slowly varying dynamic pressure as the dependent variableallows for large integration steps, thereby increasing computationalefficiency. If these concepts could be made sufficientlyefficient and robust, they can be implementedonboard atmospheric flight vehicles for real-time trajectorygeneration. Rather than rely on predetermined profiles, theonboard system would generate a profile based on the currentstate of the vehicle (as opposed to a fixed set of nominalconditions). In addition to increasing the performance andflexibility of the guidance system near nominal operatingconditions, this capability could be used to provide anautonomous abort capability.ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThe authors would like to acknowledge the X-34 guidance,navigation, and control team members Tim Osowski, MikeRuth, Dan Rovner, and Jennifer Henry of Orbital ScienceCorporation.REFERENCES[1] James, J., Entry Guidance Training Manual, NASA JohnsonSpace Center, Flight Training Branch, Houston, TX, July1988, pp 4-1.[2] Walyus, K.D. and C. Dalton, "Approach and LandingSimulator for Space Shuttle Orbiter Touchdown Conditions,"Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 28, No. 4,1991, pp. 478-485.[3] Betts, J.T., "Survey of Numerical Methods for TrajectoryOptimization," Journal of Guidance, Control, andDynamics, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1998, pp. 193-207.[4] Haug, E.J., Intermediate Dynamics, Prentice-Hall, 1997, pp.403-416.[5] Press,W.H., S.A.Teukolsky,W.T.Vetterling, and B.P. Flannery,Numerical Recipes in Fortran: The Art of ScientificComputing, Cambridge University Press, 2 nd ed., 1992. pp582-586.Autolanding Trajectory Design for the X-34 23
eg H. Bartonbiographies biographiesGreg H. Barton has been with <strong>Draper</strong> <strong>Laboratory</strong> since 1985. Currently, he is theChief Engineer for advanced guidance and control technologies for ReusableLaunch Vehicles (RLVs). This activity began in 1996 with the X-34 program andhas now grown to developing advanced algorithms for a new generation ofRLVs. His responsibilities over the years have included all levels of project developmentfrom concept design, algorithm and software development, to test and verification forflight certification. Management duties have included all levels from task lead, project lead, proposalmanager to program manager. In addition to these duties, he has served as technicalsupervisor and mentor for new staff and MIT graduates. He was responsible for managing<strong>Draper</strong>’s programs in Advanced Guidance and Control within the Space Programs Office during1999. These programs have spanned all aspects of <strong>Draper</strong>’s engineering disciplines includingadvanced algorithms, flight software, and hardware prototypes. Program management responsibilitiesinclude the Space Shuttle, Space Station, Mars Sample Return, and RLVs within NASAJSC, MSFC, and JPL centers, as well as commercial and international customers. In conjunction,Mr. Barton has planned and managed new business and program development.teve G. TragesserSteve G. Tragesser obtained a BS in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from theUniversity of Illinois in 1992, an MS in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from PurdueUniversity in 1994, and a PhD in 1997 with a dissertation on aerobraking with tethered spacecraft.Dr. Tragesser worked at <strong>Draper</strong> <strong>Laboratory</strong> for one and a half years developing descentguidance algorithms for RLVs. He is currently an Assistant Professor at the Air Force Institute ofTechnology. Areas of research interest include guidance of hypersonic vehicles; dynamics oftethered spacecraft; and trajectory modeling, design, and optimization.24Autolanding Trajectory Design for the X-34: Biographies-- ---
- Page 6 and 7: V 0 e jωt L R R R TL: (Z 0 ,β,I)C
- Page 9 and 10: Figure 16 shows a fabricated "race-
- Page 11 and 12: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS LEDGMENTSThe author
- Page 13 and 14: aanan MillerRaanan Miller is a Seni
- Page 15 and 16: The motivation for developing ALIP
- Page 17 and 18: (4)where the state variables v and
- Page 19 and 20: q’ = f 1 (q, α, h) (26)q = f 2 (
- Page 21: 4000Computed Altitude (ft)300020001
- Page 25 and 26: ActuatorsSensorsIntelligent Sensors
- Page 27 and 28: Table 2. Potential sensors requirin
- Page 29 and 30: Table 4. Comparison of single-chann
- Page 31 and 32: Using many small I/O networks will
- Page 33 and 34: Network Control ComputersTriple Twi
- Page 35 and 36: Kaplesh KumarAnthony PetrovichTommy
- Page 37 and 38: DESIGN CONSIDERATIONSThe overall go
- Page 39 and 40: BIAS DRIFT STABILITYAn important re
- Page 41 and 42: Hz291206002912050029120400291203002
- Page 43 and 44: In order to show bias repeatability
- Page 45 and 46: nthony PetrovichAnthony Petrovich i
- Page 47 and 48: Ramses M. AgustinRami S. MangoubiRo
- Page 49 and 50: v k is the sensor noise. In our cas
- Page 51 and 52: The preceding performance criterion
- Page 53 and 54: JET THRUST ESTIMATIONWe will first
- Page 55 and 56: 1st measurement (nominal)0.010.0050
- Page 57 and 58: 45004000350030002500Thrust (lb)2000
- Page 59 and 60: amses AgustinbiographiesRamses Agus
- Page 61 and 62: Jamie M. AndersonPeter A. Kerrebroc
- Page 63 and 64: Figure 1. The Draper Laboratory VCU
- Page 65 and 66: were adjusted to give good tracking
- Page 67 and 68: 80604020Heading (deg)0-20-40-60-800
- Page 69 and 70: Marc S. WeinbergII:"'JI.m-4..... 7.
- Page 71 and 72: where z i is measured from the arbi
- Page 73 and 74:
L = beam lengthC = capacitance of e
- Page 75 and 76:
3.02.52.0F/z ratio to linear1.51.00
- Page 77 and 78:
The following pages contain the bib
- Page 79 and 80:
errors. Numerical testing based on
- Page 81 and 82:
of which are high performance and p
- Page 83 and 84:
presented.The economic benefits of
- Page 85 and 86:
over conventional analyzers. A plan
- Page 87 and 88:
Smith, J.; Proulx, R.J.; Cefola, P.
- Page 89 and 90:
using a dissolved wafer process wit
- Page 91 and 92:
Donald E. GustafsonDavid J. LuciaAu
- Page 93 and 94:
onald E. GustafsonbiographiesDonald
- Page 95 and 96:
Greiff, Paul; Brezinski, PaulGetter
- Page 97 and 98:
DOCTOR ROBERT D. MAURERDr. Maurer l
- Page 99 and 100:
All Draper employees (excluding Off
- Page 101:
Chauddhry, A.I.; Supervisors: Kang,