from the ground up - The Tyee

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Excerpts from the ensuing discussion in The Tyee’s comment section:Tough Question, Monteposted by “VivianLea Doubt” on January 12, 2011But after a little reflection, I think transportation hasto come first among elements. In the face of peakoil and water shortages that have hit many Canadianmunicipalities, this may seem, gosh almost frivolous...In thinking about the best community I ever lived in,it was actually also the poorest. What this meant wasthat people walked, took the bus, rode their bikes -obviously because they had to - and the corollary wasthat anywhere one went there were opportunities tomeet ones’ neighbours.On any given day then, I had brief, friendly conversations- or even simply exchanges of greetings, as Imoved about my neighbourhood. The impact of thison obesity, or traffic jams, or a myriad of other factorsprobably cannot be overstated. Certainly, its’ impacton social relationships cannot be overstated; here wasa place where school children walked to school, andneighbours looked out for them, where elders werelooked out for, too, where we felt mostly confidentand safe in our place. This is in stark contrast to thesterile subdivision where I now reluctantly reside -where everyone has a car and no one talks to eachother because they never see each other.I currently am involved in the research, design and(eventual) construction of a Living Building registeredproject just outside Victoria and, for me, thepriority is to try to BALANCE all the elements inorder to create a building that sits comfortably in itsenvironment.That being said, sometimes the elements are self-selecting.For instance; we may not have a choice as toour site, and this could have implications with regardsto transportation, etc. that are outside our control(short of not building at all).I believe we need to have an holistic approach whichrecognises the conditions that apply and works tomaximise the potential of all the elements.Maybe, just maybe, if we had neighbourhoods wherepeople walked to the store, the coffee shop, the bus- maybe this might be the catalyst for the other deepchanges that need to be made.Why the need to prioritize?posted by “stevesatow” on January 13, 2011Monte, firstly I want to say that I have enjoyed readingthis series of articles on green building. Thankyou.That being said, I question the premise that there is aneed to artificially prioritise ANY element in favourof others when drafting a certification programme.32
CASE STUDY #3: Choi BuildinggreenfromthegroundupPhoto by Justin LangilleC.K. Choi BuildingPoint Grey, VancouverCompleted: 1996Use: OfficeDistinction: 1995 Progressive Architecture Award (among others)Ahead-of-its-time passive design elements give the C.K. Choi building standout energy performance. Openedin 1996 to provide 30,000 sq. ft. of resource and office space for the Institute of Asian Research at U.B.C. inVancouver, the C.K. Choi was the first green building on campus. Architects Matsuzaki Wright Inc. relied onlarge operable windows for ventilation and natural lighting, reducing energy costs by 192,000 kilowatt hoursper year. The building itself was built of 50 per cent reused and recycled materials, including recycled bricksfrom university’s decommissioned militia armouries. The Choi saves approximately 100,000 gallons of watera year by using composting toilets that require no flushing, and recycling grey water from urinals and sinks forirrigation. The $6 million building won numerous awards, including the 1995 Progressive Architecture Awardfor Green Architecture and the 1996 Earth Award from the Building Operators and Managers’ Association ofB.C., for its unprecedented (at the time) sustainability.33
Page 3: greenfromthegroundupContributorsMon
Page 8 and 9: greenfromthegroundupHow Smart Is
Page 10 and 11: twentieth century, purely local mar
Page 12 and 13: Excerpts from the ensuing discussio
Page 14 and 15: Is this Canada’s Most Affordable
Page 16 and 17: “As it all turns out, we were abl
Page 18 and 19: Designers Challenged to Get Creativ
Page 23 and 24: lots. Most of the apartments would
Page 27 and 28: Council for Sustainable Development
Page 29 and 30: uildings held value relative to con
Page 31 and 32: CASE STUDY #2: The Brookgreenfromth
Page 33 and 34: drywall reduce moisture problems. Z
Page 37 and 38: six core categories: sustainable si
Page 39: There are an estimated 25,000 Passi
Page 43 and 44: could train on? For the city, it wa
Page 47 and 48: 1979 paper.“Truly superb insulati
Page 50: CASE STUDY #4: The Centre for Inter
Page 53 and 54: solid spruce provides thermal mass
Page 55 and 56: “It worked out fabulously,” he
Page 57 and 58: Low-Energy Homes Mean Thousands of
Page 59 and 60: The inside sheet of OSB will double
Page 63 and 64: How Green School Buildings Help Chi
Page 65 and 66: Airtight buildings can also create
Page 69 and 70: When it comes to meeting our future
Page 73 and 74: So Much Rain! Why Not Put It To Wor
Page 75 and 76: Discussions to this end are already
Page 77 and 78: How to Design a Building that Resto
Page 79 and 80: is we want to make sure we know at
Page 81 and 82: CASE STUDY #7: Austria PassivHausgr
Page 83 and 84: Beyond rebatesOne thing is clear: i
Page 85 and 86: Greening Homes Can Be Big Boost to
Page 87 and 88: provincial government.”There is p
Page 89 and 90: CASE STUDY #8: The Okanagan College
Page 92 and 93:
gook.”“The EPS is something tha
Page 94 and 95:
Building Green from the Ground UpWe
Page 96 and 97:
easier to tackle green projects tha
Page 98:
Excerpts from the ensuing discussio
show all

from the ground up - The Tyee

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?