11.07.2015 Views

Mohawk – Wyandot Ancestry of Lt. John Young's ... - Davidkfaux.org

Mohawk – Wyandot Ancestry of Lt. John Young's ... - Davidkfaux.org

Mohawk – Wyandot Ancestry of Lt. John Young's ... - Davidkfaux.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Canajoharie (Upper <strong>Mohawk</strong> Castle), and further afield the Hill family <strong>of</strong> Tiononderoge(Lower <strong>Mohawk</strong> Castle). In the 1789 deed <strong>of</strong> sale for Ft. Hunter, Captain Joseph Brantsigned to represent the Canajoharie <strong>Mohawk</strong>s and Captain David Hill (noted in the 1792Campbell Diary) did the same for the Ft. Hunter <strong>Mohawk</strong>s.At the time <strong>of</strong> his marriage to Catharine circa 1765-7, <strong>John</strong> Young, later lieutenant <strong>of</strong> theSix Nation Indian Department, resided at Canajoharie on property owned by his fatherAdam on the Van Horne Tract among the <strong>Mohawk</strong> settlements between Ft. Hendrickopposite the mouth <strong>of</strong> East Canada Creek, and the most westerly cluster at Indian Castle.However it is important to note that proximity was one <strong>of</strong> the major determining factorsin selecting a marriage partner. It was most typical to marry neighbors, generally closeones at that – certainly among the Palatine Germans <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Mohawk</strong> Valley (Jones, 1986).Young resided among the Canajoharie <strong>Mohawk</strong>s at the Upper Castle. It was 36 miles tothe Ft. Hunter Lower Castle. While finding a marriage partner who was residing in thelatter location was certainly possible, it was somewhat improbable – although thepreviously noted pre-Revolution association between the Young family and the Ft.Hunter <strong>Mohawk</strong>s, likely the Hill family, needs to be explained.The above suggests that it was very likely that Catharine was also residing at Canajohariein the 1760s. The <strong>John</strong>son Papers make note that by 1755 Nicholas Brant was in theprocess <strong>of</strong> building a house near Ft. Hendrick in Canajoharie (Upper Castle), perhaps tojoin his father who had moved there about 1753.It was the acculturated <strong>Mohawk</strong>s who tended to be scrupulous about ensuring that eachchild was baptized (whether the event would be recorded by the minister is anothermatter), and tended to accept or encourage their children’s marriages to prominent Whitemen – the Brants and Hills being the most sterling example <strong>of</strong> this tendency in the<strong>Mohawk</strong> Valley and in the early days along the Grand River. An unnamed daughter <strong>of</strong>Brant Canagaradunckwa married Sir William <strong>John</strong>son and had two sons by him (noted inthe will <strong>of</strong> Sir William), one <strong>of</strong> whom, <strong>Lt</strong>. Brant <strong>John</strong>son, married a white woman.Joseph Brant’s sister Molly Brant also married Sir William <strong>John</strong>son. Esther Hill marriedEpaph. Lord Phelps, and Mary Hill married William Kennedy Smith (see Faux, 2002).There was a small handful <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mohawk</strong>s named Catharine baptized between 1745 and1749 (the target year range based on Catharine’s age in the Census <strong>of</strong> Niagara <strong>of</strong> 1783,which indicates that she was born circa 1747). However there is generally a “problem” inan attempt to link any to the matter here under discussion. The only recorded <strong>Mohawk</strong>baptism <strong>of</strong> a Catharine in 1747 occurred 3 June at the Schenectady Reformed DutchChurch. She was born to Nicus Brant and Margaretje, with the former’s father Brant(Canagaradunckwa) and step - mother Christina as sponsors. Click here to see thebaptismal record. Unfortunately only a brother Lawrence (baptized 1754 Ft. Hunter) anda sister Susanna (baptized 1758 Schoharie) are documented in the church registers. Therewere likely more (perhaps many more) children, probably baptized by Reverend Ehle -but he left no existing written records <strong>of</strong> his ministerial duties.42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!