24.11.2012 Views

Arctic technology: Winterisation of FPSO 38 Cruise ... - Ship & Offshore

Arctic technology: Winterisation of FPSO 38 Cruise ... - Ship & Offshore

Arctic technology: Winterisation of FPSO 38 Cruise ... - Ship & Offshore

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SHIPBUILDING & EQUIPMENT | GREEN SHIP TECHNOLOGY<br />

Effi ciency<br />

tests<br />

EEDI | European Maritime Safety<br />

Agency (EMSA) has awarded Finish<br />

service provider Deltamarin a<br />

contract for a study on tests and<br />

trials <strong>of</strong> the Energy Effi ciency Design<br />

Index (EEDI) as developed<br />

by the IMO. The main objective<br />

<strong>of</strong> the contract is to provide<br />

EMSA with a technical study on<br />

the EEDI, in order to refi ne its<br />

application for certain categories<br />

<strong>of</strong> RoRo ships and to identify the<br />

potential application <strong>of</strong> the index<br />

or any alternative method to<br />

improve the energy effi ciency <strong>of</strong><br />

purpose-built vessels from a technical<br />

and design point <strong>of</strong> view.<br />

Deltamarin’s commission includes<br />

fi rstly the refi nement <strong>of</strong><br />

the EEDI formula for RoRo and<br />

RoPax vessels. In this context,<br />

Deltamarin shall assess the current<br />

baselines approach for volume<br />

and weight carriers and<br />

consider the various IMO submissions<br />

at previous MEPC sessions.<br />

If necessary, a refi nement<br />

or an adjustment <strong>of</strong> the baselines<br />

for the volume and weight carriers<br />

will be proposed. Deltamarin<br />

is also to identify possible correction<br />

factors to be included in<br />

the EEDI formula for RoRo and<br />

RoPax vessels. In case no correction<br />

factor is suitable, Deltamarin<br />

has to develop an alternative<br />

approach to address energy effi<br />

ciency for the applicable vessel<br />

types, arrange test/trials <strong>of</strong><br />

the proposed approach, and<br />

draw conclusions on its suitability.<br />

The study will also include<br />

a comparative analysis looking<br />

at the greenhouse gas emission<br />

reduction potential between the<br />

current EEDI approach and the<br />

potential new proposal.<br />

Secondly, according to the contract,<br />

Deltamarin will develop a<br />

frame work to address the energy<br />

effi ciency <strong>of</strong> purpose-built vessels<br />

and specialised ships. Based<br />

on representative samples establishing<br />

baselines for these vessel<br />

categories, requirements for any<br />

additional correction factors will<br />

be identifi ed. The main goal will<br />

be to develop methods on how to<br />

improve energy effi ciency <strong>of</strong> these<br />

vessels during the design phase.<br />

20 <strong>Ship</strong> & <strong>Offshore</strong> | 2011 | N o 1<br />

Corrosion studies on ballast water<br />

CLEANBALLAST | Germanybased<br />

RWO, a worldwide supplier<br />

<strong>of</strong> systems for water and<br />

wastewater treatment aboard<br />

ships and <strong>of</strong>fshore rigs, in cooperation<br />

with a leading European<br />

corrosion institute<br />

(SWEREA KIMAB) and the classifi<br />

cation society Germanischer<br />

Lloyd (GL), has carried out<br />

thorough accelerated corrosion<br />

studies in treated full-salinity<br />

sea water with the CleanBallast<br />

ballast water treatment (BWT)<br />

system. The tests simulated operation<br />

over an approximate<br />

entire lifetime <strong>of</strong> a ballast water<br />

tank/piping structure <strong>of</strong> approximately<br />

40 years.<br />

Functionality <strong>of</strong><br />

CleanBallast<br />

CleanBallast has been designed<br />

to operate in waters with low<br />

and full salinity. The natural<br />

corrosiveness <strong>of</strong> those environments<br />

differs signifi cantly, with<br />

full salinity (>32PSU) being a<br />

very corrosive medium to common<br />

construction materials. A<br />

larger quantity <strong>of</strong> active chlorine<br />

also has further negative<br />

effects on corrosiveness, such<br />

as the increase <strong>of</strong> the wear rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> non-passivated metals.<br />

The disinfection unit “Ecto-<br />

Sys®” utilised by the Clean-<br />

Ballast system is based on<br />

electrochemistry but operates<br />

very differently compared with<br />

conventional chlorination or<br />

electrolysis systems using salt<br />

water (containing chloride),<br />

where a maximum production<br />

<strong>of</strong> active chlorine is desired.<br />

Instead, EctoSys® produces<br />

short-lived mixed oxidants,<br />

which have a more striking<br />

and powerful effect compared<br />

with active chlorine. Thus, the<br />

EctoSys® is not dependent on<br />

chloride content (salinity) but<br />

produces oxidants directly<br />

from the water. The negative<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> active chlorine on<br />

corrosiveness can effectively<br />

be avoided.<br />

In natural brackish and full-salinity<br />

seawater, the disinfection<br />

unit EctoSys® will – besides the<br />

short-lived oxidants hydroxyl<br />

radicals – only produce low<br />

levels (up to maximum 2mg/l)<br />

<strong>of</strong> more persistent oxidants,<br />

summarised as TRO (Total<br />

Residual Oxidants). Being oxidising<br />

agents, such substances<br />

in higher concentrations are<br />

relevant for corrosive properties<br />

<strong>of</strong> water. TRO will decay<br />

via interactions with dissolved<br />

organic matter. Fig. 1 illustrates<br />

a typical decay curve <strong>of</strong> TRO,<br />

showing that the natural blank<br />

level <strong>of</strong> 0.2 – 0.3mg/l <strong>of</strong> TRO is<br />

reached within approximately<br />

two hours.<br />

Simulation <strong>of</strong> entire<br />

lifetime<br />

The studies undertaken by<br />

RWO, SWEREA-KIMAB and<br />

Fig. 1: Natural decay <strong>of</strong> residual oxidants TRO produced by<br />

CleanBallast, T=22°C, pH=7.9, salinity 15PSU<br />

GL included accelerated comparative<br />

studies (treated and<br />

untreated seawater) using both<br />

uncoated steel test specimens<br />

but more importantly test<br />

specimens with two-coat paint<br />

systems according to NOR-<br />

SOK Coating 3B approved according<br />

to DNV Classifi cation<br />

Note 33.1 class B1, common<br />

and approved for use in ballast<br />

water tanks, for instance,<br />

the Jotun system ‘Balloxy HB<br />

light’. The tests included parallel<br />

tests with both continuous<br />

exposure to the water and<br />

intermittent cyclic exposure<br />

to water and air. Intermittent<br />

exposure better resembles the<br />

real conditions in ballast water<br />

tanks and a corrosive case<br />

worse than continuous exposure.<br />

The tests were accelerated,<br />

that is, the exposure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

test panels was set to simulate<br />

an approximate entire lifetime<br />

<strong>of</strong> a ballast water tank/piping<br />

system, regarding initial maximum<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> TRO<br />

and natural decay.<br />

The evaluation <strong>of</strong> the exposed<br />

test panels was performed according<br />

to the following standards:<br />

� SS-EN ISO 9227:2006 (salt<br />

spray 1440 h)<br />

� SS-EN ISO 6270-1 (condense<br />

1440 h)<br />

� SS-EN ISO 2812-2 :2007<br />

(immersion 3000 h)<br />

�<br />

EN ISO 15711:2004 (ca-<br />

thodic 3000 h).<br />

Based on the result <strong>of</strong> these<br />

tests, both SWEREA KIMAB<br />

and Germanischer Lloyd concluded<br />

that there are no additional<br />

corrosive properties <strong>of</strong><br />

seawater treated with CleanBallast,<br />

compared with untreated<br />

seawater. These studies were<br />

later recommended by the IMO<br />

technical group GESAMP-BW-<br />

WG, as part <strong>of</strong> the guidance for<br />

other vendors developing ballast<br />

water treatment analysis, to<br />

be included in their respective<br />

approval process (ref. MEPC<br />

59/2/16, §4.5.1).<br />

CleanBallast is certifi ed and<br />

classifi ed by GL as compatible<br />

with epoxy-based ballast water<br />

tank coating systems.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!