Where Now for European Social Democracy? - Policy Network
Where Now for European Social Democracy? - Policy Network
Where Now for European Social Democracy? - Policy Network
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
BRIGITTE ZYPRIES 91dispute regarding the correct programme we cannot lose sight of this:we need a process <strong>for</strong> immigration that is geared toward the needsof the job market. With the immigration law we could better andmore flexibly steer employment migration than be<strong>for</strong>e. This will haveresults <strong>for</strong> all of us, <strong>for</strong> the entire German society. We expect positivechanges, such as in the job market and the social security system, butalso as to cultural co-existence. With the immigration law we have<strong>for</strong> the first time placed immigration policy in a larger context. Amigration policy that considers these contexts and keeps a view towardall, immigrants and citizens, will succeed as a decisive policy aimed atintegration. Integration is the prerequisite <strong>for</strong> innovation.Freedom in security: prerequisite <strong>for</strong> asocial democratic Europe in the 21st century“Fair re<strong>for</strong>m of our country.” Under this program the executivecommittee of the SPD in January 2004 agreed the “Weimar Guidelineson Innovation.”We want ‘Made in Germany’ to remain a trade mark. To be presentin the growth markets of tomorrow, our state-of-the-art technologymust be promoted more than be<strong>for</strong>e. Education, science, and researchmust become a matter <strong>for</strong> the entire society.Fairness in opportunities and integration are prerequisites <strong>for</strong> this,as are the long-term security of our social system and stable publicfinances.But so is freedom in security. It is a prerequisite <strong>for</strong> individual andempowering development. It is also the central theme of socialdemocracy in the twenty-first century. When faced with a choice,taking responsibility <strong>for</strong> freedom is not always easy. Simple,reactionary, and vague slogans are sometimes too seductive, candelude people into false security, calm them, and are – at least in theshort-term – politically successful. It is easy <strong>for</strong> conservative politics toplay this tune. <strong>Social</strong> democratic politics cannot allow it to be so easy;they must differentiate, explain, and maintain the balance betweenfreedom and security. By doing so, social democratic legal policy willbe successful.