10.07.2015 Views

OSHA Recordkeeping Handbook - Msabc.net

OSHA Recordkeeping Handbook - Msabc.net

OSHA Recordkeeping Handbook - Msabc.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The first treatment is glue used to close a wound. The use of medical glue to close a wound is notfirst aid, and therefore must be considered medical treatment. First aid includes the use of the followingwound-covering devices: bandages, Band Aids©, gauze pads, butterfly bandages, or Steri-Strips©, 29 CFR 1904.7(b)(5)(ii)(D). Other wound-closing devices, such as sutures, staples, tapes,or glues are considered medical treatment. See 66 FR 5989 (January 19, 2001).The second treatment is the use of a prescription antibiotic for a puncture wound. Under the rule,the use of prescription medication to treat a wound is medical treatment. This follows even if themedication is an antibiotic or antiseptic administered following an injury to prevent a possibleinfection. In the preamble to the rule, <strong>OSHA</strong> specifically considered and rejected an exception forprescription antibiotics or antiseptics. See 66 FR 5986.Thank you for your interest in occupational safety and health. We hope you find this informationhelpful. <strong>OSHA</strong> requirements are set by statute, standards, and regulations. Our interpretation lettersexplain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannotcreate additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes <strong>OSHA</strong>’s interpretation of the requirementsdiscussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to <strong>OSHA</strong> rules.In addition, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keepapprised of such developments, you can consult <strong>OSHA</strong>'s website at http://www.osha.gov. If youhave any further questions, please contact my Division of <strong>Recordkeeping</strong> Requirements, at 202-693-1702.Sincerely,Keith Goddard, DirectorDirectorate of Evaluation and AnalysisLetter of interpretation related to sections 1904.5, 1904.5(a), 1904.5(b)(2), 1904.6, 1904.6(a), 1904.7 and 1904.31 –Evaluation of seven scenarios for work-relatedness and recordkeeping requirements.January 15, 2004Ms. Leann M. Johnson-Koch1200 Ni<strong>net</strong>eenth Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20036-2412§1904.7Dear Ms. Johnson-Koch:Thank you for your E-mail to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (<strong>OSHA</strong>) regardingthe Injury and Illness Recording and Reporting Requirements contained in 29 CFR Part 1904. Your letterwas forwarded to my office by Richard Fairfax, Director, Directorate of Enforcement Programs. TheDivision of <strong>Recordkeeping</strong> Requirements is responsible for the administration of the <strong>OSHA</strong> injury andillness recordkeeping system nationwide. Please excuse the delay in responding to your request.In your letter, you ask <strong>OSHA</strong> to clarify the following scenarios to ensure accurate and consistent guidanceto your members for purposes of <strong>OSHA</strong> <strong>Recordkeeping</strong> requirements. I will address your scenariosby first restating each one and then answering it.Scenario 1:• An employee reported to work at 7:00 a.m.• At 12:15 p.m. the employee reported that his toes on his left foot had started swelling and his foothad started hurting.• The employee wanted to go to a doctor for evaluation.• On the First Report of Injury, that the employee completed before he went to the doctor, the employeeindicated that the cause of the illness was “unknown (feet wet at cooling tower).”72<strong>OSHA</strong> RECORDKEEPINGHANDBOOK

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!