Quality Indicators of Northern Shrimp (Pandalus borealis)

QingzhuMeans and Effects SectionTerm Count Mean Standard Error EffectAll 25 0,320845,115333E-02A: GroupxxxxDay0 8 0,335 6,57021E-030,2838467LIQ/+1 5 0,322 8,310732E-030,2708467LIQ/+4 6 0,3081667 7,586625E-030,2570133LIQ/+6 6 0,3136667 7,586625E-030,2625133Duncan's Multiple-Comparison TestGroup Count Mean Different From GroupsLIQ/+4 6 0,3081667LIQ/+6 6 0,3136667LIQ/+1 5 0,322Day0 8 0,33527. WHC: Analysis of Variance TableSource Sum of Mean Prob PowerTerm DF Squares Square F-Ratio Level(Alpha=0,05)A: Groupxxxxx 3 45,43388 15,14462 3,11 0,066611 0,573514S(A) 12 58,3797 4,864975Total (Adjusted) 15 103,8136Total 16Means and Effects SectionTerm Count Mean Standard Error EffectAll 16 90,74125 22,68531A: GroupxxxxxDay0 4 93,5375 1,102834 70,85219S-ICE/-1 4 90,5075 1,102834 67,82219S-ICE/-4 4 89,7775 1,102834 67,09219S-ICE/-6 4 89,1425 1,102834 66,45718Duncan's Multiple-Comparison TestGroup Count Mean Different From GroupsS-ICE/-6 4 89,1425S-ICE/-4 4 89,7775S-ICE/-1 4 90,5075Day0 4 93,537528. Sensory score: Analysis of Variance TableSource Sum of Mean Prob PowerTerm DF Squares Square F-Ratio Level(Alpha=0,05)A: Groupxxxxx 3 61,22461 20,4082 157,30 0,000000* 1,000000S(A) 28 3,632813 0,1297433Total (Adjusted) 31 64,85742Total 32Means and Effects SectionTerm Count Mean Standard Error EffectAll 32 2,6484380,3310547A: GroupxxxxxDay0 8 4,34375 0,1273496 4,012695S-ICE/-1 8 3,65625 0,1273496 3,325195S-ICE/-4 8 1,53125 0,1273496 1,200195UNU-Fisheries Training Programme 56