18.11.2012 Views

E9_jury's report

E9_jury's report

E9_jury's report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

JURY´S REPORT<br />

european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />

EUROPAN 9<br />

Report<br />

of the meeting of the trinational jury on 11/12 January 2008 in Berlin<br />

The meeting started on Friday 11 January, 2008 at 10.00 am<br />

Mr Kleine, deputy chairperson of EUROPAN Germany greets those present and<br />

apologises for the<br />

chairperson, Ms Sandeck, who very much regrets that she is unable to take<br />

part in the jury meeting due to illness. Mr Kleine explains the significance of<br />

the EUROPAN competition for young architects in the whole of Europe and the<br />

specialness of this year’s trinational jury meeting, in which not only the projects<br />

submitted for the German locations, but also the projects for Warsaw in<br />

Poland and Gyór in Hungary are to be judged. Throughout Europe, EUROPAN 9<br />

saw more than 1,750 projects submitted at 73 different locations; in Germany,<br />

there were 137 proposals for a total of seven locations, in Warsaw 19 and in<br />

Gyór 21 projects.<br />

In September and October 2007, in an initial jury phase, special committees<br />

met at the individual sites and decided on a preliminary selection from among<br />

the projects submitted. Members of the jury were represented in each of the<br />

special committees. Mr Kleine explains, that it is the jury’s task to assess the<br />

43 pre-selected works independent of the location involved. He points out that<br />

the awarding of the prizes and runners-up prizes must be decided based on the<br />

quality of the works, however, he also clearly states that it is EUROPAN<br />

Germany’s wish that prizes and runners-up prizes be awarded at all of the<br />

sites.<br />

Mr Kleine <strong>report</strong>s on the Cities and Juries Forum that took place in Catania/<br />

Sicily at the beginning of December 2007 where the problems faced at each of<br />

the sites was discussed comparatively using the pre-selected projects in thematic<br />

groups together with projects at other European sites. He suggests that<br />

the individual members of the jury who took part in the special committees and<br />

workshops in Catania bring the aspects talked about there into the present discussion<br />

as part of the information-gathering round.<br />

The competition works are arranged in this <strong>report</strong> according to the thematic<br />

groups, keeping to the same order, these have been hanged up as an exhibition<br />

to be viewed:<br />

Extensions in question – limiting<br />

ROSTOCK Fishermen and tanner‘s quarter<br />

Local mutations – infiltrating<br />

BABENHAUSEN Stadteingang Ost<br />

GYÓR Sziget<br />

STRAUBING Völkl-Gelände<br />

WARSZAWA Czyste<br />

Local mutations – intensifying<br />

SELB Nördliche Innenstadt<br />

Opportunities for public space – walking<br />

BERLIN Südkreuz<br />

DONAUWÖRTH Parkstadt<br />

SPREMBERG Georgenberg<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!