to account when it talks about social mobility andprovides instead greater educational inequality,and offering the practical tools to steer a differentpath.We do have a credible and progressiveeducation policy alternative to the Conservatives,but our argument here has been that we willfail to make headway unless we give moreattention to the way the message is projectedand received by the people we need to persuade– young people and their parents. We need tothink more clearly about the way we frame ourarguments and recognise that we need a strategyfor winning support and building a movement.Policy proposals alone, however brilliant, will notdo the trick.To strengthen our position and tackle thestrengths of the Tories, we have to develop a newstory about schooling in language that parentsand students can understand – a new commonsense. At its heart should be the notion thateducation is about the creation of a good society,about learning the knowledge and skills neededto live together, to earn our living, to developfulfilling relationships and to realise our capabilities.To bring that about we should propose a neweducation cultural revolution:• every child can succeed – every child canbecome a reader and an explorer, aware oftheir talents, confident in their abilities froman early age; every child is capable of universityentrance, a good work-based qualificationor an apprenticeship• tackle ghetto schools – every mainstreamstate school should have a comprehensivelocal intake and no more faith schools shouldbe funded.After proper debate, let us decide on our strategy,use the emerging Compass brand – open, honest,inclusive and committed to a vision of the GoodSociety – to collaborate with students, parents,educational professionals, employers, localauthorities, think tanks and campaign groups tobuild a campaign to win the majority.Education for the good society | 57
12. Rethinking thecomprehensive ideal –new ways of conductingeducational politicsam not arguing for a separation of education andpolitics, but for a new relationship between thetwo. A priority for all political parties, particularlysocial democratic, liberal and green, shouldbe not only the creation of new policy content,but finding new ways of practicing educationalpolitics – a new policy style.Ken SpoursParty politics and education – a toxicmixParty politics and education, in England at least,have represented a toxic mix for several decades.There was never a golden age, but in recent timeswe have plumbed the depths. The problems havebeen well documented and the record appliesto all the major parties. The last 30 years haveseen education reforms guided by political andelectoral calculation or ideological dogma, leadingto constant change tied to ministerial careers andan obsession with structures, whether these beschools or qualifications. Moreover, an addictionto ‘dog whistle politics’ has meant that bothmajor parties felt they knew what the electorate(or their part of it) wanted. For Labour, it wasperformance at any price, leading to a regime oftargets and accountability. For the Conservativesit is a conviction that parents understand theeducation they themselves experienced and thereis political gold to be mined in traditionalism andthe educational image of the 1950s.This kind of educational politics has resulted inthe marginalisation of the voice of professionalswho, time and again, have been blamed for the illsof education. A politically informed agenda hasproduced little continuity or the sharing of ideasbut, instead, has fuelled the polarisation of debates– teachers v. parents; knowledge v. skills; academicv. vocational. The dichotomies comprise a longlist and David Cameron and Michael Gove aretrying their best to add to it. The result has beena chaotic and recriminatory reform process thattires teachers, puzzles parents and employers, andcreates a permanent sense of discontent.Having said this, education is fundamental tosociety and is, therefore, bound to be political. IRethinking the comprehensive ideal –five ways of doing things differentlyThis first Compass ebook has discussed the valuesthat inform the building of the Good Society –fairness and equality, democracy, sustainabilityand wellbeing. Doubtless, in time, more will beadded. These need to contribute to our thinkingabout education because it is a crucial dimensionof the Good Society and its realisation. Theyhelp us understand that means are as importantas ends; remind us of what is worth strugglingfor and provide us with a moral compass. Theyshow that our politics will be led by fundamentalcommitments and, crucially, they can be thebasis of a wider dialogue, which aims to educatethe population more generally about the widerpurposes of education itself.Drawing on the chapters in this book, I wouldlike to suggest five ways of thinking about thepractice of transformative educational politics.1 Have a long political memoryPoliticians tend to suffer from policy amnesia,exhibiting little if any policy memory. Everythinghas to be shiny and new. However, for Labourand other parties to renew the comprehensiveideal will require the opposite – a very longpolitical memory that stretches back to themutualism, solidarity and reciprocity that wasat the birth of the labour movement. It has toinject this kind of memory into its concept ofwhat is meant by state education if it to becomea force for innovation and liberation and notfor bureaucracy. A long memory that goes backnot only 50 but 100 years reinforces a commitmentto pluralism, democracy and collective selforganisation– those things we should cherishand that we lost in statism. A long memory alsoprovides connections with the liberal traditionsthat also contributed to progressive change in thelate nineteenth century.58 | www.compassonline.org.uk
- Page 1 and 2:
Educationfor theGoodSocietyThe valu
- Page 3 and 4:
Acknowledgements:Compass would like
- Page 5 and 6:
ContributorsLisa Nandy is Labour MP
- Page 7 and 8: IntroductionEducation for the Good
- Page 9 and 10: 1 This article has been developedou
- Page 11 and 12: 8 See Ann Hodgson, Ken Spoursand Ma
- Page 13 and 14: 13 The most comprehensiverecent res
- Page 15 and 16: 1 See for example B. Simon, ‘Cane
- Page 17 and 18: 10 J. Martin, Making Socialists: Ma
- Page 19 and 20: the poorest homes (as measured by e
- Page 21 and 22: 1 In 2008, 15 per cent ofacademies
- Page 23 and 24: 1 Angela McRobbie, The Aftermathof
- Page 25 and 26: 8 Christine Skelton, Schooling theB
- Page 27 and 28: 1 See www.education.gov.uk/b0065507
- Page 29 and 30: 13 Barbara Fredrickson, ‘Therole
- Page 31 and 32: 6. Education forsustainabilityTeres
- Page 33 and 34: well as cognitively. Real understan
- Page 35 and 36: 7. Schools fordemocracyMichael Fiel
- Page 37 and 38: and joyful relations between person
- Page 39 and 40: 8 Wilfred Carr and AnthonyHartnett,
- Page 41 and 42: 1 Winston Churchill, quoted inNIACE
- Page 43 and 44: 9 See http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/ed
- Page 45 and 46: 1 The Learning Age: A Renaissancefo
- Page 47 and 48: nities, and not have the public-pri
- Page 49 and 50: 4 Engineering flexibility: a system
- Page 51 and 52: other countries to require their re
- Page 53 and 54: 6. Remember that many of the outcom
- Page 55 and 56: 2 Adrian Elliott, State SchoolsSinc
- Page 57: 4 Peter Hyman, ‘Fear on the front
- Page 61 and 62: training, be part of a local system
- Page 64: About CompassCompass is the democra