12.07.2015 Views

Course in Probability Theory

Course in Probability Theory

Course in Probability Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4 .2 ALMOST SURE CONVERGENCE ; BOREL-CANTELLI LEMMA 1 81Theorem 4 .2 .5. The implication (6) rema<strong>in</strong>s true if the events {E„ } are pairwise<strong>in</strong>dependent .PROOF . Let I„ denote the <strong>in</strong>dicator of E,,, so that our present hypothesisbecomes(8)dm :A n : L (Im 1 n ) = 1(I .)(%'(I n ) .Consider the series of r .v .'s : >n °_ 1 I n (w) . It diverges to +oo if and only ifan <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite number of its terms are equal to one, namely if w belongs to an<strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite number of the En 's . Hence the conclusion <strong>in</strong> (6) is equivalent to(9)00What has been said so far is true for arbitrary En 's . Now the hypothesis <strong>in</strong>(6) may be written as00E AI 1 ) = +00 -n=1Consider the partial sum Jk = En=1 I n .have for every A > 0 :Us<strong>in</strong>g Chebyshev's <strong>in</strong>equality, we(10) {I Jk - 0 (Jk)I < A6(Jk)} > 1 -U 2 (Jk)A2U2(Jk)= 1 - 1A 2 'where or 2 (J) denotes the variance of J . Writ<strong>in</strong>gPit = ((I,) = ~~( En ),we may calculate a 2 (Jk) by us<strong>in</strong>g (8), as follows :kn=1In + 21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!