experiencing the water is brought to life by a footbridge system 

which provides access to a “water city”, and this is emphasised by the deliberate 

accentuation of the end points of a canal that runs in a north-south 

direction. 

The proposed connection to the town centre by way of the green strip in an 

east-west direction which is surrounded by detached and terraced houses was 

treated by the jury with some criticism. 

The historical barracks area is provided with an amorphous series of buildings 

which are suggestive of an “old town” and are too concentrated for Babenhausen, 

coming from the B26 and going northwards - this was criticised by the 

jury: the utilisation of the buildings here remains just as unclear as the functionality 

of the proposed structure. 

The quality of the design lies in the emphasis and development of the water 

theme which gives the new quarter its own profile. 


This work picks up very coherently on the existing buildings of the former ski 

factory for its guiding concept and sees it as an already nearly completely finished 

structure (“readymade”). The proposed architectural and artistic elements 

in this area strongly upgrade the site optically and functionally, whereby 

attention is paid to making sure that the substance also continues to appear 

“original” in the future. 

Elaborate conversions are done without. The surrounding galleries are 

assessed as an interesting approach here, however, on the ground, they seem 

pretentious. They cannot really be regarded as a realistic measure there. The 

new utilisation of the large halls enables a variety of proposals which do justice 

to the overall idea (for example, sport, youth hotel, offices, workshops, band 

building, maisonette apartments). 

The residential buildings in the northern part in two long rows create a definite 

focus as a strict, block-type building element, but must be questioned in view 

of the given urban construction context.The orientation of the northern housing 

row is not advantageous with respect to lighting and the use of open spaces. 

The central green space acts as a ribbon-like link between the areas used for 

buildings. The arrangement of fixed sport areas in the biotope is problematic in 

the form it has been presented in. 

UR 334 “come together!” 

This work is characterised from an urban construction point of view by its division 

into a cultural-commercial area on the Völkl premises and a residential 

quarter in the north. The “come together” exists in the form of a continuous 

18



EUROPAN 9 

SELB 

SELB 

BERLIN 

pedestrian pathway with a central green zone in the middle. By adding to 

the existing Völkl buildings, the authors have succeeded in creating a 

convincing closure of the central green zone towards the south. 

The two access ways in the east and west open up the area invitingly due 

to their funnel-shaped design. 

The planned reutilisation of the parking space on the ground floor is, 

however, unconvincing. The uniformly remodelled façades of the Völkl 

buildings require an overall concept that does not really correspond with 

a diverse, fragmented utilisation. The residential quarter in the north 

has sensibly aligned and organised buildings with floor plans that can be 

used well and coherent access which also takes the existing topography 

into consideration. 

The authors allow for the existing orchard and network the footpaths 

coherently along the former railway tracks. 

This work enables a step-by-step introduction to the realisation and 

gives the area a new image. 

ZK 977 catalog for dwelling on the time 

This work stands out through two strategically interesting approaches. 

In the area under consideration, the existing stock is to be activated by 

“hot spots” with the aim of encouraging and intensifying different kinds 

of social activity. In the project area, the work devises different, segmented 

elements that complement the existing stock, while also forming a 

new spatially attractive quarter by being combined independently. Here, 

the playful treatment of the elements is a strategy that not only promises 

flexibility, but also represents an interesting artistic approach. Even 

if one can accuse the design of having a certain arbitrariness, the urban 

planning and conceptual charm of the work outweighs this. 

PO 007 THE LUXURY OF EMPTINESS 

This work is a good contribution towards the future reorganisation of the 

northern town centre of Selb and creates new residential and leisure 

space qualities. This applies to both the area under consideration, which 

is to be transformed into an attractive town park that is a sustainable 

element for the revaluation of living in the town centre and, at the same 

time, provides an impulse for social activities. 

The proposal for the project area qualitatively and appropriately provides 

answers to the demographic development in Selb and takes into consideration 

the increased demand for living in the old town which is suitable 

for senior citizens. 

LG 034 Tissue of lies 

The approach this project takes of picking out the loop as a theme by 

upgrading the existing and developing the new symbolic places along the 

path is convincing and is met with acceptance. These intensifications in 

the form of acupunctures activate the surrounding area and have the 

potential to actively influence these. 

The intellectual approach of releasing oneself from the plan and proposing 

a literary stroll along the Schöneberg Loop in the form of a book 

first of all seems strange, however, in the course of reading becomes 

increasingly enjoyable and turns out to be a brilliant strategy. The to 

some extent self-ironic treatment demonstrates an intense analysis and 

leads to an intelligent concept which delivers precise proposals for 

selected special places along the promenade. The proposed programmatic 

and architectural interventions demonstrate high quality standards 

which should be developed further and gone into in more detail. 

The “extro“ of the book supplies a possible strategy for implementing 

19



EUROPAN 9 

BERLIN 

DONAUWÖRTH 

SPREMBERG 

the loop: “First of all the event, then the way there. Events must be the initial 

impulse. The path then follows faster as an urgent desire”. 

MM 777 “Over the Train“ 

This project stands out due to its radicalness. The existing complex situation is 

contrasted with a simple and convincing spatial intervention, a straight line 

links the Gleisdreieck station to the Südbahnhof railway station in the form of a 

bridge construction over the railway tracks. 

It thus includes a previously inaccessible space and opens up a new view of the 

city and the existing division is set in scene and artistically exaggerated. Due to 

the up and downswing of the bridge, different spatial situations emerge over 

the city and under the trees, something that offers potential as a daytrip destination 

for tourists. The aim expressed in the idea is unfortunately not fulfilled 

by the proposed bridge design. 

The jury criticised the schematic presentation, the starting and finishing points 

seem arbitrary, the connection to the existing bridges has to be reworked and 

the construction has to be made more precise. 

Altogether a fascinating idea that draws attention to the hidden potential of the 

railway ditches and wasteland and opens up perspectives which are absolutely 

worth following up on. 

DW 628 recharging space 

The main theme of the work is the integration of a central ‘spine’ which, as a 

north-south oriented pathway system that links up open spaces, connects the 

various residential areas of Parkstadt with one another and convincingly interlinks 

the public utilisations and places. The integration of the topography in 

this strategy leads to interesting open space situations. The problematic intermediate 

space between the existing residential towers is activated using 

various utilisation proposals, the ground floors are opened up towards this area 

and are given a community utilisation The concept of “recharging space” offers 

an informal and flexible guiding idea for the activation of the public space in 

Parkstadt, Donauwörth. 

LB 369 bridge & door 

The clearly structured conceptual approach, which is developed logically from a 

precise analysis, a clear description of the problem in the form of assumptions, 

an urban construction concept, right up to selective architectural/open space 

planning interventions, was judged positively. 

The analysis does not limit itself to existing urban construction-spatial defects, 

but also brings in cultural aspects. In the following, a story is told in which a 

dialog is created between a constructed environment and its users. 

The urban construction concept is convincing, despite seeming arbitrary in 

some places, and parts of the fairground meadow, such as the children’s farm 

in particular, are viewed with some criticism. 

The four selected elements along Bahnhofstrasse fulfil their task as transition 

points and link up the town park. The spatial break that cuts through Bahnhofstrasse 

is cleverly overcome and, using infrastructural and plastic design interventions, 

new pathways are created and new open spaces made accessible. The 

railway station area is structured functionally, Bahnhofstrasse finds its logical 

end point, the old railway station building is relieved from its function through a 

connecting, roofed over extension and is open for new social, cultural and private 

commercial utilisations. Using an elegant pedestrian bridge, the way 

which Bahnhofstrasse cuts through the high plateau is overcome, and the existing 

green strips above the town are connected to one another. The elements 

proposed for the town park, such as the vineyard and passageway, are based on 

actual historical elements, the proposed visual relationships (once again) open 

up new views of Spremberg’s townscape. The proposed cone in the Georgen- 

20



EUROPAN 9 

SPREMBERG 

strasse area is discussed with some controversy and is found to be overexaggerated. 

The jury assessed the overall concept, which accentuates the general 

context using clear interventions, as convincing. 

JS 303 Moving closer (Auf Tuchfühlung) 

This work proposes creating a new network of roads and pathways with 

the aim of closely interlinking the railway station square with the historical 

old town. This network of roads and pathways is not limited to the 

area under consideration, but attempts to bring into being a wider context, 

for example, in the form of a proposed bridge which crosses over 

the lower-lying Bahnhofstrasse as part of the network of paths, thereby 

linking the Stadtpark to the Georgenberg park. The threadlike structures 

of the roads and pathways give the planning area a distinguished form, 

even if the theme of cloth-making applied to finding a form for all of the 

elements is a little overdone. The design of the square in front of the 

railway station seems schematic, the proposed buildings constructed in 

rows at the rear area of the former cloth factory is not convincing. 

The decision to fit terraced seating into the existing topography of the 

hillside situation in front of the open air-stage is seen as a possible 

solution which, by enabling a new design of the fairground, could work 

to give more emphasis to the green belt of the Spreeaue meadow landscape. 

10 Opening the authors’ envelopes 

The authors’ envelopes are opened and the names of the authors are 

read out (see the list of prize winners and participants on pages 23 ff.) 

11 The meeting of the jury is closed 

Dr. Merk thanks the participants for their professional and dedicated 

cooperation and hands over the chair to Mr. Kleine as the representative 

of the competition organisers. 

On behalf of the competition organisers, Mr. Kleine thanks all of those 

who took part in the competition, in particular Dr. Merk, for her competent 

chairing of the meeting and he congratulates all of the winners on 

their success. 

Berlin, 18 January 2008 

Responsible for the report: Ulrike Poeverlein 

21



EUROPAN 9 

PRIZE 

HONOURABLE MENTION 

PRESELECTION 

ROUND 

MW 993 grünkern 

Thorsten Erl, Architekt (D), Andreas Bartels, Architekt (D), 

Stefan Werrer, Architekt (D) 

AZ751 a gardener‘s theory… 

Fieke Verschueren, Architektin (NL), Peter Frost-Møller, Stadtplaner (DK), 

Martijn Rauwers, Landschaftsarchitekt (NL) 

AT 356 vielfeld 

Katrin Rappenecker, Architektin (D), Petra Lenschow, Architektin (D), 

AB 117 connecting sustainability – cultivated urban landscape 

Oliver Hauck, Architekt (D), Andreas Noback, Architekt (D), 

Alexandra Förster, Architektin (D) 

BR 648 THE GREEN ATTACK 

Gunther Slagmeulder, Bauingenieur-Architekt (B), 

Sophie Troch, Bauingenieurin-Architektin (B) 

CD 382 Green Innovation 

Carolin Röhrig, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Diane Schöne, Judith Barthel 

DN 496 Global Estate 

Andrea Petrecca, Architektin (I) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Marco Ferrari, Giovanni Piovene Porto Godi 

DO 178 one two three 

Matthias Schneider, Architekt (D), Antonella Sgobba, Architektin (I), 

Michael Schott, Architekt (D) 

JL 947 baseline 

Maren Harnack, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (D) 

LN 607 „BABENHAUSEN V E R N E T Z T“ 

Ulla Schuck, Architektin (D), Nicole Hahn, Künstlerin (D), 

Lili Reckermann, Künstlerin (D) 

MB 215 KASERNENAREAL 

Julia Goldschmidt, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (D), Claudia Becker, Architektin/ 

Stadtplanerin (D), Jef Angelo De Bièvre, Landschaftsarchitekt (B), Manu 

Gryson, Bauingenieur-Architekt (B), Francis De Wolf, Architekt/Stadtplaner (B) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Matthias Van Rossen, Stijn Heremans 

TO 101 critical reconstruktion 

Arjan Harbers, Architekt/Stadtplaner (NL) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Kristin Jensen 

TS 108 shifting balance‘ 

Tina Ritter, Architektin (D), Volker Ritter, Architekt (D), Fenja Kopf, Architektin 

(D), Bettina Balcaen, Architektin (D) 

22

PARTICIPANTS BABENHAUSEN 


EUROPAN 9 

ROUND 

UC 158 urban carpet 

Carla Heil, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (D), 

Katrin Amtmann, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (D) 

UR 215 R.ON. Recipe for one City of Babenhausen 

Andres Krause, Architekt (D), Jeremias Lorch, Architekt (D), 

Heiko Hoppe, Architekt (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Stephan Jack, Tim Alfers, Raphael Fischer, Ramona Fröhlich, 

Özgün Özartan, Johannes von Alten 

YA 007 Reloading 

Raul Recuero, Architekt (ES) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Matias Nieto 

23

PARTICIPANTS BERLIN 


EUROPAN 9 

PRIZE 

PRIZE 

PRESELECTION 

ROUND 

LG 034 Lügengebäude 

Wolfgang Koelbl, Architekt (A) 

MM 777 Over the Train 

Marine Miroux, Architektin (F), Christoph Hager, Architekt (A) 

BR 287 Südparcours 

Pierre Alexandre Devernois, Architekt (F), Mathieu Mercuriali, Architekt (F), 

Mathieu Mercuriali, Architekt (F), Florian Hertweck, Architektur- und Stadttheorethiker 

(D), Matthieu Lott, Architekt (F) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Nam Le Toan 

MB 001 Menschbahn 

Dimitri Goldenberg, Architekt (UA), Elena Deshinova, Architektin (RU), Marie- 

Pierre Vandeputte, Architektin (F) 

AB 123 Anti-Palace 

Arnaud Bouquin, Architekt (F), Alexandre Bullier, Architekt (F) 

AN 629 Grüne Impulse 

Ning Liu, Architekt (CN), Yuna Le Bris du Rest, Architektin (F), 

Nicolas Jobard, Architekt (F), Alexander Glöckner, Architekt (D) 

BL 356 „Stadtoase statt Insel“ 

Manja Krieg, Architektin (D), Monika Block, Architektin (D), 

Morna Hildebrandt, Architektin (D), Kristina Semprimoznik, Architektin (D) 

BX 151 

Beate Lendt, Architektin (D) 

DS 999 Dialog 

Isabell Schleicher, Architektin (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Thomas Hanisch, Jens Raade 

EZ 311 Ode to the Ordinary 

Clarisse Bonnet, Architektin (F), Morice Gwénaëlle, Architekt (F) 

Julie Lavergne, Architektin (F) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Isabelle Vartan 

FF 523 In The Loop 

Felix Fassbinder, Architekt (D), Paulo Moreira, Architekt (P) 

FM 747 Na Klar 

Coen Kampstra, Architekt (NL), Jan Winsemius, Jurist (NL) 

GH 707 Camillo Sitte meets Robert Venturi 

Jorg Sieweke, Architekt/Stadtplaner (D), 

Anna Viader, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (ES), 

Joachim Schultz, Architekt/Stadtplaner (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Carine Kandjee, Benjamin Gutsche 

GP 181 What If ? Eine Strategie für die Schöneberger Insel 

Gerrit Wegener, Architekt (D), Patrick Hoffmann, Architekt (D) 

24

PARTICIPANTS BERLIN 


EUROPAN 9 

ROUND 

IT 181 Berlin‘s Cheap & Chic Injection 

Tihomir Viderman, Architekt/Stadtplaner (HR) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Ivana Galinovic 

LB 099 99 Luftballons 

Mario Menzio, Architekt (I), Vittorio Campodonico, Architekt (I), 

Giuditta Dirotti, Architekt (I), Marco Di Crescenzo, Architekt (I), 

Ludovico Milesi, Architekt (I) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Francesca Caria, Giovanni Francesco Elia, Luca Cassissa, Francesco 

Modica, Gianluca Sericola, Beatrice Traspedini, Jacopo Pagnini 

ML 197 Landungsbrücken, Berlin Schöneberg 

Leander Moons, Architekt (NL), Markus Helbach, Architekt (D) 

MM 010 Meeting & Motion 

Alexander Valentino, Architekt (I), 

d‘Ambros Matteo, Architekt/Stadtplaner (I) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Alice Bartoli, Andreas Faoro, Francesca Rizzetto, Antonio Carmelo Rizzo, 

Paolo Agostinelli, Livia Di Mario 

MR 123 Schöneberger See 

Ralf Pflugfelder, Architekt (D), Magnus Nilsson, Architekt (S), Markus 

Miessen, Architektur- und Städtebautheoretiker (D) 

SL 533 Sustain[en]able Capital! Suedlauf Park 

Lena Raizberg, Architektin (D), Stefan Petro, Architekt (D), Jan Humbert, 

Architekt (D), Carola Scholz, Architektin (D) 

ZZ 000 Urban Braiding 

Christian J. Lange, Architekt (D), Nerea Feliz, Architektin (ES) 

25

PARTICIPANTS DONAUWÖRTH 


EUROPAN 9 

PRIZE 

PRESELECTION 

ROUND 

DW 628 recharching space 

Dominique Dinies, Architekt (D), Markus Vogl, Architekt (D), 

Robert Diem, Architekt (AT), Sandra Schiel , Architektin (A), 

Irina Koerdt, Architektin (D) 

AT 247 Ausser Wand und Band 

Tobias Häberle, Architekt (D), Anne Riggenmann, Architektin (D) 

LF 392 Parkstadt Mitte 

Joachim Buerklein, Architekt (D), Petra Alschinger, Innenarchitektin (D), 

Manuela Mannes, Grafikdesignerin (D) 

MC 345 Zentrum - Parkstadt 

Florian Dilg, Architekt (D), 

Anja Gaigl, Architektin (D), Angelika Zwingel, Architektin (D) 

DE 866 Skywalk Parkstadt 

Alexander Eberhardt, Architekt (D), Stephan Leiber, Architekt (D) 

DW 099 Grüne Amoebe 

Jaime Gastalver López-Pazo, Architekt/Stadtplaner (ES), 

Laura Riviello, Architektin (I), Celedonio Garrido Santos, Architekt (ES), 

Laura Tena Sanchez, Architektin (ES), Ana Lapuerta Martinez, Architektin (ES), 

Fernandez Ricardo Carballo, Bauingenieur (ES), Antonio Caro Puerta, 

Bauingenieur (ES), Antonio Franco Garcia, Bauingenieur-Architekt (ES), 

Maria Villa Castro, Grafikdesignerin (ES), Eva María Santaliestra Durán, 

Bauingenieur-Architektin (ES), Garcia Lilian Weikert, Landschaftsarchitektin 

(ES) 

DW 115 Energiestrand Donauwörth 

Jana Richter, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (D), 

Jan Landschreiber, Stadtplaner (D), Henri Praeger, Architekt (D) 

EA 971 Global And Local Networks 

Manfred Frericks, Architekt (D), 

Miguel Angel Garcia Valenzuela, Architekt (ES) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Fernandez Jaime Asensio 

FQ 483 Parkstadt - Stadtpark 

Tobias Eckert, Architekt (D) 

FT 279 Neue Reichsstrasse 

Thomas Bögl, Architekt (D) 

JB 273 Parkstadt - Stadtpark 

Bettina Kandler, Architektin (D), Jan Bunje, Architekt (D) 

JJ 723 Rundraum - Die andere Stadt 

Johannes Schotanus, Architekt (NL), Jonas Labbé, Architekt (S/D) 

JK 127 Öffnung durch Abgrenzung 

Stefan Kühn, Architekt (D) 

LC 785 Grund Formen 

Luciano Motta, Architekt (I), Carolin Stapenhorst, Architektin (D) 

26

PARTICIPANTS DONAUWÖRTH 


EUROPAN 9 

ROUND 

PH 157 Park-Stadt-Garten 

Björn Severin, Architekt (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Florian Hoheisel, Eduard Bossert, Ilja Maksimov, Mikus Sils, 

Florian Ludwig, David Gregori Ribes, Defne Saylan 

PW 732 Quartiersadern 

Wiebke Lambert, Architektin (D), 

Theresa Golka, Architektin (D), Marie Selter, Architektin (D) 

27

PARTICIPANTS ROSTOCK 


EUROPAN 9 

PRIZE 

RUNNER-UP 

RUNNER-UP 

PRESELECTION 

ROUND 

ET 192 stepscape greenscape waterscape 

Florian Krieger, Architekt (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Michiko Bach 


Steffen Lukannek, Architekt (D), Thomas Schindler, Architekt (D), 

Doreen Schenker, Architektin (D), Ferdinand Eichler, Architekt (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Jenny Clasen 


Timo Heise, Architekt (D), Christian Dirumdam, Architekt (D), Björn Rolle, 

Architekt (D), Henning Fritsch, Architekt (D), Matthias Mumm, Architekt (D) 

FM 314 Alle Wohnen am Wasser 

Sabrina Engel, Architektin (D), Stefan Filz, Architekt (D), Florian Kluge, 

Landschaftsarchitekt (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

David Mathyl, Jose Antonio Ramirez Chacon 

MX 381 Die Schilfstadt – Reed City 

Claus Sesselmann, Innenarchitekt (D) 

PA 367 Rostock, ZweiBrücken 

Almut Coppius, Architektin (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Philipp Jacob, Nils Hiller, Enis Ben Khemais 

AB 123 „Biotop Rostock“ 

Torsten Schult, Architekt (D), Margherita Fanin, Architektin (I) 

AP 723 Zwischenhöfe 

Patricia Medina Quero, Architektin (ES), 

Andrey Garcia Corredor, Architekt (COL) 

AS 145 Kapillare 

Steffen Barnikol, Architekt (D), Steffen Burucker, Architekt (D) 

BB 003 Stadtlandschaften 

Niels Vauth, Architekt/Stadtplaner (D), Michael Sauer, Architekt (D), Malte 

Diers, Architekt (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Kornelia Heitbrink 

CF 106 „Seven Up“ 

Falk Liebscher, Architekt (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Claudia Herrmann, Falk Saalbach 

CS 572 Fischerinseln 

Christina Enke, Architektin (D), Sebastian Schröter, Künstler (D) 

CU 500 Riverscape 

Martijn Van Raaij, Architekt (NL), Martijn Prins, Architekt (NL), Martjn Tillema, 

Architekt/Stadtplaner (NL), Arjan Welman, Stadtplaner (NL), Ewout Brouwer, 

Stadtplaner (NL) 

28



EUROPAN 9 

ROUND 

CZ 007 Waterland 

Daniel Höwekamp, Architekt (D), Kathrin Hanf, Architektin (D) 

EJ 010 Rostock 

Jeroen De Bok, Stadtplaner (NL), Emiel Arends, Stadtplaner (NL) 

ES 101 Bootshaus – Siedlung im Warnow Park 

Heike Nowotny, Architektin (D) 

GL 121 ZigZag 

Wouter Stoer, Architekt (NL), Albert Vogelzang, Architekt (NL), 

Bart Zantman, Architekt (NL), Peter van der Knoop, Architekt (NL) 

IS 107 Rostock Lido 

Stefania Manni, Architektin (I), Andrea Treu, Architekt (I), 

Roberto Pigorini, Architekt (I), Paolo Moretto, Architekt (I) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Alessandro Dimita 

JJ 135 Quais 

Jan Kaufmann, Architekt (D), Jörg Hoffmann, Architekt (D) 

LB 313 Riverside Redevelopment 

Irena Hrabincova, Architektin (CZ), Choong Chan Yew, Architekt (MY), 

Dat Liu, Architekt (UK), Jacob Richard, Architekt (UK) 

LL 382 Grün der Zeit – Rostock deine letzte Chance 

Susanne Dieckmann, Architektin (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Leander Urbanczyk, David Peter Lieser 

MK 282 Urban Camouflage Patterns 

Florian Henniges, Architekt/Stadtplaner (D) 

MU 541 in Fasern 

Irene Yerro, Architektin (ES), Anita Barthelemey, Architektin (A), 

Fabien Barthelemey, Architekt (F), Jürgen Kästner, Architekt (D), 

Natalia Guerrero, Landschaftsarchitektin (ES) 

PM 911 StadtLand+ 

Philipp Tscheuschler, Architekt (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Matthias Tscheuschler 

RB 187 gerber.beat 

Robert Baum, Architekt (D) 

RC 227 Urban Wilderness 

Alejo Paillard, Architekt (F), Gesa Buettner, Architektin (D) 

RM 191 Full House 

Annette Joppien, Architektin (D), Martin Peña, Architekt (ES), 

Maren Klaeschen, Architektin (D), Ann Kathrin Broszio, Architektin (D) 

RS 123 floating borders 

Sascha Redmer, Architekt (D), Sabrina Sippel, Architektin (D) 

29



EUROPAN 9 

ROUND 

SH 836 Neues Wohnen am Bruch 

Stefan Schaufert, Architekt (D), Hannes Hamann, Landschaftsarchitekt (D), 

Olaf Pfotenhauer, Landschaftsarchitekt (D), Henning Güldenpenning, 

Landschaftsarchitekt (D) 

SK 778 Linkin‘ 

Gerard Scholten, Architekt (NL), Frederike Bückmann, Architektin (NL) 

SW 777 Wasser marsch! 

Vinzenz Dilcher, Architekt (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Wilhelm Rosenberger, Stephan Niewolik 

TM 247 3-fingers Marina|Center|Park 

Sebastian Allhoff, Stadtplaner (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Tobias Backen, Matthias Pöhler, Aaron Hartmann, Martijn van der Linden 

UP 201 Outside In 

Almut Wolff, Architektin (D), Natalie Harder, Architektin (D) 

WK 123 Wickie und die starken Männer 

Christof Brinkmann, Architekt (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Eva Espuny Camacho 

ZX 973 ehemaliges Fischer- und Gerberviertel 

Ali Reza Djafarsadeh, Architekt (D), Rafael Armenteros, Architekt (D), 

Mahmoud Reza Shafei, Innenarchitekt (D) 

ZZ 343 Green Connection 

Anna Grunow, Architektin (D), Farshad Nasrollahi, Architekt (IR) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Kevin Herbst, Jan Winterstein, Patricia Groborz 

30

PARTICIPANTS SELB 


EUROPAN 9 

PRIZE 

RUNNER-UP 

PRESELECTION 

ROUND 

ZK 977 Catalog for dwelling on the time 

Julio De La Fuente, Architekt (ES), Natalia Gutierrez, Architektin (ES), 

Álvaro Martín Fidalgo, Architekt (ES), Arantxa Ozaeta Cortázar, Architekt 

(ES) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Alberto Amoros, Jose Amoros, Eduardo Barcelo, Álvaro Lorente, 

Javier Castillo, Celia Garcia, Ramon Francos, Jorge Chico, Iker Gomez, 

Mateo Borsetti, Maria Navascues, Javier Pinilla, Monica Hernandez, 

Daniel Perez, Esther Carranza, Belen Lopez 

PO 007 Luxus der Leere 

Susanne Pietsch, Architektin (D), Hannes Ochmann, Innenarchitekt (D) 

BO 573 PUNKT UND LINIE ZU FLÄCHE 

Emilie Bonnetblanc, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (F), 

Giacomo Bongiorno, Architekt (I), Thomas Bormann, Architekt (D) 

BY 123 selb_ständig bewegt 

Stephan Häublein, Architekt (D), Johannes Müller, Architekt (D), 

Daniel Dörr, Bauingenieur-Architekt (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Stefan Berger, Robert Augustin 

IB 290 Green City 

Denis Andernach, Architekt (D), Moritz Alken, Architekt (D), 

Nicolas Bahnemann, Architekt (D), Tassya Rauch, Architektin (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Philipp Reichelt, Achim Widjaja 

MA 683 CROSSOVER 

Sarina Arnold, Architektin (D), Patricia Costantini, Architektin (D), Marita 

Zinth, Landschaftsarchitektin (D) 

AV 213 sonnenterrassen 

Veronika Schreieder, Architektin (D), Andrea Kister, Architektin (D) 

BY 551 GenerationPOD 

Jana Richter, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (D), Jan Landschreiber, Stadtplaner 

(D), Henri Praeger, Architekt (D) 

CD 250 LIVING FIELDS 

Horst Trapp, Architekt (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Markus Büttner, Thomas Völkl, Josef Steinmetzer 

CD 282 Betula Silva 

Sybille Wiegandt, Architektin (D), Cornelia Dittmar, Architektin (D) 

CR 089 in between trees 

Tobias Miazga, Architekt (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Jochen Seelos, Harald Schmidt 

EP 001 Nördliche Innenstadt 

Hendrik Otto, Architekt (D) 

31

PARTICIPANTS SELB 


EUROPAN 9 

ROUND 

JM 142 DUAL LAYER 

Sinisa Bodrozic, Architekt (HR), Ivan Ralis, Architekt (HR), Nenad Ravnic, Architekt 

(HR) 

KX 937 backbone EIN RÜCKGRAT FÜR SELB 

Ines Lauer, Architektin (D), Max Richter, Architekt (D) 

MF 711 space glace / Raumglasur 

Frank Menzel, Architekt (D), Maria Saffer, Architektin (D), 

Marie Langen, Architektin (D) 

OX 100 FLAT SELB 

Subhash Mukerjee, Architekt (I), Michele Bonino, Architekt (I), 

Rebecca Gasco, Architektin (Italy), Cristina Marietta, Architekt (I) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Elizabeth Forde, Daniele Dabbene 

SD 034 VICINITY 

Pablo Tena, Architekt (ES), Mireia Vergés, Architektin (ES), 

Francesco Rossini, Architekt (I) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Petra Stern, Giovanna Santoro, Rüdiger Wurth 

SN 711 Felder, Wald & Wiesen 

Stefan Schoebel, Architekt (D), Nadya Faris Bibawi, Architektin (D) 

VL 111 Herzklopfen 

Valentina Ruzanova, Architektin (Russian Federation), 

Ludmila Chumachenko, Architektin (Russian Federation) 

32

PARTCIPANTS SPREMBERG 


EUROPAN 9 

PRIZE 

RUNNER-UP 

PRESELECTION 

ROUND 

LB 639 Brücke & Tür 

Saskia Hebert, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (D) 

JS 303 Auf Tuchfühlung 

Sandra Neumann, Architektin (D), Stefan Aman, Architekt (D), 

Mario Sobolewski, Architekt (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Jana Neumann, Sebastian Schultze, Johanna Walf 

AS 691 ParkÜBERFluß 

Martin Stauss, Architekt (D), Ralf Kockrow, Bauingenieur (D) 

CB 107 acupunture Spremberg 

Alessandra Spagnoli, Architektin (I), Tatjana-Sonja Trebesch, Architektin 

(D), 

Matthias Graf von Ballestrem, Architekt (D), Elisabetta Vitaletti, Architektin 

(I), Paola Angelini, Architekt (I) 

AC 807 EntreFlaneur 

Anja Mieg-Debik, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (D), 

Carsten Cielobatzki, Architekt (D), 

Dirk Müller, Architekt (D), Beeke Bartelt, Architekt (D) 

AT 710 Spremberger Parkensemble 

Axel Rühl, Landschaftsarchitekt (D) 

CC 100 STADT LANDSCHAFT FLUSS 

Ulrich Weingärtner, Architekt (D), Sebastian Blecher, Architekt (D), 

Nils Lillig, Architekt (D) 

EH 835 SPREMBERG – Stadt als Bühne 

Maria Koch, Architektin (D), Susanne Röllig, Architektin (D), 

Christin Ansorge, Architektin (D), Gunnar Krempin, Architekt (D) 

FR 506 Spremberg .city landscape. 

Andrea Löffler, Landschaftsarchitektin (D), 

Alexander Götze, Landschaftsarchitekt (D), 

Katrin Grafe, Landschaftsarchitektin (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Kostek Osobinski 

MD 112 PERLENERNTE - HARVESTING PEARLS 

Katrin Bohn, Architektin (D), Barbara Schmaus, Architektin (D), 

Carsten Liesenberg, Architekt/Stadtplaner (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Thomas Müller, Konstantinos Chalaris, Jonathan Gales, Larissa Begault, 

Thomas McCreesh, Nick Hayhurst 

MJ 111 AUENPERLEN 

Marek Vogt, Architekt (D), Jens Hölzinger, Architekt (D) 

MS 247 Der Freiraumraum 

Melanie Semmer, Architektin (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Stefanie Helga Paul, Mark Knobloch 

33

PARTICIPANTS SPREMBERG 


EUROPAN 9 

ROUND 

SD 007 Spremberg – 127-30 Meter ü.NN 

Julia Kühle, Architektin (D), Corina Dietrich, Architektin (D) 

SL 357 bandscapes 

Sebastian Seelig, Stadtplaner (D), 

Kathleen Liebscher, Stadtplanerin (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Lisa Hartung 

34

PARTICIPANTS STRAUBING 


EUROPAN 9 

PRIZE 

RUNNER-UP 

PRESELECTION 

ROUND 


Anita Sinanian, Architektin (D), Marc-Philip Reichwald, Architekt (D), 

Peter-Karsten Schultz, Architekt (D) 

UR 334 come together 

Camilo Hernandez, Architekt (D), Nataly Granados, Architektin (D), 

Sonja Knapp, Stadtplanerin (D) 

NK 507 ALLMENDE / AGORA 

Julius Klaffke, Architekt (D) 

SW 777 NOW HERE 

Andreas Sternecker, Architekt (D), Christian Wagner, Landschaftsarchitekt 

(D), Beatrix Gruber, Architektin (D), Bernhard Schambeck, Architekt (D) 

AI 111 Projected Growth – Geplantes Wachstum 

Harald Gasmann, Architekt (D), Odile Ullrich, Architektin (D), Carolin 

Kodisch, Architektin (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Fabian von Ferrari, Maren Ziegler 

AK 268 Impuls Völkl 

Jürgen Caruso, Architekt (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Andreas Kollefrath 

AS 385 „patchwork“ 

Markus Pfreundtner, Architekt (D) 

BL 671 Democratic Landscape 

Detlev Bruckhoff, Architekt (D) 

CM 248 A-real/Z 

Melanie Jobst, Architektin (D), Christian Hauth, Architekt (D), 

Eleonora Cardella, Architektin (I) 

JA 233 Kultivar 

Florian Zopfy, Architekt (D), Thomas Schonder, Architekt (D), 

Daniela Sacher, Architektin (D), Bartosz Puszkarczyk, Architekt (D), 

Juliane Scharl, Architektin (D) 

JS 162 Better Life - GmbH 

Ralf Pasel, Architekt (D), Frederik Kuenzel, Architekt (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Sarah Bein, Franziska Sack, Sarah Pape 

LM 016 Molecular Diversity 

Luis Machuca, Architekt (ES), Manuel Rodriguez Ruiz, Architekt ES) 

QQ 001 Neue Mitte Straubing Süd 

Christine Schonter, Stadtplanerin (D), Julia Semmlin, Stadtplanerin (D), 

Martin Wille, Architekt (D) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Julian Benesch, Joerg Hahn 

35

PARTICIPANTS STRAUBING 


EUROPAN 9 

ROUND 

SL 009 Energy Park 

Dirk Waldmann, Architekt/Stadtplaner (D), 

Berthold Jungblut, Architekt (D), Michael Trinkner, Architekt (D) 

SU 307 Halle, Hof 

Ulrike Tillmann, Architektin (D), Susanne Schindler, Architektin (CH) 

36

PARTICIPANTS GYÓR 


EUROPAN 9 

PRIZE 

RUNNER-UP 


PRESELECTION 

ROUND 


Juan Tur (E), Ana Arriero (E), Esteban Carlos Higinio (E), Architekten 

Carmen Paz (E) Architektin/Stadtplanerin 


Arroyo Gustavo Romanillos, Architekt (ES), 

Germana De Donno, Architektin (I) 

DG 112 Dongiovanni 

Nicolas Matteo Cazzato, Architekt (I), Emiliano Giuffrida, Architekt (I), 

Romolo Ottaviani, Architektur- und Stadttheoretiker (I ), 

Antonella Sonia Perin, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (I), 

Barbara Cerruti, Architektin (I) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Itala Bevivino, Elisabetta Cerruti, Carlo Brizioli, Simone Stabile, 

Massimo Severo, Stefano La Rocca 

DD 123 Gyór-Sziget 1+1=1 

Rogier Dobma, Architekt (NL), Aafke van Dijk, Architekt (NL) 

FU 359 4 in 1 

Marisol Vidal Martinez, Architekt (ES), Eva Grubbauer, Architektin (A) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Maida Coric 

NN 010 Magyarország 

Nir Goldberg, Architekt (A) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Noa Haim 

ZY 457 Nomadic Landscape 

Sigrid Zenger, Architektin (D), Johan Löberg, Architekt 

AR 555 Gyór-Sziget 

Roberta Horváth, Architektin (HU), Andrea Tenerin, Architekt (HU) 

BA 010 Infiltrations 

Cristian Borcan, Architekt (RO), Alexandru Axinte, Architekt (RO), 

BG 901 Natural Implant 

Guido Schot, Architekt (NL), Brigitte Kwa, Architektin (NL) 

BW 365 Project Biscuit 

Johan Willekens, Architekt (B) 

GR 002 Rescaling 

Danilo Lacone, Architekt (I), Mattia Leone, Architekt (I), 

Valentina La Gioia, Architektin (I), Paola Galante, Architektin (I), 

Vera Autidio, Architektin (I) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Gianfranco Latorraca, Raffaele Guaragna 

GS 308 Stripes 

Andrea Martinelli , Architekt (I), 

Alessandra Rabbi, Architekt (I), Daniela Anzil, Architekt (I) 

37

PARTICIPANTS GYÓR 


EUROPAN 9 

ROUND 

GY 005 Biscuit Valley 

Javier Molinero, Architekt (ES), Maria Oliver, Architekt (ES), 

Javier Matoses, Architekt (ES), Marcos Sangüesa, Architekt (ES), 

Rafael Mira, Architekt (ES) 

GY 939 Európai udvariasság és a fenntartható város-kekszgyár, sziget városrész 

Bálint Terdik, Architekt (HU), Péter Tóth, Architekt (HU), 

Tamás Rüll, Architekt (HU), Balázs Dárdai, Architekt (HU) 

IP 000 Innerplaza 

Tommaso Nicola Santostasi, Architekt (I), 

Alberta Solarino, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (I), 

Alfonso Spina, Architekt (I) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Peter Andrej Zavarzin 

KE 478 Green changes 

Ivan Branislav, Architekt (SK), Emil Popovic, Ingenieur-Architekt (SK) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Stefan Tkac, Miloslav Kovac, Karol Hruby 

KS 133 Ring-A-Ding 

Robert Mair, Architekt (A) 

NH 123 Uran leaves 

Michele Roveri, Architekt (I), Nicola Bettini, Architektin (I), 

Stefano Massa, Architekt (I) 

SI 167 Suburban Myths, Industrial Ventures 

Glenn Lyppens, Architekt (B), Kin Way Cheung , Innenarchitekt (NL), Joris Bourgeois, 

Architekt (B), Zemmouri Najiw, Architekt (B) 

TM 892 Super-Hof 

Simonetta Rossetti , Architektin (I), Thomas Bisiani, Architekt (I), 

Marco Degrassi, Architekt (I) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Elisa Rossetti 

38

PARTICIPANTS WARSZAWA 


EUROPAN 9 

PRIZE 

RUNNER-UP 



PRESELECTION 

ROUND 


Mateusz Adamczyk, Architekt/Stadtplaner (PL), Michal Palej, Architekt/ 

Stadtplaner (PL), Artur Michalak, Architekt/Stadtplaner (PL), Patrycja 

Sowa, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (PL) 

MM 321 Warszawa 

Salvador Ubago Palma, Architekt (ES), Anna Klimczak, Künstlerin (PL), 

Francisco Antonio Garcia Pérez, Architekt (ES), 

Dorota Kurazynska, Künstlerin (PL), Piotr Dryja, Künstler (PL) 


Agata Mierzwa, Architektin (PL), Rolf Jenni, Architekt (CH) 

EE 560 Czyste Warszawa 2007-2008 

Szymon Kalata, Architekt (PL), Eliza Kalata, Architektin (PL), 

Bartek Citko, Architekt (PL), Piotr Solowiej, Architekt (PL 

AE 826 where winds walk 

Marlena Happach, Architektin (PL), Marek Happach, Architekt (PL), 

Renata Jólwik, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (PL) 

AG 408 nowa gazownia 

Agata Bonenberg, Architektin (PL) 

AI 375 Warszawa metamorfozy miejsc bližej… 

Paweł Chilimoniuk, Architekt (PL), Dominik Skura, Architekt (PL), 

Monika Morawiak, Bauingenieur (PL), Wiesław Połchłopek, Architekt 

(PL), Radosław Nawa, Bauingenieur (PL) 

AS 247 kalejdoskop 

Arkadiusz Seredyn, Architekt (PL), Agata Seredyn, Architektin (PL) 

CU 009 far away - just around the corner 

Ulli Heckmann, Architekt (D), Charlotte Elkaim, Architektin (F) 

EU 161 eu-PAN v.09 

Jorge Taravillo Canete, Architekt (ES) 

FA 011 metamorfoza miejsc 

Anna Flak, Architektin (PL) 

FL 430 overlap 

Cyril Pressacco, Architekt (F), Laurent Noel, Architekt (F), 

Martin Fougeras Lavargnolle, Architekt (F), Florence Mottes, Architekt (F) 

HF 000 hybrid forum 

Paolo Valente, Architekt (I), Spartaco Paris, Architekt (I) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Marcin Batko, Mikolaj Iwanczuk, Francesco Pagano, Paola Ria, Maria 

Caterina 

IZ 345 making room for creativity 

Luis Filipe da Silva Portas de Ibérico Nogueira, Architekt (PT), 

Claudio Cruz da Silva, Architekt (PT), 

Filipe Cardoso Reis Sá Coelho, Architekt (PT), 

José Jorge Castro Felgueiras Soares, Architekt (PT), 

Carlos Manuel da Silva Bessa Pinto, Architekt (PT) 

39

PARTICIPANTS WARSZAWA 


EUROPAN 9 

ROUND 

IZ 751 koral 

Eva Iszoro, Architektin (ES) 

KS 701 Warszawa - lokalne centrum „Czyste“ - parasol 

Lukasz Sadura, Architekt (D), Max Kaminski, Architekt (D) 

TW 007 w kółko czyste 

Anna Lipka, Architektin (PL) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Agata Filipek, Maciej Misiewicz 

UX 307 green cells 

Ana Monteiro, Architektin (PT) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Pedro Viegas 

WA 607 local mutations - infiltrating 

Michał Adamczyk, Architekt (PL) 

Mitarbeiter: 

Karol Žurawski, Tomasz Podniesiñski 

40


EUROPAN 9 

41 

TABLE OF ATTENDANCES 

meeting of the trinational jury, held on January 11/12 2008 in Berlin

E9_jury's report

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?