E9_jury's report
E9_jury's report
E9_jury's report
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Gyór<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
Warszawa<br />
Berlin<br />
Babenhausen<br />
Donauwörth<br />
REPORT<br />
of the trinational jury-meeting<br />
Germany // Poland // Hungary<br />
Extensions in question// Limiting<br />
Rostock<br />
Local Mutations// Infi ltrating<br />
Straubing<br />
Local Mutations// Intensifying<br />
Selb<br />
Opportunities for punlic Space // Walking<br />
Spremberg
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
Organiser<br />
coordination of the competition<br />
EUROPAN<br />
Deutsche Gesellschaft zur Förderung von<br />
Architektur, Städte- und Wohnungsbau e.V.<br />
Lützowstraße 102-104<br />
D-10785 Berlin<br />
Tel. 030 262 01 12<br />
Fax 030 261 56 84<br />
E-Mail: mail@europan.de<br />
in co-operation with<br />
EUROPAN Polska<br />
EUROPAN Magyarország<br />
and the cities<br />
Babenhausen<br />
Berlin<br />
Donauwörth<br />
Gyór<br />
Rostock<br />
Selb<br />
Spremberg<br />
Straubing<br />
Warszawa<br />
EUROPAN<br />
Deutsche Gesellschaft zur Förderung von<br />
Architektur, Städte- und Wohnungsbau e.V.<br />
Ulrike Poeverlein<br />
Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Herrmann<br />
Dipl.-Ing. Melanie Humann<br />
Dipl.-Ing. Sven Kröger<br />
Dipl.-Kommunikationswirt Stefan Meyer<br />
Dipl.-Ing. Ulrike Poeverlein
JURY´S REPORT<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
Report of the trinational jury-meeting<br />
1 Forming the jury<br />
2 Opening the meeting of the jury<br />
3 Information round/<strong>report</strong> of the local technical committee<br />
4 Discussion of basic principles<br />
5 First valuation round<br />
6 Return applications<br />
7 Second valuation round<br />
8 Prizes, runners-up, honorable mentions<br />
9 Written assessment of the works<br />
10 Opening the authors’ envelopes<br />
11 The meeting of the jury is closed<br />
Participants Babenhausen<br />
Participants Berlin<br />
Participants Donauwörth<br />
Participants Rostock<br />
Participants Selb<br />
Participants Spremberg<br />
Participants Straubing<br />
Participants Gyór<br />
Participants Warschau<br />
Table of attendances<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
10<br />
11<br />
13<br />
21<br />
21<br />
22<br />
24<br />
26<br />
28<br />
31<br />
33<br />
35<br />
37<br />
39<br />
41
JURY´S REPORT<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
Report<br />
of the meeting of the trinational jury on 11/12 January 2008 in Berlin<br />
The meeting started on Friday 11 January, 2008 at 10.00 am<br />
Mr Kleine, deputy chairperson of EUROPAN Germany greets those present and<br />
apologises for the<br />
chairperson, Ms Sandeck, who very much regrets that she is unable to take<br />
part in the jury meeting due to illness. Mr Kleine explains the significance of<br />
the EUROPAN competition for young architects in the whole of Europe and the<br />
specialness of this year’s trinational jury meeting, in which not only the projects<br />
submitted for the German locations, but also the projects for Warsaw in<br />
Poland and Gyór in Hungary are to be judged. Throughout Europe, EUROPAN 9<br />
saw more than 1,750 projects submitted at 73 different locations; in Germany,<br />
there were 137 proposals for a total of seven locations, in Warsaw 19 and in<br />
Gyór 21 projects.<br />
In September and October 2007, in an initial jury phase, special committees<br />
met at the individual sites and decided on a preliminary selection from among<br />
the projects submitted. Members of the jury were represented in each of the<br />
special committees. Mr Kleine explains, that it is the jury’s task to assess the<br />
43 pre-selected works independent of the location involved. He points out that<br />
the awarding of the prizes and runners-up prizes must be decided based on the<br />
quality of the works, however, he also clearly states that it is EUROPAN<br />
Germany’s wish that prizes and runners-up prizes be awarded at all of the<br />
sites.<br />
Mr Kleine <strong>report</strong>s on the Cities and Juries Forum that took place in Catania/<br />
Sicily at the beginning of December 2007 where the problems faced at each of<br />
the sites was discussed comparatively using the pre-selected projects in thematic<br />
groups together with projects at other European sites. He suggests that<br />
the individual members of the jury who took part in the special committees and<br />
workshops in Catania bring the aspects talked about there into the present discussion<br />
as part of the information-gathering round.<br />
The competition works are arranged in this <strong>report</strong> according to the thematic<br />
groups, keeping to the same order, these have been hanged up as an exhibition<br />
to be viewed:<br />
Extensions in question – limiting<br />
ROSTOCK Fishermen and tanner‘s quarter<br />
Local mutations – infiltrating<br />
BABENHAUSEN Stadteingang Ost<br />
GYÓR Sziget<br />
STRAUBING Völkl-Gelände<br />
WARSZAWA Czyste<br />
Local mutations – intensifying<br />
SELB Nördliche Innenstadt<br />
Opportunities for public space – walking<br />
BERLIN Südkreuz<br />
DONAUWÖRTH Parkstadt<br />
SPREMBERG Georgenberg<br />
4
JURY´S REPORT<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
1 Forming the jury<br />
Mr Kleine confirms that the jury are all present. Mr Claus, Mr Hirsch and<br />
Ms Sandeck had to cancel their participation in the meeting of the jury<br />
and are replaced by Mr Gunther, Ms Heinisch and Mr Kleine. At the proposal<br />
of Mr Kleine, Dr Merk is voted in as the chairperson with no dissentient<br />
votes. As such, the jury is made up of the following persons:<br />
Voting members<br />
Dr. Elisabeth Merk, Munich (chairperson)<br />
Prof. Henri Bava, Paris/Karlsruhe<br />
Wallie Heinisch, Stuttgart<br />
Holger Kleine, Berlin<br />
Dr. Engelbert Lütke Daldrup, Berlin<br />
Jürgen Mayer H., Berlin<br />
Jens Metz, Berlin<br />
Hubert Trammer, Warsaw<br />
Zsolt Gunther, Budapest<br />
Representatives<br />
Prof. Herbert Kallmayer, Munich<br />
Prof. Christian Kern, Munich/Vienna<br />
Gunter Maurer, Munich<br />
Eckhard Rieper, Kempten<br />
Dr. Irene Wiese-von Ofen, Essen<br />
International observers<br />
Yuna Conan, EUROPAN Europe, Paris<br />
Dr. Lütke Daldrup has to leave the meeting at around 7.00 pm and is<br />
represented thereafter by Prof. Kallmayer.<br />
2 Opening the meeting of the jury<br />
Dr. Merk thanks the jury for the trust it has placed in her and takes the<br />
chair. The members of the jury assure those present that they<br />
– have not had any exchange of views with the competition participants<br />
concerning the tasks and the solution to these and that they shall not do<br />
so during the meeting;<br />
– have not received any information about competition works up to the<br />
date of submittal;<br />
– will treat the advisory meetings of the special committee as confidential;<br />
– have kept anonymity;<br />
– will refrain from commenting on presumed authors.<br />
The chairperson points out the personal obligation of the jurors to<br />
assess the works objectively, basing their decisions solely on the public<br />
offer.<br />
3 Information round/<strong>report</strong> of the local technical committee<br />
The chairperson suggests having an information round first, during<br />
which the sites and the pre-selected works will be introduced and the<br />
jury members will <strong>report</strong> on the discussions that took place in the local<br />
special committees and on the Cities and Juries Forum in Catania. In the<br />
order of the thematic groups, the sites and the pre-selected projects will<br />
be introduced using a beamer presentation and discussed in detail.<br />
5
JURY´S REPORT<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
Extensions in question – limiting<br />
ROSTOCK Fischermen and tanners’ quarter<br />
The Hanseatic town of Rostock intends to further stabilise and develop its town<br />
centre as part of its overall urban planning. Here, residential utilisation also<br />
plays a decisive role for new user groups and the stabilisation of or increase in<br />
the number of inhabitants living in the town centre. With the competition, concepts<br />
are to be worked out for the reuse of an extensive piece of land which,<br />
although it is mainly wasteland, is nevertheless a historically important former<br />
commercial and residential area directly at the edge of the old town which<br />
should be developed into an urban, central and ecologically oriented residential<br />
site. Below the old town, a new and smaller town district is to emerge, which<br />
deliberately sets itself apart from the image of the old town. Here, an expedient<br />
concentration of the buildings in favour of generous landscaped areas along<br />
the Unterwarnow and along the town walls is desired.<br />
The special situation of the area at the water should be emphasised and should<br />
be something that can be clearly experienced in the open spaces.<br />
Local mutations – infiltrating<br />
BABENHAUSEN eastern entryway into the town<br />
As the US Army has relinquished the site, the hundred-year old barracks are to<br />
be converted back to civilian life. Because of its former function, the site is isolated<br />
spatially from the rest of the town at the present time, whereby it dominates<br />
the situation at the eastern edge of the town due to the size of its surface<br />
area. Together with the commercial wasteland situated opposite it, the area is<br />
to be integrated into the overall situation as part of a restructuring process and<br />
should thus form the new entryway into the town from the east. A positive revaluation<br />
and address formation should contribute to developing a residential and<br />
commercial site, which evolves its own identity. In addition to its function as an<br />
entryway into the town, in future, the area should reflect the town’s self-image<br />
as a location for sustainable energy technologies and employment and confer<br />
this to the whole town.<br />
GYÓR Sziget<br />
The main theme is taken up at three levels at this site: territorial, urban and<br />
local. The district of Sziget (island) is one of the most sensitive zones in the<br />
town. This district developed its specific character in the course of the 19th<br />
century. Different nationalities and religious minorities were banished from the<br />
town and formed the multi-cultural background against which a provincial<br />
milieu was able to emerge. This was followed in the 20th century by the settlement<br />
of industry, something which is on the retreat at the present time, as production<br />
is being relocated to other areas. Although Sziget has become a district<br />
with its own atmosphere, it is lacking in public places with urban functions and<br />
a lively urban neighbourhood. The site proposed for a building project is located<br />
in an industrial area that is in the middle of a breaking up.<br />
STRAUBING Völkl premises<br />
The manufacturer of sports products, Völkl, is not only an example of the development<br />
of indigenous manual work into an innovative-productive industrial<br />
operation. Völkl is also associated with sport, leisure and ‘youth culture’. On<br />
the site of the former manufacturing plants which have mostly been standing<br />
unoccupied since the relocation of operations to the edge of the town, a piece<br />
of the town’s history is still present, and the revitalisation and restructuring of<br />
this site within a super-ordinate urban construction concept is what is aimed<br />
at. The transformation from an industrial to a services society and the demographic<br />
perspectives of dwindling population figures of an ever older social<br />
community presents challenges for the sustainable development of town centre<br />
areas, especially here in this contact area between commercial and residential<br />
6
JURY´S REPORT<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
utilisations. Taking into consideration the existing building stock that is<br />
worth keeping and by including and/or developing existing green structures,<br />
a multifunctional quarter should emerge, which enables an innovative,<br />
new form of urbanity. Here, the structuring and design of the<br />
public space as well the improvement of the functional and architectural<br />
qualities in the necessary repair of the town is regarded as a substantial<br />
factor for a sustainable, positive development of the town centre’s residential<br />
and working environment.<br />
WARSAW Czyste<br />
The area under consideration includes a zone traditionally used by<br />
industry, the railway and for residential purposes with a low concentration<br />
of warehouses, production plants as well as retail trade, offices and<br />
residential buildings. Green surfaces and a park stretch along the<br />
expanse of Brylowksa Street. The old gasworks comprise several protected<br />
buildings for which a new utilisation can be proposed. A good link<br />
to the public transport system is guaranteed by the local street network<br />
and the immediate vicinity of the railway station. The proximity to<br />
Warsaw’s inner city offers adequate prerequisites for the development of<br />
multi-functional utilisation options and for the creation of public spaces.<br />
The aim is to develop a new residential quarter with a private atmosphere<br />
and the creation of an attractive public space which integrates the<br />
existing park and offers secure pedestrian footpaths to the neighbouring<br />
quarters.<br />
Local mutations – intensifying<br />
SELB northern innercity<br />
In the town of Selb, which is threatened by shrinkage and excessive<br />
aging, a new structure for the northern town centre is to be provided<br />
with residential and leisure qualities that include this aspect in their<br />
design: the guarantee of mobility, barrier-free access as well as a harmonious<br />
programme of cultural facilities are part of the urban construction<br />
requirements. Particular value is placed on a comprehensive concept<br />
for the open spaces, which links individual areas of the town with<br />
one another and provides the town with new qualities for pedestrians. As<br />
such, a coherent traffic concept, which makes economic and ecological<br />
sense is to be developed for the area.<br />
The architectural part of the design comprises both the conversion of<br />
existing apartments in accordance with disabled-friendly standards and<br />
the planning of new cost-effective residential building types which<br />
enable, in an innovative way, barrier-free living to the same extent for<br />
young families as for older people and the disabled. The design of the<br />
residential surroundings and a differentiation of the exterior spaces are<br />
an important component in the design task.<br />
Oppotunities of public space – walking<br />
BERLIN Südkreuz<br />
The Südkreuz area is infrastructurally very well integrated into the<br />
urban and regional context. The inner access to the area, however, is<br />
insufficient, even pedestrian and cycle paths break off at the area’s<br />
boundaries. The existing traffic surfaces (railway, car) only pass through<br />
the area at the present time, the railway station is used by city train passengers<br />
to change trains, but not as a final destination and it is hardly<br />
used at all for intercity rail transport.<br />
In order to do away with this island situation, a super-ordinate development<br />
concept for access to the area is needed, one that includes both<br />
the publicly-owned properties and the numerous private wasteland<br />
7
JURY´S REPORT<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
areas. The ‘Schöneberg Loop’ is being planned in order to link the area up to<br />
the urban context; the ‘loop’, a pedestrian and cycle path, should start from the<br />
‘bottleneck’ at the Yorck bridges and lead via Südkreuz back to Gleisdreieck/<br />
Potsdamer Platz/Tiergarten. The integration of public spaces including already<br />
existing parks and sport facilities should thus join up the mosaic-like structure<br />
of the quarter to a cohesive whole and connect this to the inner city.<br />
DONAUWÖRTH Parkstadt<br />
The town district of Parkstadt came into being from the end of the fifties up to<br />
the seventies as a planned area of the town to expand the settlement capacities<br />
of the town’s core located to the south-west. The area is located on the ridge of<br />
the “Schellenberg” mountain, part of the foothills of the forested peaks of the<br />
Franconian Jura, elevated approx. 100 metres above the actual town centre.<br />
The town quarter, which was designed at the drawing-board, has shortcomings<br />
in practice, above all with respect to public spaces. The open park structure<br />
does not offer a central point of orientation and the street areas are lacking in<br />
qualities that make people want to spend time there. One important project<br />
over the coming years is therefore the redesign and revaluation of the central<br />
area of Parkstadt, which already has important infrastructural facilities, but<br />
nevertheless has been unable to develop a function as a centre. A point of identification<br />
for the town district and an area where people can encounter one<br />
another and spend time should be created which adequately serves the public<br />
functions. The traffic access situation should be improved and the network of<br />
pathways should be adapted. The aim is to adjust the area to the changing<br />
needs and demands of the residents under the aspect of sustainability and to<br />
further develop the public space as a communicative place for encounters.<br />
SPREMBERG Georgenberg<br />
The town of Spremberg has a diverse urban construction and topographic<br />
appearance. The historical, compact town centre is surrounded by two arms of<br />
the River Spree. The watercourses and the existing green belt separate the<br />
parts of the town that emerged later than the town centre. In the course of<br />
urban renewal, the interlacing of the town centre residential areas is afforded<br />
great significance. The Stadtpark am Georgenberg (the town park) situated between<br />
the railway station and the town centre must be developed in a modern<br />
way, in line with its hinge effect. The Stadtpark/Georgenbergpark is a diffuse<br />
place which consists of the park, its monuments, the Bismarck Tower, the<br />
cemetery, the open-air stage, the fairground and the pond with swans. In the<br />
previous urban development, neither the functional nor the spatial linking up of<br />
the individual objects was given any notice. The task at hand is to bring the<br />
area to life and to increase the qualities that encourage people to spend time<br />
there by a better interlinking and revival of the places in it. By guiding the<br />
pedestrian flow between the historical town centre and the railway station, the<br />
Georgenberg is to be revaluated in its significance as an infrastructural access<br />
element and make a contribution to the improved interlinking of the areas.<br />
The extensive information round ended at 1.30 pm.<br />
4 Discussion of basic principles<br />
After the lunch break, the chairperson Dr. Merk suggested that super-ordinate<br />
criteria for judging the competition entries at the different sites be defined in a<br />
discussion of basic principles.<br />
After detailed discussion, the jury decides, in addition to the questions concerning<br />
the specific solution approaches for the task set at each site, to apply the<br />
following criteria for judging the competition works:<br />
8
JURY´S REPORT<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
ROSTOCK<br />
GYÓR<br />
WARSZAWA<br />
BABENHAUSEN<br />
STRAUBING<br />
SELB<br />
– choice of means<br />
– programmatic approach<br />
– strategic approach<br />
– realisation qualities<br />
5 First valuation round<br />
The jury decides to choose the projects that demonstrate approaches<br />
that are continuative with respect to the above-mentioned criteria in a<br />
first round and with a simple majority of the votes. The 43 works will be<br />
discussed with regard to the specific theme set and the relevancy of this<br />
theme when applied to the competition area. Following these discussions,<br />
an application will be made for every work for its continuation in<br />
the further proceedings:<br />
Extensions in question – limiting ja nein<br />
ET 192 STEPSCAPEGREENSCAPEWATERSCAPE 6 3<br />
FM 314 ALLE WOHNEN AM WASSER 8 1<br />
FM 914 sinking cities 3 6<br />
MX 381 Die Schilfstadt – Reed City 4 5<br />
PA 367 Rostock, ZweiBrücken 2 7<br />
UR 300 elevated village 5 4<br />
Local mutations – infiltrating<br />
CC 881 urban magma 9 0<br />
DD 123 1+1=1 1 8<br />
DG 112 DONGIOVANNI 1 8<br />
FU 359 4 in 1 5 4<br />
NN 010 RECONSTRUCTING LANDMARK 2 7<br />
WS 248 wetside 8 1<br />
ZY 457 NOMADIC LANDSCAPE 2 7<br />
AE 826 where winds walk 1 8<br />
AR 002 four rooms 4 5<br />
EE 560 Warszawa Czyste 4 5<br />
MM 321 Warszawa 6 3<br />
XY 139 urban cocktail 8 1<br />
AT 356 vielfeld 2 7<br />
AZ 751 a gardeners theory … 4 5<br />
MW 993 grünkern Babenhausen 9 0<br />
AP 123 readymade 3 6<br />
NK 507 ALLMENDE/AGORA 2 7<br />
SW 777 NOW HERE 3 6<br />
UR 334 „come together!“ 6 3<br />
Local mutations – intensifying<br />
BO 573 PUNKTUNDLINIEZUFLÄCHE 3 6<br />
BY 123 selb_ständig bewegt 4 5<br />
IB 290 Green City 8 1<br />
MA 683 CROSSOVER 1 8<br />
PO 007 LUXUS DER LEERE 5 4<br />
ZK 977 catalog for dwelling on the time 9 0<br />
9
JURY´S REPORT<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
BERLIN<br />
DONAUWÖRTH<br />
SPREMBERG<br />
ROSTOCK<br />
GYÓR<br />
WARSZAWA<br />
BABENHAUSEN<br />
STRAUBING<br />
ROSTOCK<br />
Opportunities for public space – walking<br />
BR 287 Südparcours 2 7<br />
LG 034 Lügengebäude 9 0<br />
MB 001 Menschbahn 3 6<br />
MM 777 “Over the Train“ 5 4<br />
AT 247 AUSSER WAND UND BAND 0 9<br />
DW 628 recharging space 8 1<br />
LF 392 PARKSTADT MITTE 0 9<br />
MC 345 Donauwörth – Zentrum Parkstadt 0 9<br />
AS 691 Park ÜBER Fluß 0 9<br />
CB 107 acupuncture Spremberg 0 9<br />
JS 303 Auf Tuchfühlung 6 3<br />
LB 369 brücke & tür 8 1<br />
In the first round, which ends at approx. 9.00 pm, 24 works have been rejected<br />
and 19 submitted to the further proceedings.<br />
The chairperson suggests ending the meeting with this outcome and continuing<br />
it on the next day at 9:00 am. She asks all of the jury members to check their<br />
selection up to now and, if necessary, to submit applications for works to be<br />
returned to the competition proceedings.<br />
Second meeting day, Saturday 12 January, 2008<br />
Start of meeting: 9.00 am<br />
6 Return applications<br />
At the beginning of the meeting, return applications are filed for 7 competition<br />
entries and are voted on as follows:<br />
FM 914 sinking cities 5 4<br />
DG 112 DONGIOVANNI 5 4<br />
AR 002 four rooms 5 4<br />
AT 356 vielfeld 2 7<br />
AZ 751 a gardener‘s theory … 4 5<br />
AP 123 readymade 9 0<br />
NK 507 ALLMENDE/AGORA 5 4<br />
2 return applications are rejected, 5 projects are resubmitted to the further<br />
procedure.<br />
7 Second valuation round<br />
In a second valuation round, the 24 works still taking part in the procedure are<br />
once again discussed in detail. Following that, an application for continuation in<br />
the competition is filed for every work:<br />
ET 192 STEPSCAPEGREENSCAPEWATERSCAPE 8 1<br />
FM 314 ALLE WOHNEN AM WASSER 2 7<br />
10
JURY´S REPORT<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
GYÓR<br />
WARSZAWA<br />
BABENHAUSEN<br />
STRAUBING<br />
SELB<br />
BERLIN<br />
DONAUWÖRTH<br />
SPREMBERG<br />
ROSTOCK<br />
GYÓR<br />
WARSZAWA<br />
BABENHAUSEN<br />
STRAUBING<br />
FM 914 sinking cities 8 1<br />
UR 300 elevated village 2 7<br />
CC 881 urban magma 8 1<br />
DG 112 DONGIOVANNI 1 8<br />
FU 359 4 in 1 3 6<br />
WS 248 wetside 9 0<br />
AR 002 four rooms 2 7<br />
EE 560 Warszawa Czyste 3 6<br />
MM 321 Warszawa 7 2<br />
XY 139 urban cocktail 8 1<br />
MW 993 grünkern Babenhausen 9 0<br />
AP 123 readymade 9 0<br />
NK 507 ALLMENDE/AGORA 4 5<br />
UR 334 „come together !“ 6 3<br />
IB 290 Green City 5 4<br />
PO 007 LUXUS DER LEERE 5 4<br />
ZK 977 catalog for dwelling on the time 9 0<br />
LG 034 Lügengebäude 9 0<br />
MM 777 “Over the Train“ 8 1<br />
DW 628 recharging space 7 2<br />
JS 303 Auf Tuchfühlung 5 4<br />
LB 369 brücke & tür 9 0<br />
The outcome is that 17 projects remain in the further procedure.<br />
8 Prizes, runners-up, honourable mentions<br />
The chairperson proposes that the works be discussed in a further<br />
round and, upon application by the panel, the jurors first of all vote on<br />
the prizes and, following that, on the runners-up prizes.<br />
The votes for awarding prizes are as follows:<br />
ET 192 STEPSCAPEGREENSCAPEWATERSCAPE 5 4<br />
FM 914 sinking cities 4 5<br />
CC 881 urban magma 6 3<br />
WS 248 wetside 4 5<br />
MM 321 Warszawa 1 8<br />
XY 139 urban cocktail 7 2<br />
MW 993 grünkern Babenhausen 8 1<br />
AP 123 readymade 7 2<br />
UR 334 „come together !“ 2 7<br />
11
JURY´S REPORT<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
SELB<br />
BERLIN<br />
DONAUWÖRTH<br />
SPREMBERG<br />
ROSTOCK<br />
GYÓR<br />
WARSZAWA<br />
STRAUBING<br />
SELB<br />
SELB<br />
BERLIN<br />
SPREMBERG<br />
ROSTOCK<br />
ROSTOCK<br />
DONAUWÖRTH<br />
BERLIN<br />
SELB<br />
ROSTOCK<br />
IB 290 Green City 0 9<br />
PO 007 LUXUS DER LEERE 0 9<br />
ZK 977 catalog for dwelling on the time 8 1<br />
LG 034 Lügengebäude 8 1<br />
MM 777 “Over the Train“ 1 8<br />
DW 628 recharging space 7 2<br />
JS 303 Auf Tuchfühlung 0 9<br />
LB 369 brücke & tür 9 0<br />
As such, nine works are awarded a prize.<br />
After this, each of the remaining works is considered with respect to rewarding<br />
them with runners-up prizes, the vote is as follows:<br />
FM 914 sinking cities 9 0<br />
WS 248 wetside 9 0<br />
MM 321 Warszawa 6 3<br />
UR 334 „come together !“ 6 3<br />
IB 290 Green City 4 5<br />
PO 007 LUXUS DER LEERE 6 3<br />
MM 777 “Over the Train“ 8 1<br />
JS 303 Auf Tuchfühlung 7 2<br />
As such, 7 works are awarded runners-up prizes.<br />
Ms Poeverlein explains that, for the German sites, a total of seven prizes and<br />
seven runners-up prizes have been awarded and Europan Germany is aiming to<br />
distribute the total amount of prize money awarded, on the basis of the principles<br />
and guidelines for competitions (GRW). The chairperson asks the members<br />
of the jury to once again check the decisions they have reached up to now<br />
and, if necessary, to file applications for the awarding of further prizes or runners-up<br />
prizes. She points out that the possibility also exists of awarding an<br />
honourable mention, for example, for outstanding partial solutions.<br />
After an individual round, the following return applications are filed and voted<br />
upon by the panel of jurors as follows:<br />
FM 314 ALLE WOHNEN AM WASSER 2 7<br />
UR 300 elevated village 6 3<br />
LF 392 PARKSTADT MITTE 3 6<br />
As a result, the work ‘UR 300 elevated village’ is once again entered into the<br />
competition proceedings.<br />
After that, the applications for the awarding of further prizes and/or runnersup<br />
prizes were filed, and were voted on as follows:<br />
PRIZE<br />
MM 777 “Over the Train“ 5 4<br />
RUNNERS-UP<br />
IB 290 Green City 3 6<br />
UR 300 elevated village 5 4<br />
12
JURY´S REPORT<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
ROSTOCK<br />
GYÓR<br />
WARSZAWA<br />
WARSZAWA<br />
BABENHAUSEN<br />
STRAUBING<br />
SELB<br />
ROSTOCK<br />
GYÓR<br />
WARSZAWA<br />
BABENHAUSEN<br />
STRAUBING<br />
SELB<br />
BERLIN<br />
BERLIN<br />
DONAUWÖRTH<br />
SPREMBERG<br />
ROSTOCK<br />
ROSTOCK<br />
GYÓR<br />
WARSZAWA<br />
STRAUBING<br />
SELB<br />
SPREMBERG<br />
GYÓR<br />
WARSZAWA<br />
WARSZAWA<br />
BABENHAUSEN<br />
ROSTOCK<br />
Finally, the following works were nominated for honourable mention.<br />
The votes on the applications were as follows.<br />
FM 314 ALLE WOHNEN AM WASSER 4 5<br />
DG 112 DONGIOVANNI 7 2<br />
AR 002 four rooms 6 3<br />
EE 560 Warszawa Czyste 5 4<br />
AZ 751 a gardeners theory … 7 2<br />
NK 507 ALLMENDE/AGORA 4 5<br />
IB 290 Green City 4 5<br />
As such, the prizes, runners-up prizes and honourable mentions are as<br />
outlined below:<br />
PRIZE GROUP<br />
ET 192 STEPSCAPEGREENSCAPEWATERSCAPE<br />
CC 881 urban magma<br />
XY 139 urban cocktail<br />
MW 993 grünkern Babenhausen<br />
AP 123 readymade<br />
ZK 977 catalog for dwelling on the time<br />
LG 034 Lügengebäude<br />
MM777 “Over the Train“<br />
DW 628 recharging space<br />
LB 369 brücke & tür<br />
RUNNERS-UP GROUP<br />
FM 914 sinking cities<br />
UR 300 elevated village<br />
WS 248 wetside<br />
MM 321 Warszawa<br />
UR 334 „come together !“<br />
PO 007 LUXUS DER LEERE<br />
JS 303 Auf Tuchfühlung<br />
HONOURALBLE MENTIONS<br />
DG 112 DONGIOVANNI<br />
AR 002 four rooms<br />
EE 560 Warszawa Czyste<br />
AZ 751 a gardeners theory …<br />
9 Written assessment of the works<br />
The jury decides to issue a written appraisal of the works awarded with<br />
prizes, runners-up prizes and honourable mentions. The individual<br />
jurors each take on works, for the purposes of formulating the written<br />
appraisal as a résumé of the joint discussions in the jury. The written<br />
appraisals are then read out, discussed and recorded in the protocol in<br />
the following version as a summary of the jury’s opinion:<br />
ET 192 STEPSCAPEGREENSCAPEWATERSCAPE<br />
This design shows a clear structuring of the area into a green zone<br />
which encourages the opening up of the town wall, and a constructed<br />
progressive line structure with its point of focus at the water, while also<br />
making the accessibility of the town to the water its main theme. In a<br />
further, necessary review, this diagrammatic basic structure can easily<br />
13
JURY´S REPORT<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
ROSTOCK<br />
ROSTOCK<br />
be made dynamic without losing its individuality, but rather reinforcing it as an<br />
independent urban proposal. A greater differentiation of the residential bars<br />
with respect to how the lengths and heights are designed, the alignment, parallelism<br />
and different forms for the open areas is desired in order to interweave<br />
the stubborn principle more intensely with an even more attractive and<br />
more accessible design of the waterside and to understand it as an offering to<br />
the whole town.<br />
Adding on to single-storey buildings to give them an accentuated four-storey<br />
form which is opposed to the down-sloping terrain initially seems unusual, but,<br />
in the context of the open spaces and the differentiated housing, residential<br />
and design proposals, conveys a very plausible approach.<br />
The idea, characterised by urban construction aspects and with its courtyard<br />
house, linked rows of houses and the apartment building which brings in new<br />
aspects, offers sufficient and manifold proposals and the prerequisite for a<br />
required mix.<br />
FM 914 sinking cities<br />
Particularly in face of the worldwide discussion about an increasing sea level,<br />
“Sinking Cities” constitutes the active formulation of a building site which<br />
changes with the weather and sees this fact as potential. The design here<br />
questions the supposed safety of a real estate property on secure ground and is<br />
replaced in favour of a changing environment with a new relationship to water,<br />
theoretically as a residential adventure. The residential units, however, do not<br />
exploit the potential of their relation to the open space. This could be designed<br />
more forcefully and more provocatively. The proposals for the design of the<br />
open spaces, which react to the changing water levels and could provide a unique<br />
public realm still have to be developed.<br />
UR 300 elevated village<br />
With the creation of residential groups, in order to create inner courtyards, a<br />
clear structure in the urban construction of the eastern surface areas is generated.<br />
Only the Gerberbruch axis leads into the area from the old town. The<br />
area directly in front of the town wall is clearly inferior to the eastern area in<br />
its urban construction because it does not convey clearly defined statements.<br />
A green area between these new buildings to the west and the town wall means<br />
that the distance to the historical old town is respected and the visual axis to<br />
the Petrikirche (church) is maintained and extended. In the area on the banks<br />
of the Warnow, an attractive and generous green belt will be created with a<br />
clear orientation towards the water, a public path and incorporated public<br />
amenities.<br />
What is noticeable is the penetration of the area in its middle axis by a water<br />
canal that flanks the footpaths and forms a central area. All in all, an area,<br />
which has qualities that invite people to linger there is created by the naturefriendly<br />
concept in the partial area along the banks of the Warnow. The same<br />
treatment of the towards the connecting street is regarded with criticism.<br />
Also regarded with some criticism is the design of the public and semi-public<br />
spaces which cannot be concealed, not even by the atmospheric perspectives.<br />
The reduction of the street that goes along the canal in the middle of the quarter<br />
to its function as an access point and measures to calm the traffic overlook<br />
the opportunity for an urban proposal for the open spaces complementary to<br />
the generous natural open area on the banks of the Warnow.<br />
The fragmented building structure of contemporary architecture plays with the<br />
texture and style of the old town. The 2 to 4-storey residential groups play an<br />
exemplarily subordinate role in relation to the old town. Through a differentiated<br />
development of the buildings, extremely diverse structures emerge which<br />
allow very different residential forms (apartments, maisonettes).<br />
14
JURY´S REPORT<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
GYÓR<br />
GYÓR<br />
GYÓR<br />
WARSZAWA<br />
CC 881 urban magma<br />
The design defines the small alleyways in the town quarter and, ultimately,<br />
redefines the overall structure of Sziget. By maintaining the industrial<br />
building fabric and by adding to this with a flexible, carpet-like residential<br />
structure, an interesting interaction is created between the large<br />
and the small. This leap in scale is bridged by means of residential<br />
towers which are connected to the public functions.<br />
The deserted factory buildings are to be reutilised to serve public functions<br />
(sport, multifunctional spaces, local supplies, restaurants) and will<br />
be arrayed along a curving line to follow the building fabric. These<br />
closed spaces will be interrupted by paths that permeate the entire area,<br />
giving the exterior spaces a strong identity. The exterior spaces, which<br />
are seemingly haphazard, and yet clearly positioned due to the existing<br />
buildings and the predefined roads and pathways, lend the quarter an<br />
additional quality that is true to scale.<br />
WS 248 wetside<br />
The concept assumes that the industrial building fabric is to be almost<br />
completely demolished, as it was not erected until the 20th century. In<br />
its place, it is proposed that a nature area be reintroduced/reinstituted<br />
on the former floodplain as water lily-like forms. The area will be filled<br />
with these circular forms and, by leaving out several buildings, the<br />
emerging intermediate spaces will be defined as public areas. The project<br />
introduces a new, unusual character to the area, which is totally<br />
foreign to the existing, adjacent structure. The dynamics of the units<br />
nevertheless reflect the rhythm of the Sziget district. These forms stand<br />
out due to their functional flexibility. Alternating cross-sections and different<br />
arrangements of the volumes within the structures enable identifiable,<br />
versatile spaces.<br />
Due to the unusual form, the public rooms will be defined in a novel way.<br />
They deliberately forgo the conventional central character and, instead,<br />
create flowing spaces. The oblique surfaces that resemble segments of<br />
a circle underline the fact that a certain group of users (students,<br />
researchers and professors) are being addressed.<br />
DG 112 DONGIOVANNI<br />
The authors have decided to accentuate the diffuse suburban former<br />
commercial area with the strong figure of a largely visible gatehouse.<br />
This building has been designed with a keen eye on the townscape, but<br />
at the same time, interrupts its relationship to its environment. It opens<br />
up a wide view across the town and, in turn, also simultaneously draws<br />
the attention of people crossing the bridge towards the building.<br />
The concentration on the large form with underground garages and<br />
shops, sport facilities and restaurants, as well as the elevated plateau<br />
for access purposes mean a great deal of work for building and maintenance,<br />
but allow respective green areas and open spaces to recreate<br />
themselves in diverse ways.<br />
The jury appreciated the large gesture that the design provides with an<br />
honourable mention because it provides an opportunity for discussion<br />
about an urban construction feature by another dimension in the town<br />
Gyór, however, they found the details of the project inadequate.<br />
XY 139 urban cocktail<br />
This project picks up on the scale and morphology of the surroundings in<br />
a playful and intelligent manner and develops a mixed utilisation quarter<br />
with its own identity and a high residential quality. It emphasises local<br />
features and creates diverse intermediate spaces which have an inviting<br />
and open atmosphere.<br />
15
JURY´S REPORT<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
WARSZAWA<br />
WARSZAWA<br />
A closer look at the design makes clear that the arrangements are not of an<br />
arbitrary nature, but, with their “patchwork strategy”, they very precisely<br />
reflect the contextual disarray of the surroundings and lend power to their qualities<br />
without falsely harmonising or “straightening” them. The fragmentary<br />
nature and polymorphism enable a phase-by-phase realisation. What has been<br />
discussed with some controversy, is whether the design is rather meant as a<br />
strategic contribution that advocates “fewer rules achieve more” and an open<br />
development from “case to case”, or whether it deals with morphological<br />
arrangements which are prescribed and not open for negotiation. The fact that<br />
precisely this debate is kicked off at this site with these means is seen as a<br />
quality however and, what is more, it is also indisputable that this project represents<br />
in both interpretations a courageous, unconventional approach that is<br />
dealt with virtuously and precisely.<br />
MM 321 Warsaw<br />
The author of this design is obviously fascinated by the poetic qualities of this<br />
“terrain vague” and therefore does not propose a complete re-planning of the<br />
competition area, but four groups of buildings in the forms of rows which act<br />
like fragments flushed from the cut caused by the railway to the edge of the<br />
city. Not only a hard border between city and wasteland, but a transition zone,<br />
an area of porousness is intended. The author attempts to anchor the rows of<br />
buildings more tightly to the site by placing them parallel to the existing building<br />
lines. The four groups are joined up by glass bridges designed as large<br />
public conservatories with Mediterranean plants, or by rows of tower blocks<br />
that should create both space and identity. A mixed utilisation is planned for<br />
the building which includes, in addition to offices and shops, child day-care<br />
centres and common areas, although residential utilisation should dominate.<br />
The position of the sun, lighting and shadow as well as the appropriate plants<br />
are investigated in detail. The lack of private open spaces is seen with some<br />
criticism, while the concentration of parking spaces in two strips and the exclusive<br />
access of the Pradzynskiego are seen as positive because, in this way, the<br />
intermediate spaces can be kept as homogeneous areas with vegetation. The<br />
ring railway tracks will be laid underground thus removing a barrier within the<br />
“terrain vague”.<br />
All in all, the jury is won over by the sensitive creation of space, which balances<br />
the openness and indefiniteness on the one hand, as well as order and proportionateness,<br />
in an uninhibited way; moreover, the design enables a phase-byphase<br />
realisation and programmatic adjustment in the face of changing conditions.<br />
AR 002 four rooms<br />
The project regards the town as an archipelago – every island is distinguished<br />
by its own composition and its own character. The town district of Czyste is<br />
dealt with as one of these islands. The already existing diversity of forms and<br />
functions is seen as motivation to introduce a new organising principle into the<br />
area.<br />
Four long elevated building bars structure the space diagonally to the existing<br />
street. This solution connects the neighbouring building and open space structures<br />
in a way that is respectful.<br />
This strategy can have both model character for growth in the city within<br />
clearly defined boundaries and can represent an expedient upgrading of<br />
modern terraced housing estates (of which there are many in Poland and Warsaw).<br />
However, the new construction of elevated housing rows, which copy this type<br />
of housing from the sixties without criticism, is discussed very controversially<br />
by the jury.<br />
16
JURY´S REPORT<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
WARSZAWA<br />
BABENHAUSEN<br />
By comparison, the treatment of open space within the archipelago is<br />
seen overall as positive, especially the proportionateness and quality of<br />
the park in front of the gasometer.<br />
The diversity of the architectural typologies and functions of the “infills“,<br />
which tend to have an interchangeable character between the<br />
rows of houses which are seen as permanent organisational structures,<br />
fall back on the genius loci of Czyste.<br />
EE 560 Warsaw, Czyste<br />
The gasworks area is to be made more compact by building new structures<br />
which reinforce the existing structures with their orthogonal grid<br />
pattern and the dimension of the individual elements. In-between solitary<br />
buildings, a quiet, flowing space emerges with a regular rhythm.<br />
The proposal for the project area stands in complete contrast to this: a<br />
monumental, folded structure is proposed which resembles the public<br />
park in its size and basic form. In conjunction with the park area, it<br />
forms an angle which surrounds the gasworks.<br />
The structure consists of two-storey bridges made of steel and glass<br />
which cross one another and form a continuous roof structure which is<br />
accessible on foot. These draw reference from the industrial past in their<br />
materiality. For pedestrians, a huge viewing platform opens up, which<br />
enables new views of Warsaw and its skyline, as well as into the intermediate<br />
spaces of the artificial hill. Views into the distance contrast with<br />
close-ups.<br />
The ground floor is dedicated to office utilisations, the “branches” of the<br />
structure are filled with apartments whose conventional floor plans do<br />
not adequately continue the urbanistic daringness.<br />
As to what extent the structure is suitable for providing qualitative,<br />
generation-specific and person-specific living is discussed with some<br />
controversy in the jury. The lack of cultural and public facilities is criticised,<br />
both inside the building and on the roof garden. Despite this, the<br />
project shows a new way of articulating spaces for Warsaw and opens up<br />
a new debate about the question of artificiality and nature in the city.<br />
MW 993 Babenhausen’s green core<br />
The author develops three quarters from out of the large-scale existing<br />
situation, each of which have the potential of creating their own identity.<br />
The size of the quarter is oriented towards the dimensions of<br />
Babenhausen’s town districts and thus defuses any competition between<br />
the new town district and the town centre.<br />
Due to the clear and well-structured formation of boundaries, a new<br />
“green centre” comes into being between the different parts of the quarter,<br />
which cleverly generates sustainable links to the town centre, in the<br />
open space and to the nearby artificial lake.<br />
Formalities are proposed to secure the quality of these boundaries and<br />
are typologically identified.<br />
As a framework for the successive further development and as a sign of<br />
new qualities for the former barracks site, the construction of attractive<br />
residential buildings at these boundaries allows for a rhythmical pace<br />
for the development measures in the core of the partial areaa and therefore<br />
also demonstrates robustness with respect to possibly changing<br />
utilisations and needs.<br />
The concept structures the existing buildings and manages without a<br />
radical tabula rasa. The quality of the “green core” can be emphasised<br />
more by the author, whereby the “Monte Scherbelino” is a charming<br />
detail from the deconstruction of disposable buildings.<br />
17
JURY´S REPORT<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
BABENHAUSEN<br />
STRAUBING<br />
STRAUBING<br />
Unfortunately, the opportunity of using water as a landscape element in Babenhausen<br />
is far too tentative and has been considered without the decided inclusion<br />
of the nearby lake.<br />
The three new quarters have been dedicated to the functions of living in the<br />
east, commerce in the south-west and mixed utilisation with services in the<br />
barracks area which is listed under the protection of historical buildings. Here,<br />
it is of interest that the respective boundaries towards the central green area<br />
are formed from different living concepts which are also adapted to the area’s<br />
character (workshops, town villas, terraced houses). One aspect which is seen<br />
in a positive light is the possibility of also placing convenience stores in the<br />
“innovation field” and to connect them to the bypass. As such, this also offers<br />
the opportunity of providing the new area with local supply outlets.<br />
AZ 751 a gardener‘s theory …<br />
This design guides the water from the northerly located Hassel lake (artificial)<br />
as a consistent image-generating element into the design area and, with a<br />
canal that is cut off by a marina at the southern end, creates a unique quality.<br />
The possibility of experiencing the water is brought to life by a footbridge system<br />
which provides access to a “water city”, and this is emphasised by the deliberate<br />
accentuation of the end points of a canal that runs in a north-south<br />
direction.<br />
The proposed connection to the town centre by way of the green strip in an<br />
east-west direction which is surrounded by detached and terraced houses was<br />
treated by the jury with some criticism.<br />
The historical barracks area is provided with an amorphous series of buildings<br />
which are suggestive of an “old town” and are too concentrated for Babenhausen,<br />
coming from the B26 and going northwards - this was criticised by the<br />
jury: the utilisation of the buildings here remains just as unclear as the functionality<br />
of the proposed structure.<br />
The quality of the design lies in the emphasis and development of the water<br />
theme which gives the new quarter its own profile.<br />
AP 123 readymade<br />
This work picks up very coherently on the existing buildings of the former ski<br />
factory for its guiding concept and sees it as an already nearly completely finished<br />
structure (“readymade”). The proposed architectural and artistic elements<br />
in this area strongly upgrade the site optically and functionally, whereby<br />
attention is paid to making sure that the substance also continues to appear<br />
“original” in the future.<br />
Elaborate conversions are done without. The surrounding galleries are<br />
assessed as an interesting approach here, however, on the ground, they seem<br />
pretentious. They cannot really be regarded as a realistic measure there. The<br />
new utilisation of the large halls enables a variety of proposals which do justice<br />
to the overall idea (for example, sport, youth hotel, offices, workshops, band<br />
building, maisonette apartments).<br />
The residential buildings in the northern part in two long rows create a definite<br />
focus as a strict, block-type building element, but must be questioned in view<br />
of the given urban construction context.The orientation of the northern housing<br />
row is not advantageous with respect to lighting and the use of open spaces.<br />
The central green space acts as a ribbon-like link between the areas used for<br />
buildings. The arrangement of fixed sport areas in the biotope is problematic in<br />
the form it has been presented in.<br />
UR 334 “come together!”<br />
This work is characterised from an urban construction point of view by its division<br />
into a cultural-commercial area on the Völkl premises and a residential<br />
quarter in the north. The “come together” exists in the form of a continuous<br />
18
JURY´S REPORT<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
SELB<br />
SELB<br />
BERLIN<br />
pedestrian pathway with a central green zone in the middle. By adding to<br />
the existing Völkl buildings, the authors have succeeded in creating a<br />
convincing closure of the central green zone towards the south.<br />
The two access ways in the east and west open up the area invitingly due<br />
to their funnel-shaped design.<br />
The planned reutilisation of the parking space on the ground floor is,<br />
however, unconvincing. The uniformly remodelled façades of the Völkl<br />
buildings require an overall concept that does not really correspond with<br />
a diverse, fragmented utilisation. The residential quarter in the north<br />
has sensibly aligned and organised buildings with floor plans that can be<br />
used well and coherent access which also takes the existing topography<br />
into consideration.<br />
The authors allow for the existing orchard and network the footpaths<br />
coherently along the former railway tracks.<br />
This work enables a step-by-step introduction to the realisation and<br />
gives the area a new image.<br />
ZK 977 catalog for dwelling on the time<br />
This work stands out through two strategically interesting approaches.<br />
In the area under consideration, the existing stock is to be activated by<br />
“hot spots” with the aim of encouraging and intensifying different kinds<br />
of social activity. In the project area, the work devises different, segmented<br />
elements that complement the existing stock, while also forming a<br />
new spatially attractive quarter by being combined independently. Here,<br />
the playful treatment of the elements is a strategy that not only promises<br />
flexibility, but also represents an interesting artistic approach. Even<br />
if one can accuse the design of having a certain arbitrariness, the urban<br />
planning and conceptual charm of the work outweighs this.<br />
PO 007 THE LUXURY OF EMPTINESS<br />
This work is a good contribution towards the future reorganisation of the<br />
northern town centre of Selb and creates new residential and leisure<br />
space qualities. This applies to both the area under consideration, which<br />
is to be transformed into an attractive town park that is a sustainable<br />
element for the revaluation of living in the town centre and, at the same<br />
time, provides an impulse for social activities.<br />
The proposal for the project area qualitatively and appropriately provides<br />
answers to the demographic development in Selb and takes into consideration<br />
the increased demand for living in the old town which is suitable<br />
for senior citizens.<br />
LG 034 Tissue of lies<br />
The approach this project takes of picking out the loop as a theme by<br />
upgrading the existing and developing the new symbolic places along the<br />
path is convincing and is met with acceptance. These intensifications in<br />
the form of acupunctures activate the surrounding area and have the<br />
potential to actively influence these.<br />
The intellectual approach of releasing oneself from the plan and proposing<br />
a literary stroll along the Schöneberg Loop in the form of a book<br />
first of all seems strange, however, in the course of reading becomes<br />
increasingly enjoyable and turns out to be a brilliant strategy. The to<br />
some extent self-ironic treatment demonstrates an intense analysis and<br />
leads to an intelligent concept which delivers precise proposals for<br />
selected special places along the promenade. The proposed programmatic<br />
and architectural interventions demonstrate high quality standards<br />
which should be developed further and gone into in more detail.<br />
The “extro“ of the book supplies a possible strategy for implementing<br />
19
JURY´S REPORT<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
BERLIN<br />
DONAUWÖRTH<br />
SPREMBERG<br />
the loop: “First of all the event, then the way there. Events must be the initial<br />
impulse. The path then follows faster as an urgent desire”.<br />
MM 777 “Over the Train“<br />
This project stands out due to its radicalness. The existing complex situation is<br />
contrasted with a simple and convincing spatial intervention, a straight line<br />
links the Gleisdreieck station to the Südbahnhof railway station in the form of a<br />
bridge construction over the railway tracks.<br />
It thus includes a previously inaccessible space and opens up a new view of the<br />
city and the existing division is set in scene and artistically exaggerated. Due to<br />
the up and downswing of the bridge, different spatial situations emerge over<br />
the city and under the trees, something that offers potential as a daytrip destination<br />
for tourists. The aim expressed in the idea is unfortunately not fulfilled<br />
by the proposed bridge design.<br />
The jury criticised the schematic presentation, the starting and finishing points<br />
seem arbitrary, the connection to the existing bridges has to be reworked and<br />
the construction has to be made more precise.<br />
Altogether a fascinating idea that draws attention to the hidden potential of the<br />
railway ditches and wasteland and opens up perspectives which are absolutely<br />
worth following up on.<br />
DW 628 recharging space<br />
The main theme of the work is the integration of a central ‘spine’ which, as a<br />
north-south oriented pathway system that links up open spaces, connects the<br />
various residential areas of Parkstadt with one another and convincingly interlinks<br />
the public utilisations and places. The integration of the topography in<br />
this strategy leads to interesting open space situations. The problematic intermediate<br />
space between the existing residential towers is activated using<br />
various utilisation proposals, the ground floors are opened up towards this area<br />
and are given a community utilisation The concept of “recharging space” offers<br />
an informal and flexible guiding idea for the activation of the public space in<br />
Parkstadt, Donauwörth.<br />
LB 369 bridge & door<br />
The clearly structured conceptual approach, which is developed logically from a<br />
precise analysis, a clear description of the problem in the form of assumptions,<br />
an urban construction concept, right up to selective architectural/open space<br />
planning interventions, was judged positively.<br />
The analysis does not limit itself to existing urban construction-spatial defects,<br />
but also brings in cultural aspects. In the following, a story is told in which a<br />
dialog is created between a constructed environment and its users.<br />
The urban construction concept is convincing, despite seeming arbitrary in<br />
some places, and parts of the fairground meadow, such as the children’s farm<br />
in particular, are viewed with some criticism.<br />
The four selected elements along Bahnhofstrasse fulfil their task as transition<br />
points and link up the town park. The spatial break that cuts through Bahnhofstrasse<br />
is cleverly overcome and, using infrastructural and plastic design interventions,<br />
new pathways are created and new open spaces made accessible. The<br />
railway station area is structured functionally, Bahnhofstrasse finds its logical<br />
end point, the old railway station building is relieved from its function through a<br />
connecting, roofed over extension and is open for new social, cultural and private<br />
commercial utilisations. Using an elegant pedestrian bridge, the way<br />
which Bahnhofstrasse cuts through the high plateau is overcome, and the existing<br />
green strips above the town are connected to one another. The elements<br />
proposed for the town park, such as the vineyard and passageway, are based on<br />
actual historical elements, the proposed visual relationships (once again) open<br />
up new views of Spremberg’s townscape. The proposed cone in the Georgen-<br />
20
JURY´S REPORT<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
SPREMBERG<br />
strasse area is discussed with some controversy and is found to be overexaggerated.<br />
The jury assessed the overall concept, which accentuates the general<br />
context using clear interventions, as convincing.<br />
JS 303 Moving closer (Auf Tuchfühlung)<br />
This work proposes creating a new network of roads and pathways with<br />
the aim of closely interlinking the railway station square with the historical<br />
old town. This network of roads and pathways is not limited to the<br />
area under consideration, but attempts to bring into being a wider context,<br />
for example, in the form of a proposed bridge which crosses over<br />
the lower-lying Bahnhofstrasse as part of the network of paths, thereby<br />
linking the Stadtpark to the Georgenberg park. The threadlike structures<br />
of the roads and pathways give the planning area a distinguished form,<br />
even if the theme of cloth-making applied to finding a form for all of the<br />
elements is a little overdone. The design of the square in front of the<br />
railway station seems schematic, the proposed buildings constructed in<br />
rows at the rear area of the former cloth factory is not convincing.<br />
The decision to fit terraced seating into the existing topography of the<br />
hillside situation in front of the open air-stage is seen as a possible<br />
solution which, by enabling a new design of the fairground, could work<br />
to give more emphasis to the green belt of the Spreeaue meadow landscape.<br />
10 Opening the authors’ envelopes<br />
The authors’ envelopes are opened and the names of the authors are<br />
read out (see the list of prize winners and participants on pages 23 ff.)<br />
11 The meeting of the jury is closed<br />
Dr. Merk thanks the participants for their professional and dedicated<br />
cooperation and hands over the chair to Mr. Kleine as the representative<br />
of the competition organisers.<br />
On behalf of the competition organisers, Mr. Kleine thanks all of those<br />
who took part in the competition, in particular Dr. Merk, for her competent<br />
chairing of the meeting and he congratulates all of the winners on<br />
their success.<br />
Berlin, 18 January 2008<br />
Responsible for the <strong>report</strong>: Ulrike Poeverlein<br />
21
JURY´S REPORT<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
PRIZE<br />
HONOURABLE MENTION<br />
PRESELECTION<br />
ROUND<br />
MW 993 grünkern<br />
Thorsten Erl, Architekt (D), Andreas Bartels, Architekt (D),<br />
Stefan Werrer, Architekt (D)<br />
AZ751 a gardener‘s theory…<br />
Fieke Verschueren, Architektin (NL), Peter Frost-Møller, Stadtplaner (DK),<br />
Martijn Rauwers, Landschaftsarchitekt (NL)<br />
AT 356 vielfeld<br />
Katrin Rappenecker, Architektin (D), Petra Lenschow, Architektin (D),<br />
AB 117 connecting sustainability – cultivated urban landscape<br />
Oliver Hauck, Architekt (D), Andreas Noback, Architekt (D),<br />
Alexandra Förster, Architektin (D)<br />
BR 648 THE GREEN ATTACK<br />
Gunther Slagmeulder, Bauingenieur-Architekt (B),<br />
Sophie Troch, Bauingenieurin-Architektin (B)<br />
CD 382 Green Innovation<br />
Carolin Röhrig, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Diane Schöne, Judith Barthel<br />
DN 496 Global Estate<br />
Andrea Petrecca, Architektin (I)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Marco Ferrari, Giovanni Piovene Porto Godi<br />
DO 178 one two three<br />
Matthias Schneider, Architekt (D), Antonella Sgobba, Architektin (I),<br />
Michael Schott, Architekt (D)<br />
JL 947 baseline<br />
Maren Harnack, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (D)<br />
LN 607 „BABENHAUSEN V E R N E T Z T“<br />
Ulla Schuck, Architektin (D), Nicole Hahn, Künstlerin (D),<br />
Lili Reckermann, Künstlerin (D)<br />
MB 215 KASERNENAREAL<br />
Julia Goldschmidt, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (D), Claudia Becker, Architektin/<br />
Stadtplanerin (D), Jef Angelo De Bièvre, Landschaftsarchitekt (B), Manu<br />
Gryson, Bauingenieur-Architekt (B), Francis De Wolf, Architekt/Stadtplaner (B)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Matthias Van Rossen, Stijn Heremans<br />
TO 101 critical reconstruktion<br />
Arjan Harbers, Architekt/Stadtplaner (NL)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Kristin Jensen<br />
TS 108 shifting balance‘<br />
Tina Ritter, Architektin (D), Volker Ritter, Architekt (D), Fenja Kopf, Architektin<br />
(D), Bettina Balcaen, Architektin (D)<br />
22
PARTICIPANTS BABENHAUSEN<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
ROUND<br />
UC 158 urban carpet<br />
Carla Heil, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (D),<br />
Katrin Amtmann, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (D)<br />
UR 215 R.ON. Recipe for one City of Babenhausen<br />
Andres Krause, Architekt (D), Jeremias Lorch, Architekt (D),<br />
Heiko Hoppe, Architekt (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Stephan Jack, Tim Alfers, Raphael Fischer, Ramona Fröhlich,<br />
Özgün Özartan, Johannes von Alten<br />
YA 007 Reloading<br />
Raul Recuero, Architekt (ES)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Matias Nieto<br />
23
PARTICIPANTS BERLIN<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
PRIZE<br />
PRIZE<br />
PRESELECTION<br />
ROUND<br />
LG 034 Lügengebäude<br />
Wolfgang Koelbl, Architekt (A)<br />
MM 777 Over the Train<br />
Marine Miroux, Architektin (F), Christoph Hager, Architekt (A)<br />
BR 287 Südparcours<br />
Pierre Alexandre Devernois, Architekt (F), Mathieu Mercuriali, Architekt (F),<br />
Mathieu Mercuriali, Architekt (F), Florian Hertweck, Architektur- und Stadttheorethiker<br />
(D), Matthieu Lott, Architekt (F)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Nam Le Toan<br />
MB 001 Menschbahn<br />
Dimitri Goldenberg, Architekt (UA), Elena Deshinova, Architektin (RU), Marie-<br />
Pierre Vandeputte, Architektin (F)<br />
AB 123 Anti-Palace<br />
Arnaud Bouquin, Architekt (F), Alexandre Bullier, Architekt (F)<br />
AN 629 Grüne Impulse<br />
Ning Liu, Architekt (CN), Yuna Le Bris du Rest, Architektin (F),<br />
Nicolas Jobard, Architekt (F), Alexander Glöckner, Architekt (D)<br />
BL 356 „Stadtoase statt Insel“<br />
Manja Krieg, Architektin (D), Monika Block, Architektin (D),<br />
Morna Hildebrandt, Architektin (D), Kristina Semprimoznik, Architektin (D)<br />
BX 151<br />
Beate Lendt, Architektin (D)<br />
DS 999 Dialog<br />
Isabell Schleicher, Architektin (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Thomas Hanisch, Jens Raade<br />
EZ 311 Ode to the Ordinary<br />
Clarisse Bonnet, Architektin (F), Morice Gwénaëlle, Architekt (F)<br />
Julie Lavergne, Architektin (F)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Isabelle Vartan<br />
FF 523 In The Loop<br />
Felix Fassbinder, Architekt (D), Paulo Moreira, Architekt (P)<br />
FM 747 Na Klar<br />
Coen Kampstra, Architekt (NL), Jan Winsemius, Jurist (NL)<br />
GH 707 Camillo Sitte meets Robert Venturi<br />
Jorg Sieweke, Architekt/Stadtplaner (D),<br />
Anna Viader, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (ES),<br />
Joachim Schultz, Architekt/Stadtplaner (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Carine Kandjee, Benjamin Gutsche<br />
GP 181 What If ? Eine Strategie für die Schöneberger Insel<br />
Gerrit Wegener, Architekt (D), Patrick Hoffmann, Architekt (D)<br />
24
PARTICIPANTS BERLIN<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
ROUND<br />
IT 181 Berlin‘s Cheap & Chic Injection<br />
Tihomir Viderman, Architekt/Stadtplaner (HR)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Ivana Galinovic<br />
LB 099 99 Luftballons<br />
Mario Menzio, Architekt (I), Vittorio Campodonico, Architekt (I),<br />
Giuditta Dirotti, Architekt (I), Marco Di Crescenzo, Architekt (I),<br />
Ludovico Milesi, Architekt (I)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Francesca Caria, Giovanni Francesco Elia, Luca Cassissa, Francesco<br />
Modica, Gianluca Sericola, Beatrice Traspedini, Jacopo Pagnini<br />
ML 197 Landungsbrücken, Berlin Schöneberg<br />
Leander Moons, Architekt (NL), Markus Helbach, Architekt (D)<br />
MM 010 Meeting & Motion<br />
Alexander Valentino, Architekt (I),<br />
d‘Ambros Matteo, Architekt/Stadtplaner (I)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Alice Bartoli, Andreas Faoro, Francesca Rizzetto, Antonio Carmelo Rizzo,<br />
Paolo Agostinelli, Livia Di Mario<br />
MR 123 Schöneberger See<br />
Ralf Pflugfelder, Architekt (D), Magnus Nilsson, Architekt (S), Markus<br />
Miessen, Architektur- und Städtebautheoretiker (D)<br />
SL 533 Sustain[en]able Capital! Suedlauf Park<br />
Lena Raizberg, Architektin (D), Stefan Petro, Architekt (D), Jan Humbert,<br />
Architekt (D), Carola Scholz, Architektin (D)<br />
ZZ 000 Urban Braiding<br />
Christian J. Lange, Architekt (D), Nerea Feliz, Architektin (ES)<br />
25
PARTICIPANTS DONAUWÖRTH<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
PRIZE<br />
PRESELECTION<br />
ROUND<br />
DW 628 recharching space<br />
Dominique Dinies, Architekt (D), Markus Vogl, Architekt (D),<br />
Robert Diem, Architekt (AT), Sandra Schiel , Architektin (A),<br />
Irina Koerdt, Architektin (D)<br />
AT 247 Ausser Wand und Band<br />
Tobias Häberle, Architekt (D), Anne Riggenmann, Architektin (D)<br />
LF 392 Parkstadt Mitte<br />
Joachim Buerklein, Architekt (D), Petra Alschinger, Innenarchitektin (D),<br />
Manuela Mannes, Grafikdesignerin (D)<br />
MC 345 Zentrum - Parkstadt<br />
Florian Dilg, Architekt (D),<br />
Anja Gaigl, Architektin (D), Angelika Zwingel, Architektin (D)<br />
DE 866 Skywalk Parkstadt<br />
Alexander Eberhardt, Architekt (D), Stephan Leiber, Architekt (D)<br />
DW 099 Grüne Amoebe<br />
Jaime Gastalver López-Pazo, Architekt/Stadtplaner (ES),<br />
Laura Riviello, Architektin (I), Celedonio Garrido Santos, Architekt (ES),<br />
Laura Tena Sanchez, Architektin (ES), Ana Lapuerta Martinez, Architektin (ES),<br />
Fernandez Ricardo Carballo, Bauingenieur (ES), Antonio Caro Puerta,<br />
Bauingenieur (ES), Antonio Franco Garcia, Bauingenieur-Architekt (ES),<br />
Maria Villa Castro, Grafikdesignerin (ES), Eva María Santaliestra Durán,<br />
Bauingenieur-Architektin (ES), Garcia Lilian Weikert, Landschaftsarchitektin<br />
(ES)<br />
DW 115 Energiestrand Donauwörth<br />
Jana Richter, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (D),<br />
Jan Landschreiber, Stadtplaner (D), Henri Praeger, Architekt (D)<br />
EA 971 Global And Local Networks<br />
Manfred Frericks, Architekt (D),<br />
Miguel Angel Garcia Valenzuela, Architekt (ES)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Fernandez Jaime Asensio<br />
FQ 483 Parkstadt - Stadtpark<br />
Tobias Eckert, Architekt (D)<br />
FT 279 Neue Reichsstrasse<br />
Thomas Bögl, Architekt (D)<br />
JB 273 Parkstadt - Stadtpark<br />
Bettina Kandler, Architektin (D), Jan Bunje, Architekt (D)<br />
JJ 723 Rundraum - Die andere Stadt<br />
Johannes Schotanus, Architekt (NL), Jonas Labbé, Architekt (S/D)<br />
JK 127 Öffnung durch Abgrenzung<br />
Stefan Kühn, Architekt (D)<br />
LC 785 Grund Formen<br />
Luciano Motta, Architekt (I), Carolin Stapenhorst, Architektin (D)<br />
26
PARTICIPANTS DONAUWÖRTH<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
ROUND<br />
PH 157 Park-Stadt-Garten<br />
Björn Severin, Architekt (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Florian Hoheisel, Eduard Bossert, Ilja Maksimov, Mikus Sils,<br />
Florian Ludwig, David Gregori Ribes, Defne Saylan<br />
PW 732 Quartiersadern<br />
Wiebke Lambert, Architektin (D),<br />
Theresa Golka, Architektin (D), Marie Selter, Architektin (D)<br />
27
PARTICIPANTS ROSTOCK<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
PRIZE<br />
RUNNER-UP<br />
RUNNER-UP<br />
PRESELECTION<br />
ROUND<br />
ET 192 stepscape greenscape waterscape<br />
Florian Krieger, Architekt (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Michiko Bach<br />
FM 914 sinking cities<br />
Steffen Lukannek, Architekt (D), Thomas Schindler, Architekt (D),<br />
Doreen Schenker, Architektin (D), Ferdinand Eichler, Architekt (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Jenny Clasen<br />
UR 300 elevated village<br />
Timo Heise, Architekt (D), Christian Dirumdam, Architekt (D), Björn Rolle,<br />
Architekt (D), Henning Fritsch, Architekt (D), Matthias Mumm, Architekt (D)<br />
FM 314 Alle Wohnen am Wasser<br />
Sabrina Engel, Architektin (D), Stefan Filz, Architekt (D), Florian Kluge,<br />
Landschaftsarchitekt (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
David Mathyl, Jose Antonio Ramirez Chacon<br />
MX 381 Die Schilfstadt – Reed City<br />
Claus Sesselmann, Innenarchitekt (D)<br />
PA 367 Rostock, ZweiBrücken<br />
Almut Coppius, Architektin (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Philipp Jacob, Nils Hiller, Enis Ben Khemais<br />
AB 123 „Biotop Rostock“<br />
Torsten Schult, Architekt (D), Margherita Fanin, Architektin (I)<br />
AP 723 Zwischenhöfe<br />
Patricia Medina Quero, Architektin (ES),<br />
Andrey Garcia Corredor, Architekt (COL)<br />
AS 145 Kapillare<br />
Steffen Barnikol, Architekt (D), Steffen Burucker, Architekt (D)<br />
BB 003 Stadtlandschaften<br />
Niels Vauth, Architekt/Stadtplaner (D), Michael Sauer, Architekt (D), Malte<br />
Diers, Architekt (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Kornelia Heitbrink<br />
CF 106 „Seven Up“<br />
Falk Liebscher, Architekt (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Claudia Herrmann, Falk Saalbach<br />
CS 572 Fischerinseln<br />
Christina Enke, Architektin (D), Sebastian Schröter, Künstler (D)<br />
CU 500 Riverscape<br />
Martijn Van Raaij, Architekt (NL), Martijn Prins, Architekt (NL), Martjn Tillema,<br />
Architekt/Stadtplaner (NL), Arjan Welman, Stadtplaner (NL), Ewout Brouwer,<br />
Stadtplaner (NL)<br />
28
PARTICIPANTS ROSTOCK<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
ROUND<br />
CZ 007 Waterland<br />
Daniel Höwekamp, Architekt (D), Kathrin Hanf, Architektin (D)<br />
EJ 010 Rostock<br />
Jeroen De Bok, Stadtplaner (NL), Emiel Arends, Stadtplaner (NL)<br />
ES 101 Bootshaus – Siedlung im Warnow Park<br />
Heike Nowotny, Architektin (D)<br />
GL 121 ZigZag<br />
Wouter Stoer, Architekt (NL), Albert Vogelzang, Architekt (NL),<br />
Bart Zantman, Architekt (NL), Peter van der Knoop, Architekt (NL)<br />
IS 107 Rostock Lido<br />
Stefania Manni, Architektin (I), Andrea Treu, Architekt (I),<br />
Roberto Pigorini, Architekt (I), Paolo Moretto, Architekt (I)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Alessandro Dimita<br />
JJ 135 Quais<br />
Jan Kaufmann, Architekt (D), Jörg Hoffmann, Architekt (D)<br />
LB 313 Riverside Redevelopment<br />
Irena Hrabincova, Architektin (CZ), Choong Chan Yew, Architekt (MY),<br />
Dat Liu, Architekt (UK), Jacob Richard, Architekt (UK)<br />
LL 382 Grün der Zeit – Rostock deine letzte Chance<br />
Susanne Dieckmann, Architektin (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Leander Urbanczyk, David Peter Lieser<br />
MK 282 Urban Camouflage Patterns<br />
Florian Henniges, Architekt/Stadtplaner (D)<br />
MU 541 in Fasern<br />
Irene Yerro, Architektin (ES), Anita Barthelemey, Architektin (A),<br />
Fabien Barthelemey, Architekt (F), Jürgen Kästner, Architekt (D),<br />
Natalia Guerrero, Landschaftsarchitektin (ES)<br />
PM 911 StadtLand+<br />
Philipp Tscheuschler, Architekt (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Matthias Tscheuschler<br />
RB 187 gerber.beat<br />
Robert Baum, Architekt (D)<br />
RC 227 Urban Wilderness<br />
Alejo Paillard, Architekt (F), Gesa Buettner, Architektin (D)<br />
RM 191 Full House<br />
Annette Joppien, Architektin (D), Martin Peña, Architekt (ES),<br />
Maren Klaeschen, Architektin (D), Ann Kathrin Broszio, Architektin (D)<br />
RS 123 floating borders<br />
Sascha Redmer, Architekt (D), Sabrina Sippel, Architektin (D)<br />
29
PARTICIPANTS ROSTOCK<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
ROUND<br />
SH 836 Neues Wohnen am Bruch<br />
Stefan Schaufert, Architekt (D), Hannes Hamann, Landschaftsarchitekt (D),<br />
Olaf Pfotenhauer, Landschaftsarchitekt (D), Henning Güldenpenning,<br />
Landschaftsarchitekt (D)<br />
SK 778 Linkin‘<br />
Gerard Scholten, Architekt (NL), Frederike Bückmann, Architektin (NL)<br />
SW 777 Wasser marsch!<br />
Vinzenz Dilcher, Architekt (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Wilhelm Rosenberger, Stephan Niewolik<br />
TM 247 3-fingers Marina|Center|Park<br />
Sebastian Allhoff, Stadtplaner (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Tobias Backen, Matthias Pöhler, Aaron Hartmann, Martijn van der Linden<br />
UP 201 Outside In<br />
Almut Wolff, Architektin (D), Natalie Harder, Architektin (D)<br />
WK 123 Wickie und die starken Männer<br />
Christof Brinkmann, Architekt (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Eva Espuny Camacho<br />
ZX 973 ehemaliges Fischer- und Gerberviertel<br />
Ali Reza Djafarsadeh, Architekt (D), Rafael Armenteros, Architekt (D),<br />
Mahmoud Reza Shafei, Innenarchitekt (D)<br />
ZZ 343 Green Connection<br />
Anna Grunow, Architektin (D), Farshad Nasrollahi, Architekt (IR)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Kevin Herbst, Jan Winterstein, Patricia Groborz<br />
30
PARTICIPANTS SELB<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
PRIZE<br />
RUNNER-UP<br />
PRESELECTION<br />
ROUND<br />
ZK 977 Catalog for dwelling on the time<br />
Julio De La Fuente, Architekt (ES), Natalia Gutierrez, Architektin (ES),<br />
Álvaro Martín Fidalgo, Architekt (ES), Arantxa Ozaeta Cortázar, Architekt<br />
(ES)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Alberto Amoros, Jose Amoros, Eduardo Barcelo, Álvaro Lorente,<br />
Javier Castillo, Celia Garcia, Ramon Francos, Jorge Chico, Iker Gomez,<br />
Mateo Borsetti, Maria Navascues, Javier Pinilla, Monica Hernandez,<br />
Daniel Perez, Esther Carranza, Belen Lopez<br />
PO 007 Luxus der Leere<br />
Susanne Pietsch, Architektin (D), Hannes Ochmann, Innenarchitekt (D)<br />
BO 573 PUNKT UND LINIE ZU FLÄCHE<br />
Emilie Bonnetblanc, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (F),<br />
Giacomo Bongiorno, Architekt (I), Thomas Bormann, Architekt (D)<br />
BY 123 selb_ständig bewegt<br />
Stephan Häublein, Architekt (D), Johannes Müller, Architekt (D),<br />
Daniel Dörr, Bauingenieur-Architekt (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Stefan Berger, Robert Augustin<br />
IB 290 Green City<br />
Denis Andernach, Architekt (D), Moritz Alken, Architekt (D),<br />
Nicolas Bahnemann, Architekt (D), Tassya Rauch, Architektin (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Philipp Reichelt, Achim Widjaja<br />
MA 683 CROSSOVER<br />
Sarina Arnold, Architektin (D), Patricia Costantini, Architektin (D), Marita<br />
Zinth, Landschaftsarchitektin (D)<br />
AV 213 sonnenterrassen<br />
Veronika Schreieder, Architektin (D), Andrea Kister, Architektin (D)<br />
BY 551 GenerationPOD<br />
Jana Richter, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (D), Jan Landschreiber, Stadtplaner<br />
(D), Henri Praeger, Architekt (D)<br />
CD 250 LIVING FIELDS<br />
Horst Trapp, Architekt (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Markus Büttner, Thomas Völkl, Josef Steinmetzer<br />
CD 282 Betula Silva<br />
Sybille Wiegandt, Architektin (D), Cornelia Dittmar, Architektin (D)<br />
CR 089 in between trees<br />
Tobias Miazga, Architekt (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Jochen Seelos, Harald Schmidt<br />
EP 001 Nördliche Innenstadt<br />
Hendrik Otto, Architekt (D)<br />
31
PARTICIPANTS SELB<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
ROUND<br />
JM 142 DUAL LAYER<br />
Sinisa Bodrozic, Architekt (HR), Ivan Ralis, Architekt (HR), Nenad Ravnic, Architekt<br />
(HR)<br />
KX 937 backbone EIN RÜCKGRAT FÜR SELB<br />
Ines Lauer, Architektin (D), Max Richter, Architekt (D)<br />
MF 711 space glace / Raumglasur<br />
Frank Menzel, Architekt (D), Maria Saffer, Architektin (D),<br />
Marie Langen, Architektin (D)<br />
OX 100 FLAT SELB<br />
Subhash Mukerjee, Architekt (I), Michele Bonino, Architekt (I),<br />
Rebecca Gasco, Architektin (Italy), Cristina Marietta, Architekt (I)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Elizabeth Forde, Daniele Dabbene<br />
SD 034 VICINITY<br />
Pablo Tena, Architekt (ES), Mireia Vergés, Architektin (ES),<br />
Francesco Rossini, Architekt (I)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Petra Stern, Giovanna Santoro, Rüdiger Wurth<br />
SN 711 Felder, Wald & Wiesen<br />
Stefan Schoebel, Architekt (D), Nadya Faris Bibawi, Architektin (D)<br />
VL 111 Herzklopfen<br />
Valentina Ruzanova, Architektin (Russian Federation),<br />
Ludmila Chumachenko, Architektin (Russian Federation)<br />
32
PARTCIPANTS SPREMBERG<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
PRIZE<br />
RUNNER-UP<br />
PRESELECTION<br />
ROUND<br />
LB 639 Brücke & Tür<br />
Saskia Hebert, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (D)<br />
JS 303 Auf Tuchfühlung<br />
Sandra Neumann, Architektin (D), Stefan Aman, Architekt (D),<br />
Mario Sobolewski, Architekt (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Jana Neumann, Sebastian Schultze, Johanna Walf<br />
AS 691 ParkÜBERFluß<br />
Martin Stauss, Architekt (D), Ralf Kockrow, Bauingenieur (D)<br />
CB 107 acupunture Spremberg<br />
Alessandra Spagnoli, Architektin (I), Tatjana-Sonja Trebesch, Architektin<br />
(D),<br />
Matthias Graf von Ballestrem, Architekt (D), Elisabetta Vitaletti, Architektin<br />
(I), Paola Angelini, Architekt (I)<br />
AC 807 EntreFlaneur<br />
Anja Mieg-Debik, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (D),<br />
Carsten Cielobatzki, Architekt (D),<br />
Dirk Müller, Architekt (D), Beeke Bartelt, Architekt (D)<br />
AT 710 Spremberger Parkensemble<br />
Axel Rühl, Landschaftsarchitekt (D)<br />
CC 100 STADT LANDSCHAFT FLUSS<br />
Ulrich Weingärtner, Architekt (D), Sebastian Blecher, Architekt (D),<br />
Nils Lillig, Architekt (D)<br />
EH 835 SPREMBERG – Stadt als Bühne<br />
Maria Koch, Architektin (D), Susanne Röllig, Architektin (D),<br />
Christin Ansorge, Architektin (D), Gunnar Krempin, Architekt (D)<br />
FR 506 Spremberg .city landscape.<br />
Andrea Löffler, Landschaftsarchitektin (D),<br />
Alexander Götze, Landschaftsarchitekt (D),<br />
Katrin Grafe, Landschaftsarchitektin (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Kostek Osobinski<br />
MD 112 PERLENERNTE - HARVESTING PEARLS<br />
Katrin Bohn, Architektin (D), Barbara Schmaus, Architektin (D),<br />
Carsten Liesenberg, Architekt/Stadtplaner (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Thomas Müller, Konstantinos Chalaris, Jonathan Gales, Larissa Begault,<br />
Thomas McCreesh, Nick Hayhurst<br />
MJ 111 AUENPERLEN<br />
Marek Vogt, Architekt (D), Jens Hölzinger, Architekt (D)<br />
MS 247 Der Freiraumraum<br />
Melanie Semmer, Architektin (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Stefanie Helga Paul, Mark Knobloch<br />
33
PARTICIPANTS SPREMBERG<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
ROUND<br />
SD 007 Spremberg – 127-30 Meter ü.NN<br />
Julia Kühle, Architektin (D), Corina Dietrich, Architektin (D)<br />
SL 357 bandscapes<br />
Sebastian Seelig, Stadtplaner (D),<br />
Kathleen Liebscher, Stadtplanerin (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Lisa Hartung<br />
34
PARTICIPANTS STRAUBING<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
PRIZE<br />
RUNNER-UP<br />
PRESELECTION<br />
ROUND<br />
AP 123 readymade<br />
Anita Sinanian, Architektin (D), Marc-Philip Reichwald, Architekt (D),<br />
Peter-Karsten Schultz, Architekt (D)<br />
UR 334 come together<br />
Camilo Hernandez, Architekt (D), Nataly Granados, Architektin (D),<br />
Sonja Knapp, Stadtplanerin (D)<br />
NK 507 ALLMENDE / AGORA<br />
Julius Klaffke, Architekt (D)<br />
SW 777 NOW HERE<br />
Andreas Sternecker, Architekt (D), Christian Wagner, Landschaftsarchitekt<br />
(D), Beatrix Gruber, Architektin (D), Bernhard Schambeck, Architekt (D)<br />
AI 111 Projected Growth – Geplantes Wachstum<br />
Harald Gasmann, Architekt (D), Odile Ullrich, Architektin (D), Carolin<br />
Kodisch, Architektin (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Fabian von Ferrari, Maren Ziegler<br />
AK 268 Impuls Völkl<br />
Jürgen Caruso, Architekt (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Andreas Kollefrath<br />
AS 385 „patchwork“<br />
Markus Pfreundtner, Architekt (D)<br />
BL 671 Democratic Landscape<br />
Detlev Bruckhoff, Architekt (D)<br />
CM 248 A-real/Z<br />
Melanie Jobst, Architektin (D), Christian Hauth, Architekt (D),<br />
Eleonora Cardella, Architektin (I)<br />
JA 233 Kultivar<br />
Florian Zopfy, Architekt (D), Thomas Schonder, Architekt (D),<br />
Daniela Sacher, Architektin (D), Bartosz Puszkarczyk, Architekt (D),<br />
Juliane Scharl, Architektin (D)<br />
JS 162 Better Life - GmbH<br />
Ralf Pasel, Architekt (D), Frederik Kuenzel, Architekt (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Sarah Bein, Franziska Sack, Sarah Pape<br />
LM 016 Molecular Diversity<br />
Luis Machuca, Architekt (ES), Manuel Rodriguez Ruiz, Architekt ES)<br />
QQ 001 Neue Mitte Straubing Süd<br />
Christine Schonter, Stadtplanerin (D), Julia Semmlin, Stadtplanerin (D),<br />
Martin Wille, Architekt (D)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Julian Benesch, Joerg Hahn<br />
35
PARTICIPANTS STRAUBING<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
ROUND<br />
SL 009 Energy Park<br />
Dirk Waldmann, Architekt/Stadtplaner (D),<br />
Berthold Jungblut, Architekt (D), Michael Trinkner, Architekt (D)<br />
SU 307 Halle, Hof<br />
Ulrike Tillmann, Architektin (D), Susanne Schindler, Architektin (CH)<br />
36
PARTICIPANTS GYÓR<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
PRIZE<br />
RUNNER-UP<br />
HONOURABLE MENTION<br />
PRESELECTION<br />
ROUND<br />
CC 881 urban magma<br />
Juan Tur (E), Ana Arriero (E), Esteban Carlos Higinio (E), Architekten<br />
Carmen Paz (E) Architektin/Stadtplanerin<br />
WS 248 wetside<br />
Arroyo Gustavo Romanillos, Architekt (ES),<br />
Germana De Donno, Architektin (I)<br />
DG 112 Dongiovanni<br />
Nicolas Matteo Cazzato, Architekt (I), Emiliano Giuffrida, Architekt (I),<br />
Romolo Ottaviani, Architektur- und Stadttheoretiker (I ),<br />
Antonella Sonia Perin, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (I),<br />
Barbara Cerruti, Architektin (I)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Itala Bevivino, Elisabetta Cerruti, Carlo Brizioli, Simone Stabile,<br />
Massimo Severo, Stefano La Rocca<br />
DD 123 Gyór-Sziget 1+1=1<br />
Rogier Dobma, Architekt (NL), Aafke van Dijk, Architekt (NL)<br />
FU 359 4 in 1<br />
Marisol Vidal Martinez, Architekt (ES), Eva Grubbauer, Architektin (A)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Maida Coric<br />
NN 010 Magyarország<br />
Nir Goldberg, Architekt (A)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Noa Haim<br />
ZY 457 Nomadic Landscape<br />
Sigrid Zenger, Architektin (D), Johan Löberg, Architekt<br />
AR 555 Gyór-Sziget<br />
Roberta Horváth, Architektin (HU), Andrea Tenerin, Architekt (HU)<br />
BA 010 Infiltrations<br />
Cristian Borcan, Architekt (RO), Alexandru Axinte, Architekt (RO),<br />
BG 901 Natural Implant<br />
Guido Schot, Architekt (NL), Brigitte Kwa, Architektin (NL)<br />
BW 365 Project Biscuit<br />
Johan Willekens, Architekt (B)<br />
GR 002 Rescaling<br />
Danilo Lacone, Architekt (I), Mattia Leone, Architekt (I),<br />
Valentina La Gioia, Architektin (I), Paola Galante, Architektin (I),<br />
Vera Autidio, Architektin (I)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Gianfranco Latorraca, Raffaele Guaragna<br />
GS 308 Stripes<br />
Andrea Martinelli , Architekt (I),<br />
Alessandra Rabbi, Architekt (I), Daniela Anzil, Architekt (I)<br />
37
PARTICIPANTS GYÓR<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
ROUND<br />
GY 005 Biscuit Valley<br />
Javier Molinero, Architekt (ES), Maria Oliver, Architekt (ES),<br />
Javier Matoses, Architekt (ES), Marcos Sangüesa, Architekt (ES),<br />
Rafael Mira, Architekt (ES)<br />
GY 939 Európai udvariasság és a fenntartható város-kekszgyár, sziget városrész<br />
Bálint Terdik, Architekt (HU), Péter Tóth, Architekt (HU),<br />
Tamás Rüll, Architekt (HU), Balázs Dárdai, Architekt (HU)<br />
IP 000 Innerplaza<br />
Tommaso Nicola Santostasi, Architekt (I),<br />
Alberta Solarino, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (I),<br />
Alfonso Spina, Architekt (I)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Peter Andrej Zavarzin<br />
KE 478 Green changes<br />
Ivan Branislav, Architekt (SK), Emil Popovic, Ingenieur-Architekt (SK)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Stefan Tkac, Miloslav Kovac, Karol Hruby<br />
KS 133 Ring-A-Ding<br />
Robert Mair, Architekt (A)<br />
NH 123 Uran leaves<br />
Michele Roveri, Architekt (I), Nicola Bettini, Architektin (I),<br />
Stefano Massa, Architekt (I)<br />
SI 167 Suburban Myths, Industrial Ventures<br />
Glenn Lyppens, Architekt (B), Kin Way Cheung , Innenarchitekt (NL), Joris Bourgeois,<br />
Architekt (B), Zemmouri Najiw, Architekt (B)<br />
TM 892 Super-Hof<br />
Simonetta Rossetti , Architektin (I), Thomas Bisiani, Architekt (I),<br />
Marco Degrassi, Architekt (I)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Elisa Rossetti<br />
38
PARTICIPANTS WARSZAWA<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
PRIZE<br />
RUNNER-UP<br />
HONOURABLE MENTION<br />
HONOURABLE MENTION<br />
PRESELECTION<br />
ROUND<br />
XY 139 urban cocktail<br />
Mateusz Adamczyk, Architekt/Stadtplaner (PL), Michal Palej, Architekt/<br />
Stadtplaner (PL), Artur Michalak, Architekt/Stadtplaner (PL), Patrycja<br />
Sowa, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (PL)<br />
MM 321 Warszawa<br />
Salvador Ubago Palma, Architekt (ES), Anna Klimczak, Künstlerin (PL),<br />
Francisco Antonio Garcia Pérez, Architekt (ES),<br />
Dorota Kurazynska, Künstlerin (PL), Piotr Dryja, Künstler (PL)<br />
AR 002 four rooms<br />
Agata Mierzwa, Architektin (PL), Rolf Jenni, Architekt (CH)<br />
EE 560 Czyste Warszawa 2007-2008<br />
Szymon Kalata, Architekt (PL), Eliza Kalata, Architektin (PL),<br />
Bartek Citko, Architekt (PL), Piotr Solowiej, Architekt (PL<br />
AE 826 where winds walk<br />
Marlena Happach, Architektin (PL), Marek Happach, Architekt (PL),<br />
Renata Jólwik, Architektin/Stadtplanerin (PL)<br />
AG 408 nowa gazownia<br />
Agata Bonenberg, Architektin (PL)<br />
AI 375 Warszawa metamorfozy miejsc bližej…<br />
Paweł Chilimoniuk, Architekt (PL), Dominik Skura, Architekt (PL),<br />
Monika Morawiak, Bauingenieur (PL), Wiesław Połchłopek, Architekt<br />
(PL), Radosław Nawa, Bauingenieur (PL)<br />
AS 247 kalejdoskop<br />
Arkadiusz Seredyn, Architekt (PL), Agata Seredyn, Architektin (PL)<br />
CU 009 far away - just around the corner<br />
Ulli Heckmann, Architekt (D), Charlotte Elkaim, Architektin (F)<br />
EU 161 eu-PAN v.09<br />
Jorge Taravillo Canete, Architekt (ES)<br />
FA 011 metamorfoza miejsc<br />
Anna Flak, Architektin (PL)<br />
FL 430 overlap<br />
Cyril Pressacco, Architekt (F), Laurent Noel, Architekt (F),<br />
Martin Fougeras Lavargnolle, Architekt (F), Florence Mottes, Architekt (F)<br />
HF 000 hybrid forum<br />
Paolo Valente, Architekt (I), Spartaco Paris, Architekt (I)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Marcin Batko, Mikolaj Iwanczuk, Francesco Pagano, Paola Ria, Maria<br />
Caterina<br />
IZ 345 making room for creativity<br />
Luis Filipe da Silva Portas de Ibérico Nogueira, Architekt (PT),<br />
Claudio Cruz da Silva, Architekt (PT),<br />
Filipe Cardoso Reis Sá Coelho, Architekt (PT),<br />
José Jorge Castro Felgueiras Soares, Architekt (PT),<br />
Carlos Manuel da Silva Bessa Pinto, Architekt (PT)<br />
39
PARTICIPANTS WARSZAWA<br />
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
ROUND<br />
IZ 751 koral<br />
Eva Iszoro, Architektin (ES)<br />
KS 701 Warszawa - lokalne centrum „Czyste“ - parasol<br />
Lukasz Sadura, Architekt (D), Max Kaminski, Architekt (D)<br />
TW 007 w kółko czyste<br />
Anna Lipka, Architektin (PL)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Agata Filipek, Maciej Misiewicz<br />
UX 307 green cells<br />
Ana Monteiro, Architektin (PT)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Pedro Viegas<br />
WA 607 local mutations - infiltrating<br />
Michał Adamczyk, Architekt (PL)<br />
Mitarbeiter:<br />
Karol Žurawski, Tomasz Podniesiñski<br />
40
european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces<br />
EUROPAN 9<br />
41<br />
TABLE OF ATTENDANCES<br />
meeting of the trinational jury, held on January 11/12 2008 in Berlin