QingzhuLIQ/+4 4 89,175 1,227883 66,59969LIQ/+6 4 88,6025 1,227883 66,02719Duncan's Multiple-Comparison TestGroup Count Mean Different From GroupsLIQ/+6 4 88,6025LIQ/+4 4 89,175LIQ/+1 4 89,89Day0 4 93,537522. Sensory score: Analysis <strong>of</strong> Variance TableSource Sum <strong>of</strong> Mean Prob PowerTerm DF Squares Square F-Ratio Level(Alpha=0,05)A: Groupxxxx 3 41,81836 13,93945 62,37 0,000000* 1,000000S(A) 28 6,257813 0,2234933Total (Adjusted) 31 48,07617Total 32Means and Effects SectionTerm Count Mean Standard Error EffectAll 32 2,9140630,3642578A: GroupxxxxDay0 8 4,34375 0,1671426 3,979492LIQ/+1 8 3,71875 0,1671426 3,354492LIQ/+4 8 1,9375 0,1671426 1,573242LIQ/+6 8 1,65625 0,1671426 1,291992Duncan's Multiple-Comparison TestGroup Count Mean Different From GroupsLIQ/+6 8 1,65625 LIQ/+1, Day0LIQ/+4 8 1,9375 LIQ/+1, Day0LIQ/+1 8 3,71875 LIQ/+6, LIQ/+4, Day0Day0 8 4,34375 LIQ/+6, LIQ/+4, LIQ/+123. Hardness: Analysis <strong>of</strong> Variance TableSource Sum <strong>of</strong> Mean Prob PowerTerm DF Squares Square F-Ratio Level(Alpha=0,05)A: Groupxxxx 3 9,41386 3,137954 1,38 0,275680 0,313014S(A) 21 47,67176 2,270084Total (Adjusted) 24 57,08562Total 25Means and Effects SectionTerm Count Mean Standard Error EffectAll 25 7,55028 1,220724A: GroupxxxxDay0 8 7,029125 0,5326918 5,808401LIQ/+1 5 8,4098 0,6738077 7,189076LIQ/+4 6 8,083167 0,6150994 6,862443LIQ/+6 6 6,996 0,6150994 5,775276Duncan's Multiple-Comparison TestGroup Count Mean Different From GroupsLIQ/+6 6 6,996Day0 8 7,029125LIQ/+4 6 8,083167LIQ/+1 5 8,409824. Springiness: Analysis <strong>of</strong> Variance TableUNU-Fisheries Training Programme 54
QingzhuSource Sum <strong>of</strong> Mean Prob PowerTerm DF Squares Square F-Ratio Level(Alpha=0,05)A: Groupxxxx 3 1,939442E-02 6,464806E-03 4,66 0,011938* 0,826195S(A) 21 2,911174E-02 1,386273E-03Total (Adjusted) 24 4,850616E-02Total 25Means and Effects SectionTerm Count Mean Standard Error EffectAll 25 0,65056 0,103359A: GroupxxxxDay0 8 0,689375 1,316374E-02 0,586016LIQ/+1 5 0,6186 1,665097E-02 0,515241LIQ/+4 6 0,6326666 1,520018E-020,5293077LIQ/+6 6 0,6433333 1,520018E-020,5399743Duncan's Multiple-Comparison TestGroup Count Mean Different From GroupsLIQ/+1 5 0,6186 Day0LIQ/+4 6 0,6326666 Day0LIQ/+6 6 0,6433333 Day0Day0 8 0,689375 LIQ/+1, LIQ/+4, LIQ/+625. Cohesiveness: Analysis <strong>of</strong> Variance TableSource Sum <strong>of</strong> Mean Prob PowerTerm DF Squares Square F-Ratio Level(Alpha=0,05)A: Groupxxxx 3 5,655607E-03 1,885202E-03 9,83 0,000298* 0,991853S(A) 21 4,028633E-03 1,918397E-04Total (Adjusted) 24 9,68424E-03Total 25Means and Effects SectionTerm Count Mean Standard Error EffectAll 25 0,340525,419133E-02A: GroupxxxxDay0 8 0,36125 4,896934E-030,3070587LIQ/+1 5 0,3382 6,194186E-030,2840087LIQ/+4 6 0,3235 5,654492E-030,2693087LIQ/+6 6 0,3318333 5,654492E-03 0,277642Duncan's Multiple-Comparison TestGroup Count Mean Different From GroupsLIQ/+4 6 0,3235 Day0LIQ/+6 6 0,3318333 Day0LIQ/+1 5 0,3382 Day0Day0 8 0,36125 LIQ/+4, LIQ/+6, LIQ/+126. Resilience: Analysis <strong>of</strong> Variance TableSource Sum <strong>of</strong> Mean Prob PowerTerm DF Squares Square F-Ratio Level(Alpha=0,05)A: Groupxxxx 3 2,883193E-03 9,610644E-04 2,78 0,066118 0,585438S(A) 21 7,252167E-03 3,453413E-04Total (Adjusted) 24 1,013536E-02Total 25UNU-Fisheries Training Programme 55
- Page 1 and 2:
Final Project 2003Quality Indicator
- Page 3 and 4: QingzhuACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............
- Page 5 and 6: Qingzhu1 INTRODUCTIONThe northern s
- Page 8: Qingzhu2.3 Assessment methods of fr
- Page 11 and 12: Qingzhurecovered its height during
- Page 13 and 14: Qingzhu3.2 Sensory evaluationA Qual
- Page 15 and 16: Qingzhu3.9 pH measurementpH was mea
- Page 17 and 18: Qingzhu3.13 Data analysisThe data,
- Page 19 and 20: QingzhuThe lowest score was awarded
- Page 21 and 22: QingzhuTVB-N mgN/100g12010080604020
- Page 23 and 24: Qingzhu4.5 Water contentThe effects
- Page 25 and 26: Qingzhu4.7 Water-holding capacity (
- Page 27 and 28: QingzhuSpringiness (N)0.80.70.60.50
- Page 29 and 30: Qingzhu250S-ICE/-200Current (nA) --
- Page 31 and 32: QingzhuTable 4: Correlation (r) bet
- Page 33 and 34: Qingzhu1.0PC2Bi-plotResilience Cohe
- Page 35 and 36: Qingzhuof the main spoilage-causing
- Page 37 and 38: Qingzhu5.6 Correlation analysisThe
- Page 39 and 40: QingzhuNH 3 response of electronic
- Page 41 and 42: QingzhuLIST OF REFERENCESAitken, A.
- Page 43 and 44: Qingzhuof fish in research and indu
- Page 45 and 46: QingzhuAPPENDIXAnalysis of Variance
- Page 47 and 48: QingzhuICE/+4 5 8,564 0,6168125 7,0
- Page 49 and 50: QingzhuTotal (Adjusted) 31 18,5293T
- Page 51 and 52: QingzhuGroup Count Mean Different F
- Page 53: QingzhuAll 24 0,345750,0572743A: Gr
- Page 57 and 58: QingzhuS-ICE/-6 8 1,0625 0,12734960
- Page 59 and 60: QingzhuTerm DF Squares Square F-Rat
- Page 61 and 62: QingzhuGroup Count Mean Different F
- Page 63: QingzhuTerm DF Squares Square F-Rat