11.07.2015 Views

Evaluation of the Key Stage 2 Language Learning Pathfinders

Evaluation of the Key Stage 2 Language Learning Pathfinders

Evaluation of the Key Stage 2 Language Learning Pathfinders

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Effective staffing is essential to a successful primary languages programme. In some casestudy <strong>Pathfinders</strong>, <strong>the</strong> most frequent teachers <strong>of</strong> primary languages were <strong>the</strong> primaryteachers, who were mainly non-specialists, supported perhaps by visiting trainee teachersfrom abroad, as well as FLAs, HEI undergraduate volunteers, or PGCE trainees withlanguage skills, sixth formers studying languages, or secondary, usually Specialist <strong>Language</strong>College (SLC) teachers. Specialist <strong>Language</strong> Colleges already have a remit to provideoutreach work and <strong>the</strong>re was a perception that <strong>Pathfinders</strong> had helped increase <strong>the</strong> rangeand volume <strong>of</strong> this work. ‘Planning has been more coherent and strategic.’ (outreachteacher). Occasionally, <strong>the</strong> original plan had been for all secondary schools to becomeinvolved in outreach work, but this did not happen, and <strong>the</strong> SLC was delivering <strong>the</strong> vastmajority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> languages. Some part-time teachers were former secondary teachers.Elsewhere <strong>the</strong> delivery model was mixed, including primary teachers alone in some schoolsand outreach teachers in o<strong>the</strong>rs, <strong>the</strong> intention in <strong>the</strong> latter case being that <strong>the</strong> class teachershould reinforce <strong>the</strong> language across <strong>the</strong> curriculum where possible and appropriate. Insome <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>Pathfinders</strong>, <strong>the</strong> model was gradually to enable <strong>the</strong> class teacher to take fullresponsibility for languages after observation and joint working with a visiting specialist(<strong>of</strong>ten from an SLC or a local authority advisor/consultant). Although this was <strong>the</strong> vision inmany schools, <strong>the</strong> reality on <strong>the</strong> ground was <strong>of</strong>ten that <strong>the</strong> class teacher remainedsomewhat reluctant to take over <strong>the</strong> teaching independently, especially in those instanceswhen primary teachers were passive observers.In effective examples <strong>of</strong> this model, <strong>the</strong> visiting teacher left a plan and materials with <strong>the</strong>class teacher, who used <strong>the</strong>se to follow <strong>the</strong> lesson up or to teach <strong>the</strong> lesson with a differentgroup <strong>of</strong> pupils. In cases where <strong>the</strong> class teacher was less (or not at all) involved, this couldbe viewed as a missed opportunity for pr<strong>of</strong>essional development. The visiting teacher mightstart by acting as a role model and <strong>the</strong> class teacher would gradually take a more active partteam-teaching on a small scale. This would help build confidence both in subject knowledgeand pronunciation and in pedagogy, whilst support was available, before having to teachindependently. Demands on even <strong>the</strong> most conscientious primary teachers were indicatedby <strong>the</strong> following example. In one large junior school teachers were initially given protectedtime to observe <strong>the</strong> outreach teacher, but as time went on and pupils became familiar with<strong>the</strong> visiting specialist, primary members <strong>of</strong> staff observing were increasingly taken out tocover any o<strong>the</strong>r absences in <strong>the</strong> school. As <strong>the</strong> outreach teacher remarked, ‘Primary[teachers] have no time just to sit and watch.’ In several schools, primary teachers took <strong>the</strong>period when <strong>the</strong> visiting specialist delivered languages as ‘free’ time or time to catch up withadministrative tasks, and might or might not stay in <strong>the</strong> classroom, which had implications for58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!