Amani Labda - Peace Maybe Joint Evaluation of Conflict - Channel ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2 METHODOLOGY2.1 Outline of the evaluationJOINT EVALUATION OF CONFLICT PREVENTION AND PEACE BUILDING IN DRCVOLUME 1A team of 15 individuals, comprising regional, technical and evaluation expertise,were deployed from October 2009 to September 2010. The team, representingeight nationalities, divided into three consultants per region with other technicalfunctions performed across the evaluation’s scope. The team was divided intosub-groups who shared certain report tasks. After an initial data collection andanalysis period, a core group held meetings and feedback session from October2010 to March 2011 in Europe and the DRC.The Synthesis Report contains the principal evaluation conclusions. It starts witha conflict analysis from 2002-2010 (Chapter 3). This section is the foundation uponwhich performance was analysed. The policy interventions of the SteeringCommittee members are outlined and evaluated in Chapter 4.The following chapters, 5 to 9, present the most significant conclusions from theproject analysis phase, grouped according to theme. They follow classicevaluation criteria: coordination, effectiveness, efficiency, relevance and impact.From there, conclusions and recommendations flow, of which a general naturewas chosen in order to invite greater interest not only from actors in Congo butalso institutions intervening in similar conditions in other parts of the world.In addition, during the evaluation, and in accordance with the TOR, 4 otherdocuments were developed 15 : The Preliminary Report contains an analysis of the project database to beevaluated, as was presented by the Steering Committee. It captures theevaluation methodology presented at the inception meetings in January2010 in Kinshasa, Goma and Bukavu 16 , and that were subsequentlyadopted by the Steering Committee. The Policy Report (French and English versions) presents an examinationof the strategies used by the eleven member organisations of theCommittee, and an analysis of overall policy coordination. A sample of 51projects was selected during this phase, based on the database. The Field Mission Report describs in detail the work achieved and the finaladjustments made to the project sample, as a result of constraints andcircumstances encountered. This field report was sent to the SteeringCommittee, the consultative groups, as was the Policy Report.The volume 2 of supplementary annexes from the synthesis report containsdetailed analysis of certain aspects deemed particularly important for developing15 These reports are in the annexes and on the CD Rom.16 Bunia was not visited at this stage for reasons of time.
JOINT EVALUATION OF CONFLICT PREVENTION AND PEACE BUILDING IN DRCVOLUME 1the conclusions 17 . This second volume is designed for individuals interested indeepening their understanding of some of the foundational analysis.The evaluation team then proceeded to establish consultative groups in Kinshasa,Goma and Bukavu, and as of May 2010, in Bunia. These consultative groups,numbering about 100 individuals 18 and were chaired by representatives of theMinisters of Planning and from each of the three Provinces. They constituted animportant factor for maintaining the evaluation’s relevance; they allowed theevaluation to maintain an active dialogue with the principal stakeholders 19 . Thesegroups benefited from power point presentations of the overall evaluationconclusions, and were able to discuss the development of recommendations.All the complementary reports to the synthesis report described above, as well asthe power point slides, are in the public domain, and are available on CD-Rom.2.2 Analytical Framework and Choice of Evaluation ThemesThis evaluation has four elements that constitute its overall framework:1. The evaluation questions (as described in the previous section and drawnfrom the TOR);2. A conflict analysis (presented in Chapter 3);3. A project sample (the full database is found in Chapter 4); and4. The themes of intervention based on the hypotheses developed (presentedfurther down in this chapter).The framework could be represented in the following way:17 This contains a full description, project by project of the 51 sampled, the conflict analysis and analysis ofthe mining sector as a source of conflict in addition to the links between justice and demobilisation, and adiscussion on methodology.18 The list of members of the Consultative Groups is provided in Appendix.19 It should be noted that the consultative groups are distinct from the conflict mapping groups.
Page 2: JOINT EVALUATION OF CONFLICT PREVEN
Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTSTABLE OF CONTENTS
Page 7 and 8: LIST OF ACRONYMS11.11.11 Belgian NG
Page 9 and 10: ICGLR International Conference for
Page 11 and 12: USAIDWBWFPZFDUnited States Agency f
Page 13 and 14: JOINT EVALUATION OF CONFLICT PREVEN
Page 53 and 54: Conflict driversConflictMappingwork
Page 55 and 56: Lack of military capacity/ lack of
Page 81 and 82:
JOINT EVALUATION OF CONFLICT PREVEN
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172:
show all

Amani Labda - Peace Maybe Joint Evaluation of Conflict - Channel ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?