West Mojave Plan FEIR/S - Desert Managers Group

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Lancaster Landfill and Recycling Center: This class III landfill facility is located onEast Avenue F, Lancaster, and serves the city of Lancaster and the surrounding unincorporatedcounty area. The landfill is owned and operated by Waste Management of California, Inc. Itoccupies 276 acres, of which 209 acres are identified for waste disposal. The facility is permittedfor a capacity of 22,645,000 cubic yards with a permitted throughput of 1,700 tons per day. As ofDecember 31, 2000, there was 20,583,180 cubic yards of remaining capacity. The site includes alandfill with no septage ponds. It is fenced with six-foot chain-link for security. Ravens havebeen noted in the area but not in substantial numbers. The working face is covered daily with aminimum of 6 inches of compacted soil or with a special cover made of a light weight fibrousmaterial and anchored with tires. Litter control is provided by a high net fence and portable unitslocated near the working face.In addition to these two landfills, the City of Lancaster owns and maintains a mediumvolume transfer/processing facility at their city yard on North 7 th Street <strong>West</strong>. This 16-acrefacility has a permitted capacity of 11,550 cubic cards with a throughput of 100 tons per day.San Bernardino County: County of San Bernardino Solid Waste Management Division(SBSWMD) is responsible for the operation and management of San Bernardino County’s solidwaste disposal system. SBSWMD owns and operates three landfills and eight transfer stationswithin the planning area. Landfill operations are no longer occurring at the following locationsbecause they are in the process of being closed: Newberry Disposal Site (SWIS # 33-AA-0039),the Phelan Refuse Disposal Site (SWIS # 36-AA-0044, the Hesperia Refuse Disposal Site (SWIS# 36-AA-0050), the Twentynine Palms disposal Site (SWIS# 36-AA-0060), the Lenwood-Hinkley Refuse Disposal Site (SWIS # 36-AA-0061), The Lucerne Valley Disposal Site (SWIS #36-AA-0062), the Yermo Disposal Site (SWIS # 36-AA-0047) and the Apple Valley DisposalSite (SWIS #36-AA-0048).Disposal fees at all county sites is as follows:• $10.00 for up to 500 pounds of ordinary residential waste• $34.30 per ton for residential waste over 500 pounds (prorated)• $84.30 per ton for waste requiring special handling• $103.78 per ton for tiresThe SBSWMD operates the facilities through its contract operator, Burrtec WasteIndustries, Inc. The contract operator handles the day-to-day operations and maintenance of theCounty’s Solid Waste Disposal System, including both its Landfills (both active and inactive)and its Transfer Stations.Additional information on solid waste facilities in San Bernardino County is as follows:Barstow Landfill (SWIS # 36-AA-0046): The Barstow Landfill (BSL) is a Class IIIdisposal facility with two, Class II, lined surface impoundments accepting only non-hazardoussolid wastes. The BSL began operations in 1963 and has been in continuous operation since thattime. The landfill is located in an unincorporated portion of the County on Barstow Road,Chapter 3 3-260
approximately 3 miles south of the City of Barstow, off State Highway 247. The landfill disposaloperations are currently being conducted within an approximately 47-acre refuse disposalfootprint of an approximately 640-acre site; the remaining land is utilized for the scale facility,land farming and surface impoundments. Approximately 480 acres are still undisturbed and arereserved for future expansion. The landfill has a permitted capacity of 3,584,000 cubic yards ofwhich 94,086 cubic yards was remaining as of July 8, 2002. The current operation at the currentpit has an estimated closure date of 2007. The site is located in an area designated by theUSFWS as critical habitat for the desert tortoise. The facility includes a landfill and two septageponds. The active landfill area is fenced for security but the fence is not adequate to keepscavengers out. The ponds are not covered and may attract ravens. The working face is covereddaily with a minimum of 6 inches of compacted soil.Landers Landfill (SWIS # 36-AA-0057): The Landers Sanitary Landfill (LSL) is a ClassIII facility on 637 acres, 44 of which are used for solid waste disposal. The site is located onWinters Road, east of S. Avalon Avenue in the unincorporated community of Landers. The LSLwas acquired by SBSWMD in a land transfer from the Bureau of Land Management inNovember 2000. The landfill has a permitted capacity of 3,080,000 cubic yards, with a permittedthroughput of 1200 tons per day. Remaining capacity was 326,201 cubic yards as of July 8,2002. The site has an estimated closure date of 2008. After that date the material will betransported and be replaced by transfer stations and solid waste will be transported to Victorvilleor Barstow. Facilities include a landfill and four septage ponds. The site is about 80 percentfenced with chain-link for security, which is probably not adequate to keep scavengers out.Recent inspections indicate a very large number of ravens at this facility compared to nine otherlandfills visited in San Bernardino County. The working face is covered daily with a minimum of6 inches of compacted soil.Victorville Landfill (SWIS # 36-AA-0045): The Victorville Sanitary Landfill (VSL) is aClass III regional landfill facility and is located on Stoddard Wells Road, in Victorville. The sitehas a total acreage of 80-acres, 67 of which are used for waste disposal, seven acres were used asseptage drying ponds and six acres comprised a daily/intermediate soil cover borrow area. In1998, the facility ceased accepting liquid waste and in September 2000, the liquid waste surfaceimpoundments were clean closed in compliance with applicable regulations.This facility has a permitted capacity of 7,700,000 cubic yards, with permitted throughputof 1,600 tons per day. The remaining capacity was 277,879 cubic yards as of July 8, 2002. Theactive area of the landfill that is currently in operation has an estimate closure date of 2005. Theexpansion area would continue to operate beyond this date. The facility includes a sanitarylandfill, the inactive surface impoundment area, and a borrow pit. The entire site is fenced withsix-foot chain-link for security and to reduce entry by scavengers. The working face is covereddaily with a minimum 6 inches of compacted soil. There is illegal dumping outside of the fencedarea and litter controls have, at times, not been effective.A biological opinion (1-8-94-F-8) was issued for the 37.5 acre borrow pit locatedadjacent to the landfill. The terms and conditions are generally the same as for the miningoperation, including the installation of tortoise proof fences to keep tortoises out of the pit area.Chapter 3 3-261
Page 1 and 2:
CHAPTER THREEAFFECTED ENVIRONMENT3.
Page 3 and 4:
The CDCA Plan assigns a “multiple
Page 5 and 6:
Desert Tortoise Research Natural Ar
Page 7 and 8:
closure to target shooting. Hunting
Page 9 and 10:
percentage of public land ownership
Page 11 and 12:
As of March 2004, BLM had acquired
Page 13 and 14:
Ripley Joshua Tree Woodland: The st
Page 15 and 16:
through “resource use” designat
Page 17 and 18:
Significant Ecological Areas: There
Page 19 and 20:
Wildlife and Wildflower Sanctuaries
Page 21 and 22:
Mojave River Forks Regional Park: A
Page 23 and 24:
oriented commercial uses are expect
Page 25 and 26:
HCP would include mitigation measur
Page 27 and 28:
3.1.3.12 City of RidgecrestThe City
Page 29 and 30:
It is a goal of the town’s genera
Page 31 and 32:
• Inyo California Towhee (April 1
Page 33 and 34:
(i) The taking will be incidental;(
Page 35 and 36:
handled, and number accidentally ki
Page 37 and 38:
3.1.5 California Endangered Species
Page 39 and 40:
Obtaining an Incidental Take Permit
Page 41 and 42:
Monitoring: Monitoring is often the
Page 43 and 44:
is so restrictive that project dela
Page 45 and 46:
excess moisture. A minus 4 is consi
Page 47 and 48:
Air BasinsN190I n y o C o395Ridgecr
Page 49 and 50:
Federal PM10 Planning AreasN190Owen
Page 51 and 52:
POLLUTANTOzone (O 3 )RespirablePart
Page 53 and 54:
AIRBASINAIR QUALITYDISTRICTPOLLUTAN
Page 55 and 56:
subtraction of transported ozone in
Page 57 and 58:
The general soil information and ma
Page 59 and 60:
The Marine Corps Ground Combat Cent
Page 61 and 62:
The most permeable basin-fill depos
Page 63 and 64:
Surface water was and is the major
Page 65 and 66:
A relatively small number of introd
Page 67 and 68:
freshwater or alkali wetlands, or o
Page 69 and 70:
3.3.2 Desert Tortoise3.3.2.1 Regula
Page 71 and 72:
progress toward meeting the overall
Page 73 and 74:
“higher density” and “lower d
Page 75 and 76:
several seasons (Esque 1994 in Aver
Page 77 and 78:
Assistant District Manager Molly Br
Page 79 and 80:
• Since 1975, federal land manage
Page 81 and 82:
“52 mi 2 of higher density tortoi
Page 83 and 84:
1984 Tortoise Range and Density Map
Page 85 and 86:
Higher Density Tortoise Sign Count
Page 87 and 88:
When data for the three lowest sign
Page 89 and 90:
Occurrence of Tortoises Relative to
Page 91 and 92:
Regional Declines in the Four DWMAs
Page 93 and 94:
Tortoise Distribution within the Re
Page 95 and 96:
Boarman (pers. comm., Nov 2002) has
Page 97 and 98:
tortoises are either extirpated (La
Page 99 and 100:
sites surveyed by LaRue between 199
Page 101 and 102:
aseline data are lacking. Grasses p
Page 103 and 104:
Canine Predators: This includes coy
Page 105 and 106:
The spatial distribution of 12 of 1
Page 107 and 108:
Predation Versus Scavenging of Juve
Page 109 and 110:
Table 3-20Prevalence of Tortoises i
Page 111 and 112:
(Jacobson et al. 1991, Brown et al.
Page 113 and 114:
3.3.2.5.3 Older and Newer Die-off R
Page 115 and 116:
Table 3-21Characteristics of Older
Page 117 and 118:
Table 3-22Characteristics of Older
Page 119 and 120:
of the Johnson Valley Open Area, an
Page 121 and 122:
Distribution of Recreational and Re
Page 123 and 124:
Tortoises and Burrows Crushed: Vehi
Page 125 and 126:
TypeYearsSignCount98-99-01Distance2
Page 127 and 128:
OHV Impacts to Soils: OHV use has r
Page 129 and 130:
Rodman DWMA. There were no higher d
Page 131 and 132:
of Dove Springs that has experience
Page 133 and 134:
Both inside and adjacent to open ar
Page 135 and 136:
3.3.2.6.6 Organized Competitive OHV
Page 137 and 138:
3.3.2.7 Current Effectiveness of Ex
Page 139 and 140:
Overall, one sees that 68% of the 3
Page 141 and 142:
off regions discussed herein. Black
Page 143 and 144:
ManixACECMojave fishhookcactusRainb
Page 145 and 146:
Range of Mohave Ground SquirrelN190
Page 147 and 148:
3.3.3.2.2 Seasonal ActivityThe MGS
Page 149 and 150:
1996). As herbaceous annuals appear
Page 151 and 152:
1998 Mohave Ground Squirrel Transec
Page 153 and 154:
Finally, the 84% success rate was a
Page 155 and 156:
LaRue characterized substrates at t
Page 157 and 158:
There were no MGS occurrences in 28
Page 159 and 160:
certain shrubs (e.g. winterfat) tha
Page 161 and 162:
NAWS China Lake 1993). As discussed
Page 163 and 164:
Cumulatively, one finds there to be
Page 165 and 166:
Citing Bury and Luckenbach (1977),
Page 167 and 168:
the MGS is restricted to about 7,00
Page 169 and 170:
Habitat Management Plans (HMPs) wer
Page 171 and 172:
Basic to the biology of bighorn she
Page 173 and 174:
3.3.6 Birds3.3.6.1 Bendire’s Thra
Page 175 and 176:
3.3.6.5 Golden EagleLife History: T
Page 177 and 178:
The towhee recovery plan establishe
Page 179 and 180:
Regulatory Status: Federal Endanger
Page 181 and 182:
3.3.6.15 Western Yellow-billed Cuck
Page 183 and 184:
Other major threats are flood contr
Page 185 and 186:
Population Status in the Planning A
Page 187 and 188:
on the inaccessible mountain slopes
Page 189 and 190:
3.3.8.8 Kern BuckwheatLife History:
Page 191 and 192:
Threats Affecting the Mojave Monkey
Page 193 and 194:
3.3.8.16 Red Rock PoppyLife History
Page 195 and 196:
populations show intergradation wit
Page 197 and 198:
3.4.1.1 Regional EnvironmentIn tota
Page 199 and 200:
Table 3-37Average Annual Units Cons
Page 201 and 202:
2002 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEMPLOYMENT
Page 203 and 204:
TABLE 3-382000 CENSUS DEMOGRAPHIC C
Page 205 and 206:
to undergo a dramatic reversal to t
Page 207 and 208:
3.4.1.5 Study Area Property Valuati
Page 209 and 210: The supply of private property in t
Page 211 and 212: ALLOTMENT NAME TYPE OF LIVESTOCK FO
Page 213 and 214: Grazing AllotmentsNOlanchaDarwinTun
Page 215 and 216: ALLOTMENT NAMEALLOTMENTACRESP. L. 1
Page 217 and 218: 3.4.3 Mineral Potential and Develop
Page 219 and 220: Mineral Potential, Active and Inact
Page 221 and 222: Mineral Potential, Active and Inact
Page 223 and 224: development based on the results of
Page 225 and 226: MANAGEMENT AREATable 3-46Potential
Page 227 and 228: A third item, yttrium (on the USBM
Page 229 and 230: the California Department of Conser
Page 231 and 232: Table 3-49 shows the number of mini
Page 233 and 234: produces about 75,000 tons per year
Page 235 and 236: Table 3-50Most Important Deposits B
Page 237 and 238: 3.4.3.5 Coolgardie MesaThe Coolgard
Page 239 and 240: Areas designated as regionally sign
Page 241 and 242: Recreationists engage in activities
Page 243 and 244: OPENAREADoveSpringsElMirageJawboneC
Page 245 and 246: cycle engine motorcycles in OHV rid
Page 247 and 248: One popular activity is dual sport
Page 249 and 250: Compliance With Regulations: Compli
Page 251 and 252: REGIONORCITYRidgecrestSanBernardino
Page 253 and 254: REGIONORCITYVictorville /AppleValle
Page 255 and 256: Rail: The West Mojave planning area
Page 257 and 258: Arterials: Arterials are routes wit
Page 259: Ridgecrest-Inyokern Sanitary Landfi
Page 263 and 264: Trona-Agrus Transfer Station (SWIS
Page 265 and 266: The BLM is an agency of the U.S. De
Page 267 and 268: Route designations apply only to ro
Page 269 and 270: Utility Maintenance: Many powerline
Page 271 and 272: ACECNAME ANDNUMBERHarper Dry Lake(3
Page 273 and 274: SUBREGIONAmboyBighornCoyoteEastSier
Page 275 and 276: • All pipelines with diameters gr
Page 277 and 278: 3.6.2 Energy Generation PlantsEnerg
Page 279 and 280: 3.7 CULTURAL RESOURCES3.7.1 Archaeo
Page 281 and 282: seasonal movement from place to pla
Page 283 and 284: RIDGECREST FIELD OFFICEPROPERTY NAM
Page 285 and 286: ACECRose SpringFossil FallsLast Cha
Page 287 and 288: have been dated by radiocarbon and
Page 289 and 290: MYACENOZOICEPOCHTable 3-65Paleontol
Page 291 and 292: In the southern area, fossils of la
Page 293 and 294: At Twenty-Nine Palms, there is an u
show all

West Mojave Plan FEIR/S - Desert Managers Group

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?