18 de 0ctubre de 2010 www.elsuapdetodos.com1352 C.D. Deakin et al. / <strong>Resuscitation</strong> 81 (2010) 1305–1352815. Rundgren M, Karlsson T, Nielsen N, Cronberg T, Johnsson P, Friberg H. Neuronspecific enolase and S-100B as predictors of outcome after cardiac arrest andinduced hypothermia. <strong>Resuscitation</strong> 2009;80:784–9.816. Fieux F, Losser MR, Bourgeois E, et al. Kidney retrieval after sudden out ofhospital refractory cardiac arrest: a cohort of uncontrolled non heart beatingdonors. Crit Care 2009;13:R141.817. Kootstra G. Statement on non-heart-beating donor programs. Transplant Proc1995;27:2965.818. Fondevila C, Hessheimer AJ, Ruiz A, et al. Liver transplant using donors afterunexpected cardiac death: novel preservation protocol and acceptance criteria.Am J Transplant 2007;7:1849–55.819. Morozumi J, Sakurai E, Matsuno N, et al. Successful kidney transplantation fromdonation after cardiac death using a load-distributing-band chest compressiondevice during long warm ischemic time. <strong>Resuscitation</strong> 2009;80:278–80.820. Perkins GD, Brace S, Gates S. Mechanical chest-compression devices: currentand future roles. Curr Opin Crit Care 2010;16:203–10.821. Engdahl J, Abrahamsson P, Bang A, Lindqvist J, Karlsson T, Herlitz J. Is hospitalcare of major importance <strong>for</strong> outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?Experience acquired from patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitatedby the same Emergency Medical Service and admitted to one of twohospitals over a 16-year period in the municipality of Goteborg. <strong>Resuscitation</strong>2000;43:201–11.822. Liu JM, Yang Q, Pirrallo RG, Klein JP, Aufderheide TP. Hospital variability ofout-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival. Prehosp Emerg Care 2008;12:339–46.823. Herlitz J, Engdahl J, Svensson L, Angquist KA, Silfverstolpe J, Holmberg S. Majordifferences in 1-month survival between hospitals in Sweden among initialsurvivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. <strong>Resuscitation</strong> 2006;70:404–9.824. Callaway CW, Schmicker R, Kampmeyer M, et al. Receiving hospital characteristicsassociated with survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. <strong>Resuscitation</strong>2010.825. Davis DP, Fisher R, Aguilar S, et al. The feasibility of a regional cardiac arrestreceiving system. <strong>Resuscitation</strong> 2007;74:44–51.826. Spaite DW, Bobrow BJ, Vadeboncoeur TF, et al. The impact of prehospital transportinterval on survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: implications <strong>for</strong>regionalization of post-resuscitation care. <strong>Resuscitation</strong> 2008;79:61–6.827. Spaite DW, Stiell IG, Bobrow BJ, et al. Effect of transport interval on out-ofhospitalcardiac arrest survival in the OPALS Study: implications <strong>for</strong> triagingpatients to specialized cardiac arrest centers. Ann Emerg Med 2009.828. Vermeer F, Oude Ophuis AJ, vd Berg EJ, et al. Prospective randomised comparisonbetween thrombolysis, rescue PTCA, and primary PTCA in patients withextensive myocardial infarction admitted to a hospital without PTCA facilities:a safety and feasibility study. Heart 1999;82:426–31.829. Widimsky P, Groch L, Zelizko M, Aschermann M, Bednar F, Suryapranata H.Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to primary angioplasty vsimmediate thrombolysis vs combined strategy <strong>for</strong> patients with acute myocardialinfarction presenting to a community hospital without a catheterizationlaboratory The PRAGUE study. Eur Heart J 2000;21:823–31.830. Widimsky P, Budesinsky T, Vorac D, et al. Long distance transport <strong>for</strong> primaryangioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Finalresults of the randomized national multicentre trial–PRAGUE-2. Eur Heart J2003;24:94–104.831. Le May MR, So DY, Dionne R, et al. A citywide protocol <strong>for</strong> primary PCI inST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2008;358:231–40.832. Abernathy 3rd JH, McGwin Jr G, Acker 3rd JE, Rue 3rd LW. Impact of a voluntarytrauma system on mortality, length of stay, and cost at a level I trauma center.Am Surg 2002;68:182–92.833. Clemmer TP, Orme Jr JF, Thomas FO, Brooks KA. Outcome of critically injuredpatients treated at Level I trauma centers versus full-service community hospitals.Crit Care Med 1985;13:861–3.834. Culica D, Aday LA, Rohrer JE. Regionalized trauma care system in Texas: implications<strong>for</strong> redesigning trauma systems. Med Sci Monit 2007;13:SR9–18.835. Hannan EL, Farrell LS, Cooper A, Henry M, Simon B, Simon R. Physiologic traumatriage criteria in adult trauma patients: are they effective in saving lives bytransporting patients to trauma centers? J Am Coll Surg 2005;200:584–92.836. Harrington DT, Connolly M, Biffl WL, Majercik SD, Cioffi WG. Transfer times todefinitive care facilities are too long: a consequence of an immature traumasystem. Ann Surg 2005;241:961–6 [discussion 6–8].837. Liberman M, Mulder DS, Lavoie A, Sampalis JS. Implementation of a traumacare system: evolution through evaluation. J Trauma 2004;56:1330–5.838. MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, et al. A national evaluation of the effectof trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med 2006;354:366–78.839. Mann NC, Cahn RM, Mullins RJ, Brand DM, Jurkovich GJ. Survival among injuredgeriatric patients during construction of a statewide trauma system. J Trauma2001;50:1111–6.840. Mullins RJ, Veum-Stone J, Hedges JR, et al. Influence of a statewide traumasystem on location of hospitalization and outcome of injured patients. J Trauma1996;40:536–45 [discussion 45–6].841. Mullins RJ, Mann NC, Hedges JR, Worrall W, Jurkovich GJ. Preferential benefitof implementation of a statewide trauma system in one of two adjacent states.J Trauma 1998;44:609–16 [discussion 17].842. Mullins RJ, Veum-Stone J, Helfand M, et al. Outcome of hospitalized injuredpatients after institution of a trauma system in an urban area. JAMA1994;271:1919–24.843. Mullner R, Goldberg J. An evaluation of the Illinois trauma system. Med Care1978;16:140–51.844. Mullner R, Goldberg J. Toward an outcome-oriented medical geography: anevaluation of the Illinois trauma/emergency medical services system. Soc SciMed 1978;12:103–10.845. Nathens AB, Jurkovich GJ, Rivara FP, Maier RV. Effectiveness of state traumasystems in reducing injury-related mortality: a national evaluation. J Trauma2000;48:25–30 [discussion 1].846. Nathens AB, Maier RV, Brundage SI, Jurkovich GJ, Grossman DC. The effectof interfacility transfer on outcome in an urban trauma system. J Trauma2003;55:444–9.847. Nicholl J, Turner J. Effectiveness of a regional trauma system in reducing mortalityfrom major trauma: be<strong>for</strong>e and after study. BMJ 1997;315:1349–54.848. Potoka DA, Schall LC, Gardner MJ, Staf<strong>for</strong>d PW, Peitzman AB, Ford HR. Impactof pediatric trauma centers on mortality in a statewide system. J Trauma2000;49:237–45.849. Sampalis JS, Lavoie A, Boukas S, et al. Trauma center designation: initial impacton trauma-related mortality. J Trauma 1995;39:232–7 [discussion 7–9].850. Sampalis JS, Denis R, Frechette P, Brown R, Fleiszer D, Mulder D. Direct transportto tertiary trauma centers versus transfer from lower level facilities: impacton mortality and morbidity among patients with major trauma. J Trauma1997;43:288-95 [discussion 95–6].851. Nichol G, Aufderheide TP, Eigel B, et al. Regional systems of care <strong>for</strong> outof-hospitalcardiac arrest: a policy statement from the American HeartAssociation. Circulation 2010;121:709–29.852. Nichol G, Soar J. Regional cardiac resuscitation systems of care. Curr Opin CritCare 2010;16:223–30.853. Soar J, Packham S. Cardiac arrest centres make sense. <strong>Resuscitation</strong>2010;81:507–8.www.elsuapdetodos.com
<strong>Resuscitation</strong> 81 (2010) 1353–136318 de 0ctubre de 2010 www.elsuapdetodos.comContents lists available at ScienceDirect<strong>Resuscitation</strong>journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/resuscitation<strong>European</strong> <strong>Resuscitation</strong> <strong>Council</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Resuscitation</strong> 2010Section 5. Initial management of acute coronary syndromesHans-Richard Arntz a,1 , Leo L. Bossaert b,∗,1 , Nicolas Danchin c , Nikolaos I. Nikolaou da Department of Cardiology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charite, Berlin, Germanyb Department of Critical Care, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgiumc Department of Coronary Artery Disease and Intensive Cardiac Care, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, Franced Constantopouleio General Hospital, Athens, GreeceSummary of main changes since 2005 <strong>Guidelines</strong>Changes in the management of acute coronary syndrome sincethe 2005 guidelines include:DefinitionsThe term non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction-acute coronarysyndrome (non-STEMI-ACS) has been introduced <strong>for</strong> bothNSTEMI and unstable angina pectoris because the differential diagnosisis dependent on biomarkers that may be detectable only afterhours, whereas decisions on treatment are dependent on the clinicalsigns at presentation.Chest pain units and decision rules <strong>for</strong> early discharge• History, clinical examinations, biomarkers, ECG criteria and riskscores are unreliable <strong>for</strong> the identification of patients who maybe safely discharged early.• The role of chest pain observation units (CPUs) is to identify, byusing repeated clinical examinations, ECG and biomarker testing,those patients who require admission <strong>for</strong> invasive procedures.This may include provocative testing and, in selected patients,imaging procedures as cardiac computed tomography, magneticresonance imaging, etc.Symptomatic treatment• Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) should beavoided.• Nitrates should not be used <strong>for</strong> diagnostic purposes.• Supplementary oxygen to be given only to those patients withhypoxaemia, breathlessness or pulmonary congestion. Hyperoxaemiamay be harmful in uncomplicated infarction.Causal treatment• <strong>Guidelines</strong> <strong>for</strong> treatment with acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) havebeen made more liberal and it may now be given by bystanderswith or without dispatchers assistance.• Revised guidance <strong>for</strong> new antiplatelet and antithrombin treatment<strong>for</strong> patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)and non-STEMI-ACS based on therapeutic strategy.• Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors be<strong>for</strong>e angiography/percutaneous coronaryintervention (PCI) are discouraged.Reperfusion strategy in STEMI• Primary PCI (PPCI) is the preferred reperfusion strategy providedit is per<strong>for</strong>med in a timely manner by an experienced team.• A nearby hospital may be bypassed by emergency medical services(EMS) provided PPCI can be achieved without too muchdelay.• The acceptable delay between start of fibrinolysis and first ballooninflation varies widely between about 45 and 180 mindepending on infarct localisation, age of the patient, and durationof symptoms.• ‘Rescue PCI’ should be undertaken if fibrinolysis fails.• The strategy of routine PCI immediately after fibrinolysis (‘facilitatedPCI’) is discouraged.• Patients with successful fibrinolysis but not in a PCI-capable hospitalshould be transferred <strong>for</strong> angiography and eventual PCI,per<strong>for</strong>med optimally 6–24 h after fibrinolysis (the ‘pharmacoinvasive’approach).• Angiography and, if necessary, PCI may be reasonable in patientswith return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after cardiac arrestand may be part of a standardised post-cardiac arrest protocol.• To achieve these goals, the creation of networks including EMS,non-PCI capable hospitals and PCI hospitals is useful.www.elsuapdetodos.comPrimary and secondary prevention∗ Corresponding author.E-mail address: leo.bossaert@ua.ac.be (L.L. Bossaert).1 These individuals contributed equally to this manuscript and are equal first coauthors.• Recommendations <strong>for</strong> the use of beta-blockers are morerestricted: there is no evidence <strong>for</strong> routine intravenous betablockersexcept in specific circumstances such as <strong>for</strong> the0300-9572/$ – see front matter © 2010 <strong>European</strong> <strong>Resuscitation</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.016