11.07.2015 Views

Mohawk – Wyandot Ancestry of Lt. John Young's ... - Davidkfaux.org

Mohawk – Wyandot Ancestry of Lt. John Young's ... - Davidkfaux.org

Mohawk – Wyandot Ancestry of Lt. John Young's ... - Davidkfaux.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

It is perhaps important to note that many genealogical studies do not probe to this depthwhen the evidence is acceptable as is. The present author has extended the reach moreout <strong>of</strong> the desire to be 100% sure. However when working in what amounts to “ethnicgenealogy”, at the time under consideration, “certainty” in relation to the identity <strong>of</strong> afemale ancestor is <strong>of</strong>ten unattainable.The evidence strongly suggests that Margaret Brant Kayadontyi and Mary HillKatehriunigh were sisters. This would also explain why <strong>Lt</strong>. <strong>John</strong> Young’s uncles wereresiding in homes owned by the Ft. Hunter <strong>Mohawk</strong>s on the <strong>Mohawk</strong> Flats in 1780 – ifwhites were going to occupy the homes the occupants had deserted to fight for theBritish, it was better to seek tenants among those who had a family connection. Itenhances the likelihood that Margaret “the younger” was Kayadontyi (i.e., the “peggyyoung” from the 1789 Ft. Hunter deed). After the death <strong>of</strong> her husband (prior to 1768)and perhaps cohabiting with Captain Daniel, it would make sense that she would havereturned to her birthplace and the home <strong>of</strong> all her siblings, the <strong>Mohawk</strong> Flats at Ft.Hunter, and so would have been a signor to the 1789 Ft. Hunter deed. The onlyCatharine to file a claim for lands was a Katerine who was residing at Niagara 22 April1784. Her claim included a house worth 80 pounds (only one other <strong>Mohawk</strong> in eithervillage had a house worth this much), and 60 acres <strong>of</strong> land - only the three Hill brothersand their sister Mary <strong>of</strong> Ft. Hunter had more. The documents do not indicate whether thehouse and land were at Ft. Hunter or Canajoharie. It could have been property locatednear Ft. Hendrick, possibly inherited by Catharine Young from her father (see Faux,2002).If, as intimated above, <strong>John</strong> Young was related to both the Brants and the Hills via hiswife, a reasonable question is whether there is evidence <strong>of</strong> a continuing affiliation withthese families along the Grand River. The fact that Joseph Brant was a witness to the sale<strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong> Young’s Loyalist grant at the Head <strong>of</strong> the Lake has already been noted, as has<strong>John</strong>’s attendance and signature as witness to almost every Six Nations document fromthe first days <strong>of</strong> settlement until he death in 1812. Furthermore, the youngest son <strong>of</strong>Joseph Brant, <strong>John</strong> Brant, was elected to the House <strong>of</strong> Assembly in 1832, with thesupport <strong>of</strong> settlers on the Six Nations’ lands, especially Warner Nelles, an election<strong>of</strong>ficial (Herring, 1998, p.57). Furthermore on 17 September 1791 in the William NellesAccount Book there is an entry, Aaron Hill Capt David Son to Wm Nelles. This debt wasdischarged by <strong>John</strong> Young at an unspecified date (Toronto Public Library, BaldwinRoom).In summary:1) The Beaver Tribe / Clan comes from the <strong>Wyandot</strong> “branch” <strong>of</strong> the Upper<strong>Mohawk</strong>s, from the descendants <strong>of</strong> the wife (Catharine) <strong>of</strong> BrantCanagaradunckwa, the mother <strong>of</strong> Nicholas Brant Canadiorha. The nameTahanata may have been that <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong>, the brother <strong>of</strong> Nicholas.47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!