12.07.2015 Views

Course in Probability Theory

Course in Probability Theory

Course in Probability Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

198 1 CHARACTERISTIC FUNCTIONMore generally, we can def<strong>in</strong>e the Laplace transform of an s .d .f. or a functionG of bounded variation satisfy<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong> "growth condition" at <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ity . Inparticular, if F is an s .d .f., the Laplace transform of its <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite <strong>in</strong>tegralis f<strong>in</strong>ite for ~ . > 0 and given byXG(x) = / F(u) du0G(~ ) _ e--xF(x) dx = fe-~ dxf/.c(d y)4[O,oo) [O,oo) [O,x]_fa(dy) fe-Xx dx = - f e_ ~,cc(dy)[O, ) ) [O oo) Awhereµ is the s .p.m . of F . The calculation above, based on Fub<strong>in</strong>i's theorem,replaces a familiar "<strong>in</strong>tegration by parts" . However, the reader should bewareof the latter operation . For <strong>in</strong>stance, accord<strong>in</strong>g to the usual def<strong>in</strong>ition, asgiven <strong>in</strong> Rud<strong>in</strong> [1] (and several other standard textbooks!), the value of theRiemann-Stieltjes <strong>in</strong>tegralis 0 rather than 1, but1000e-~'x d6o(x)or e-~ d8o (x) = Jim 80 (x)e-; x IIE + f00AToc80 (x)Ae - ~ dxis correct only if the left member is taken <strong>in</strong> the Lebesgue-Stieltjes sense, asis always done <strong>in</strong> this book .There are obvious analogues of propositions (i) to (v) of Sec . 6 .1 .However, the <strong>in</strong>version formula requir<strong>in</strong>g complex <strong>in</strong>tegration will be omittedand the uniqueness theorem, due to Lerch, will be proved by a different method(cf. Exercise 12 of Sec . 6 .2) .Theorem 6 .6 .2 . Let F j be the Laplace transform of the d .f . F j with support<strong>in</strong> °+,j=1,2 .If F1 = F2, then F1=F2 .PROOF . We shall apply the Stone-Weierstrass theorem to the algebragenerated by the family of functions {e - ~` X, A > 0}, def<strong>in</strong>ed on the closedpositive real l<strong>in</strong>e : 7+ = [0, oo], namely the one po<strong>in</strong>t compactification ofM,+ = [0, oo) . A cont<strong>in</strong>uous function of x on R + is one that is cont<strong>in</strong>uous<strong>in</strong> ~+ and has a f<strong>in</strong>ite limit as x --* oo . This family separates po<strong>in</strong>ts on A' +and vanishes at no po<strong>in</strong>t of ~f? + (at the po<strong>in</strong>t +oo, the member e-0x = 1 of thefamily does not vanish!) . Hence the set of polynomials <strong>in</strong> the members of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!