Table 14 c<strong>on</strong>tinuedEnrolls dual CMS design grant forC<strong>on</strong>tracts with Dual eligible initiative<strong>State</strong> eligibles duals initiativeMedicare SNPsunder developmentFL x x xGA x xHI xIA xID x xKY x xMA x x x xMExMI x x xMN x x x xMOxNC x x xNExNJ x xNM xNY x x x xOHxOK x x xOR x x xPA x xRIxSC x x x xTN x x xTX x x xUT x xVT x xWA x x x xWI x x x xTotal 25 15 21 2148 00
Looking ahead: <strong>Medicaid</strong> managed care expansi<strong>on</strong> and health reformKey Secti<strong>on</strong> Findings: <strong>State</strong>s expect to rely increasingly <strong>on</strong> managed care to serve <strong>Medicaid</strong> beneficiaries.Severe budget pressures remain a key challenge for states, and new demands associated withhealth reform also emerge as issues.While some states see barriers to <strong>Medicaid</strong> MCOs becoming Exchange plans, others expectMCOs to seize the Exchange as a market opportunity.Key health reform implicati<strong>on</strong>s for <strong>Medicaid</strong> managed care are yet to come into focus in manystates.Under the ACA, beginning in 2014, <strong>Medicaid</strong> eligibility will expand to reach nearly all Americans underage 65 with income below 133 percent of the federal poverty level, and others up to 400 percent of thepoverty level will be eligible for subsidies to purchase coverage offered through new health insuranceExchanges. An estimated 16 milli<strong>on</strong> additi<strong>on</strong>al people – mostly, uninsured adults – are expected to gain<strong>Medicaid</strong> coverage by 2019, and a similar number will gain coverage through the Exchanges. The healthreform law envisi<strong>on</strong>s seamless transiti<strong>on</strong>s and coordinati<strong>on</strong> between coverage programs when peoplemove from <strong>on</strong>e to the other due to changes in their income or other circumstances.Although it is widely expected that managed care will play a growing role in <strong>Medicaid</strong> under healthreform, until this survey, there has been no systematic assessment of states’ plans in this regard, or ofthe capacity of their MCOs to absorb new <strong>Medicaid</strong> enrollment. To gauge how prepared states are forthe <strong>Medicaid</strong> expansi<strong>on</strong> and the coordinati<strong>on</strong> challenges ahead, the survey asked states that c<strong>on</strong>tractwith MCOs several questi<strong>on</strong>s about the future of <strong>Medicaid</strong> managed care under health reform.<strong>State</strong>s expect to rely more <strong>on</strong> managed care in the near term. C<strong>on</strong>tinued budget pressures and interestin improving service delivery and payment systems are fueling states’ plans to expand the use ofmanaged care in <strong>Medicaid</strong>. In all, 27 states (of 45 resp<strong>on</strong>ding) indicated that they expect to rely <strong>on</strong><strong>Medicaid</strong> managed care to a greater extent. Of these 27 states, six specified that they have plans tomandate managed care enrollment for additi<strong>on</strong>al <strong>Medicaid</strong> populati<strong>on</strong>s (California, Kentucky, Louisiana,Michigan, New Jersey, and South Carolina), and four reported that they have plans to expand managedcare to additi<strong>on</strong>al geographic areas (Florida, Kentucky, Texas, and Virginia).<strong>State</strong>s see significant issues, challenges, and opportunities in the next couple of years. <strong>State</strong> budgetstrains and enrollment increases are both challenges that states cited frequently. The lingeringeffects of the recessi<strong>on</strong> – reduced tax revenues, high unemployment, and high demand for healthand human services programs (<strong>Medicaid</strong>, in particular) – all c<strong>on</strong>tinue to generate intense pressure <strong>on</strong>states already struggling to meet competing needs with limited resources.<strong>State</strong>s also identified c<strong>on</strong>cerns about new demands <strong>on</strong> their capacity stemming from health reform,al<strong>on</strong>g with other issues. Increased <strong>Medicaid</strong> enrollment, adequacy of provider networks, Exchangedevelopment, and development of systems for claiming the proper federal matching rate weream<strong>on</strong>g the challenges states menti<strong>on</strong>ed. <strong>State</strong>s also cited a need for more flexibility to integrate carefor dual eligibles. Individual states identified several other issues and pressures, including the need49
- Page 1 and 2:
kaisercommission onmedicaidand theu
- Page 3 and 4: kaisercommission onmedicaidand theu
- Page 5 and 6: Table of ContentsExecutive Summary
- Page 7 and 8: EXECUTIVE SUMMARYMedicaid, the publ
- Page 9 and 10: party enrollment brokers to provide
- Page 11 and 12: HEDIS©, CAHPS©, and state-specifi
- Page 13: ConclusionFor over 30 years, state
- Page 16 and 17: from the recession and the slow rec
- Page 18 and 19: A note on Medicaid managed care ter
- Page 20 and 21: Managed caremodelTable 1: Medicaid
- Page 23 and 24: States are increasingly mandating m
- Page 25 and 26: States with Medicaid MCOsKey Sectio
- Page 27 and 28: States have “auto-assignment” a
- Page 29 and 30: excess of a specified threshold for
- Page 31 and 32: Dental care and outpatient and inpa
- Page 33 and 34: the second trimester, and within th
- Page 35 and 36: eported that they limit PCP panel s
- Page 37 and 38: States with non-comprehensive PHPsK
- Page 39 and 40: Measuring, monitoring, and improvin
- Page 41 and 42: seven states required 10 measures o
- Page 43 and 44: CAHPS© surveys. North Carolina is
- Page 45 and 46: Special initiatives to improve qual
- Page 47 and 48: public health efforts to reduce dis
- Page 49 and 50: Medicaid managed long-term care and
- Page 51 and 52: (e.g., need to credential Adult <st
- Page 53: In many states, broader efforts foc
- Page 57 and 58: ConclusionFor over 30 years, state
- Page 59 and 60: APPENDIX 2: Summary of Medicaid Man
- Page 61 and 62: Program Name(e.g., Popular Name, 19
- Page 63 and 64: APPENDIX 3: MCO Contracts, Plan Cha
- Page 65 and 66: State(No. ofcontracts)NameEnrollmen
- Page 67 and 68: State(No. ofcontracts)NameEnrollmen
- Page 69 and 70: APPENDIX 5: MCO Capitation Rate-Set
- Page 71 and 72: APPENDIX 7: MCO Network Adequacy Re
- Page 73 and 74: State Primary Care Obstetric Care S
- Page 75 and 76: APPENDIX 9: Providers Recognized as
- Page 77 and 78: APPENDIX 11: PCCM Administrative Se
- Page 79 and 80: APPENDIX 13: Initiatives to Improve
- Page 81 and 82: I. MANAGED CARE OVERVIEW1. Total Ma
- Page 83 and 84: 4. Enrollment Requirements.a. We ar
- Page 85 and 86: ii. Please indicate whether the fac
- Page 87 and 88: c. Required Providers: We are inter
- Page 89 and 90: IV. NON-COMPREHENSIVE PREPAID HEALT
- Page 91 and 92: . Does your state use CAHPS© surve
- Page 93 and 94: VI. SPECIAL INITIATIVESAll states s
- Page 95 and 96: Appendix I: Managed Care Contracts1
- Page 97: Appendix II: Clinical Quality Perfo
- Page 100: 1330 G S T R E E T NW, W A S H I N