<strong>TAP</strong> <strong>Field</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>No</strong>. 5 Figure 46 Parish division <strong>of</strong> Shetland asdocumented in the Old Statistical Account(1791-99) with the location <strong>of</strong> <strong>gallow</strong> <strong>hills</strong> andpossible <strong>gallow</strong>s sites.Parishes: 1 Dunrossness; 2 Sandwick; 3 Burra; 4Cunningsburgh; 5 Tingwall; 6 Bressay; 7 Whiteness;8 Foula; 9 Sandsting; 10 Walls; 11 Nesting; 12 Sandness;13 Aithsting; 14 Whalsay; 15 Papa Stour; 16Lunasting; 17 Delting; 18 <strong>No</strong>rthmavine; 19 South-Yell; 20 Fetlar; 21 Unst; 22 <strong>No</strong>rth-Yell; 23 Mid-Yell;24 Weisdale; 25 Lerwick; 26 Quarffanother, more interesting thing: several <strong>of</strong> thediscussed <strong>gallow</strong>s sites are indeed close to the(theoretical) border <strong>of</strong> different parishes. Thebest examples are the Know <strong>of</strong> Wilga, whichlies at the border <strong>of</strong> Cunningsburgh and Sandwick,and the Gallow Hill <strong>of</strong> Walls, which isclose to the border <strong>of</strong> Sandsting, ‘guarding’the Bridge <strong>of</strong> Walls. If we assume that Deltingwas divided into several parishes, with St.Magnus church in Laxobigging and St. Olaf’schurch in Olnairth as the principle churches,Figure 47 Pre-reformation parish churches(after Cant 1975, see also ig. 44) and theirassociated parishes modelled as Thiessen-polygonswith the location <strong>of</strong> <strong>gallow</strong> <strong>hills</strong> and possible<strong>gallow</strong>s sites.the Gallow Hill <strong>of</strong> Brae would be exactly at theborder. The same applies to Gulga in Gluss, locatednear the theoretical border between theparishes <strong>of</strong> St. Ofaf’s church in Ollaberry andSt. Magnus’ (?) church in Hillswick, as well asto Muckle Heog, at the border between theparishes <strong>of</strong> St. Mary’s church in Haroldswickand St. John’s in Baliasta. The so-called GallowsKnowe at Holsigarth in Mid-Yell is rightat the border between Mid- and South-Yell,both <strong>of</strong> which are listed separately in the OldStatistical Account. As stated above, the GallowHills <strong>of</strong> Unst, Fetlar and Whalsay can alsobe considered to be located at the border <strong>of</strong>their parishes.However, it needs to be stressed that not all32
Gallow <strong>hills</strong><strong>of</strong> the discussed sites follow this rule. The GallowHill <strong>of</strong> Huesbreck, Golgo in Sandwick andthe Watch Hill (Gallow Hill?) in <strong>No</strong>rthmavineare in the centre rather than at the border <strong>of</strong>their respective parishes.Summarising the above, it is hard to see anyconnection between the <strong>gallow</strong>s place namesand the alleged thing-sites or the division <strong>of</strong>the thing-districts. There is, however, a verystrong link with the pre-Reformation parishchurches and the early modern parish division.Most <strong>of</strong> the <strong>gallow</strong>s sites are close toan old parish church and directed towardsan internal parish boundary; that is, near theborder <strong>of</strong> several parishes, which must havebeen joined together before the 17th century.Gallows and prehistoricmonumentsOne <strong>of</strong> the common features that Smith(2006) identiied in his analysis <strong>of</strong> Shetland’s<strong>gallow</strong>s sites was their close associationwith prehistoric monuments. Most <strong>of</strong> thesemonuments can be identiied as Neolithicand Bronze Age burial cairns. Only in Golgo inSandwick, the place <strong>of</strong> execution is reportedto have been a standing stone, which, unfortunately,does not survive.The association <strong>of</strong> (Medieval) <strong>gallow</strong>s withprehistoric monuments, especially barrows,is well known from all over north-westernEurope (Meurkens 2010; Reynolds 2009).However, we need to distinguish betweenprehistoric barrows called Gallow Hill, andlarge, natural <strong>hills</strong>, which bear the same nameand have prehistoric burials on their summitor slope. In the former case, the namerefers to the prehistoric monument itself(although the nature <strong>of</strong> the monument neednot have been apparent to those, who coinedthe name); in the latter case, the name refersto a natural hill, which just happens to hostone or more prehistoric sites. In the lattercase, the association between the prehistoricmonument and the place <strong>of</strong> execution is lessevident and needs further veriication. Forthe <strong>gallow</strong>s sites in Shetland, this is very dif-icult, since we do not know the exact location<strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the <strong>gallow</strong>s. To assume that they mayhave been located on or near the prehistoricmonuments would be an obvious circularargument.Of the 13 sites discussed above, seven arehilltops or hillocks with a cairn on their summit.At least three <strong>of</strong> them are problematic:the summit <strong>of</strong> the Gallow Hill in Tingwall ismerely marked by a small, undateable stoneheap, which does not seem to have formed animpressive monument at any time. There aresome more elaborate structures nearby, butagain, we do not know the exact location <strong>of</strong>the <strong>gallow</strong>s. The same applies to the GallowHill <strong>of</strong> Unst, which has some truly spectacularcairns, but lacks a distinct summit. For thetime being, the evidence for the <strong>gallow</strong>s sitein Gluss is very weak, and its identiication,as Smith (2006) argued, is partially based onthe presence <strong>of</strong> a prehistoric cairn. Hence, thissite should be excluded from the discussion toprevent circular reasoning.In ive cases, there is no evident association<strong>of</strong> the <strong>gallow</strong>s site with any prehistoric monuments.There are burial cairns on the GallowHills <strong>of</strong> Walls and Brae, but they are located atthe base or on the slope <strong>of</strong> the hill. The GallowHills <strong>of</strong> Scalloway and Fetlar and the hill <strong>of</strong>Holsigarth do not host any visible prehistoricsites at all.To this it must be added, that it is harder toind a hill without visible prehistoric remainsin Shetland than one with. In my opinion,there is not enough evidence to postulate ageneral association <strong>of</strong> the Medieval places <strong>of</strong>execution in Shetland with prehistoric (sepulchral)monuments.However, the situation is slightly differentfor the vanished standing stone at Golgo inSandwick. Here, the tradition directly describesthe use <strong>of</strong> a possibly prehistoric monumentas a gibbet. There is a similar examplefrom Aberdeenshire: the Hanging Stone onGallows Hill near Rosehearty, a tall standingstone now included in a ield wall (Fig.48), is also said to have been used to hangpeople. 32 In fact, numerous standing stones33