Michael Fielding takes the traditional concept of‘fellowship’ to a new level. His concept of ‘democraticfellowship’ is used to recognise an interdependencybetween teachers and students as thebasis for greater democracy in our educationalinstitutions, a pre-condition for wider democracyin the educational system as a whole.Chapters 8, 9 and 10 explore other dimensionsof expansiveness. In Chapter 8, ‘What kind ofsociety values adult learning?’, Tom Sperlingerfinds that the road to the Good Society will belittered with imperfections and thus there is aconstant need to learn and relearn. Followingon from this Tom Schuller in Chapter 9 arguesfor the wider benefits of lifelong learning andsuggests there should be a ‘longer and different’approach to learning throughout the life-course– arguably the hallmark of the Good Society inaction. Ewart Keep takes the analysis into therealms of the economy and labour market inChapter 10. He recalls that New Labour wasover-ambitious about what education and skillscould achieve on their own and under-ambitiousabout the need to forge the Good Societyin the wider economy. He persuasively arguesthat education, as a transformative force, cannotdo this in isolation from a wider social andeconomic strategy.The final two chapters aim to act as a bridgebetween this volume, which is primarilyconcerned with vision, and the education ebooksto come, which will increasingly focus on debates,strategy and structure. In ‘Re-taking the highground: steps towards a persuasive progressiveposition on schooling’, Martin Yarnit suggeststhat the Left’s failure has been, in large part,its inability to learn from successful politicalcampaigning. He argues for a new cultural revolutionto transform popular commonsense, basedon an underlying optimism that all learners cansucceed given the right conditions. In Chapter12 Ken Spours suggests that Education of theGood Society and the renewal of the comprehensiveideal will require a new type of educationalpolitics based on a values-led approach.This ebook will be the first of several Compasspublications to contribute to an agenda forprogressive education reform. The CompassEducation Group was formed in 2010 and has over200 participants. It has developed an Educationfor the Good Society Statement, a micro-site andholds regular meetings, seminars and conferences.The next step will be a series of seminarsduring 2011/12 to build on this volume, and tofocus on its omissions – the education sectorsfrom primary through to higher education, howinstitutions are organised, how the curriculumand qualifications system can be transformed,and the practicalities of a genuine approach tolifelong learning.Neal Lawson and Ken Spours(September 2011)For further information about the CompassEducation Group and education for the GoodSociety please contact Ken Spours(k.spours@ioe.ac.uk).Education for the good society | 7
1 This article has been developedout of an initial statement‘Education for the Good Society’(February 2011), which hasprovided a reference point for theCompass Education Group and itsGood Society project.2 The vision of a comprehensivesystem is now being revisited. Seefor example, Michael Fielding’seditorial in the spring 2011 editionof Forum, ‘A comprehensivecurriculum: reaffirmation andrenewal’, Forum, 53(1), pp.3–9.3 For recent critiques ofpoliticised policy-making ineducation see, for example,David Raffe and Ken Spours,Policy-Making and Policy Learningin 14–19 Education, Bedford WayPapers, 2007, and Richard Pringet al., Education for All, Routledge,2009.4 Michael Gove, ‘What iseducation for?’, speech to theRSA, 30 June 2009.1. Education forthe Good Society:The values and principlesof a new comprehensivevisionNeal Lawson and Ken SpoursWhy this debate and why now?The Left has suffered a huge defeat. No not thedefeat and the election of the Conservative-ledCoalition Government in 2010 but the intellectualand hegemonic defeat of over 30 years ago.That defeat transformed education into a battlegroundfor the soul of our young people andtheir teachers and parents. What sort of peopledo we as a society want to create? What is ourvision of humanity? In the face of such immensequestions and the onslaughts of the Right, theLeft crumbled. New Labour did some goodthings about school investment and standards,but its purpose was almost entirely neo-liberal– to better create a workforce fit for free marketfundamentalism. This enlightened neo-liberalapproach was better than its crude Thatcheritealternative, but has allowed Gove and Cameronto slip into its jet stream and continue the samelineage of reforms based on break-up, individualisationand commercialisation. While thesereforms need to be fought and resisted there is adeeper struggle to be engaged in. The Right wonbecause they dared to dream of a different world– and they made their dream a reality. The Leftwill only set the terms of debate again once wehave a vision of the world we want to create andunderstand the role of education in pre-figuring,making and sustaining that world. This is theGood Society project. 1Arguably the greatest problem arising fromthat hegemonic defeat has been the narrowingof a vision of education and a disconnectionbetween much of professional and popularopinion. This is despite the fact that we nowknow more about how people learn and increasinglyappreciate the relationship between widerfactors in the economy and society and theexperience of education. It is interesting tocompare people’s attitudes towards health andeducation. The National Health Service remainssacred to the public despite repeated assaultsfrom the Right, because of the compelling visionof free health care, regardless of waiting lists,rationing and persistent inequalities. Educationin England, on the other hand, never had its1948 moment, nor did ever really experience agolden age that captured the public imagination.The comprehensive school movement remainedunderdeveloped, despite islands of inspirationin Leicestershire, Oxford or the Inner LondonEducation Authority, and the idea of an inclusiveand comprehensive curriculum and qualificationssystem did not emerge until the 1990s. 2Instead, education became increasingly associatedwith the search for social advantage anddivisions deepened, even though the educationsystem expanded and became better resourced.At the centre of this ‘modernisation’ was arestrictive vision of education and a loss ofoptimism, a process that began in the mid-1970sand continued under Thatcherism, New Labourand now the Coalition.The concept of education for the GoodSociety is an attempt to address the crisis ofeducational vision. This is not the first attempt– many others have tried before. However,looking across Left interventions it is possibleto see negativity, where a positive vision ofeducation has become subordinate to a fear ofthe adversary. As the Right advanced its agenda,so the Left’s vision of education also appeared tonarrow, often retreating into a set of apprehensionsabout unequal outcomes as a result of thevery successes of neo-liberalism. Furthermore,New Labour did not help. It adopted much ofthe tone of neo-liberal thinking and conductedan extremely complex educational policyin a top-down and politicised way. 3 As the2010 general election approached, it was theRight that came to talk in more positive termsabout change, taking command of key termsconcerning rigour, knowledge, freedom andinnovation. Michael Gove, Secretary of State forEducation, has taken this ideological offensiveto a new level. 48 | www.compassonline.org.uk
- Page 1 and 2: Educationfor theGoodSocietyThe valu
- Page 3 and 4: Acknowledgements:Compass would like
- Page 5 and 6: ContributorsLisa Nandy is Labour MP
- Page 7: IntroductionEducation for the Good
- Page 11 and 12: 8 See Ann Hodgson, Ken Spoursand Ma
- Page 13 and 14: 13 The most comprehensiverecent res
- Page 15 and 16: 1 See for example B. Simon, ‘Cane
- Page 17 and 18: 10 J. Martin, Making Socialists: Ma
- Page 19 and 20: the poorest homes (as measured by e
- Page 21 and 22: 1 In 2008, 15 per cent ofacademies
- Page 23 and 24: 1 Angela McRobbie, The Aftermathof
- Page 25 and 26: 8 Christine Skelton, Schooling theB
- Page 27 and 28: 1 See www.education.gov.uk/b0065507
- Page 29 and 30: 13 Barbara Fredrickson, ‘Therole
- Page 31 and 32: 6. Education forsustainabilityTeres
- Page 33 and 34: well as cognitively. Real understan
- Page 35 and 36: 7. Schools fordemocracyMichael Fiel
- Page 37 and 38: and joyful relations between person
- Page 39 and 40: 8 Wilfred Carr and AnthonyHartnett,
- Page 41 and 42: 1 Winston Churchill, quoted inNIACE
- Page 43 and 44: 9 See http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/ed
- Page 45 and 46: 1 The Learning Age: A Renaissancefo
- Page 47 and 48: nities, and not have the public-pri
- Page 49 and 50: 4 Engineering flexibility: a system
- Page 51 and 52: other countries to require their re
- Page 53 and 54: 6. Remember that many of the outcom
- Page 55 and 56: 2 Adrian Elliott, State SchoolsSinc
- Page 57 and 58: 4 Peter Hyman, ‘Fear on the front
- Page 59 and 60:
12. Rethinking thecomprehensive ide
- Page 61 and 62:
training, be part of a local system
- Page 64:
About CompassCompass is the democra