11.07.2015 Views

130x1g2 - CCSDS

130x1g2 - CCSDS

130x1g2 - CCSDS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TM SYNCHRONIZATION AND CHANNEL CODING—SUMMARY OF CONCEPT AND RATIONALEFigure 8-1: Power Efficiency versus Spectral Efficiency for Several <strong>CCSDS</strong> CodesWhen power is extremely constrained, one must choose a code from the left side of the figureand accept the corresponding bandwidth expansion. Conversely, when bandwidth isconstrained, one must choose from the points towards the bottom of the figure, at the cost ofincreased energy per bit. Turbo codes are good choices for power-constrained links, andLDPC codes serve well when bandwidth is constrained, typically for higher data-rate links.It may be noted that the Reed-Solomon and convolutional codes are out-performed in bothmetrics by LDPC codes.Also shown in figure 8-1 is the capacity limit on a binary-input AWGN channel, and theunconstrained AWGN channel capacity (Reference [47]). The region between these capacitylimits becomes available with the use of higher order modulations, as shown in figure 8-2.To the extent possible with available equipment, the use of a higher order modulation may bea more practical means for saving bandwidth than the use of a code with rate much above0.8. For the QPSK and 16-APSK modulations, performance results are shown only for thelongest block length at each code rate. While 8-PSK data are also omitted for clarity, theycan be interpolated from the QPSK and 16-APSK results.<strong>CCSDS</strong> 130.1-G-2 Page 8-3 November 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!