11.07.2015 Views

Contents - Medicinski Fakultet u Sarajevu - University of Sarajevo

Contents - Medicinski Fakultet u Sarajevu - University of Sarajevo

Contents - Medicinski Fakultet u Sarajevu - University of Sarajevo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Oral presentationBIOMEHANICAL DAMAGE OF THE CERVICALSPINE-WHIPLASH INJURYNarcisa Vavra – Hadžiahmetović 1 , Zoran Hadžiahmetović 21Clinic for physical medicine and rehabilitation2Emergency Department<strong>Sarajevo</strong>, Bolnička 25, Bosnia and HerzegovinaE-mail: h.vemi@bih.net.baIntroduction: Whiplash, also called neck sprain orneck strain, is an injury to the s<strong>of</strong>t tissues <strong>of</strong> the neckcaused by biomechanical injury <strong>of</strong> the cervical spine.The exact injury mechanism that causes whiplash injuriesis unknown. The aim <strong>of</strong> this paper is to make rulesfor rehabilitation. Examines and Methods: 40 patientswith WNI were treated in Clinical center <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Sarajevo</strong> (Clinic for physiotherapy and rehabilitationand in Clinic for urgent medicine) in period 2004/2008.They were divided in two groups – (G1 and G2)with20 patients in each group.G1 group was treated by s<strong>of</strong>tcervical collar and analgesics, G2 by physiotherapeuticmodalities. Check was done 6 weeks and 6 months afterinjury and therapy. The aim was to estimate the functionalanswer according diagnosis and therapeuticalmodalities. Results: All patients were divided in fourgrades <strong>of</strong> Whiplash-Associated Disorder defined by theQuebec Task Force on Whiplash-associated disorders.The authors made 6 weeks follow – up after treatment<strong>of</strong> patients and 77% <strong>of</strong> them had no problems, 23 % patientslost symptoms <strong>of</strong> WNI after 2 – 6 months. Theycame back to everyday activities in period 1 – 3 monthsexcept 2 <strong>of</strong> them who needed 6 months. Functionalstatus was good by each group. Conclusion: Presentedvalues <strong>of</strong> clinical parameters indicate that there was nostatistically significant difference in finale results betweengroups, G1 and G2 (p>0.05).Key words: cervical spine - biomechanical damage - rehabilitation17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!