11.07.2015 Views

Mohawk – Wyandot Ancestry of Lt. John Young's ... - Davidkfaux.org

Mohawk – Wyandot Ancestry of Lt. John Young's ... - Davidkfaux.org

Mohawk – Wyandot Ancestry of Lt. John Young's ... - Davidkfaux.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

grandson <strong>of</strong> the said Mary Hill) it was stated that the father, encountered anIndian maiden, a grand – daughter <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Mohawk</strong> Chief, Isaac Hill, who was arelative <strong>of</strong> the celebrated Joseph Brant (Ibid., p.76). More specifics come fromDavid Jacket Hill. Draper stated that the, Informants father was Capt. Isaac Hill– (whose father was Isaac Hill also, from <strong>Mohawk</strong> country) - born in 1762 – died46 years ago – 1833, above Brantford, aged 71 years (Ibid., Vol. 13, p.29, 26September 1879). It seems likely that Draper recorded the father’s age for that <strong>of</strong>the grandfather – but this is unclear. Assuming that 1762 plus or minus two yearsis correct, then between 1760 and 1764 there were 9 recorded <strong>Mohawk</strong> baptisms,all at the Dutch Reformed Church <strong>of</strong> Schenectady, and 4 infants were given thename Isaac. A better candidate is an Isaac, son <strong>of</strong> Isaac and Catharine (married24 February 1754), baptized at the Ft. Hunter Anglican Church 25 February 1756.This Isaac had a brother Abraham baptized here 9 February 1758 (Sievertsen,1996). In explaining the origin <strong>of</strong> the Hill surname, Draper said that Mrs. Martin(descendant <strong>of</strong> the Hills <strong>of</strong> Ft. Hunter) and David Jacket Hill, can give no account<strong>of</strong> relationship with Capt. David Hill & brothers, yet give me precisely the samehill – side origin <strong>of</strong> the family name. Hence it would seem to me, they had acommon origin (Ibid., p.40). The above is clear as mud in an attempt to ascertainwhether “our” Isaac was the above scion <strong>of</strong> this large family responsible for somany <strong>of</strong> those with the surname Hill, the most common / frequent <strong>of</strong> all surnameson the Six Nations Reserve). If he was the brother <strong>of</strong> Catharine, then the surnameHill could also likely be the surname by which she was known.Irrespective <strong>of</strong> the Brant or Hill surname issues, the date <strong>of</strong> Isaac’s death (orrelinquishing <strong>of</strong> his credentials) can be inferred via the timing <strong>of</strong> Joseph Brant’s selection<strong>of</strong> a new interpreter, an individual he formally adopted as a nephew, presumably in theplace <strong>of</strong> Isaac.Joseph Brant’s “adopted nephew” and <strong>of</strong>ficial interpreter was <strong>John</strong> Norton (the son <strong>of</strong> aScottish mother and Cherokee father). Norton served earlier as a school teacher atTyendinaga and trader for <strong>John</strong> Askin in the west. This “adoption” appears to have takenplace about 1795 when Norton was recommended by Joseph Brant to be the <strong>of</strong>ficial SixNations interpreter (see Kelsay, 1986). <strong>John</strong> Norton’s Indian names wereTeyoninhokarawen (after 1799) and earlier “The Snipe” (Dow-wis-dow-wis). On 22December 1795, Governor Simcoe forwarded a letter to Lord Dorchester from JosephBrant requesting that Norton be made Interpreter in the Indian Department for the SixNations (DCB, Vol. VI).The fact is that Brant’s interpreter prior to 1795 was his nephew Isaac, but that in 1795Brant petitioned for a paid position as interpreter for Norton. This may mean that Isaacand his family remained in the Sandusky area after the defeat <strong>of</strong> the Western Nations atFallen Timbers by General Anthony Wayne, and that Brant needed a replacement whowould reside at Six Nations on the Grand River (see Biographical Introduction, Journal <strong>of</strong><strong>John</strong> Norton, 1816, Published 1970 by the Champlain Society). Also it is very likely thatthe reason for Norton’s appointment was due to the death <strong>of</strong> Joseph Brant’s nephew Isaacin 1794 or 1795. Thus Norton would be “in the room <strong>of</strong>” Isaac, Brant’s nephew and so23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!