E9_jury's report
E9_jury's report
E9_jury's report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
JURY´S REPORT<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
Report<br />
of the meeting of the trinational jury on 11/12 January 2008 in Berlin<br />
The meeting started on Friday 11 January, 2008 at 10.00 am<br />
Mr Kleine, deputy chairperson of EUROPAN Germany greets those present and<br />
apologises for the<br />
chairperson, Ms Sandeck, who very much regrets that she is unable to take<br />
part in the jury meeting due to illness. Mr Kleine explains the significance of<br />
the EUROPAN competition for young architects in the whole of Europe and the<br />
specialness of this year’s trinational jury meeting, in which not only the projects<br />
submitted for the German locations, but also the projects for Warsaw in<br />
Poland and Gyór in Hungary are to be judged. Throughout Europe, EUROPAN 9<br />
saw more than 1,750 projects submitted at 73 different locations; in Germany,<br />
there were 137 proposals for a total of seven locations, in Warsaw 19 and in<br />
Gyór 21 projects.<br />
In September and October 2007, in an initial jury phase, special committees<br />
met at the individual sites and decided on a preliminary selection from among<br />
the projects submitted. Members of the jury were represented in each of the<br />
special committees. Mr Kleine explains, that it is the jury’s task to assess the<br />
43 pre-selected works independent of the location involved. He points out that<br />
the awarding of the prizes and runners-up prizes must be decided based on the<br />
quality of the works, however, he also clearly states that it is EUROPAN<br />
Germany’s wish that prizes and runners-up prizes be awarded at all of the<br />
sites.<br />
Mr Kleine <strong>report</strong>s on the Cities and Juries Forum that took place in Catania/<br />
Sicily at the beginning of December 2007 where the problems faced at each of<br />
the sites was discussed comparatively using the pre-selected projects in thematic<br />
groups together with projects at other European sites. He suggests that<br />
the individual members of the jury who took part in the special committees and<br />
workshops in Catania bring the aspects talked about there into the present discussion<br />
as part of the information-gathering round.<br />
The competition works are arranged in this <strong>report</strong> according to the thematic<br />
groups, keeping to the same order, these have been hanged up as an exhibition<br />
to be viewed:<br />
Extensions in question – limiting<br />
ROSTOCK Fishermen and tanner‘s quarter<br />
Local mutations – infiltrating<br />
BABENHAUSEN Stadteingang Ost<br />
GYÓR Sziget<br />
STRAUBING Völkl-Gelände<br />
WARSZAWA Czyste<br />
Local mutations – intensifying<br />
SELB Nördliche Innenstadt<br />
Opportunities for public space – walking<br />
BERLIN Südkreuz<br />
DONAUWÖRTH Parkstadt<br />
SPREMBERG Georgenberg<br />
4