were what was happening, as the mass defect of ti3 C is about 10 7 eV, and that of 5 B earound zero, a particle of energy about 1 .4 x 10 7 eV would be produced . The mass defec tof a given isotope is the difference between its actual mass and its predicted mass ,that is, its atomic number times the average mass of the proton and neutron. The nuclearreaction in question would be written as follows : 9 Be-ece. + particle . The theoreticalenergy of the particle if this reaction were taking place was approximately in agreemen twith experimental values, and so it was assumed that this was the reaction taking place .ehadwick found in 193? that this new particle also ejected <strong>particles</strong> from many otherlight elements apart from hydrogen .It was Chadwick who continued the research into this type of radiation, and h edecided, assuming the validity of the law of the conservation of energy and momentum ,that the new particle must have a mass near that of the proton . This being so, h esuggested that the newly discovered particle was the neutron predicted by Rutherfor dsome twelve years before . Feather and Chadwick determined the approximate mass of theneutron as follows : inside a vacuum chamber, alpha <strong>particles</strong> from a sample of poloniu mwere made to hit beryllium foil, thus producing neutrons . These neutrons travelle dout through a window in the vacuum chamber until they reached some paraffin (CH L ) orparacyanogen (CN) from which they ejected protons which were then counted by means o fa proportional counter (see chapter 8) . By careful integration of the results obtainedwith paraffin slabs and those with paracyanogen ones, a value of 1 .006 proton masse swas deduced for the mass of the neutron . Chadwick believed that this mass, just slightl yless than than the sum of the masses of the proton_and the electron, represented abound state of these two <strong>particles</strong> . The fact that the subsequent mass was less than th esum of its component parts, he explained as being caused by the bonding energy necessar yto hold the two constituent <strong>particles</strong> together . However, it can be shown, using moderntechniques, that it is impossible to achieve this bound state without using an energyfar in excess of the mass of the electron . Thus the atomic nucleus came to be considere das a system containing two types of <strong>particles</strong> : protons and neutrons, which soon becam econsidered by most physicists as <strong>particles</strong> in their own right .
CHAPTER TWO : SORE BASIC PRINCIPLES .The Quantum Theory, together with Relativity, has probably been the greatest advanc ein <strong>physics</strong> during this century . It was initiated in 1900 by Iax Planck, who, whil estudying black-body radiation spectra, came upon the idea that electromagnetic energyis only emitted and absorbed by matter in integral multiples of some minute unit o fenergy or quantum . Black-body or 'cavity' radiation is electromagnetic radiatio nemitted from a hole in a heated black-body, usually an oven, the hole being smallenough not to let any outside radiation enter the cavity, yet large enough for th eradiation in it to be monitored . The Black Body theory which had been derived at th eend of the nineteenth century by Rayleigh and Jeans in England, and Kirchoff and Wienin Germany, postulated that the intensity of the higher frequencies should be ver yhigh, decreasing towards the lower frequencies, so that a graph of wavelength tointensity would look like a hyperbola with its asymptotes at the two axes . However ,Planck noticed that the actual curve looked nothing like this . For low frequencies ,the old curve was comparatively accurate, but below a certain maximum wavelength ,intensity rapidly decreased to zero, instead of becoming infinite . This discrepanc ybetween the Black Body Theory and the new experimental results soon became known a sthe 'Ultraviolet Catastrophe', because it was in the ultraviolet region that th ecurve should have become an asymptote to the intensity axis, but instead fell away t ozero .Classical <strong>physics</strong> stated that the emission and absorption of light and other energieswas a continuous process, but Planck made the revolutionary suggestion that i twas in fact discontinuous . Reinforcement for this idea soon came from a most unexpecte dangle . In 1887 Hertz had taken a piece of zinc and illuminated it with ultraviole tlight, and had found that it became electrically charged, thus discovering an effec twhich quickly became known as the Photoeclectric Effect . It was soon found that howeve rbright a red light was made to impringe on a piece of metal, no electrons would eve rbe liberated, but on the other hand, only a very low intensity of blue light woul dliberate electrons, and when the intensity was increased, the number of electron sproduced remained constant . Classical wave mechanics, however, stated that the energ yof light beam was related purely to its intensity (amplitude) and was independant o fits frequency . With his new knowledge, Planck was soon able to formulate the equation :E = hv ,where E is the energy of the light beam, v is its frequency, and h is Planck's constant ,whose value is now acknowledged to be 6 .62559(16) x 10-s4 Js . But, due to the measurementsof Lenard and Idillikan in 1905 and 1916 respectively, it was realised that th eenergy of an electron produced in the photoelectric effect was not hv, but hv-W wher eW is a new constant . Hillikan measured this constant in the following way : he place dnewly-cut electrodes of lithium, sodium, and potassium on a turntable in a vacuu mchamber, making sure that there was no metallic oxide on them . Light entering througha window at one end of the chamber produced photoelectrons at the ea+hole, which wer ethen attracted to a positively charged cage at the window end of the chamber, whichwas connected to an electrometer. Having compensated for the 'contact' potentialdifference between the cage and the cathode, Rillikan's results agreed very well withthe Planck-Einstein formula E c hv - B, and his values for W were almost the same a sthose postulated from a study of thermionic emission .
- Page 1 and 2: ~~N ."$ II itOL'it At .AQo
- Page 3: CONTENT S .Chapter OneThe Early His
- Page 9: nA and n e are substituted in the f
- Page 13 and 14: Let us now consider the evidence fo
- Page 15 and 16: the light they emit . Heisenberg kn
- Page 17 and 18: Beats are heard of frequency v . If
- Page 19 and 20: CHAPTER THREE : THE EXCLUSION PRINC
- Page 21 and 22: order to have the radius of curvatu
- Page 23 and 24: had been definitely recorded .Let u
- Page 25 and 26: were looking for, experimenters set
- Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER FOUR : THE 'PROLIFERATION O
- Page 29 and 30: about 9 .5 x 10-u s . A few years l
- Page 31 and 32: 1953, by seeing what, if any, polar
- Page 33 and 34: he built up a new algebra . We see,
- Page 35 and 36: lambda particles are preferentially
- Page 37 and 38: Homestake gold mine in South Dakota
- Page 39 and 40: so that 907(, of the pions were abe
- Page 41 and 42: postulates that any particle exist
- Page 43 and 44: type of particles which decay in th
- Page 45 and 46: A large number of n -N resonances h
- Page 47 and 48: was discovered in the course of the
- Page 49 and 50: where s and t are the riandelstam v
- Page 51 and 52: any single energy, both the s- and
- Page 53 and 54: CHAPTER SIX : SYMMETRY AND STRUCTUR
- Page 55 and 56: is 1 .3 x 10 s . The leaders o; is,
- Page 57 and 58: called 'parallelogram rule' of Matt
- Page 59 and 60: Let us now consider the quarks or a
- Page 61 and 62:
in the first reaction are due to it
- Page 63 and 64:
charge of the nucleon cloud is slig
- Page 65 and 66:
CHAPTER SEVEN : INTERACTIONS .Physi
- Page 67 and 68:
of an electromagnetic decay need no
- Page 69 and 70:
Different scattering graphs caused
- Page 71 and 72:
of radius about 3 x 10 -" m, which
- Page 73 and 74:
that the beta decay process of the
- Page 75 and 76:
photon, .4•*l, and for the antiph
- Page 77 and 78:
should expect some asymmetry in the
- Page 79 and 80:
p where L is the orbital momentum o
- Page 81 and 82:
about 70°' of the ne utrons . Afte
- Page 83 and 84:
We consider an isolated system of n
- Page 85 and 86:
on their spins . We find that if we
- Page 87 and 88:
device : scalers, which record the
- Page 89 and 90:
In appearance, semiconductor partic
- Page 91 and 92:
Usually, photons passing through a
- Page 93 and 94:
during this short time, worthwhile
- Page 95 and 96:
CHAPTER NINE: THE ACCELERATION OF P
- Page 97 and 98:
1931 Sloan and Lawrence built a thi
- Page 99 and 100:
faster than light . instead, the ph
- Page 101 and 102:
employed for each function . In act
- Page 103 and 104:
and again by Budker and Veksler in
- Page 105 and 106:
BIBLIOGRAPHY .General works :The Ph
- Page 107 and 108:
Scalar : .esons may ihplain by the
- Page 109 and 110:
Name S J I I s U P GY ND ND 1 ND ND
- Page 111 and 112:
p5,55' 77 6570p 070601,.635 67.7355
- Page 113 and 114:
A .3 Quark combinations to fora sta
- Page 115 and 116:
s+ki # 13 .41M.V I9mo. dxry nvla)33
- Page 117 and 118:
k.1515e.pr rim
- Page 119 and 120:
° Prix.-.,a..u(14751 o IMfon.ly ca
- Page 121 and 122:
A .5 Conservation and invariance la
- Page 123 and 124:
F_AG Fixed field alternating gradie
- Page 125 and 126:
S Scalar gamma matrix product .S En
- Page 127 and 128:
Elastic cross—section .Inelastic
- Page 129 and 130:
C .3 Compound SI units used in this
- Page 131 and 132:
w oE >< k)- c; ev--o ;,o»,--.@r«-
- Page 133:
APPENDIX F : PHYSICAL CONSTANTS .(F