is no shortage of inspiring examples of goodeducational practice in Britain, and a constantflowering of educational initiatives. We can drawon the expertise and good will of headteachersand other education professionals, and the workof think tanks and inspiring initiatives such asWhole Education and the RSA’s Opening Minds.Film is a powerful medium for conveyingalternative realities, often more effective than therelaying of evidence in written form. The story ofthe transformation of the Alberta school system,told on film by students, teachers and parents,has an impact because seeing is believing andbecause skillfully made documentary brings tolife debate about values. Rhonda Evans’ filmsopen up the complexities of curriculum choice,collaboration and public value to a lay audience,demonstrating that an inspiring vision can betranslated into a reality that benefits all. 34 Recongise candour as a political weaponTruth is one of the first victims of political debate,as we try to pretend that it is only our opponents’case that is weak and inconsistent, their argumentis totally lacking merit, or there is no commonground between our position and theirs. Withbigoted opponents, this style of debate may winus supporters, but not with a sophisticated politicianlike Michael Gove, the current Secretary ofState for Education.Despite his maladroit handling of the BuildingSchools for the Future programme, Michael Govehas shown himself a skilled media operator, withhis defence of academies and free schools and,above all, his determination to take the fight tothe enemy.Who said, ‘The gap in attainment betweenrich and poor, which widened in recent years,is a scandal’? Yes, Michael Gove. Who said,‘By the time they reach university age just 45children out of a cohort of 80,000 on free schoolmeals make it to Oxbridge’? Who said, ‘On amoral level, this waste of talent, this blightingof individual lives, is an affront to decency. Andin economic terms, as we face an increasinglycompetitive global environment, it’s a tragedy’?Michael Gove, again.Not only is he determined to usurp the left’sterritory on educational inequality, he is alsoadept at rooting his policies, when it suits him, inevidence. There are three essential characteristicsthat mark out the best performing and fastestreforming education systems:• Rigorous research, from the OECD and others,has shown that more autonomy for individualschools helps drive higher standards.• Landmark work by Professor Michael Barberfor McKinsey, backed up by the researchof Fenton Whelan, has shown that teacherquality is critical, with the highest performingeducation nations having the best-qualifiedteachers.• And research again from the OECD underlinesthat rigorous external assessment –proper testing you can trust – helps improvestandards.Gove is also rather good at spotting the weaknessesin traditional Tory stances and fendingoff attacks:In particular we have to move beyond the steriledebate that sees academic knowledge as mutuallyexclusive to the skills required for employment;and rigour as incompatible with the enjoyment oflearning.Failing to grasp the complexity and appeal ofthe Tory message would be a big mistake. Sothe fourth step in our strategy is about taking aleaf out of Gove’s book. That means addressingstrongly held popular conceptions, or misconceptions,recognising shortcomings in the traditionalstances of the left, and beginning to tella new story about education that reflects thevalues of the Good Society. Above all, it meansgiving more attention to the way we frame ourarguments.Too often, we prefer to speak to ourselves,using language that excludes all but the educationprofessionals. The challenge to the centre-leftis to reach out to embrace wider concerns andbroader perspectives. One way of doing thatis by reminding our audience that improvingschooling involves a constant balancing actbetween doing the best for your child and doingthe best for all children: never one or the other.We have to provide evidence with accounts ofhow both have been achieved. And we will needto reassure our audience that we want what theywant for their children.3 See www.evanswoolfe.com/player/alberta1.html and www.evanswoolfe.com/player/alberta2.html.Education for the good society | 55
4 Peter Hyman, ‘Fear on the frontline’, New Statesman, 27 January2011.5 See www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd/31/28/46660259.pdf,p.805 Address popular (mis-)conceptions andshortcomingsIn doing so, we have to address a number of ideasthat are very widespread and have the status ofcommon sense.The most damaging notion – because there is agrain of truth to it – is that the left does not careabout knowledge and the three Rs. There havebeen times when progressives got the balancewrong between engaging students and ensuringthat they were properly equipped with the skillsand knowledge essential for independent andcreative learning. In a recent piece for the NewStatesman, Peter Hyman argued that the classdivide in his south London comprehensive isabout reading:Sometimes – weirdly, in my view – those whobelieve in proper teaching of phonics, grammarand fluent writing are pigeonholed as traditionalists.But for me and, I believe, for anyone on theleft, striving for high levels of literacy is a moralimperative. Our greatest challenge in education isto ensure that the children leave school with highqualitycommunication skills. 4He is right, but the best progressive educationhas always been about combining literacy andenlightenment.‘Vocational is second best.’ Although everyonejoins in the national clamour for more plumbers,parents and teachers are notoriously resistantto the value of apprenticeships when it comesto their own children. Our vision is of the equalvalue of practical and academic learning to individualsand society.‘Good behaviour and firm discipline disappearedwith the rise of the comprehensive.’ Itdid not, but the commitment of young people toschooling cannot be taken for granted as it wasin a more deferential era. Gove recognises theobstacles to engaging students, talks about theneed to ‘excite and challenge’ them, but in theend calls for a highly restrictive curriculum – theEnglish Baccalaureate. We can present a trulyexciting alternative vision that is more in keepingwith the demands of the modern world.‘Streaming is essential for every child.’ Fewitems of educational common sense are as widelyreceived as the notion that children thrive inthe company of their intellectual peers. Yet, theevidence points in the opposite direction towardsmixed ability learning. The OECD, based on thePISA – Programme for International StudentAssessment – studies, concludes:The more schools group students by ability acrossall subjects and the more frequently schoolstransfer students to other schools because of theirlow academic achievement, behavioural problemsor special learning needs, the lower the schoolsystems’ overall performance. 5In other words, too much differentiation byability lowers overall performance.We should strenuously avoid defending theindefensible: there are state schools we would notwant our children to attend.6 Promote learner voice and agencyFinally, we need to amplify the voice and agencyof students (and parents). Has any movementfor change ever been successful unless at somestage (not necessarily initially) it truly engagesthose most affected – in this case students andtheir parents? No new product or type of servicewill succeed unless there is a constant focuson understanding how it meets the needs ofthe customers, again, in this case students andparents. This must involve deep ‘insight’ intotheir needs, not just surveys or focus groups.While many middle-class parents may be fearfulof change if it involves their children, the sameis not necessarily true of the children themselveswho may feel they are succeeding despite thesystem not because of it. The views of studentsare a vital piece of the jigsaw, though becausethey are young, it is one that most people ignore(or pay lip-service to).Movement for changeIn many ways, our biggest challenge is to createor support the development of a network ormovement that campaigns for a new educationfuture. The movement must be focused on thevision, revealing the anomalies and building faith.It has to be equipped with the means to reach outto promote a positive vision. It should also actas a lighthouse, warning of the dangers of traditionaleducation policy, holding the Government56 | www.compassonline.org.uk
- Page 1 and 2:
Educationfor theGoodSocietyThe valu
- Page 3 and 4:
Acknowledgements:Compass would like
- Page 5 and 6: ContributorsLisa Nandy is Labour MP
- Page 7 and 8: IntroductionEducation for the Good
- Page 9 and 10: 1 This article has been developedou
- Page 11 and 12: 8 See Ann Hodgson, Ken Spoursand Ma
- Page 13 and 14: 13 The most comprehensiverecent res
- Page 15 and 16: 1 See for example B. Simon, ‘Cane
- Page 17 and 18: 10 J. Martin, Making Socialists: Ma
- Page 19 and 20: the poorest homes (as measured by e
- Page 21 and 22: 1 In 2008, 15 per cent ofacademies
- Page 23 and 24: 1 Angela McRobbie, The Aftermathof
- Page 25 and 26: 8 Christine Skelton, Schooling theB
- Page 27 and 28: 1 See www.education.gov.uk/b0065507
- Page 29 and 30: 13 Barbara Fredrickson, ‘Therole
- Page 31 and 32: 6. Education forsustainabilityTeres
- Page 33 and 34: well as cognitively. Real understan
- Page 35 and 36: 7. Schools fordemocracyMichael Fiel
- Page 37 and 38: and joyful relations between person
- Page 39 and 40: 8 Wilfred Carr and AnthonyHartnett,
- Page 41 and 42: 1 Winston Churchill, quoted inNIACE
- Page 43 and 44: 9 See http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/ed
- Page 45 and 46: 1 The Learning Age: A Renaissancefo
- Page 47 and 48: nities, and not have the public-pri
- Page 49 and 50: 4 Engineering flexibility: a system
- Page 51 and 52: other countries to require their re
- Page 53 and 54: 6. Remember that many of the outcom
- Page 55: 2 Adrian Elliott, State SchoolsSinc
- Page 59 and 60: 12. Rethinking thecomprehensive ide
- Page 61 and 62: training, be part of a local system
- Page 64: About CompassCompass is the democra