advance. If we nurture developments of this kindwithin a wider strategy of what has variouslybeen called ‘real utopias’ (Erik Olin Wright),‘democratic experimentalism’ (Roberto Unger)or ‘prefigurative practice’ (Carl Boggs), we mayyet create a Good Society worthy not just of thename, but of the radical democratic traditions towhich it belongs. In the resonant words of SheliaRowbotham, ‘Some changes have to start now,else there is no beginning for us.’ 1010 Sheila Rowbotham, ‘Thewomen’s movement and organizingfor socialism,’ in SheilaRowbotham, Lynne Segal andHilary Wainwright, Beyond theFragments: Feminism and theMaking of Socialism, Merlin Press,1979, p.140.Education for the good society | 39
1 Winston Churchill, quoted inNIACE, The Future for LifelongLearning: A National Strategy,National Institute of AdultContinuing Education, 2009, p.2.2 Iris Murdoch, Existentialists andMystics, Chatto & Windus, 1950,p.342.3 For this chapter I assume that‘lifelong learning’ refers to abroader way in which learningis conceptualised across the lifecourse; my focus is specificallyon the provision of educationfor adults.4 See for example Joe Cox, ‘Onthe “big society” vs the “goodsociety” – a case in point’,Compass Online, 28 February2011, www.compassonline.org.uk/news/item.asp?n=12260.5 See Toby Helm, ‘Small isbeautiful: the father of DavidCameron’s big society’, Observer,27 March 2011, www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/mar/27/small-beautiful-david-cameronbig-society.6 Quoted by A.C. Grayling inDavid Utting, Contemporary SocialEvils, Policy Press, 2009, p.122.8. What kind of societyvalues adult education?Tom SperlingerThere is, perhaps, no branch of our vast educationalsystem which should attract… the aid andencouragement of the state [more] than adulteducation.Winston Churchill 1Goodness appears to be both rare and hard topicture.Iris Murdoch 2What kind of societies do (and do not)value adult education?My purpose in this chapter is to think aboutthe role of adult education in the Good Societyand also about how it might help us define ournotions of the ‘good’ in this context. 3 There hasbeen some debate recently about the differencebetween Compass’s idea of the Good Society andthe Conservative idea of the Big Society. 4 Oneway in which to reflect on differences betweenthem might be by understanding the supportingor opposing terms in each case. For example, theopposite of the ‘big’ society is presumably the‘small’ society, one that is relatively self-enclosedor exclusive. A rhetorical sense of inclusion has,in fact, been one of the Big Society’s more attractiveelements. Yet this big–small dichotomy isof limited use, since the Big Society is oftenabout supporting relatively small-scale, local andself-organised projects; the reported influence ofSchumacher’s Small is Beautiful on it underlinesthat ‘small’ is just as operative a word in thisconception of how society works. 5 In fact, theopposing term to the Big Society seems to be notthe ‘small society’ but the ‘big state’, as is underlinedby one of David Cameron’s most effectivelines of recent years: ‘There is such a thing associety, it’s just not the same as the state.’ 6 The BigSociety is as much, if not more, of an attempt tore-conceptualise the role and size of the state as ofsociety. It is also thus a vision of society in whichthe state has a predefined (and limited) role.The Good Society, in contrast, can presumablybe opposed by a notion of the ‘bad’ or dysfunctionalsociety and one might imagine a spectrumof less good societies, with a sense of progressiontowards the ‘good’ as either a set of concretepossibilities or utopian aspirations. One mightargue that the Good Society is itself inherentlypragmatic, since it could also be compared tothe perfect society. In contrast, ‘good’ implies apermanent relationship to ‘bad’ or less good; asense of continual action to achieve whatever‘goodness’ is possible. It is also crucial here thatthe Good Society does not, within the term itself,specify a relationship to the state – and thusneither places the state outside such a society nordefines in advance its role within it.In turning to the question in my title, I want tothink similarly about opposing terms, to imaginethe kind of society that would not value adulteducation. Here too it is worth noting that onesuch society might be a perfect society or one thathad achieved a level of perfection in the educationof its children. Adult education would not beneeded if education as a child could completelyprepare a person for life. There would needto be a relatively unforgiving form of equalityin this provision, with each citizen offered a‘perfect’ form of education as a child and littleor no opportunity for a second chance if theyfailed to use it. This model would also imply thateducation is designed to prepare one for experience(rather than respond to it) or that one of thequalities that might be learnt as a child would beto be a ‘lifelong learner’ on one’s own. The othernotable aspect of this imagined society is that itwould presumably be relatively or entirely static.If the society succeeded in preparing children forlife, this implies that there would not be radicalchanges in the nature of the society in theirlifetime or in its composition (since outsiderswould require education at a later stage).This is not the only sort of society one canimagine that would not value adult education.Another example might be a society in whichindividuals did not live long, making the ideaof adult education almost redundant. Otherexamples would include societies with particularconceptions of a working life or of each citizen’srelationship to the body of knowledge the societyholds. For example, a society with a relativelylimited range of employments or professions –40 | www.compassonline.org.uk
- Page 1 and 2: Educationfor theGoodSocietyThe valu
- Page 3 and 4: Acknowledgements:Compass would like
- Page 5 and 6: ContributorsLisa Nandy is Labour MP
- Page 7 and 8: IntroductionEducation for the Good
- Page 9 and 10: 1 This article has been developedou
- Page 11 and 12: 8 See Ann Hodgson, Ken Spoursand Ma
- Page 13 and 14: 13 The most comprehensiverecent res
- Page 15 and 16: 1 See for example B. Simon, ‘Cane
- Page 17 and 18: 10 J. Martin, Making Socialists: Ma
- Page 19 and 20: the poorest homes (as measured by e
- Page 21 and 22: 1 In 2008, 15 per cent ofacademies
- Page 23 and 24: 1 Angela McRobbie, The Aftermathof
- Page 25 and 26: 8 Christine Skelton, Schooling theB
- Page 27 and 28: 1 See www.education.gov.uk/b0065507
- Page 29 and 30: 13 Barbara Fredrickson, ‘Therole
- Page 31 and 32: 6. Education forsustainabilityTeres
- Page 33 and 34: well as cognitively. Real understan
- Page 35 and 36: 7. Schools fordemocracyMichael Fiel
- Page 37 and 38: and joyful relations between person
- Page 39: 8 Wilfred Carr and AnthonyHartnett,
- Page 43 and 44: 9 See http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/ed
- Page 45 and 46: 1 The Learning Age: A Renaissancefo
- Page 47 and 48: nities, and not have the public-pri
- Page 49 and 50: 4 Engineering flexibility: a system
- Page 51 and 52: other countries to require their re
- Page 53 and 54: 6. Remember that many of the outcom
- Page 55 and 56: 2 Adrian Elliott, State SchoolsSinc
- Page 57 and 58: 4 Peter Hyman, ‘Fear on the front
- Page 59 and 60: 12. Rethinking thecomprehensive ide
- Page 61 and 62: training, be part of a local system
- Page 64: About CompassCompass is the democra