Evaluation of IT modernisation in the NHS - NETSCC
Evaluation of IT modernisation in the NHS - NETSCC
Evaluation of IT modernisation in the NHS - NETSCC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Report to SDO for NCRS ProjectIntroductionTable 2: Relationship between orig<strong>in</strong>al and revised protocolsPolicy change Consequence Plan <strong>in</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al protocol Revision to study protocol Impact on study outputsNCRSimplementationis now under <strong>the</strong>remit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>NPf<strong>IT</strong> and <strong>IT</strong>applications areto be suppliedvia <strong>the</strong> LSPOrganisationaluncerta<strong>in</strong>tyTwo levels <strong>of</strong> qualitativeanalysis:1. Staff (use <strong>of</strong> EPRs)2. Patients (careprocess)Include a third level <strong>of</strong>qualitative analysis -1. Management team(organisational context)2. Staff (use <strong>of</strong> NCRS)3. Patients (care process)<strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> organisationalimpact <strong>of</strong> NPf<strong>IT</strong> policy changes,on NCRS implementation, atacute trust level.Low levels <strong>of</strong>NCRSimplementationEvaluate 5 EPR functions1. e-book<strong>in</strong>g2. e-test order<strong>in</strong>g3. PACS4. e-communications5. e-prescrib<strong>in</strong>gEvaluate 3 NCRS – thosefunctions most widely <strong>in</strong> placedur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> study time-frame.1. e-book<strong>in</strong>g2. e-test order<strong>in</strong>g3. PACSThe reduction <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong>functions evaluated meanssome macro level (acrossTrust) analysis will be replacedby micro (with<strong>in</strong> trust)evaluation, both for quantitativeand qualitative aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>study.Low levels <strong>of</strong>NCRSimplementationQualitatively evaluate <strong>the</strong>impact <strong>of</strong> EPRs on patientsby exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g two types <strong>of</strong>patient journey, hipreplacement and stroke.Qualitatively evaluate <strong>the</strong>impact <strong>of</strong> e-functions bytarget<strong>in</strong>g patients whose carehas taken place <strong>in</strong> areas <strong>in</strong>which e-functions have beendeployed.Evaluat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong>patient care via specific NCRSe-functions expected to<strong>in</strong>fluence care will optimise <strong>the</strong>probability <strong>of</strong> captur<strong>in</strong>g change.NCRS – <strong>NHS</strong> Care Record Service; NPf<strong>IT</strong> – <strong>the</strong> National Programme for Information Technology; <strong>IT</strong> – <strong>in</strong>formation technology; LSP –local service provider; EPR – electronic patient record; PACS – picture archiv<strong>in</strong>g and communication system.6