the proton would be directed into the rest of the equipment . If a given particle wa san antiproton, then it would be stable, and would not decay during its passage throughthe testing e q uipment, and this ser v ed as another test . At the selected momentum, 1 .19GeV, the experimenters knew that pions would have a velocity of about 0 .99 c, kaon sof 0 .93 c, and antiprotons of about 0 .78 c . But only about one in 40 000 particle sproduced was an antiproton, so some method of distinguishing between negative meson sand antiprotons had to be found . The beam was focused to a point, and was recorded whe nit passed through the first of two scintillation counters . 40 feet further on, ther ewas another identical scintillation counter . The readingsfrom both counter ., were thendisplayed on a screen, and the distance apart that the two peaks representing th epassage of a particle were, was proportional to the time taken for that particle t otravel from one counter to the next . It was calculated that a meson would take aroun d40 ns for the journey, and an antiproton around 51 ns . But some method had to b edevised to guard against the possibility that two mesic events might trigger th ecounters at an interval apart typical of an antiproton . The experimenters decided t oset up two velocity-selective Cerenkov counters after the second scintillation counter .A Cerenkov counter works on the principle that when a particle passes through a mediumat a velocity greater than the velocity of light in that medium, it emits photons, th eangle of emission being proportional to its velocity . The first Cerenkov counter,which was made of C B F,, 0, which has a refractive index of 1 .276, was made sensitiveto all <strong>particles</strong> with a velocity greater than 0 .79 c . The second Cerenkov counter ,made of fused quartz of refractive index 1 .458, was designed to detect <strong>particles</strong> wit ha velocity of between 0 .75 and 0 .78 c . By this time, any antiproton should have beenslowed down to a velocity of about 0 .765 c by its passage through the two scintillatio ncounters and the first Cerenkov counter . Thus, any antiproton passing through th etesting equipment would trigger the two scintillation counters 51 ns apart, woul dleave no trace in the first Cernkov counter, and would be recorded by the second one .In October 1956, the discovery of the antiproton was officially announced, afte rsixty correct sets of readings had been obtained . A few months later another researc hteam trapped an antiproton in glass, and observed the Cerenkov radiation produced b yits annihilation products. This proved that the <strong>particles</strong> selected by the team a tBerkeley were true antiprotons . At the same time Chamberlain, Chupp, Segre, Wiegand ,Goldhaber, and some Italian physicists tried to find antiproton disintegration star sin photographic emulsions exposed to beams containing antiprotons . After a short time ,some events were recognised by scanners at Rome, and, when it was realised that th evelocity absorbers used destroyed antiprotons, many more tracks were found .Soon after the discovery of the antiproton, Cork, Lambertson, Piccioni, and Wenze lfound evidence of the antineutron while working at the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory .They employed an improved version of the Chamberlain-Segre antiproton selector t oproduce a beam of antiprotons . This then entered a liquid scintillator in which charg eexchange took place, and any antiprotons became antineutrons . The newly-produced anti -neutrons passed through two more scintillation counters without detection, but anyhigh energy photons, which were also neutral, were revealed by the prescence of alead plate la" thick between the two scintillation counters, which made them materialis einto a virtual pair of an electron and a positron, which was then detected in th esecond scintillation counter . After encounter with the second scintillation counter ,the beam of <strong>particles</strong> was directed into a large lead-glass Cerenkov counter in whichthe antineutrons decayed . By the time it was announced that the antineutron had bee ndiscovered, 114 flashes of light in the Cerenkov counter from antineutron annihilation
had been definitely recorded .Let us now consider anti-atoms, which consist of positrons orbiting around nucleiof antiprotons and antineutrons . When the 28 and 70 GeV proton synchrotrons cane int ooperation at CERN, Geneva and Serpukhov respectively in 1971, it became, for thefirst time, possible to search for antideuterons and antihelium nuclei . The machin eat Serpukhov managed to produce around 50 000 antideuterons per day, which made i tpossible to make detailed statistical observations of them . Using time-of-fligh tmeasuring apparatus accurate to one part in 1 0 10 , experimenters at Serpukhov manage dto find five antihelium-3 nuclei or antialpha <strong>particles</strong> in 200 000 million particle stested . No atoms of higher atomic number made of antimatter have been discovered t odate .Let us now discuss the possibility of the natural existence of antimatter in ou runiverse . We must start by asking how this could be detected, if it did exist . It i sobvious that two galaxies which were intrinsically the same, but one of which wa scomposed of antimatter, and the other matter, would look the same, and so it is useles sto use ordinary optical telescopes to search for antimatter . However, we could loo kfor the products of matter-antimatter collisions, which we would find in the form o f90% high-energy gamma and neutrino radiation, and 105 energetic electrons andpositrons . The former would be able to cross great distances of space without reactin gwith anything, but the latter would be trapped within their original galaxy by it sweak magnetic field . Let us consider the possibility of antimatter in the vast, bu tvery tenuous, hydrogen clouds which fill interstellar and intergalactic space, bu twhich are so spread out that on average, there is only one hydrogen atom per cubi ccentimetre . These tenuous hydrogen clouds would be slightly excited by the electron sand positrons trapped within the galaxy by its magnetic field . Let us assume that al lthe energy of this interstellar hydrogen is derived from matter-antimatter collisions .We know from various observations that the energy of this hydrogen is only abou t10 pJ of3, and thus we see that the ratio of the -mount of matter in the universe t othe amount of antimatter is greater than ten million to one . From this we can als odeduce that if matter could segregate itself from antimatter, as in the Leidenfros tphenomenon, then it would be very unlikely that there would be any antimatter stars inour own galaxy .We know that electrons or positrons which have been accelerated in a magnetic fiel demit an electromagnetic radiation called synchrotron radiation . This synchrotronradiation can take the form of radio waves, so that the question of whether antimatte rmatter annihilation is responsible for some of the intense radio waves which reac hEarth from such astronomical anomalies as the rluasars (quasi-stellar radio sources) i sraised . We find that if one part in ten million of the gas in, for e xample, the CrabNebula was antimatter, then the amount of synchrotron radiation produced by electron sissuing from matter-antimatter annihilations would roughly correspond to the amoun tof radio energy which is produced by the Crab Nebula . On a wider front, we find that i fthe concentration of antimatter in matter is one part in ten million in each galaxy ,then the amount of radio noise produced by the two colliding galaxies Cygnus A, woul dalmost exactly correspond to that produced in theory by high-energy electrons an dpositrons being accelerated by the large field produced by the collision of the tw ogalaxies' small magnetic fields . .Messier 8 7 ' s bright jet might also consist of antimatter ,as might many high-energy anomalies all over the universe . However, the fact that th euniverse is usually symmetrical would raise the question 'Why is there not the sam eamount of antimatter as there is matter in the universe?' This is at present unanswerable,but many physicists and astronomers hope that it will be answered, otherwise
- Page 1 and 2: ~~N ."$ II itOL'it At .AQo
- Page 3: CONTENT S .Chapter OneThe Early His
- Page 9 and 10: nA and n e are substituted in the f
- Page 11 and 12: CHAPTER TWO : SORE BASIC PRINCIPLES
- Page 13 and 14: Let us now consider the evidence fo
- Page 15 and 16: the light they emit . Heisenberg kn
- Page 17 and 18: Beats are heard of frequency v . If
- Page 19 and 20: CHAPTER THREE : THE EXCLUSION PRINC
- Page 21: order to have the radius of curvatu
- Page 25 and 26: were looking for, experimenters set
- Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER FOUR : THE 'PROLIFERATION O
- Page 29 and 30: about 9 .5 x 10-u s . A few years l
- Page 31 and 32: 1953, by seeing what, if any, polar
- Page 33 and 34: he built up a new algebra . We see,
- Page 35 and 36: lambda particles are preferentially
- Page 37 and 38: Homestake gold mine in South Dakota
- Page 39 and 40: so that 907(, of the pions were abe
- Page 41 and 42: postulates that any particle exist
- Page 43 and 44: type of particles which decay in th
- Page 45 and 46: A large number of n -N resonances h
- Page 47 and 48: was discovered in the course of the
- Page 49 and 50: where s and t are the riandelstam v
- Page 51 and 52: any single energy, both the s- and
- Page 53 and 54: CHAPTER SIX : SYMMETRY AND STRUCTUR
- Page 55 and 56: is 1 .3 x 10 s . The leaders o; is,
- Page 57 and 58: called 'parallelogram rule' of Matt
- Page 59 and 60: Let us now consider the quarks or a
- Page 61 and 62: in the first reaction are due to it
- Page 63 and 64: charge of the nucleon cloud is slig
- Page 65 and 66: CHAPTER SEVEN : INTERACTIONS .Physi
- Page 67 and 68: of an electromagnetic decay need no
- Page 69 and 70: Different scattering graphs caused
- Page 71 and 72: of radius about 3 x 10 -" m, which
- Page 73 and 74:
that the beta decay process of the
- Page 75 and 76:
photon, .4•*l, and for the antiph
- Page 77 and 78:
should expect some asymmetry in the
- Page 79 and 80:
p where L is the orbital momentum o
- Page 81 and 82:
about 70°' of the ne utrons . Afte
- Page 83 and 84:
We consider an isolated system of n
- Page 85 and 86:
on their spins . We find that if we
- Page 87 and 88:
device : scalers, which record the
- Page 89 and 90:
In appearance, semiconductor partic
- Page 91 and 92:
Usually, photons passing through a
- Page 93 and 94:
during this short time, worthwhile
- Page 95 and 96:
CHAPTER NINE: THE ACCELERATION OF P
- Page 97 and 98:
1931 Sloan and Lawrence built a thi
- Page 99 and 100:
faster than light . instead, the ph
- Page 101 and 102:
employed for each function . In act
- Page 103 and 104:
and again by Budker and Veksler in
- Page 105 and 106:
BIBLIOGRAPHY .General works :The Ph
- Page 107 and 108:
Scalar : .esons may ihplain by the
- Page 109 and 110:
Name S J I I s U P GY ND ND 1 ND ND
- Page 111 and 112:
p5,55' 77 6570p 070601,.635 67.7355
- Page 113 and 114:
A .3 Quark combinations to fora sta
- Page 115 and 116:
s+ki # 13 .41M.V I9mo. dxry nvla)33
- Page 117 and 118:
k.1515e.pr rim
- Page 119 and 120:
° Prix.-.,a..u(14751 o IMfon.ly ca
- Page 121 and 122:
A .5 Conservation and invariance la
- Page 123 and 124:
F_AG Fixed field alternating gradie
- Page 125 and 126:
S Scalar gamma matrix product .S En
- Page 127 and 128:
Elastic cross—section .Inelastic
- Page 129 and 130:
C .3 Compound SI units used in this
- Page 131 and 132:
w oE >< k)- c; ev--o ;,o»,--.@r«-
- Page 133:
APPENDIX F : PHYSICAL CONSTANTS .(F