11.07.2015 Views

(Volume 4) - Mental Health Disorders - Vula - University of Cape Town

(Volume 4) - Mental Health Disorders - Vula - University of Cape Town

(Volume 4) - Mental Health Disorders - Vula - University of Cape Town

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The upstream determinants <strong>of</strong> mental healthin the Western <strong>Cape</strong> ProvinceThe <strong>Mental</strong> <strong>Health</strong> workgroup was asked to identify and address the“upstream” determinants <strong>of</strong> common mental disorders. The term “upstream”refers to those socio-structural factors that are considered to be the “rootcauses” <strong>of</strong> mental illness, while downstream causes typically are the “final” ordirect cause in a causal pathway. So, for example, poverty (upstream) maylead to food insecurity (upstream), which leads to poor nutrition(downstream), which can result in B12 deficiency (downstream), whichcauses mental illness. A simplified version <strong>of</strong> this model is presented in Figure4 below. This model also takes account <strong>of</strong> how downstream factors are nestedwithin upstream factors. An example <strong>of</strong> this would be the influence that thelack <strong>of</strong> access to recreational facilities (a structural factor) may have onadolescent alcohol use (a behavioural factor), which in turn has mental healthconsequences.Figure 4: A Model <strong>of</strong> Risk Factors for Disease“Downstream”“Upstream”BiologicalBehaviouralSocietalStructuralMethodologyThe upstream determinants <strong>of</strong> mental health in the Western <strong>Cape</strong> Provincewere initially identified by the authors and then presented to the ExpertGroup and Peer Reviewers for comment. For each postulated upstream factor,searches <strong>of</strong> the literature were conducted to determine the strength <strong>of</strong>evidence for a causal relationship between this factor and common mentaldisorders. The strength <strong>of</strong> any piece <strong>of</strong> evidence was assessed using standardepidemiological principles (study design, potential for bias, and so on).Wherever possible, South African data has been presented. Where data fromother settings is utilised, applicability to the South African setting has beenconsidered.21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!