12.07.2015 Views

Course in Probability Theory

Course in Probability Theory

Course in Probability Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9 .1 BASIC PROPERTIES OF CONDITIONAL EXPECTATION 1 3 17(vii) If J X, I < Y where c`(Y) < oo and X„ -+ X, then ((X„ I l')~` (X 1 10 .To illustrate, (iii) is proved by observ<strong>in</strong>g that for each A E < :f~f(Xi I ~)dJT=f X i d2 ~`'(X2 I )}, we have 7'(A) = 0 . The <strong>in</strong>equality(iv) may be proved by (ii), (iii), and the equation X = X+ - X- . To prove(v), let the limit of f (X„ 1 ~) be Z, which exists a .e . by (iii) . Then for eachA E {, we have by the monotone convergence theorem :JZ dT = lim ' ~ (X„ I ~) dT = lim X„ dT = f X dT .A n f A " f A AThus Z satisfies the def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g relation for o (X 1 6'), and it belongs to 6' withthe F (X„ 16')'s, hence Z = e(X 16') .To appreciate the caution that is necessary <strong>in</strong> handl<strong>in</strong>g conditional expectations,let us consider the Cauchy-Schwarz <strong>in</strong>equality :(IXYI 16)2 < e(X 2 I -6')A(Y 2 I ') .If we try to extend one of the usual proofs based on the positiveness of thequadratic form <strong>in</strong> A : (`((X + AY) 2 16'), the question arises that for each ),the quantity is def<strong>in</strong>ed only up to a null set N;,, and the union of these overall A cannot be ignored without comment . The reader is advised to th<strong>in</strong>k thisdifficulty through to its logical end, and then get out of it by restrict<strong>in</strong>g theA's to the rationals . Here is another way out : start from the follow<strong>in</strong>g trivial<strong>in</strong>equality :IXIIYI X 2 y2up- 2a2 + 2fl 2 'where a = (X 2 1 6)12 , ,B = C~(Y 2 16) 1 / 2 , and a,B>0 ; apply the operation{- 16} us<strong>in</strong>g (ii) and (iii) above to obta<strong>in</strong>IXYIca,81 X 2 1 Y ~ 2< 2 c( a2 l~ + ZenNow use Theorem 9 .1 .3 to <strong>in</strong>fer that this can be reduced toufi2 2{IXYIIf}< - a2 +2 2=1,the desired <strong>in</strong>equality .The follow<strong>in</strong>g theorem is a generalization of Jensen's <strong>in</strong>equality <strong>in</strong> Sec . 3 .2 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!