Qingzhu31. Cohesiveness: Analysis <strong>of</strong> Variance TableSource Sum <strong>of</strong> Mean Prob PowerTerm DF Squares Square F-Ratio Level(Alpha=0,05)A: Groupxxxxx 3 1,192711E-02 3,975702E-03 10,46 0,000205* 0,994635S(A) 21 7,985134E-03 3,802445E-04Total (Adjusted) 24 1,991224E-02Total 25Means and Effects SectionTerm Count Mean Standard Error EffectAll 25 0,332485,268867E-02A: GroupxxxxxDay0 8 0,36125 6,894241E-030,3085613S-ICE/-1 6 0,3081667 7,960783E-03 0,255478S-ICE/-4 5 0,3138 8,720601E-030,2611113S-ICE/-6 6 0,334 7,960783E-030,2813113Duncan's Multiple-Comparison TestGroup Count Mean Different From GroupsS-ICE/-1 6 0,3081667 Day0S-ICE/-4 5 0,3138 Day0S-ICE/-6 6 0,334 Day0Day0 8 0,36125 S-ICE/-1, S-ICE/-4, S-ICE/-632. Resilience: Analysis <strong>of</strong> Variance TableSource Sum <strong>of</strong> Mean Prob PowerTerm DF Squares Square F-Ratio Level(Alpha=0,05)A: Groupxxxxx 3 9,486627E-03 3,162209E-03 4,64 0,012203* 0,823901S(A) 21 1,431913E-02 6,818635E-04Total (Adjusted) 24 2,380576E-02Total 25Means and Effects SectionTerm Count Mean Standard Error EffectAll 25 0,310644,928533E-02A: GroupxxxxxDay0 8 0,335 9,232169E-030,2857147S-ICE/-1 6 0,2858333 1,066039E-02 0,236548S-ICE/-4 5 0,2968 1,167787E-020,2475147S-ICE/-6 6 0,3145 1,066039E-020,2652147Duncan's Multiple-Comparison TestGroup Count Mean Different From GroupsS-ICE/-1 6 0,2858333 Day0S-ICE/-4 5 0,2968 Day0S-ICE/-6 6 0,3145Day0 8 0,335 S-ICE/-1, S-ICE/-433. WHC: Analysis <strong>of</strong> Variance TableSource Sum <strong>of</strong> Mean Prob PowerUNU-Fisheries Training Programme 58
QingzhuTerm DF Squares Square F-Ratio Level(Alpha=0,05)A: Groupxxxxxx 3 87,07057 29,02352 10,75 0,001020* 0,987920S(A) 12 32,38662 2,698885Total (Adjusted) 15 119,4572Total 16Means and Effects SectionTerm Count Mean Standard Error EffectAll 16 90,40437 22,60109A: GroupxxxxxxDay0 4 93,5375 0,8214142 70,93641LIQ/-1 4 91,5875 0,8214142 68,9864LIQ/-4 4 89,0325 0,8214142 66,4314LIQ/-6 4 87,46 0,8214142 64,85891Duncan's Multiple-Comparison TestGroup Count Mean Different From GroupsLIQ/-6 4 87,46 LIQ/-1, Day0LIQ/-4 4 89,0325 LIQ/-1, Day0LIQ/-1 4 91,5875 LIQ/-6, LIQ/-4Day0 4 93,5375 LIQ/-6, LIQ/-434. Sensory score: Analysis <strong>of</strong> Variance TableSource Sum <strong>of</strong> Mean Prob PowerTerm DF Squares Square F-Ratio Level(Alpha=0,05)A: Groupxxxxxx 3 16,75586 5,585287 19,08 0,000001* 0,999996S(A) 28 8,195313 0,2926897Total (Adjusted) 31 24,95117Total 32Means and Effects SectionTerm Count Mean Standard Error EffectAll 32 3,6640630,4580078A: GroupxxxxxxDay0 8 4,34375 0,1912752 3,885742LIQ/-1 8 4,28125 0,1912752 3,823242LIQ/-4 8 3,46875 0,1912752 3,010742LIQ/-6 8 2,5625 0,1912752 2,104492Duncan's Multiple-Comparison TestGroup Count Mean Different From GroupsLIQ/-6 8 2,5625 LIQ/-4, LIQ/-1, Day0LIQ/-4 8 3,46875 LIQ/-6, LIQ/-1, Day0LIQ/-1 8 4,28125 LIQ/-6, LIQ/-4Day0 8 4,34375 LIQ/-6, LIQ/-435. Hardness: Analysis <strong>of</strong> Variance TableSource Sum <strong>of</strong> Mean Prob PowerTerm DF Squares Square F-Ratio Level(Alpha=0,05)A: Groupxxxxxx 3 6,048713 2,016238 0,75 0,536361 0,180822S(A) 20 53,92981 2,696491Total (Adjusted) 23 59,97852Total 24Means and Effects SectionTerm Count Mean Standard Error EffectAll 24 7,215 1,199991A: GroupxxxxxxDay0 8 7,029125 0,5805698 5,829134LIQ/-1 6 8,073667 0,6703843 6,873675UNU-Fisheries Training Programme 59
- Page 1 and 2:
Final Project 2003Quality Indicator
- Page 3 and 4:
QingzhuACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............
- Page 5 and 6:
Qingzhu1 INTRODUCTIONThe northern s
- Page 8: Qingzhu2.3 Assessment methods of fr
- Page 11 and 12: Qingzhurecovered its height during
- Page 13 and 14: Qingzhu3.2 Sensory evaluationA Qual
- Page 15 and 16: Qingzhu3.9 pH measurementpH was mea
- Page 17 and 18: Qingzhu3.13 Data analysisThe data,
- Page 19 and 20: QingzhuThe lowest score was awarded
- Page 21 and 22: QingzhuTVB-N mgN/100g12010080604020
- Page 23 and 24: Qingzhu4.5 Water contentThe effects
- Page 25 and 26: Qingzhu4.7 Water-holding capacity (
- Page 27 and 28: QingzhuSpringiness (N)0.80.70.60.50
- Page 29 and 30: Qingzhu250S-ICE/-200Current (nA) --
- Page 31 and 32: QingzhuTable 4: Correlation (r) bet
- Page 33 and 34: Qingzhu1.0PC2Bi-plotResilience Cohe
- Page 35 and 36: Qingzhuof the main spoilage-causing
- Page 37 and 38: Qingzhu5.6 Correlation analysisThe
- Page 39 and 40: QingzhuNH 3 response of electronic
- Page 41 and 42: QingzhuLIST OF REFERENCESAitken, A.
- Page 43 and 44: Qingzhuof fish in research and indu
- Page 45 and 46: QingzhuAPPENDIXAnalysis of Variance
- Page 47 and 48: QingzhuICE/+4 5 8,564 0,6168125 7,0
- Page 49 and 50: QingzhuTotal (Adjusted) 31 18,5293T
- Page 51 and 52: QingzhuGroup Count Mean Different F
- Page 53 and 54: QingzhuAll 24 0,345750,0572743A: Gr
- Page 55 and 56: QingzhuSource Sum of Mean Prob Powe
- Page 57: QingzhuS-ICE/-6 8 1,0625 0,12734960
- Page 61 and 62: QingzhuGroup Count Mean Different F
- Page 63: QingzhuTerm DF Squares Square F-Rat