12.07.2015 Views

Course in Probability Theory

Course in Probability Theory

Course in Probability Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

22 1 MEASURE THEORYAxiom (ii) is called "countable additivity" ; the correspond<strong>in</strong>g axiomrestricted to a f<strong>in</strong>ite collection {E j ) is called "f<strong>in</strong>ite additivity" .The follow<strong>in</strong>g proposition(1) En ., 0 =#- ) - ~- 0is called the "axiom of cont<strong>in</strong>uity" . It is a particular case of the monotoneproperty (x) above, which may be deduced from it or proved <strong>in</strong> the same wayas <strong>in</strong>dicated below .Theorem 2 .2 .1 . The axioms of f<strong>in</strong>ite additivity and of cont<strong>in</strong>uity togetherare equivalent to the axiom of countable additivity .If E, 4,PROOF . Let E„ ~ . We have the obvious identity :00 00E n = U (Ek\Ek+1) U n Ek .k=n k=10, the last term is the empty set . Hence if (ii) is assumed, we haveVn > 1 : J (E n ) _00k=n-,~)"(Ek\Ek+1)~the series be<strong>in</strong>g convergent, we have limn,,,,-,"P(En) = 0 . Hence (1) is true .Conversely, let {Ek , k > 1) be pairwise disjo<strong>in</strong>t, then00U E k ~ok=n+1(why?) and consequently, if (1) is true, then00lim :~, U Ek = 0 .)t -4 00(k=n+1Now if f<strong>in</strong>ite additivity is assumed, we haveU Ek = ?P U Ek + JP U EkC, ~'\k=1 k=1 k=n+1 =Ono+11 00?11(Ek) + ~) U Ek -k=1 k=n+1This shows that the <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite series Ek°1 J'(Ek) converges as it is bounded bythe first member above . Lett<strong>in</strong>g n -+ oo, we obta<strong>in</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!