E9_jury's report

More documents

Recommendations

Info

JURY´S REPORT european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces EUROPAN 9 SELB BERLIN DONAUWÖRTH SPREMBERG ROSTOCK GYÓR WARSZAWA STRAUBING SELB SELB BERLIN SPREMBERG ROSTOCK ROSTOCK DONAUWÖRTH BERLIN SELB ROSTOCK IB 290 Green City 0 9 PO 007 LUXUS DER LEERE 0 9 ZK 977 catalog for dwelling on the time 8 1 LG 034 Lügengebäude 8 1 MM 777 “Over the Train“ 1 8 DW 628 recharging space 7 2 JS 303 Auf Tuchfühlung 0 9 LB 369 brücke & tür 9 0 As such, nine works are awarded a prize. After this, each of the remaining works is considered with respect to rewarding them with runners-up prizes, the vote is as follows: FM 914 sinking cities 9 0 WS 248 wetside 9 0 MM 321 Warszawa 6 3 UR 334 „come together !“ 6 3 IB 290 Green City 4 5 PO 007 LUXUS DER LEERE 6 3 MM 777 “Over the Train“ 8 1 JS 303 Auf Tuchfühlung 7 2 As such, 7 works are awarded runners-up prizes. Ms Poeverlein explains that, for the German sites, a total of seven prizes and seven runners-up prizes have been awarded and Europan Germany is aiming to distribute the total amount of prize money awarded, on the basis of the principles and guidelines for competitions (GRW). The chairperson asks the members of the jury to once again check the decisions they have reached up to now and, if necessary, to file applications for the awarding of further prizes or runners-up prizes. She points out that the possibility also exists of awarding an honourable mention, for example, for outstanding partial solutions. After an individual round, the following return applications are filed and voted upon by the panel of jurors as follows: FM 314 ALLE WOHNEN AM WASSER 2 7 UR 300 elevated village 6 3 LF 392 PARKSTADT MITTE 3 6 As a result, the work ‘UR 300 elevated village’ is once again entered into the competition proceedings. After that, the applications for the awarding of further prizes and/or runnersup prizes were filed, and were voted on as follows: PRIZE MM 777 “Over the Train“ 5 4 RUNNERS-UP IB 290 Green City 3 6 UR 300 elevated village 5 4 12
JURY´S REPORT european urbanity - sustainable city and new urban spaces EUROPAN 9 ROSTOCK GYÓR WARSZAWA WARSZAWA BABENHAUSEN STRAUBING SELB ROSTOCK GYÓR WARSZAWA BABENHAUSEN STRAUBING SELB BERLIN BERLIN DONAUWÖRTH SPREMBERG ROSTOCK ROSTOCK GYÓR WARSZAWA STRAUBING SELB SPREMBERG GYÓR WARSZAWA WARSZAWA BABENHAUSEN ROSTOCK Finally, the following works were nominated for honourable mention. The votes on the applications were as follows. FM 314 ALLE WOHNEN AM WASSER 4 5 DG 112 DONGIOVANNI 7 2 AR 002 four rooms 6 3 EE 560 Warszawa Czyste 5 4 AZ 751 a gardeners theory … 7 2 NK 507 ALLMENDE/AGORA 4 5 IB 290 Green City 4 5 As such, the prizes, runners-up prizes and honourable mentions are as outlined below: PRIZE GROUP ET 192 STEPSCAPEGREENSCAPEWATERSCAPE CC 881 urban magma XY 139 urban cocktail MW 993 grünkern Babenhausen AP 123 readymade ZK 977 catalog for dwelling on the time LG 034 Lügengebäude MM777 “Over the Train“ DW 628 recharging space LB 369 brücke & tür RUNNERS-UP GROUP FM 914 sinking cities UR 300 elevated village WS 248 wetside MM 321 Warszawa UR 334 „come together !“ PO 007 LUXUS DER LEERE JS 303 Auf Tuchfühlung HONOURALBLE MENTIONS DG 112 DONGIOVANNI AR 002 four rooms EE 560 Warszawa Czyste AZ 751 a gardeners theory … 9 Written assessment of the works The jury decides to issue a written appraisal of the works awarded with prizes, runners-up prizes and honourable mentions. The individual jurors each take on works, for the purposes of formulating the written appraisal as a résumé of the joint discussions in the jury. The written appraisals are then read out, discussed and recorded in the protocol in the following version as a summary of the jury’s opinion: ET 192 STEPSCAPEGREENSCAPEWATERSCAPE This design shows a clear structuring of the area into a green zone which encourages the opening up of the town wall, and a constructed progressive line structure with its point of focus at the water, while also making the accessibility of the town to the water its main theme. In a further, necessary review, this diagrammatic basic structure can easily 13
Page 1 and 2: Gyór european urbanity - sustainab
Page 3 and 4: JURY´S REPORT european urbanity -
Page 11: JURY´S REPORT european urbanity -
Page 23 and 24: PARTICIPANTS BABENHAUSEN european u
Page 25 and 26: PARTICIPANTS BERLIN european urbani
Page 27 and 28: PARTICIPANTS DONAUWÖRTH european u
Page 29 and 30: PARTICIPANTS ROSTOCK european urban
Page 31 and 32: PARTICIPANTS SELB european urbanity
Page 33 and 34: PARTCIPANTS SPREMBERG european urba
Page 35 and 36: PARTICIPANTS STRAUBING european urb
Page 37 and 38: PARTICIPANTS GYÓR european urbanit
Page 39 and 40: PARTICIPANTS WARSZAWA european urba
Page 41: european urbanity - sustainable cit

E9_jury's report

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?