11.07.2015 Views

Aspects of Disability Decision Making: Data and Materials

Aspects of Disability Decision Making: Data and Materials

Aspects of Disability Decision Making: Data and Materials

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C. Chronology <strong>of</strong> Significant <strong>Disability</strong> Related Judicial, Legislative, <strong>and</strong>Agency ActionsFollowing is a chronology <strong>of</strong> major court cases, legislation, <strong>and</strong> agency actions (including regulations<strong>and</strong> agency rulings) that have affected the way Social Security <strong>Disability</strong> Insurance (SSDI) <strong>and</strong> SupplementalSecurity Income (SSI) determinations are made. More extensive information is available at SSA’s websiteon its “History” page (http://www.socialsecurity.gov/history).1950 The Social Security Act Amendments <strong>of</strong> 1950 (Public Law 81-734) provided for Federal financial assistanceto States for programs designed for “aid to the permanently <strong>and</strong> totally disabled” in theform <strong>of</strong> “money payments to, or medical care on behalf <strong>of</strong>, or any type <strong>of</strong> remedial care recognizedunder State law in behalf <strong>of</strong>” needy disabled adults.1954 The Social Security Amendments <strong>of</strong> 1954 (P.L. 83-761) included a provision designed to prevent theerosion <strong>of</strong> retirement <strong>and</strong> survivors benefits as a result <strong>of</strong> a worker having a period <strong>of</strong> disability.This “disability freeze” excluded from the computation <strong>of</strong> retirement benefits any time when aworker was disabled.1956 The Social Security Amendments <strong>of</strong> 1956 (P.L. 84-880) provided for Social Security <strong>Disability</strong> Insurance(DI) benefits for workers between the ages <strong>of</strong> 50 <strong>and</strong> 65 who were found to be unable toengage in substantial gainful activity due to a medically determinable physical or mental impairmentwhich is expected to result in death or which is <strong>of</strong> long-continued <strong>and</strong> indefinite duration.They also established benefits for disabled dependent children <strong>of</strong> a retired or deceased worker.1958 The Social Security Amendments <strong>of</strong> 1958 (P.L. 85-840) established benefits for the dependents <strong>of</strong>disabled workers1960 The Social Security Amendments <strong>of</strong> 1960 (P.L. 86-778) extended disability benefits to workers underage 50, eliminated the waiting period for disabled workers who were prior SSDI beneficiaries, orhad a previously disabling condition in the five years prior to onset <strong>of</strong> current disability.In Kerner v. Flemming, 283 F.2d 916 (2 nd Cir. 1960), the Second Circuit Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals held thatwhen a claimant had shown that he could not do his past work, the burden <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> shifted to thegovernment to show what the claimant could do <strong>and</strong> what employment opportunities there werefor someone who was limited in the same way as the applicant.1963 In Hayes v. Celebrezze, 311 F.2d 648 (5 th Cir. 1963), the Fifth Circuit Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals held thatthe government must consider pain when making disability decisions, even though the cause <strong>of</strong>the pain could not be demonstrated by objective clinical <strong>and</strong> laboratory findings. By 1967, severalother circuit courts <strong>of</strong> appeals had issued similar holdings.1965 The Social Security Amendments <strong>of</strong> 1965 (P.L. 89-97) changed the statutory disability durationrequirement from “long-continued <strong>and</strong> indefinite duration” to “has lasted or can be expected tolast for a continuous period <strong>of</strong> not less than 12 months.” These amendments also changed thedefinition <strong>of</strong> disability for the blind over age 55, adopting a st<strong>and</strong>ard based on the inability toengage in work requiring skills comparable to those <strong>of</strong> past occupations.Appeals courts in two circuits held that, when denying disability on the basis that a claimant hasthe ability to do other work (that is, work other than his or her past job), the government mustshow that jobs are available in the claimant’s area.<strong>Aspects</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Disability</strong> <strong>Decision</strong> <strong>Making</strong>: <strong>Data</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Materials</strong> 89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!