GUEST EDITOR IALFIGURE 1(continued from page 38)year for a period of six to 10 years,” (Guam’srepresentative in Congress, Madeleine Z.Bordallo) said.”Consider having to repeat that majormove because of the effects of rising sealevel in Guam. As the “National Securityand the Threat of Climate Change” reportby the CNA points out, “Lack of planningfor (critical defense installations) cancompromise them or cause them to beinundated, compromising military readinessand capability.” See .In fact, Pacific Island lawmakers whoattended a three-day general assemblyof the Pacific Island legislature on Guamin early May are very concerned fortheir own sustainability in light of globalwarming, and plan to meet again inNovember to discuss the effects of globalwarming on Pacific Islanders. Generalassembly delegate Alik J. Alik, vicespeaker of the Marshall Islands’ Nitijela(Parliament), said concerns about risingsea levels have prompted some peoplein the island republic to relocate, or toconsider relocating.The Army alone has more than 14 millionacres and over 2000 Installations, 12,000historical structures, a multi-billion dollarmilitary construction program, and a baseoperations program. Not only should theArmy be preparing for the effects of globalclimate change, but also it should examinehow its institutional processes are creatinggreenhouse gases, what the installationscan do to be a part of local, regional andnational solutions, and how the Army isgoing to adapt the 21st century base structureto the new realities of climate change.The defense authorization committeesare well aware of the need to engage themilitary in the new realities of climate change,and they are hard at work with authorizing theservices. However, the services themselvesmust embrace new ways of thinking aboutthis issue and about tackling those reformsto change the way the bureaucracy works.I offer the following six suggestionsonly as a starting point:Fund the New Energy TechnologiesThe Logistics Management Institutesaid in their review of “Winning the OilEndgame” that “Aggressively developingand applying energy-saving technologiesto military applications would potentiallydo more to solve the most pressing longtermchallenges facing the Department ofDefense (DOD) and our national securitythan any other single investment area.Recently, the Secretary of Defense calledupon the services to be more innovativeas they look at the technology, andmany have said the services have fallenwoefully behind in innovation. Yet, theirvery engagement can improve the entiremarketplace for technology. The EnergyIndependence and Security Act of 2007sets a standard for cutting greenhousegases, and both DOD and the privatesector have stated that the technology isavailable to meet these greenhouse gasrequirements.” Specialized programs ineach of the military services have shownimpressive results that need to be morebroadly implemented throughout DOD.Fix the Installation Organization StructureWhile the Department of Defense is in theprocess of developing a comprehensiveenergy strategy, there remains a lack ofintegration of environmental and energypolicy. Currently, the Army Installationsand Environment organization separatesenvironmental policy and practice from theenergy organization into two stovepipe organizations.While both of them are under thesame Assistant Secretary, they have almostno lines of communication, and the energyorganization sees their mission as getting thebest price of electricity for the installations. Ifthat price is dependent on coal, so be it. If itis delivered on a vulnerable antiquated grid,that is the problem of the energy provider.The environmental and energy teammust see their mission as a nationalsecurity mission, and it must be integrated.Ongoing information and trainingprograms like those started at theNational Defense University need to beexpanded to all service academies andoffered throughout the training infrastructurein the services.Deploy more versatile fuelsDuring my tenure with the Army, there wasgreat resistance to looking at renewableenergy or distributed systems. While theinstallations planners have developed36IMAGING NOTES // S UMMER 2008 // WWW.IMAGINGNOTES.COM
a program called Enhanced Leases tobetter utilize land capacity, still the ideaof leasing for solar or wind was resistedbecause of the long-term power agreementsthe Army entered into. Perhaps thisis inherent in the process of change.The Senate Armed ServicesCommittee has recommended that theservices enter into multiyear contracts,for a period of up to 10 years, for thepurchase of alternative or synthetic fuels.The services ought to be buying at least25 percent of their electricity from wind,solar, biomass, geothermal or otherrenewable energy sources by 2025. Noplace is better suited for plug-and-drivevehicles than military installations. Asmilitary facilities expand and are upgradedand realigned, greater use of highperformance buildings, on-site distributedgeneration, and the most advancedenergy-saving technologies need to beaggressively deployed.Assess the Vulnerability of InstallationsInsurance companies have alreadyperformed risk assessments on coastalhousing and may have decided to pullout of that market. The military too shouldassess the risks and begin planning forthe next round of base closures and beginto build a base structure that takes intoaccount a warming planet and a risingsea level.Fresh water will become scarcerin more places due to warming. Justrecently, the Senate Armed ServicesCommittee, concerned with vulnerabilityof the grid, found that, “despite numerousvulnerability studies, the extent of technicaland operational risks to specific criticalmissions is not adequately assessed,or plans for its mitigation programmed.”This incomplete assessment,coupled with the trend overthe last several years to placemore defense installationsonto the commercial powergrid, suggests that departmentinfrastructure energy plansmay not be synchronized withan up-to-date technical andoperational risk evaluation.Efforts by DOD to back upcritical base functions withon-site renewable generationneed to be expanded.Change the way the services dobusiness at the installationThe department should require a fullaccounting of the cost of energy at theinstallations. This should include the costto the environment from exploration totransportation to clean up of the residue.There should be a department-wide energyefficiency target and authorization for theinstallations to modify existing contractsto take account of the full cost of energyto the installation and to create energyindependence at the installation level.Work with local communities, includingtribes, to develop a smart gridThe military installations should moveaggressively toward a web-enabled,digitally controlled power delivery systemthat efficiently distributes electricity andprotects from blackouts and excessenergy consumption.No group of Americans has a larger stakein managing the effects of climate change,and perhaps no government body has amore significant responsibility, than DOD.The department also has the structure,FIGURE 2the discipline, and the resources to playone of the most valuable leadership rolesin one of the greatest challenges facingthe next three generations. The incomingAdministration will have an opportunity toappoint a defense leadership who understandsthe national security implicationsof climate change and should ask eachpotential appointee what he or she woulddo to ensure that the DOD trains, equipsand deploys the department to lead onthis national security issue.IMAGING NOTES // S UMMER 2008 // WWW.IMAGINGNOTES.COM37