11.07.2015 Views

Mohawk – Wyandot Ancestry of Lt. John Young's ... - Davidkfaux.org

Mohawk – Wyandot Ancestry of Lt. John Young's ... - Davidkfaux.org

Mohawk – Wyandot Ancestry of Lt. John Young's ... - Davidkfaux.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

“interpreter and adopted nephew”. At any rate, no Isaac Brant Karonghyontye appears inany existing record pertaining to the Grand River after 1794. The fact that the nameKaronghyontye does not reappear on the Grand River until 1810 (see later) may supportthe possibility that Isaac died about this time.Sometime before 1805, Seth Hill likely inherited the Captain and Astawenserontha titles,but there is no evidence that he used the name Karonghyontye (Flying Sky), but insteadkept his name Kanenkaregowagh. Seth died about 1810. By 1815 the person who heldthe title Astawenserontha was <strong>John</strong> <strong>John</strong>son. Seth Hill would appear to be the maternalfirst cousin <strong>of</strong> Catharine (see later).To summarize to this point, Chief Flying Sky (Karonghyontye), who inherited thename from his uncle Captain David Hill Karonghyontye, was Captain JosephBrant’s step – nephew. It is also proposed that Isaac also inherited the “honoursand titles” <strong>of</strong> Chief and Karonghyontye (whether also Captain andAstawenserontha also cannot be said), but died or relinquished his role before thelatter appeared in any document associated with the chiefs <strong>of</strong> the Grand River.Background <strong>of</strong> Isaac Brant - Hill KaronghyontyeAs to the documentation relating to the early life and identity (e.g., names <strong>of</strong> parents;previous Indian name <strong>of</strong> Isaac), there are only strong likelihood’s to work with. Justfocusing on the church registers <strong>of</strong> Schenectady for example, there are multiple Isaacsbaptized circa 1762 (Sievertsen, 1996). Without further clues, the evidence isinconclusive and confusing. Isaac may have been “Isaac, infant, names <strong>of</strong> parents f<strong>org</strong>ot”who was baptized 17 February 1751 at the Ft. Hunter Anglican Church (Sievertsen,1996).On 12 January 1788 a group <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mohawk</strong> men and women related to Johannes Crine /Green (“White Hans”), and / or a Sarah (with a large family) petitioned (fromCanajoharie) for a return <strong>of</strong> their lands at Ft. Hunter and Canajoharie. Among thosesigning, in this case immediately after <strong>John</strong> Crine Aronghyenghtha (an Astawenseronthaname), was thirdly Isaac Geagaregonra, and fifthly Isaac Kesheghstoaghre (NYSL,Assembly Papers, Vol. 40, pp.41-4). The only probable Isaac in the two July 1789 Deedsis an entry from the Ft. Hunter (Lower <strong>Mohawk</strong>) deed with Isaac Continehquo; and fromthe Canajoharie (Upper <strong>Mohawk</strong>) document (which is torn) Dehonw-------- Isaac (-isMark). The only likely Astawenserontha names from the list <strong>of</strong> Seth Newhouse are, Deka hon was henh or De yo yon wat heh – which relate to the Canajoharie Isaac. Couldany <strong>of</strong> these be a heavily modified version <strong>of</strong> Tawalooth? With the second, it wouldonly take a single reversal <strong>of</strong> two consonants to make sense. Recall that D and T are thesame in <strong>Mohawk</strong>, and there is no “L” sound in <strong>Mohawk</strong>. So the Mahican Hendrick mayhave heard, Tah wa you theh.However the surname Brant, apparently linked to Isaac, may be a major clue (which wasused on occasion by Europeans when referring to Isaac). While Thomas Ganaghsadirha(son <strong>of</strong> Brant Canagaradunckwa) did have a son Isaac baptized in 1749, this is unlikely to24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!