Section 1904.29(b)(10). In addition, 1910.29 prohibits the employer from including the employee’sname for “privacy concern” cases whenever the Form 300 Log is made available to coworkers, formeremployees, or employee representatives.§1904.29Thank you for your interest in occupational safety and health. We hope you find this informationhelpful. <strong>OSHA</strong> requirements are set by statute, standards, and regulations. Our interpretation lettersexplain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot createadditional employer obligations. This letter constitutes <strong>OSHA</strong>’s interpretation of the requirements discussed.Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to <strong>OSHA</strong> rules. Also, fromtime to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep appraised of suchdevelopments, you can consult <strong>OSHA</strong>’s website at http://www.osha.gov. If you have any further questions,please contact the Division of <strong>Recordkeeping</strong> Requirements, at 202-693-1702.Sincerely,John L. HenshawAssistant SecretaryLetter of interpretation related to sections 1904.29, 1904.29(a), 1904.29(b), 1904.29(b)(2), 1904.31, 1904.33,1904.35, 1904.40 and 1904.46 –Recording criteria for cases involving workers from a temporary help service, employee leasing service, or personnelsupply service.June 23, 2003Mr. Edwin G. Foulke, Jr.Jackson Lewis LLP2100 Landmark Building301 North Main StreetGreenville, SC 29601-2122Dear Mr. Foulke:Thank you for your April 3, 2003 facsimile and April 10, 2003 letter to the Occupational Safetyand Health Administration (<strong>OSHA</strong>) regarding the Injury and Illness Recording and ReportingRequirements contained in 29 CFR Part 1904. Specifically, you ask <strong>OSHA</strong> to clarify the recordingcriteria for cases involving workers from a temporary help service, employee leasing service, orpersonnel supply service. Your questions have been outlined below followed by <strong>OSHA</strong>’s response.Question 1: Under 29 CFR Section 1904.31, employers who supervise temporary or leasedemployees at their facility are required to maintain the <strong>OSHA</strong> 300 Logs for those employees. Withrespect to those injuries, can the employer keep a separate 300 Log for the company employeesand one log for the temporary or leased employees?Response: The log is to be kept for an establishment. Under Section 1904.46 Definitions, an establishmentis a single physical location where business is conducted or where services or industrialoperations are performed. The controlling employer (using firm) may sub-divide the <strong>OSHA</strong> 300Log to provide separate listings of temporary workers, but must consider the separate listings to beone record for all recordkeeping purposes, including access by government representatives, employees,former employees and employee representatives as required by Section 1904.35 and 1904.40in the <strong>Recordkeeping</strong> regulation.<strong>OSHA</strong>’s view is that a given establishment should have one <strong>OSHA</strong> Log. Injuries and illnesses for allthe covered employees at the establishment are then entered into that record to create a single<strong>OSHA</strong> 300-A Summary form at the end of the year.118<strong>OSHA</strong> RECORDKEEPINGHANDBOOK
Question 2: Under 29 CFR Section 1904.31, while the standard clearly indicates the 300 Logsmust be maintained for supervised temporary or leased employees, it does not indicate who maintainsthe 301 documents or the first report of injuries, as well as the medical records on thoseemployees. Also, if a temporary or leased employee has days away from work, it is normally thetemporary or leased employee provider’s contractual responsibility to handle the medical treatmentof the employee. The temporary or leased employee provider is the only person/entity to have theinformation on days away from work. Who is responsible for maintaining the 301 logs or the firstreport of injury forms as well as the medical records for these employees, assuming that theemployee provider can produce the required documents to the employer for production in the timeperiods set forth in the standard?Response: Section 1904.29(a) says: “You must use <strong>OSHA</strong> 300, 300-A and 301 forms, or equivalentforms, for recordable injuries and illnesses.” In addition, 1904.29(b)(2) says: “You must completean <strong>OSHA</strong> 301 Incident Report form, or an equivalent form, for each recordable injury or illnessentered on the <strong>OSHA</strong> 300 Log.” Therefore, when the workers from a temporary help serviceor leasing firm are under the day-to-day supervision of the controlling party (using firm) the entire<strong>OSHA</strong> injury and illness recordkeeping responsibility belongs to the using firm.§1904.29Question 3: Using the facts in Question 2, it is also important to note that an injured temporary orleased employee, who requires days from work, may be replaced by another leased or temporaryemployee at the work site. From time of the injury, the employer has no information about thereturn to work status of the injured employee. In fact, the injured employee may be assigned toanother employer once he or she is able to return to work. How can the original employer keepaccurate 300 Logs when the employee provider has sole access to information on days away fromwork and return to work status?Response: The controlling employer has the ultimate responsibility for making good-faith recordkeepingdeterminations regarding an injury and illness to any of those temporary employees theysupervise on a day-to-day basis. Although controlling employers ultimately decide if and how aparticular case should be recorded, their decision must not be an arbitrary one, but should bemade in accordance with the requirements of the Act, regulation, and the instructions on theforms. Therefore, the controlling employer must make reasonable efforts to acquire the necessaryinformation in order to satisfy its Part 1904 recordkeeping requirements. However, if the controllingemployer is not able to obtain information from the employer of the leased or temporaryemployee, the controlling employer should record the injury based on whatever information isavailable to the controlling employer. The preamble contains a brief reference about <strong>OSHA</strong>’sexpectation that the employers share information to produce accurate records, stating that “thetwo employers have shared responsibilities and may share information when there is a need to doso.” (Federal Register p. 6041)Finally, the last question you raised is whether your client or contractor has any requirementsunder the recordkeeping standard to provide the new contractor the current <strong>OSHA</strong> 300 Logs forthat facility covering those employees who now work for that contractor. Since there was nochange of your client’s business ownership, he or she needs only to retain the records as per1904.33 and provide access under 1904.35 and 1904.40.Thank you for your interest in occupational safety and health. We hope you find this informationhelpful. <strong>OSHA</strong> requirements are set by statute, standards, and regulations. Our interpretation lettersexplain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannotcreate additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes <strong>OSHA</strong>’s interpretation of the requirementsdiscussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to <strong>OSHA</strong> rules.Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keepappraised of such developments, you can consult <strong>OSHA</strong>’s website at http://www.osha.gov. If youhave any further questions, please contact the Division of <strong>Recordkeeping</strong> Requirements, at 202-693-1702.Sincerely,John L. HenshawAssistant Secretary<strong>OSHA</strong> RECORDKEEPINGHANDBOOK119
- Page 1 and 2:
www.osha.govOSHARecordkeepingHandbo
- Page 3 and 4:
OSHARecordkeeping HandbookThe Regul
- Page 5 and 6:
ContentsRecordkeeping HandbookRoadm
- Page 7 and 8:
Section 1904.40Providing records to
- Page 9 and 10:
Section 1904.0Purpose(66 FR 6122, J
- Page 11 and 12:
Section 1904.1Partial exemption for
- Page 13 and 14:
Section 1904.2Partial exemption for
- Page 15 and 16:
employees, to OSHA within 8 hours (
- Page 17 and 18:
Partial Exemptions for Employers Un
- Page 19 and 20:
Section 1904.4Recording criteria(66
- Page 21 and 22:
Section 1904.5Determination of work
- Page 23 and 24:
(b)(7) How do I decide if a case is
- Page 25 and 26:
well, including providing informati
- Page 27 and 28:
This exception, which responds to i
- Page 29 and 30:
or she is in the work environment a
- Page 31 and 32:
have occurred but for the occupatio
- Page 33 and 34:
considered work-related. If an empl
- Page 35 and 36:
Question 5-12. Is work-related stre
- Page 37 and 38:
• The doctor described the illnes
- Page 39 and 40:
Scenario 7:• A site hired numerou
- Page 41 and 42:
Letter of interpretation related to
- Page 43 and 44:
These principles should be applied
- Page 45 and 46:
The problem with the response is tw
- Page 47 and 48:
Section 1904.6Determination of new
- Page 49 and 50:
the Guidelines stated that “the a
- Page 51 and 52:
estricted work. If the case is a pr
- Page 53 and 54:
• The doctor also prescribed the
- Page 55 and 56:
• The employees were under the di
- Page 57 and 58:
Section 1904.7General recording cri
- Page 59 and 60:
(iii) Do I have to record restricte
- Page 61 and 62:
of the length of time the employee
- Page 63 and 64:
then result in days away from work
- Page 65 and 66:
A partial day of work is recorded a
- Page 67 and 68:
In all other respects, the final ru
- Page 69 and 70:
ments. The Agency believes that the
- Page 71 and 72:
e recorded because it will require
- Page 73 and 74:
However, episodes of fainting from
- Page 75 and 76: care professional, he or she may al
- Page 77 and 78: “Other simple means” of removin
- Page 79 and 80: For purposes of OSHA recordkeeping
- Page 81 and 82: • When answering the doctor’s q
- Page 83 and 84: Response: In the recordkeeping regu
- Page 85 and 86: Letter of interpretation related to
- Page 87 and 88: Section 1904.8Recording criteria fo
- Page 89 and 90: caused by contaminated needles and
- Page 91 and 92: Section 1904.9Recording criteria fo
- Page 93 and 94: Section 1904.10Recording criteria f
- Page 95 and 96: hearing loss case that is not relat
- Page 97 and 98: average of 10 decibels or more at 2
- Page 99 and 100: argued that because the function of
- Page 101 and 102: occurs, and where hearing loss can
- Page 103 and 104: cases in their workplace via analys
- Page 105 and 106: March 4, 2004Mr. Carl O. Sall, CIHD
- Page 107 and 108: When the professional evaluating th
- Page 109 and 110: (2) May I line-out or erase a recor
- Page 111 and 112: Section 1904.12Recording criteria f
- Page 113 and 114: These new statistics would add only
- Page 115 and 116: Sections 1904.13 - 1904.28 Reserved
- Page 117 and 118: two lines of the OSHA 300 Log to de
- Page 119 and 120: which replace the OSHA 200 and 101
- Page 121 and 122: different types of occupational ill
- Page 123 and 124: OSHA 301 form. These data are usefu
- Page 125: LETTERS OF INTERPRETATION: Section
- Page 129 and 130: and has adopted language in the fin
- Page 131 and 132: Section 1904.31Covered employees(66
- Page 133 and 134: label assigned to a worker is immat
- Page 135 and 136: These workers should be evaluated j
- Page 137 and 138: Response: A case is work-related if
- Page 139 and 140: Response: Section 1904.31 states th
- Page 141 and 142: Thank you for your interest in occu
- Page 143 and 144: year covered by the summary. The su
- Page 145 and 146: 2. Number of employees and hours wo
- Page 147 and 148: LETTERS OF INTERPRETATION: Section
- Page 149 and 150: Section 1904.33Retention and updati
- Page 151 and 152: June 23, 2003Mr. Edwin G. Foulke, J
- Page 153 and 154: Section 1904.34Change in business o
- Page 155 and 156: PREAMBLE DISCUSSION: Section 1904.3
- Page 157 and 158: Incident Report (Forms 300 and 301,
- Page 159 and 160: workers’ compensation claim. See
- Page 161 and 162: LETTERS OF INTERPRETATION: Section
- Page 163 and 164: Letter of interpretation related to
- Page 165 and 166: Question 3: Using the facts in Ques
- Page 167 and 168: Section 1904.37State recordkeeping
- Page 169 and 170: tion, require employers to report f
- Page 171 and 172: (5) If I receive a variance, may th
- Page 173 and 174: Section 1904.39Reporting fatalities
- Page 175 and 176: gation. Therefore, the final rule d
- Page 177 and 178:
Section 1904.40Providing records to
- Page 179 and 180:
ness. The government inspector may
- Page 181 and 182:
Response: The controlling employer
- Page 183 and 184:
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: Section
- Page 185 and 186:
OSHA and the BLS have worked togeth
- Page 187 and 188:
provide copies of the retained reco
- Page 189 and 190:
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: Section
- Page 191 and 192:
Section 1904.46Definitions(66 FR 61
- Page 193 and 194:
of business information. For exampl
- Page 195 and 196:
inconvenience associated with keepi
- Page 197 and 198:
skin disease, respiratory disorder,
- Page 199 and 200:
Question 2: Under 29 CFR Section 19
- Page 201:
www.osha.gov