Quality Indicators of Northern Shrimp (Pandalus borealis)

QingzhuAPPENDIXAnalysis of Variance Report (Term significant at 95%, α=0.05)1. WHC: Analysis of Variance TableSource Sum of Mean Prob PowerTerm DF Squares Square F-Ratio Level(Alpha=0,05)A: Group 3 20,81317 6,937723 1,50 0,265172 0,298529S(A) 12 55,58823 4,632352Total (Adjusted) 15 76,40139Total 16Means and Effects SectionTerm Count Mean Standard Error EffectAll 16 90,10438 22,52609A: GroupLIQ/-1 4 91,5875 1,076145 69,06141S-ICE/-1 4 90,5075 1,076145 67,98141ICE/+1 4 88,4325 1,076145 65,9064LIQ/+1 4 89,89 1,076145 67,36391Duncan's Multiple-Comparison TestGroup Count Mean Different From GroupsICE/+1 4 88,4325LIQ/+1 4 89,89S-ICE/-1 4 90,5075LIQ/-1 4 91,58752. Sensory score: Analysis of Variance TableSource Sum of Mean Prob PowerTerm DF Squares Square F-Ratio Level(Alpha=0,05)A: Group 3 5,65625 1,885417 12,90 0,000018* 0,999388S(A) 28 4,09375 0,1462054Total (Adjusted) 31 9,75Total 32Means and Effects SectionTerm Count Mean Standard Error EffectAll 32 3,68750,4609375A: GroupLIQ/-1 8 4,28125 0,1351875 3,820313S-ICE/-1 8 3,65625 0,1351875 3,195313ICE/+1 8 3,09375 0,1351875 2,632813LIQ/+1 8 3,71875 0,1351875 3,257813Duncan's Multiple-Comparison TestGroup Count Mean Different From GroupsICE/+1 8 3,09375 S-ICE/-1, LIQ/+1, LIQ/-1S-ICE/-1 8 3,65625 ICE/+1, LIQ/-1LIQ/+1 8 3,71875 ICE/+1, LIQ/-1LIQ/-1 8 4,28125 ICE/+1, S-ICE/-1, LIQ/+13. WHC: Analysis of Variance TableSource Sum of Mean Prob PowerUNU-Fisheries Training Programme 45