12.07.2015 Views

#06-5558 Accrd Manual V7 - COLA

#06-5558 Accrd Manual V7 - COLA

#06-5558 Accrd Manual V7 - COLA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CRITERIA FOR QUALITY LABORATORY PERFORMANCEassess whether information from the review of other activities (such as discrepancies in the relationship ordistribution of other test results, incorrect reference ranges, or patterns related to repetitive correctiveactions for QC and calibration issues) indicates a change in the test system and its expected performancespecifications that requires further investigation and corrective action.QA 11 RDoes the laboratory have a process or mechanism in place to evaluate and adjust the reference range when itis determined that the reference range has changed?A review of your patient population relative to the use of a generally established reference range may revealthe need to establish your own reference range because of the uniqueness of your patient population (e.g.,geriatric patients, altitude).QA 12 RIf you perform the same test using different methods or instruments, do you evaluate the variance in the resultsproduced by each method at least twice a year?When multiple methods are used to perform the same test, it is important for the laboratory and the practitionersit supports to understand the relationship between results produced by each method. This is mostcritical when tracking results on a specific individual over time. If significant variances in results are present,they could potentially be interpreted as denoting changes in the patient’s condition, when in fact they aremerely the result of a bias among methods.This is easily done by split specimen analysis. If any bias is noted, it is important to reflect the difference inthe normal ranges that are used on the test report. This requirement also includes back-up instruments.QA 13 RWhen your PT results are unsatisfactory, do you take action to prevent future failures?Neglecting even a single failure in PT can cause the laboratory major problems. The QA review of PT shouldinclude a review of QC and calibration records, transcription errors in recording the PT result, expirationdates on reagents, etc.QA 14 RDoes the laboratory have a process or mechanism to detect and review patient test results that appear to beinconsistent with the distribution of patient results, the relationship with other test results or any informationrelevant and necessary to interpretation of patient results?58. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT <strong>COLA</strong> PHONE 800.981.9883 | FAX 410.381.8611 | ON-LINE www.cola.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!