Building Green <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ground UpWe asked experts how to make true sustainability <strong>the</strong> norm. Here’s what <strong>the</strong>ytold us.By Colleen KimmettArticle first published on September 21, 2011 by <strong>The</strong><strong>Tyee</strong>.ca.From modest homes made of recycled shippingcontainers, to living laboratories that actually producemore energy than <strong>the</strong>y consume, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Tyee</strong>’s‘Green <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ground Up’ series illuminates <strong>the</strong>many roles buildings play in creating a sustainablefuture.With buildings responsible for approximately 35 percent of our greenhouse gas emissions, and energyprices on <strong>the</strong> rise, <strong>the</strong>re are good social and environmentalreason to make significant shifts in our buildingstandards and expectations.In <strong>the</strong> past decade, <strong>the</strong>re have been positive developmentsin British Columbia, and particularly Vancouver,toward greener building practices. But we stillhave a long way to go.How can we make green building <strong>the</strong> norm, ra<strong>the</strong>rthan <strong>the</strong> exception? <strong>The</strong> <strong>Tyee</strong> Solutions Societysought <strong>the</strong> insights of knowledgeable veterans <strong>from</strong>across <strong>the</strong> building industry, people with <strong>the</strong> experienceto know what works and <strong>the</strong> vision to see whereit might take us. Here’s what <strong>the</strong>y had to say.Make it codeIn 2008, British Columbia introduced a green buildingcode that raised <strong>the</strong> bar for <strong>the</strong> industry across<strong>the</strong> board. It included new construction standards tosave water, improve energy performance, and make iteasier to install renewable technologies, such as solarhot water systems.Blair McCarry, a mechanical engineer with architecturalfirm Perkins & Will says <strong>the</strong>se “code forces” arekey to advancing green building techniques.Mechanical engineers like McCarry design <strong>the</strong> heating,ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systemsthat make our living space comfortable. <strong>The</strong>se systemsconsume most of <strong>the</strong> energy a building uses, sohow efficiently <strong>the</strong>y run determines to a large extentwhat <strong>the</strong> building will cost to operate as well as itsenvironmental footprint.McCarry says that <strong>up</strong> until recently, codified reductionsin energy requirements moved very slowly, “justkind of oozed down a gentle slope.”<strong>The</strong>n in 2004, <strong>the</strong> American Society of Heat-86
ing, Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineers(ASHRAE) introduced <strong>the</strong> latest iteration of itsinternationally-recognized standards and raised <strong>the</strong>bar considerably for energy efficiency in buildings.Jurisdictions across North America adoptedASHRAE’s stiffer standards. Among <strong>the</strong>m was Vancouver,which is unique in Canada for maintaining itsown bylaws to regulate building design and construction.Now Vancouver is considering adopting <strong>the</strong> evenmore stringent 2010 ASHRAE standards.“<strong>The</strong> 2010 version [of AHSRAE] is a 30 per centenergy reduction on <strong>the</strong> 2004 version,” says McCarry.“<strong>The</strong> energy norms or standards are plummeting, goingdown dramatically, as various jurisdictions adopt<strong>the</strong>m.”McCarry compares HVAC systems to <strong>the</strong> enginesystem that drives a car. “When you think of makinga more efficient vehicle, <strong>the</strong> vehicle becomes lighter,uses different materials, maybe it’s a little smaller, soit doesn’t need <strong>the</strong> V6 engine,” he explains. “By lookingat <strong>the</strong> design processes... you can figure out howto get more use out of a component.”Design a building with energy in mind -- a tighterenvelope, for example, or window shades that let inlight and heat when you need it, and block it whenyou don’t -- and automatically you require less ‘fuel’to keep it operating. <strong>The</strong> PassivHaus is a radicalexample of this; a building so tight, so well-designedthat it needs no systems at all.Sell <strong>the</strong>m on comfortAll of which gives an architect, a client’s first point ofcontact when a building is going to be developed, alarge role in determining a structure’s eventual efficiency.Architect Helen Goodland is <strong>the</strong> executive director ofVancouver’s Lighthouse Sustainable Building Centre,an enterprising non-profit whose website declares itsdedication “to advancing and catalyzing sustainabilityin British Columbia’s built environment.”Goodland agrees that with <strong>the</strong> 2008 provincial buildingcode, “everything got better.” Even so, Goodlandsays, Vancouver’s architectural aes<strong>the</strong>tic of a “city ofglass” is inherently unsustainable. While that gleamingglass office tower with ample mountain viewsmight be alluring, all that glazing also makes it inescapablyinefficient to heat and cool.Goodland notes that those fab expansive views ofmountain and ocean may lure office tenants into acommercial tower at $40 or $50 dollars a square foot-- but that when <strong>the</strong> client actually moves in, <strong>the</strong> firstthing that happens is usually that blinds go <strong>up</strong> andpartitions go in.“No one gets to see that view,” she says. “And peoplein <strong>the</strong> prestigious offices in <strong>the</strong> corner are ei<strong>the</strong>r boilingor freezing.”Yet “utility paybacks are not enough” to persuadeconsumers to choose energy efficiency, Goodlandsays emphatically. “What we find much more compellingis comfort.” She says European firms have beenquicker to catch on to <strong>the</strong> fact that a more comfortablework environment makes for happier and moreproductive employees.“I need light, I need to be acoustically protected, Ineed to be <strong>the</strong>rmally comfortable, I need to have freshair. All of those things are hard to pin down... youcan’t have a number, necessarily,” says Goodland.“But when you have it, you know you’ve got it.”LEED standards are one way to balance all of <strong>the</strong>sethings; daylight and ventilation without excessiveenergy loss through windows; acoustic protectionwithout using hazardous materials. As Katie Hyslopreported in this series, <strong>the</strong> B.C. provincial government’spush towards LEED-certified schools is making<strong>the</strong>m more efficient, but also more comfortableand conducive to learning.“Unfortunately,” says Goodland, “what we’re seeing alot still [in <strong>the</strong> marketplace] is this emphasis on formand style -- as opposed to performance. I would loveto see <strong>the</strong> architectural community step <strong>up</strong> and trulyembrace <strong>the</strong> notion of performance in <strong>the</strong>ir design.”Change is difficult. But like McCarry, Goodlandbelieves government can play a decisive role. Whengovernment is willing to “throw down <strong>the</strong> glove,” asshe puts it, and be clear about what it expects <strong>from</strong>builders now and into <strong>the</strong> future, industry finds it87