design process study for the demonstration homes - Architectural ...
design process study for the demonstration homes - Architectural ...
design process study for the demonstration homes - Architectural ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4.0 Recommendations <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Energy Commission’s ZENHome Program<br />
4.1. Cost and features<br />
The net incremental cost <strong>for</strong> ZEH features over a base Title 24 home in Cali<strong>for</strong>nia ranged<br />
from $8,000 to $15,000, depending on <strong>the</strong> aggressiveness of <strong>the</strong> rebates from <strong>the</strong> utility<br />
service territories. For example, in investor-owned utility territories where <strong>the</strong> state<br />
incentive is only $2.60/watt <strong>for</strong> a PV buydown (compared to <strong>the</strong> $3.50/watt incentive<br />
from SMUD or <strong>the</strong> $4.00/watt incentive from Roseville Electric), it would be more<br />
expensive to build ZEHs.<br />
The net cost to achieve <strong>the</strong> PIER Utility-focused Market Model ZENHomes will depend<br />
on <strong>the</strong> rebates available at both <strong>the</strong> state and federal levels during project term (2006–<br />
2008), but will be similar to <strong>the</strong> incremental cost quoted from <strong>the</strong> ZEH case studies. The<br />
features required to achieve ZENHome goals are similar to ZEH features as well.<br />
It is important <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> ZENHome project team (<strong>Architectural</strong> Energy Corporation,<br />
Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Edison, ConSol, Geltz Communications, ConsumerPowerline, and <strong>the</strong><br />
PV manufacturer) to work to acquire all possible rebates and incentives to minimize <strong>the</strong><br />
cost of building ZENHomes to <strong>the</strong> builder and homeowner. It also is important to identify<br />
and attempt to quantify benefits gained from media coverage, modifications in <strong>the</strong><br />
entitlement <strong>process</strong>es, and mortgage advantages from significantly lower energy bills.<br />
4.2. Facilitate involvement of local government<br />
Local government participants need to be on-board early in <strong>the</strong> Utility-focused Market<br />
Model <strong>for</strong> ZENHomes project. Some of <strong>the</strong> energy efficiency features (e.g., DOW T-Mass<br />
walls, buried ducts, OASYS evaporative cooler, etc.) could require significant discussions<br />
with <strong>the</strong> local building department, resulting in project delays. The ZENHome team must<br />
work proactively with building departments to facilitate understanding of <strong>the</strong> features<br />
and minimize delays and, if possible, make <strong>the</strong>se projects highly visible within <strong>the</strong> local<br />
government. Delays may be avoided and plan reviews may occur faster if <strong>the</strong> building<br />
department and city government are included as an integral part of <strong>the</strong> project.<br />
4.3. 1-kW requirement<br />
One of <strong>the</strong> goals <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> PIER ZENHome Program is to achieve 1 kW peak demand in<br />
each home. This goal will be studied in <strong>the</strong> Utility-focused Market Model <strong>for</strong> ZENHome<br />
project. It is important to note that <strong>the</strong> ease with which <strong>the</strong> 1-kW goal can be met depends<br />
on <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong> home. The 1-kW goal will be harder to achieve <strong>for</strong> larger <strong>homes</strong> and in<br />
harsher climate zones. An in-depth discussion on <strong>the</strong> 1-kW issue and <strong>the</strong> effects of square<br />
footage and climate zones will be provided in future deliverables.<br />
33