12.07.2015 Views

Course in Probability Theory

Course in Probability Theory

Course in Probability Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

236 1 CENTRAL LIMIT THEOREM AND ITS RAMIFICATIONSIn the case of a s<strong>in</strong>gle sequence of <strong>in</strong>dependent and identically distributedr .v .'s {Xj, j > 1 } with mean 0, variance 62 , and third absolute moment y < oc,the right side of (1) reduces tony Aoy 1Ao (n j2 ) 3/2 =9 3 n 1/2'H. Cramer and P . L. Hsu have shown that under somewhat stronger conditions,one may even obta<strong>in</strong> an asymptotic expansion of the form :H1(x) H2(x) H3(x)F" (x) _ ~(x)+ n1/2 + n + n3/2 + . . .where the H's are explicit functions <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g the Hermite polynomials . Weshall not go <strong>in</strong>to this, as the basic method of obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g such an expansion issimilar to the proof of the preced<strong>in</strong>g theorem, although considerable technicalcomplications arise . For this and other variants of the problem see Cramer[10], Gnedenko and Kolmogorov [12], and Hsu's paper cited at the end ofthis chapter .We shall give the proof of Theorem 7 .4 .1 <strong>in</strong> a series of lemmas, <strong>in</strong> whichthe mach<strong>in</strong>ery of operat<strong>in</strong>g with ch .f.'s is further exploited and found to beefficient .Lemma 1 . Let F be a d .f., G a real-valued function satisfy<strong>in</strong>g the conditionsbelow :Set(i) lim1,_ 00 G(x) = 0, lima ,+. G(x) = 1 ;(ii) G has a derivative that is bounded everywhere : supx jG'(x)i < M .1(2) = 2M sup I F(x) - G(x)l .Then there exists a real number a such that we have for every T > 0 :( T° 1 - cosx(3) 2MTA { 3 2 dx - nl / o xcos TxJ {F(x + a) - G(x + a)} dxX 2PROOF . Clearly the A <strong>in</strong> (2) is f<strong>in</strong>ite, s<strong>in</strong>ce G is everywhere bounded by(1) and (ii) . We may suppose that the left member of (3) is strictly positive, forotherwise there is noth<strong>in</strong>g to prove ; hence A > 0 . S<strong>in</strong>ce F - G vanishes at+oc by (i), there exists a sequence of numbers {x„ } converg<strong>in</strong>g to a f<strong>in</strong>ite limit

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!