Evaluation of IT modernisation in the NHS - NETSCC
Evaluation of IT modernisation in the NHS - NETSCC
Evaluation of IT modernisation in the NHS - NETSCC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Report to SDO for NCRS ProjectSupport<strong>in</strong>g Literaturewhat Kle<strong>in</strong> has co<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> ‘Mart<strong>in</strong>i factor’; once found <strong>the</strong>y can be used any time,any place, anywhere. 40,41This potential advantage <strong>of</strong> paper records may be onereason why <strong>the</strong> authors concluded that, although EPRs were <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> casesbeneficial, on balance time saved versus time spent was at best equal. Theauthors propose that future EPR systems will have to do considerably better <strong>in</strong>recognis<strong>in</strong>g and balanc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> potential conflicts between time saved and timespent. They also warn that current euphoric claims regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong>EPRs are likely to result <strong>in</strong> widespread disappo<strong>in</strong>tment amongst <strong>NHS</strong> staff andpatients. 42Whe<strong>the</strong>r this prediction will be realised when implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NPf<strong>IT</strong> iscompleted is unknown. A report by <strong>the</strong> Institute for Public Policy Research 43described how <strong>the</strong> benefits <strong>of</strong> EPRs to health services could be huge, but <strong>the</strong>risks could also be substantial, because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> failure to provide evidence <strong>of</strong>impact. The research, based on exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g large EPR pilots <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>NHS</strong>,concluded that public and political support for unprecedented spend<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>IT</strong><strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> health services will not be realised without better plann<strong>in</strong>g andevaluation. Trials <strong>of</strong> electronic patient records failed to demonstrate that <strong>the</strong>ywould lead to more flexible services, cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs or improvements <strong>in</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong>patients. In addition, pilots <strong>of</strong> electronic appo<strong>in</strong>tment book<strong>in</strong>g systems failed toshow clearly that <strong>the</strong>y helped to facilitate greater choice for patients about where,when and by whom <strong>the</strong>y are treated. A more recent National Audit Office reportalso raised concerns, with <strong>the</strong> current roll out <strong>of</strong> NPf<strong>IT</strong> reported as less thanoptimal. 44The report highlighted that <strong>the</strong> programme faced significant challenges<strong>in</strong> deliver<strong>in</strong>g systems to agreed timescales, ensur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>of</strong> <strong>NHS</strong>organisations <strong>in</strong> implementation and, importantly, ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> support <strong>of</strong> <strong>NHS</strong> staffand <strong>the</strong> public.2.6. ConclusionsOne aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to determ<strong>in</strong>e which organisational factors impact on <strong>the</strong>implementation <strong>of</strong> electronic patient records <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK <strong>NHS</strong>. Current researchreviewed <strong>of</strong>fers some useful <strong>in</strong>sights, <strong>in</strong> suggest<strong>in</strong>g that factors such as hav<strong>in</strong>g anorganisational culture <strong>of</strong> trust, plus good teamwork, supportive leadership, systemcustomisation, flexibility, userability and speed, will aid success. However, as22