11.07.2015 Views

Evaluation of the Key Stage 2 Language Learning Pathfinders

Evaluation of the Key Stage 2 Language Learning Pathfinders

Evaluation of the Key Stage 2 Language Learning Pathfinders

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

However, <strong>the</strong>re were challenges in achieving progression in some instances. For example,in one school children in different years (Reception, Year 4 and Year 5) were receiving <strong>the</strong>same content – basic personal information plus colours, numbers, pets etc, but <strong>the</strong>re was nooverall strategy for progression from year to year. The problem was that <strong>the</strong> staff expertisewas scattered and staff moved around between different year groups from time to time andmost <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> class teachers had limited skills and were only just about capable <strong>of</strong> dealing with<strong>the</strong>se basics. This concern was reiterated by a headteacher from ano<strong>the</strong>r Pathfinder:‘When you get up to <strong>the</strong> juniors, <strong>the</strong>re has to be progression. That has always been myconcern, that <strong>the</strong>re is no real help for progression across <strong>the</strong> primary school and if you’re notcareful, you’re going to be teaching <strong>the</strong> same basic things at Year 6 that you’re teaching inReception, because <strong>the</strong> staff <strong>the</strong>mselves are not able to move on.’ (headteacher)Significantly, as it is a feature which may not become too apparent in a two Year Pathfinder,progression from Year 3 through Year 4 and through Year 5 to Year 6 was perceived by oneheadteacher as beginning to become more challenging.‘One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> things <strong>the</strong> Pathfinder has made <strong>the</strong> school aware <strong>of</strong>, is that at <strong>the</strong> top end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>school, <strong>the</strong> French has not been challenging enough. The same sort <strong>of</strong> effect as when <strong>the</strong>ICT began to filter through’. (headteacher)As reported in <strong>the</strong> section on schemes <strong>of</strong> work, <strong>the</strong>re were particular challenges for schoolswhere classes were arranged in vertical groupings, with combined year groups. Futureplanning for <strong>the</strong>se mixed age group classes will be crucial to ensure pupils’ progression inprimary languages is maintained without content repetition.Progression from <strong>the</strong> pupils’ point <strong>of</strong> view included children in one Pathfinder referring towhat <strong>the</strong>y saw as increasing difficulty in <strong>the</strong> content <strong>of</strong> lessons.‘Last year it was all answering questions about how old you were and your bro<strong>the</strong>rs andsisters but now it is harder and we have to talk about a lot <strong>of</strong> different things.’ (pupil)They noted greater emphasis on writing with <strong>the</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> worksheets.It was interesting to note <strong>the</strong> comments <strong>of</strong> pupils who had recently been to Germany. Theyrecognised, among o<strong>the</strong>r things, thata) German pupils seemed to know a lot more English than <strong>the</strong>y knew German;78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!