10.07.2015 Views

Multiplet Effects in X-ray Absorption - Inorganic Chemistry and ...

Multiplet Effects in X-ray Absorption - Inorganic Chemistry and ...

Multiplet Effects in X-ray Absorption - Inorganic Chemistry and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

F. de Groot / Coord<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>Chemistry</strong> Reviews 249 (2005) 31–63 47Fig. 14. Left: The crystal field multiplet states of 3d 7 <strong>and</strong> 3d 8 configurations.The multiplet states with energies higher than +2.0 eV are notshown. ∆¯ was set to +2.0 eV. Right: the charge transfer multiplet calculationsfor the comb<strong>in</strong>ation of crystal field multiplets as <strong>in</strong>dicated on theleft <strong>and</strong> with the hopp<strong>in</strong>g rang<strong>in</strong>g from 0.0 to 2.0 eV as <strong>in</strong>dicated belowthe states.ter of gravity of the 3d 8 configuration was set at 2.0 eV,which identifies with a value of ∆¯ of 2.0 eV. The effectivecharge transfer energy ∆ is def<strong>in</strong>ed as the energy differencebetween the lowest states of the 3d 7 <strong>and</strong> the 3d 8 L¯ configurationsas <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> Fig. 14. Because the multiplet splitt<strong>in</strong>gis larger for 3d 7 than for 3d 8 L¯, the effective ∆ is larger than∆. The effect of charge transfer is to form a ground statethat is a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of 3d 7 <strong>and</strong> 3d 8 L¯. The energies of thesestates were calculated on the right half of the figure. If thehopp<strong>in</strong>g parameter t is set equal to zero, both configurationsdo not mix <strong>and</strong> the states of the mixed configuration are exactlyequal to 3d 7 , <strong>and</strong> at higher energy to 3d 8 L¯. Turn<strong>in</strong>gon the hopp<strong>in</strong>g parameter, one observes that the energy ofthe lowest configuration is further lowered. This state willstill be the 4 T 1g configuration, but with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g hopp<strong>in</strong>g,it will have <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g 3d 8 L¯ character. One can observe thatthe second lowest state is split by the hopp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> the mostbond<strong>in</strong>g comb<strong>in</strong>ation obta<strong>in</strong>s an energy that comes close tothe 4 T 1g ground state. This excited state is a doublet state<strong>and</strong> if the energy of this state would cross with the 4 T 1g stateone would observe a charge-transfer <strong>in</strong>duced sp<strong>in</strong>-transition.It was shown that charge transfer effects can lead to newtypes of ground states, for example, <strong>in</strong> case of a 3d 6 configuration,crystal field effects lead to a transition of a S = 2high-sp<strong>in</strong> to a S = 0 low-sp<strong>in</strong> ground state. Charge transfereffects are also able to lead to an S = 1 <strong>in</strong>termediate sp<strong>in</strong>ground state [32].Fig. 14 can be exp<strong>and</strong>ed to Tanabe–Sugano like diagramsfor two configurations 3d N + 3d N+1 L¯, <strong>in</strong>stead ofthe usual Tanabe–Sugano diagrams as a function of onlyone configuration. The energies of such two-configurationTanabe–Sugano diagrams are affected by the Slater–Condonparameters (often approximated with the B Racah parameter),the cubic crystal field 10Dq, the charge transfer energy∆¯ <strong>and</strong> the hopp<strong>in</strong>g strength t. The hopp<strong>in</strong>g can be made symmetrydependent <strong>and</strong> one can add crystal field parametersrelated to lower symmetries, yield<strong>in</strong>g to an endless series ofTanabe–Sugano diagrams. What is actually important is todeterm<strong>in</strong>e the possible types of ground states for a particularion, say Co II . Scann<strong>in</strong>g through the parameter space ofF 2 , F 4 , 10Dq, Ds, Dt, LS 3d , t Γ <strong>and</strong> ∆¯ one can determ<strong>in</strong>ethe nature of the ground state. This ground state can thenbe checked with 2p X-<strong>ray</strong> absorption. After the <strong>in</strong>clusionof exchange <strong>and</strong> magnetic fields one has also a means tocompare the ground state with techniques like X-<strong>ray</strong> MCD,optical MCD <strong>and</strong> EPR.Compar<strong>in</strong>g Fig. 13 with Fig. 14 one observes the transitionfrom a s<strong>in</strong>gle particle picture to a multiplet configurationalpicture. One can <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple put more b<strong>and</strong> character<strong>in</strong>to this configurational picture <strong>and</strong> a first step is to make atransition from a s<strong>in</strong>gle state to a series of 3d 8 L¯ states, eachwith its <strong>in</strong>cluded multiplet but with each a different effectivecharge transfer energy. One can choose to use a moreelaborate cluster model <strong>in</strong> which the neighbor atoms are actually<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the calculation [29,30,33]. These clustermodels are not described further here.1.5.2. F<strong>in</strong>al state effectsThe f<strong>in</strong>al state Hamiltonian of X-<strong>ray</strong> absorption <strong>in</strong>cludesthe core hole plus an extra electron <strong>in</strong> the valence region.One adds the energy <strong>and</strong> occupation of the 2p core hole tothe Hamiltonian. The core hole potential U pd <strong>and</strong> its higherorder terms g pd give rise to the overlap of a 2p wave functionwith a 3d wave function <strong>and</strong> is given as a summation overtwo 2p <strong>and</strong> two 3d-wavefunctions 2p 1 ,2p 2 ,3d 1 <strong>and</strong> 3d 2 :H 2p = ε 2p a † 2p a 2p +∑g pd a † 3d1 a 2p1a † 2p2 a 3d2Γ 1 ,Γ 2 ,Γ 3 ,Γ 4+ ∑l · sa † 2p1 a 2p2Γ 1 ,Γ 2The term g pd describes all two-electron <strong>in</strong>tegrals <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>cludesU pd as well as the effects of the Slater–Condon parametersF 2 , G 1 <strong>and</strong> G 3 . In addition, there is a term <strong>in</strong> theHamiltonian due to the 2p sp<strong>in</strong>–orbit coupl<strong>in</strong>g. There is nocrystal field effect on core states.H AIM = ε 3d a † 3d a 3d + ε k a † v a v + t v3d (a † 3d a v + a † v a 3d)+ ∑Γ 1 ,Γ 2 ,Γ 3 ,Γ 4g dd a † 3d1 a 3d2a † 3d3 a 3d4+ ∑Γ 1 ,Γ 2l · sa † 3d1 a 3d2 + H CF + ε 2p a † 2p a 2p+ ∑Γ 1 ,Γ 2 ,Γ 3 ,Γ 4g pd a † 3d1 a 2p1a † 2p2 a 3d2+ ∑Γ 1 ,Γ 2l · sa † 2p1 a 2p2The overall Hamiltonian <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al state is given. Thisequation is solved <strong>in</strong> the same manner as the <strong>in</strong>itial state

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!