12.07.2015 Views

Evaluation of IT modernisation in the NHS - NETSCC

Evaluation of IT modernisation in the NHS - NETSCC

Evaluation of IT modernisation in the NHS - NETSCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Report to SDO for NCRS ProjectReview <strong>of</strong> Economic Implications3.4.3. Economic f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs and methods <strong>of</strong> evaluationApart from <strong>the</strong> studies that used a f<strong>in</strong>ancial approach, o<strong>the</strong>r studies werepartial economic evaluations because <strong>the</strong>y only evaluated differences <strong>in</strong> costs,and not health benefits. Table 8 fur<strong>the</strong>r summarises <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>cluded studies by <strong>in</strong>tervention type. The perspective was identified <strong>in</strong> fourstudies and implied <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> text for four o<strong>the</strong>r studies. One adopted a societalperspective 53 and <strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g seven adopted a hospital 52,56,57,63,65,67 ordepartmental perspective. 66 Only five studies applied discount<strong>in</strong>g. 51,53,56,57,65The majority <strong>of</strong> studies compared pre and post implementation effects. All buttwo evaluations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> PACS used a pre and post comparison with<strong>the</strong> pre-PACS comparator identified as film-based imag<strong>in</strong>g. One studyreported changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> outcome measure dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> PACSand once PACS was fully implemented, fur<strong>the</strong>r compar<strong>in</strong>g those f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs withpre-PACS data. 65 Ano<strong>the</strong>r study compared <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> PACS versus PACSwith <strong>the</strong> addition <strong>of</strong> CR (computer radiography). 50 Maass et al. evaluated <strong>the</strong>effects <strong>of</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g PACS <strong>in</strong> addition to a film-based system and used<strong>the</strong>ir f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs to estimate <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> a full-scale PACS implementation. 67Similarly, studies evaluat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> EMR and CPOE implementationscompared outcomes and costs before and after <strong>in</strong>troduction.3.4.4. CostsAll but one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 7 studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> PACS reported <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong>ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> new system. In addition, two studies 49,67reported <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial capital cost <strong>of</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g PACS and staff<strong>in</strong>g costsassociated with us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> system. Wagner et al. did not report any costs.Only two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> five studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> CPOE implementation reporteddata on costs. Both Wang et al. and Kaushal et al. <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong>ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g/operat<strong>in</strong>g and staff<strong>in</strong>g associated with <strong>the</strong> new system; <strong>the</strong> formeralso reported <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial cost <strong>of</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g CPOE. Most studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>effects <strong>of</strong> EMR <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial costs <strong>of</strong> implementation; three also <strong>in</strong>cluded<strong>the</strong> costs associated with EMR operation and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance. 53,61,6230

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!